Source: OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF FILTER MEDIA TO IMPROVE WATER QUALITY IN URBAN AND AGRICULTURAL STORMWATER RUNOFF
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1004971
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Nov 5, 2014
Project End Date
Mar 31, 2018
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
STILLWATER,OK 74078
Performing Department
Biosystems & Ag Engineering
Non Technical Summary
Uncontrolled runoff from urban, suburban and rural areas is a prevalent environmental problem. These non-point sources are responsible for the pollution of 39% of the rivers, 45% of the lakes, and 51% of the estuaries in assessed water bodies in the United States. Bioretention cells (BRC), a type of stormwater filter technology used in Low Impact Development, are intended to address this problem. BRC are basically large, hi-tech holes in the ground, fill with sand, soil and other additives. Stormwater is directed into the BRC and filtered before being released to surface waters. Some of the pollutants are degraded by biological processes in the BRC, while some are trapped and held in the cell. While this technology is growing in use, there is little data on how long BRC will remove water pollutants, specifically nutrients, heavy metals, and oil. Water and filter soil sampling at cells that have been in operation for more than six years in Oklahoma will provide conclusive data. This will enable the formation of defendable recommendations suitable for stormwater engineers, landscape architects, municipal stormwater professionals and state regulators. In addition, new soil additives that may provide better pollutant trapping will be explored by laboratory testing. While the research will be directed at urban landscapes, it is expected the results will be applicable to agricultural applications.
Animal Health Component
70%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
20%
Applied
70%
Developmental
10%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
11202102020100%
Knowledge Area
112 - Watershed Protection and Management;

Subject Of Investigation
0210 - Water resources;

