Source: UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA submitted to NRP
CROP PROTECTION AND PEST MANAGEMENT FOR ALASKA`S EMERGING FARMERS AND RANCHERS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1004853
Grant No.
2014-70006-22558
Cumulative Award Amt.
$510,000.00
Proposal No.
2014-07490
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2014
Project End Date
Jun 30, 2018
Grant Year
2016
Program Code
[EIP]- Extension Implementation Program
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA
(N/A)
FAIRBANKS,AK 99775
Performing Department
Cooperative Extension Service
Non Technical Summary
This is an Extension Implementation project. Because we only get one chance to exclude a pest species from a relatively pest-free region like Alaska, the overall goal of this project is to reduce the rate of pest establishment in Alaska's farms and ranches. To do this we are increasing the training and work time of existing pest scouts. In addition we are going to develop on-line IPM training courses for pesticide applicators and others interested in controlling pests. And finally we are going to organize data from many different groups in Alaska that monitor and report on pests into one clearinghouse resource that can be used to track pests and notify land managers when important agricultural pests are identified. The number of small farms and ranches outside of traditional farming areas in Alaska is increasing in response to rising food prices, increasing food security concerns, changing climates, and emerging specialty markets. Many new growers are not aware of the pests they might encounter, nor how to manage these pests with Alaska-based IPM techniques. This lack of knowledge could result in the introduction and establishment of new pests to Alaska. We think that increasing the number of people who can identify and report new pests in Alaska and increasing the number of people with current knowledge of how to control new pests in Alaska will result in reduced establishment of new pests to Alaska, aguably the state least infested by invasive pests in the USA.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2166050106025%
2162300106025%
2163110106025%
2164010106013%
2164030106012%
Keywords
Goals / Objectives
The overall goal of this project is to reduce the rate of pest establishment in Alaska's farms and ranches. To achieve this goal, our objectives are (1) to increase the training and work time of existing pest scouts so they can expand their efforts to include early detection and rapid response to pests in animal agriculture and specialty crops throughout Alaska, (2) to enhance category specific and on-line IPM training courses for pesticide applicators that can be taken for recertification continuing education units, and (3) to organize data from many different groups in Alaska that monitor and report on pests into one clearinghouse resource that can be used to track pests and notify land managers when important agricultural pests are identified.
Project Methods
The secondary priority area, IPM Partnerships in Wide-Area Pest Monitoring and Reporting Systems, will be fundamental to an evaluation of the progress and success of this grant. The reporting system will be able to quantify the numbers of agriculture pests, results of IPM techniques, number of people using the database, and the overall impact on the rate of pest increase in Alaska. There is also an established system of gathering feedback from agricultural conferences in Alaska; commonly, over half the attendees take the time to give thoughtful responses to questions about what information they found most relevant and how they will change their practices in light of it.Initial outcomes such as favorable attitudes towards IPM and increases in knowledge of IPM will be measured through stakeholder surveys. Advances in knowledge of IPM techniques and confidence in ability to apply them will be assessed through retrospective pre-post tests administered as part of IPM workshops and First Detector trainings. Farmer and rancher willingness to have new land scouted will be tracked through an existing activity report system that cumulatively records client contacts throughout the year, including repeat contacts. As farms and ranches are visited by pest scouts, a follow-up questionnaire will be emailed (or mailed if needed) to contacts to ascertain how frequently they scout for pests and their level of understanding and use of IPM practices. At this stage, clients will also be reminded of where to send pest reports, who to contact for questions, and how to send in unknown pests.Web analytics will be used to assess the efficacy of mediated outreach. Several of the short and mid-term effects mentioned in the logic models, including increased demand for online courses, regular input of pest data, and active use of the pest database will be tracked electronically. Such analytics can also help grant personnel assess and adjust marketing efforts to make sure as many potential clients as possible are aware of opportunities for IPM education. Other mid-term outcomes, such as regular reporting of pests to IPM scouts, and a decrease in new pests, can again be assessed through recording client contacts and administering stakeholder surveys.Follow-up surveys and interviews can be used to determine progress on some of the mid and longer-term outcomes that include sustained changes in attitude and behavior at a community level. Specific to the logic model are the increased acceptance and expectation of IPM, and its use across the state by pesticide applicators and other key stakeholder groups, with the ultimate goal of a decreased number of pests in Alaska. Periodic formative reviews of progress on these goals will allow grant personnel to make adjustments to course content and outreach efforts in the event any corrective action is needed. Careful record keeping over the course of the grant will allow trends in acceptance and adoption to emerge.

