Source: CORNELL UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
STRAWBERRY SOIL HEALTH: THE ROLE OF ORGANIC MATTER
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1004353
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2014
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2017
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
CORNELL UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
ITHACA,NY 14853
Performing Department
Horticulture
Non Technical Summary
Strawberry growers in New York, the 8th largest strawberry producer in the country, face many difficulties in maintaining healthy strawberry fields. In addition to stress from cold and damp weather, soils often contain low levels of pathogens that can affect roots under suboptimal conditions. High organic matter content is thought to sustain biological soil health in the face of these conditions. An earlier survey of strawberry farms in NYS indicated that almost all have low levels of biological soil health which may reflect low levels of beneficial microorganisms and less competition for disease organisms. This may partially explain the long term decrease in yield per acre in NYS reported by the National Agricultural Statistics Service and the increasing incidence of black root rot that growers report. One difference between berry fields with low biological soil health and adjacent fields of vegetables with higher values is that strawberry growers use a large amount of straw for winter protection each year. One might expect that large additions of organic matter would enhance soil health, but it is possible that this large annual influx of straw might actually reduce microbiological activity, increase soil moisture in already wet soils, and make plants more vulnerable to disease. The goal of this project is to learn if various soil amendments/mulches and depth of tillage affects biological soil health, and if so, what is the nature of those amendments that deplete, rather than enhance, soil health. The second phase is to implement practices on the farm that data suggest will maintain higher levels of soil health, while still providing for winter protection. Growers would then have to use fewer pesticides to manage disease and will subsequently have higher yields and healthier soils.
Animal Health Component
90%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
10%
Applied
90%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
10211221070100%
Knowledge Area
102 - Soil, Plant, Water, Nutrient Relationships;

Subject Of Investigation
1122 - Strawberry;