Field Of Science
2020 - Engineering;
Goals / Objectives
Quantify long-term pollutant sorption and transformations in BRC filter media.Identify and quantify the performance of new filter media additives that will increase filter media sorption and/or transformations of pollutants.
Project Methods
MethodsDue to the broad range of the goals, specific procedures and methods for all the research cannot be defined here. The following provides a general framework of the work that will be conducted. In all of these procedures, it is assumed that the existing BRC in Grove and Stillwater, the permeable pavement at the Botanical Garden, and the new BRC and vegetated waterways in OKC will be available for testing.Goal 1Long term treatment performance will be determined by two methods. First, sampling of cell influent and effluent will provide a time series of water quality. Both grab sampling and automated samplers will be used. The second effort will be focused on core sampling of the cells as they age. Analysis of adsorbed concentrations with depth will provide insight on the sorption mechanisms and ultimate BRC performance.Water Quality SamplingWater quality samples will be collected by automated samplers on five of the existing BRC. Those cells will be selected based on their perceived pollution loading and access. Influent, drain flow and effluent (cell overflow) will be sampled. Sampling will use equipment acquired under previous EPA 319 h funding. Autosamplers will record flow using a small flume and a pressure transducer. Total, aggregated, flow-weighted samples will be the collected to provide single storm, total pollution removal. On selected BRC and times, multiple samples will be collected to provide a time series of water quality during a storm. This data will determine if the influent demonstrates a "first flush" characteristic, or if the effluent exhibits the effects of water storage in the BRC. Water quality parameters to be determined are listed in Table 1. Water quality analysis will be performed by the Soil, Water and Forage Analytical Laboratory (SWFAL). SWFAL employs state-of-the-art equipment capable of handling a wide range of analytical tasks. Accuracy and precision of test results are assured through daily analysis of quality control samples, a three step internal data review process and participation in external certification and sample exchange programs. All instruments are calibrated with certified standards and maintained according to the specification.Table 1. Water Quality Parameters.Common indicatorspH, EC, TSS, HardnessCationsNa, Ca, Mg, KAnionsCl-, SO4-2,Heavy MetalsFe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Pb, Cd, CrNutrientsNO3-N-, P (total dissolved), P (total)OrganicOil and greaseSpecific tasks for water sampling are:Install autosamplers, flumes and enclosures on the influent and effluent of five BRC.Collect water samples and deliver to the OSU-SWFAF laboratory for analysis.Analyze water quality data to quantify pollution removal.Remove autosamplers at the end of the project.Core Sampling of Filter MediaThe concentration of non-degrading, adsorbed pollutants as a function of depth will be determined in the existing BRC. At each sampling event, two to four, 2" cores will be taken by a Gidding's sampler for the full depth of the cells following the procedures in Brown and Garbrecht (2007). After sampling, the sample hole will be backfilled with sand. The cores will be visually inspected and then sectioned into 6" intervals. Analysis for dissolved and total nutrients and common ions will be performed on each section. Depending on the results, addition chemical analysis of the samples may be performed to identify the sorption mechanism and ultimate sorption capacity of the filter media. Specific analytical procedures for extraction will be determined with the assistance of Dr. Chad Penn, and will be a function of the pollutant, media and the sorption mechanism being investigated. Chemical analysis of leachate will be performed by SWFAL. Specific adsorbed pollutants of concern are phosphorous and heavy medals.Specific tasks for core sampling are:Notify property owners and arrange for access to each of the BRC. Note, as a condition of the original installation, property owners agreed to provide future access.Using a Giddings soil sampler in push mode, collect two, 2" cores from each of the 10 BRC. Backfill sample holes as needed and return cores to the BAE Groundwater Lab.In the laboratory, remove the filter material from the core tubes and describe. Slice each core in half among the axis and store one half for possible future use. Subsection the remaining half into 6" subsamples.Perform 10:1 water extractions and total digestions on each subsample. Extracts will be submit to SWFAL for analysis for the same parameters as the water samples.Goal 2There is great industrial and public agency interest in the development of "custom" blends of materials for optimum filtering of storm water pollutants. As an example, the addition of fly ash to sand filter media has been shown to greatly increase phosphate and heavy metal adsorption (Zhang, et al, 2006 and 2008). However, no known filter media can provide long term treatment for the range of pollutants commonly encountered in storm water. Allred (2008) has screened over 50 different industrial byproducts for their potential to adsorb or degrade, nitrate, metals and organic pesticides. Based on his recommendation, Midgley, et al. (2009), conducted exploratory tests of nitrate losses with sulfur modified iron and fly ash mixtures, which performed better than expected. Storm (2014) conducted simple tests of biochar to reduce nitrate in sand filter applications. His findings showed only modest reductions in nitrate.This developing area of research will be pursued as opportunities are discovered. Evaluations will follow a four step process. First, when a promising media is identified, batch adsorption/degradation for a pollutant of interest will be conducted with the pure material and mixtures of sand, following ASTM (2004) and Zhang et al. (2006 and 2008). Second, if those results are positive, additional batch tests will be performed with other contaminants and media additives to determine if the media sorption is impacted by competitive reactions or solution composition more typical of field conditions. Those results will be evaluated for performance in total pollutant removal and cost effectiveness. Third, materials passing the second phase will be subjected to long duration column testing. Depending on the size of the media, 2" to 6" diameter columns, 6" to 12" in length will be packed with prospective media mixtures. Columns will be subjected to multiple simulated storm event hydrographs. Each event will consist of ten pore volumes of influent, followed by one week of drying. This will be repeated until the column effluent concentrations reach 50% of the influent concentration. It is conceivable that a test may last up to a year. At the completion of the test, the column will be sectioned and the distribution of pollutants will be determined using the same analytical methods developed for Objective 1. Finally, if a media mixture shows promise after column testing, a field demonstration will be pursued. Field testing will require the cooperation of outside agencies, local governments and/or developers.