Progress 09/01/14 to 06/30/18

Outputs
Target Audience:Our target audience is Alaskan farmers, ranchers, and pesticide applicators, both in the horticultural world and those involved in animal agriculture. Along with active farms that make a living selling horticultural or animal products, we are also targeting hobby enthusist and homesteaders, as we want to make them aware of parasite issues, that if left unchecked could spread to our major farms. Pest scouts concentrated their major time in the four major agricultural hubs of Alaska: Fairbanks, Delta Junction, Kenai Peninsula, and the Mat-Su Valley. For the animal aspect of our project, ranchers were taught how to survey their cattle, sheep, and goats for the presence of external parasites (lice and ticks) and how to properly assess and record body condition. Fresh fecal samples were collected to determine internal parasite loads. Fecal analysis was performed, with the ranchers receiving a report containing the diagnostic results and recommendations for proper deworming strategies and parasite prevention methods. For horticultural farms, scouts looked for the presence of pests on the various plants. Farmers were given information about how to search for pests (sweeping and sticky traps for insects) and what to do if they did find something. Changes/Problems:We met a lot of resistance from farmers/ranchers. They viewed the university as part of the government, and as such, did not want scouts visiting their farms. Many people were skeptical of our agenda. We made multiple attempts to inform them that we wanted to teach them about pests and become first responders. But even with repeated attempts, we were not able to reach the number of farms as we had initially hoped. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Biannual training sessions were provided for all scouts and scientists involved in the study. Biweekly meetings also occurred to keep all informed of the presence of any new pests or new information regarding pesticides. Hands-on seminars regarding safe handling of livestock was provided to all scouts. Scouts were allowed to attend conferences for continuing education. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Our scouts worked diligently to disseminate information. They are tasked with communicating with the public with phone calls and emails, for immediate client questions and concerns. They actively interact with the public at various Garden Clubs, Farm Bureau meetings, annual Forage Producers meeting, and annual Alaska Sustainable Agriculture conference. Radio interviews with KSRM, television segments with KTVF, and multiple newspaper articles were produced. Horticultural and pesticide information was disseminated via the online courses. Information was also disseminated via blog, email, and hands-on training seminars for producers with livestock. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? For goal 1: The pest scouts received training to make them more efficient at scouting for pests and for them to feel more confident in their ability to identify pests and pest problems on farms. Their skillsets were expanded each year of the grant. They attended the Alaska Invasive Species conference and the Alaska Sustainable Agriculture conferences each year. Along with attending the meetings, some of our scouts presented training sessions. Specifically they provided opportunities for inspectors of weed-free forage and gravel certification. Other presentations were given at the annual Pesticide Applicators convention, annual Alaska Peony Producer's conference, and Western SARE conference. Fecal analysis of animals provided information regarding parasitism in Alaskan livestock. Up-to-date deworming information was provided to farmers so that appropriate drug usage and pasture management could be implemented. For goal 2: The online course was created for pesticide applicators. We worked with UAF E-Learning to establish the platform to post training videos, notes, and quizzes. For goal 3: Pest scouts worked to strengthen the network of first detectors (people who report locations of invasive species). Work has begun to catalogue invasive weeds and pests found on horticultural farms.

Publications


    Progress 09/01/15 to 08/31/16

    Outputs
    Target Audience:Our target audience is farmers, ranchers, and pesticide applicators in AIaska. This first year of the project 17 ranchers and 56 farmers were visited, interviewed, and presented with information to help them find, indentify, and control pests. Changes/Problems:There has been some push back from some farmers not wanting scouts to visit their farms. We are seen as part of the government and suspected as having some agenda other than teaching about pests and being first responders. With our earlier successes and continued advertising at meetings, in the paper, and newsletters we are hoping to overcome this resistance. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?We have had two training sessions. The first was to instruct the scouts on the goals of the project and to go over all the potential pests that they might encounter. A protocol for the visits was developed and scouts practiced body scoring and testing for anemia on cattle. In the second training, an improved protocol was developed, more training on insect pests was provided and scouts practiced body scoring and testing for anemia on sheep. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Prelimiary results of the animal portion of the study were reported at the annual Alaska Sustainable Agriculture Conference in Anchorage in Feb. 2016. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?More farms and ranches will be visited in the summer of 2016, with a goal of an additional 200 farms and ranches. Completion of the first two on-line I{M training courses for pesticide applicators should be completed and approved for use by the Alaksa Department on Environmental Conservation.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? For accomplishment 1, our pest scouts have had two trainging sessions and have been actively visiting farms (56) and ranches (17) in Alaska. Fecal samples have been taken and analysed for internal parasites and our scouts are being contacted by farmers and ranchers with questions and information about pests. For accomplishment 2, work has started on creating two on-line IPM training courses for pesticide applicators. For accomplishment 3, all data sources have been identified. Work is not focused on finding a site to house all the information.

    Publications


      Progress 09/01/14 to 08/31/15

      Outputs
      Target Audience:Pest scouts have begun visiting farms and ranches in the Fairbanks area, Delta Junction, Kenai Peninsula, and the Mat-Su Valley. At the ranches, cattle have been checked for external parasites and been given body scores. Fresh fecal samples have been collected to determine internal parasite loads. Ranch information has been obtained and ranchers have been instructed on scouting techniques for pests on both animals and pastures. At the farms, farmers are being given information about how to search for pests (sweeping and sticky traps for insects) and what to do if they find something. Most visits have been to ranches, but it is expected that there will be more farm visits as the season progresses. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Pest scouts have had two days of training to bolster their knowledge from previous work as IPM technicians. We have developed a shared google drive and it is being regularly updated with information on pests that have been found and how to identify them (e.g. lygus bugs). How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Newspaper articles have been published in several local papers about the project. The first was to encourage people to use our survey to report their most important pest. The second was to let growers know that we had started visiting farms and ranches. These articles have been adapted to go to the the AK Division of Agriculture Newsletter and to listserves of other agencies and groups. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We intend to increase the reach of the farm and ranch visits. In the coming winter we plan to begin work on combining data bases and develop our first on-line IPM training course.

      Impacts
      What was accomplished under these goals? The four scouts have begun visiting farms and ranches in their respective regions. Most operations visited to date are ranches or peony growers. Much effort is going into obtaining contact information for Alaska's farmers.

      Publications