Field Of Science
1070 - Ecology;
Goals / Objectives
To understand how various mulches/soil amendments and depth of cultivation affect biological soil health and strawberry performance over multiple years in a perennial strawberry production system. Specific questions to address are:Do different soil amendments vary in their ability to affect levels of organic matter, total carbon, soil respiration, and potentially mineralizable nitrogen indicating biological soil health in perennial strawberries?How do these variables and the composition of organic matter change over time?Does straw incorporation have specific negative impacts on strawberry root health?Are various amendments associated with yield in strawberries?Does cultivation depth impact organic matter, total carbon, soil respiration and potentially mineralizable nitrogen?Can practices be implemented to improve biological soil health in fields where indicators are low?Outreach:To promote ways to improve soil health by working directly with strawberry growers, and developing resources for use by growers.
Project Methods
Our research proposal consists of three components. First, soil amendments consisting of different C:N ratios (grass clippings, straw, sawdust) will be incorporated into a field prior to planting strawberries. The amount of dry biomass will be the same for each treatment, and will be equivalent to the typical amount used for winter mulching with wheat straw. Two different types of tillage/cultivation (deep or shallow) will be used to manage weeds and vegetative growth throughout the life of the planting. Strawberry plants will be monitored for growth, productivity and root health, while the soil will be monitored for measures of soil health, microbial respiration, PMN and total C (see below). Second, depending on the results of the first two years of our study, we will attempt to increase active carbon and biological soil health at three strawberry farms and determine the impact on strawberry root health. Third, we will communicate our results to growers, along with new management recommendations, through field days, workshops, and on farm demonstrations. A very active website (fruit.cornell.edu) will be updated to include results from our study. We will hold a field day at one of the grower farms where soil health management will be discussed.A completely randomized plot design with 8 treatments will be laid out at Cornell's research farm in Ithaca, NY. Each plot will be 12x15 feet with 4 rows of strawberries in each plot, 4 feet apart, 15 feet long. The two edge rows as well as a 4-foot buffer on the long edge will serve as a buffer. Grass, straw, and sawdust will be used as amendments (G, S, D). Thirty-two pounds (14.6 kg) dry weight of each will be spread uniformly in each plot (same rate as a standard winter straw mulch application of 4 tons per acre). Control plots will not be amended. Grass, straw, sawdust, and the control treatments will either be shallow tilled or deep tilled throughout the life of the planting when weed control is necessary. Each of these 8 treatment combinations will be replicated 4 times. Soil amendments will again be added at the same rate in fall 2014. The field will be protected with two layers of row cover during the winter to prevent frost damage.Soil samples from each block will be taken prior to tilling, and then two months later, and again in September. Soil will be sampled three times each growing season. Four representative in-row soil cores and inter-row soil cores from the top 15 cm of each block will be collected and mixed together. Any debris or mulch on top of the soil will be brushed away before a core is collected. All soil samples will be collected on the same day. Samples will be stored in a cooler packed with ice until transported back to the lab where they will be stored at 38°F until tested.PMN will be measured within a week of sampling. PMN will be measured using the method described in the CSHT manual (Gugino et al. 2009). Briefly, two 8 g samples of field moist soil sieved to 2 mm will be put into two 50 mL centrifuge tubes. To one tube 40 mL of 2.0 M potassium chloride will be added and shaken for one hour. The solution will be filtered and 20 mL will be collected and analyzed for ammonium using the colorimetric method (Gugino et al. 2009). To the second sample 10 mL of deionized water will be added and then hand shaken. It will be incubated for 7 days at 86°F before 3 mL of 2.67 M KCl is added to the tube. That tube will then be shaken for an hour and filtered. Again 20 mL will be collected and analyzed for ammonium. The difference between these two concentrations is the nitrogen mineralization rate (Gugino et al. 2009).Soil respiration will be measured using a potassium hydroxide trap for CO2. Field moist soil will be sieved through a 4 mm sieve and stored at 38°F for two weeks to reduce the effect of sample mixing on microbial respiration (Heart et al. 1994). Then, 20 g will be put into a Mason incubation jar with KOH in a separate beaker inside the jar and 30 mL of distilled CO2-free water in the bottom to keep the soil moisture high. The Mason jar will then be incubated at 30°C for a little over 3 weeks, testing the KOH conductivity every few days at first and later every week. The KOH will have a known base conductivity. As the CO2 from the soil microbial respiration reacts with the K in the KOH solution, the conductivity will decline and the rate of decline can be used to calculate the respiration rate. Each time respiration is measured the KOH trap will be replaced and more water will be added if necessary to keep soil moisture levels constant. Soil moisture will also be sampled every sample date as it is a key predictor for many soil biological processes.The Dumas combustion method as described by Grewal et al. will be used to measure total organic C (1991). Soil will be air-dried and passed through a 2 mm sieve, then ground and passed through a 150μl sieve. The soil will be put in a tin capsule and then flash combusted. C will be measured in the form of CO2 using a thermal conductivity detector and will be reported on an oven-dry basis (Grewal et al. 1991).Throughout the season disease pressure will be monitored, especially black root rot, and yield data will be collected at harvest. At the final sampling date, soil will be submitted to the CSHT lab to evaluate their biological indicators and these will be compared to our indicators of soil health.Depending on results, three growers will be identified and practices that improve soil health will be implemented on farm. Outreach activities will be designed based on the findings. The timing of on-farm meetings will depend on the practices to be implemented.

Progress 10/01/14 to 09/30/17

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audeince for this project is strawberry growers, particularly those who are interested in improving their soil health by incorporating cover crops and organic matter into their soil. Most all strawberry growers would be included in this category. Secondarily, researchers and extension workers who work directly with growers are targeted. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Does incorporating straw mulch negatively affect strawberry plant growth and productivity? Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Annual Conference, Kona, Hawaii, 2017 Soil health in strawberries. North American Strawberry Growers Annual Conference. Grand Rapids, MI 2016 plus proceedings. Using soil health information as a tool. Cornell Berry Production Workshop. Ballston Spa, NY 2016 Using soil health information as a tool. Cornell Berry Production Workshop. Lockport, NY 2016 Using soil health information as a tool. Cornell Berry Production Workshop. Bath, NY 2015 New York Berry News, quarterly newsletter, various articles What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? This study assessed yield and standard biological indicators of soil health in matted row strawberries by incorproating soil amendments with varying carbon to nitrogen ratios (C:N) prior to planting, then again on an annual basis for three years. Treatments were an unamended control, grass clippings (C:N 19), wheat straw (93), and sawdust (344); each was incorporated at two tillage depths. Soil respiration was consistently higher in plots with higher C:N amendments and the respiration rate was highest in sawdust amended shallow-tilled plots. In most cases, however, tillage had no effect. Potentially mineralizable nitrogen was occasionally higher in sawdust-amended plots but the effect was not consistent. Soil moisture and pH were higher between the rows of strawberries than within the rows and the C:N ratio of the soil was not affected by the C:N ratio of the amendments. Despite differences in these factors that have been traditionally associated with soil health, yield was not correlated with any of them. Neither the measured soil health indicators nor the C:N ratio of amendments were associated with strawberry yield, suggesting that alternative soil health tests may be required for perennial strawberries or the range of variation that we generated from our treatments was not sufficiently large or of sufficent duration to measurably impact growth or yield. The study showed that runner development is depressed when strawberry transplants are planted into soil with straw residue, and this negatively impacts yield the following year. First year yield in perennial strawberries is typically the highest, as it was for this study, so the negative impact of straw residue can be significant. This residue effect was not observed in subsequent years when straw and other amendments were incorporated between rows. This study shows the importance of avoiding planting new strawberries in locations that were planted to strawberries previously and may have straw mulch residue remaining in the field. Growers have been informed of these findings through various presentions and conferences.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Submitted Year Published: 2018 Citation: Gannett, M. and M. Pritts. 2018. Soil amendment and tillage depth effects on soil health indicators and crop yield in perennial strawberries. HortTechnology, submitted.