Progress 11/05/14 to 03/31/18

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience for this research were stormwater engineers, landscape architects, municipal stormwater professionals, and state regulators. All audience elements have been reached either in-state, regional, or national conferences including the Governors Water Conference, the Oklahoma Clean Lakes and Watersheds Conference, the Great Plains LID Conference, the EPA Region 6 Stormwater Conference, the ASABE AIM, and the EWRI Congress. In addition, six refereed journal papers have been published and two more papers are in preparation. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?One student completed his Ph.D. entirely under the project. Two additional Ph.D. students completed part of their research on the project. Finally, one undergradute gained laboratory training and experience How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results have been disseminated to the communities of interest. See thelist of conferences for details. The results have encouraged two researchers at the University of Oklahoma, and one USDA-ARS researcher to utilize fly ash in their new experimental plans. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Field studies were conducted on multiple bioretention cells (BRCs) to monitor the phosphorus removal. The filter media in the BRCs consisted of sand amended with 5% fly ash by weight. The BRCs were constructed in 2007 and intensely monitored as part of this study from May 2014 until October 2015. The focus was to analyze the aged BRCs to evaluate P accumulation in the filter media since construction in 2007 as well as to quantify current P reduction in the BRC effluent. In summary, the BRC amended with fly ash were effective in retaining phosphorus from stormwater runoff. Stormwater influent and effluent samples from three of the BRC that were intensely monitored in 2014 and 2015 showed a reduction in P concentrations (64%-75%) and P mass (76%-93%). The average Mehlich-3P and water-soluble P concentrations in the media profiles showed higher P concentrations in the top 0.15 m. The same intensive monitoring period of the BRCs also addressed microbial stormwater pollution by monitoring the removal of E. coli, enterococci and coliphage. Based on paired data the mean removals for the microbial parameters were 63%, 65%, and 67% for E. coli, enterococciand coliphage, respectively. Based on this field study, fly-ash amended BRCs may potentially be a viable option for increased microbial removal from stormwater runoff.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2017 Citation: Montefiore, L, J.R. Vogel, and G.O. Brown, 2017. Testing and Design of Fly-Ash Pellets for Phosphorous Removal in Stormwater Filters Oklahoma Clean Lakes and Watersheds Association Annual Meeting, Stillwater, OK, April 5-6.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2016 Citation: McLemore, A.J., J.R. Vogel, and G.O. Brown. 2016. Hydraulic Assessment of Bioretention Cell Performance. Oklahoma Governors Water Conference and Research Symposium, Norman, Oklahoma, October 11-12, 2016.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2016 Citation: Brown, G.O., J.R. Vogel, and L. Montefiore. 2016. Additives for Stormwater Filters: What works, what doesnt, and what is still to be learned. 18th Annual EPA Region 6 Stormwater Conference, Oklahoma City, OK, October 2-6.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2016 Citation: Brown, G.O., and J.R. Vogel, 2016. The effectiveness of fly ash to retain phosphorous and heavy metals in stormwater filters. 18th Annual EPA Region 6 Stormwater Conference, Oklahoma City, OK, October 2-6.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2017 Citation: Youngblood, S., J. Vogel, G. Brown, D. Storm, A. McLemore and S. Kandel, 2017. Field studies of microbial removal from stormwater by bioretention cells with fly-ash amendment. Water, 9(7), 526; doi:10.3390/w9070526.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2017 Citation: Kandel, S., J. Vogel, C. Penn, and G. Brown, 2017. Phosphorus retention by fly ash amended filter media in aged bioretention cells, Water, 9(10), 746; doi:10.3390/w9100746.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2017 Citation: Montefiore, L, J.R. Vogel, and G.O. Brown, 2017. Stormwater filters additives: a review and critique. Oklahoma Clean Lakes and Watersheds Association Annual Meeting, Stillwater, OK, April 5-6.


Progress 11/05/14 to 09/30/15

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience for this research is stormwater engineers, landscape architects, municipal stormwater professionals and state regulators. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?One graduate student has been supported on the project. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Presentation at the Oklahoma Clean Lakes Association annual meeting was attended by State andFederal regularory agency personnel. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Continuing laboratory testing of potential filter media.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Existing bioretention cells with flyash and sand filter mediawere sampled and the concentrations of heavy metals and phosphorous in the media and the cell effluent were determined. Results have been reported in conference and journal papers are being prepared.Laboratory experiments are now being conducted with the goal of increasing the hydraulic conductivity of flyash and sand media mixes.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2015 Citation: Christianson, R., S. Hutchinson, and G.O. Brown, 2015. Curve number estimation accuracy on disturbed and undisturbed soils, J. of Hydrologic Engineering, in press.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2015 Citation: Chavez, R.A., G.O. Brown, R.R. Coffman, and D.E. Storm, 2015. Design, construction and lessons learned from Oklahoma bioretention cell demonstration project, Applied Eng. in Ag. 31(1): 1-9.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2015 Citation: Brown, G.O., J.R. Vogel, D.E. Storm, C. Penn, 2015. Evaluation of the long-term performance of fly ash amended bioretention cells to remove phosphorous from stormwater. Oklahoma Clean Lakes and Watersheds Association. Annual Meeting, Stillwater, OK, April 8-9.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2015 Citation: 72. Chavez, R.A., G.O. Brown, and D.E. Storm, 2015. The Impact of variable hydraulic conductivity on bioretention cell performance and the implications for design innovations and practices, EWRI-ASCE, International Low Impact Development Conference 2015, Houston Texas, Jan. 19-21.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2015 Citation: Kandel, S., G.O. Brown, J.R. Vogel, D.E. Storm, and A. McLemore. 2015. Evaluating bioretention cells for enhanced phosphorus removal using fly ash as filter media and water quality improvement. EWRI-ASCE, International Low Impact Development Conference 2015, Houston Texas, Jan. 19-21.