Progress 10/01/15 to 09/30/16

Outputs
Target Audience:The target audience is commercial berry growers who are interested in improving their production by enhancing soil health. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We have mentioned our preliminary findings at grower meetings, but caution them that we have not yet made any conclusions from our work because one more year's worth of data is required. We have encouraged growers to "experiment" on their own by removing straw from a small section of field and protecting with row cover instead. Then they should evalute yield the following spring to determine if there is any effect from the absence of straw. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We will be harvesting yield data in June, 2017 and comparing the straw-incorporated treatments with controls. The field is protected with row cover for the winter because we do not want to confound the results by using straw for winter protection. Once we see the results, we will be in a better position to make recommendations to growers about how to use straw in perennial strawberry production systems. Then we will communicate results to growers through newsletters, conferences and a possible field day.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? We harvested a second year of data (in June, 2016) from plots where treatments were imposed prior to planting - at the end of 2013. Straw mulch amendment showed plant growth and yield suppression in 2015. We could not identify the factor associated with this suppression, either with greenhouse studies or by measuring soil biological processes. There was no correlation between these processes and yield in 2015. Similar results were obtained in 2016. Yields in straw amended plots continued to show yield suppression of about 15% compared to the other plots - thirty two months after the amendment was incorporated. Other amendments included sawdust with a higher C:N ratio than straw, and grass clippings with a lower C:N ratio. These two treatments and controls performed similarly. There is some unknown factor associated with straw that is depressing yields, and this is unrelated to the C:N ratio. Therefore, at the end of harvest in 2016, the 32 field plots were divided into two groups - each with two of the original treatment combinations. In one group the straw was incorporated at renovation which is standard practice for strawberry growers. All of the straw was removed from plots in the second group. In 2017 we will measure yield and see if it was impacted by straw mulch incorporation at renovation rather than at preplant. The results could have significant impacts on recommendations to growers regarding the use of straw for winter protection and subsequent incorporation.

Publications


    Progress 10/01/14 to 09/30/15

    Outputs
    Target Audience:Target audience is commercial strawberry growers in cold climates who use a perennial matted row production system. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?A graduate student based her Master's research on this project. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Three presentations have been given to grower groups where the concerns about straw mulch were presented, and alternatives for using lower amounts were discussed. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We plan to harvest plots for one more year to determine if the impact of straw persists over time, or is mostly manifest in the first fruiting year.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? Straw mulch used as a soil amendment (a common practice after straw mulch removal in spring) was found to inhibit growth, runnering and yield of strawberry plants, in contrast to amendments of grass clippings and sawdust applied at the same rate, which have lower and higher C:N ratios, respectively. We minotored total carbon, soil respiration and mineralizable nitrogen, but found no soil biological process that was associated with poor performance in straw-mulched plots. Tillage depth had no consistent impact on plants or yield. Soil characteristics between rows exhibited some differences compared to within rows, but these differences were not related to plant performance. We followed up with a greenhouse study to determine if we could isolate the component of straw that was impacting strawberries in the field. We found no component of straw that negatively impacted strawberries in the greenhouse. From this first year of data, we conclude that something about straw mulch is negatively impacting strawberry plants in field situations, but we are uncertain what is causing this.

    Publications