Source: PURDUE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
ENHANCING KINSHIP FAMILIES` HEALTH IN RURAL COUNTIES THROUGH EXTENSION EDUCATION
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1004029
Grant No.
2014-46100-22350
Cumulative Award Amt.
$139,088.00
Proposal No.
2014-07013
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2014
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2016
Grant Year
2014
Program Code
[LX]- Rural Health & Safety Education
Recipient Organization
PURDUE UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
WEST LAFAYETTE,IN 47907
Performing Department
Nursing
Non Technical Summary
As a society we strive for children to be raised in stable, nurturing, trauma-free environments. However, many children experience trauma, sometimes at the hands of their birth parents, and are subsequently removed from the home. Across the country, states are relying on kinship care, rendered by extended family members and close friends, for the 2.7 million children who have been removed from their birth parents' care. Kinship parenting offers several benefits to children, including familiar caregivers, continuity of family and cultural traditions, decreased trauma from separation, reinforced identity and self-esteem, reduction of racial disparities, and increased placement stability. Yet all children who are transitioned to a new home have experienced trauma, if not for the reasons that necessitated their removal from the home, then because of the transition to a new environment. This history of trauma is coupled with the lack of health and mental health resources that are available for rural dwellers, despite higher rates of mental illness. Kinship parents face significant challenges, including understanding how trauma may be affecting their children and family environment, and the lack of mental health resources.The overall aim of this Rural Health Safety and Education (RHSE) 1-year pilot project is to promote health by impacting parental psychological well-being (stress), parent-child relationships, and the family environment of rural kinship families through operationalizing a partnership between nursing faculty and rural extension educators. The project's aim addresses the RHSE priorities of: Information about and access to health promotion and educational activities; and training for volunteers and health services providers concerning health promotion and health care services for individuals and families in cooperation with state, local and community partners.The project team will deliver a parenting curriculum to rural kinship families and their children who have experienced trauma. The first objective is to partner with three rural Indiana county extension educators and train them to deliver a trauma-informed parenting class. This class is specifically designed for kinship and foster parents and developed by the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) and funded by Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Second, we will deliver the curriculum, providing childcare to support attendance. We will repeat the class to reach approximately 120 parents across three rural counties within the first seven months of the project timeline. Third, we will evaluate the implementation of the curriculum (e.g., attendance, educator and participant feedback), and using a pre-post-test design, we will evaluate the overall impact with validated tools to measure parental stress, parent-child relationships (parental nurturing), and the family environment. Fourth, we will evaluate global feedback on the pilot project to inform a larger proposal and disseminate results. To achieve these objectives, we will use a strong, coordinated team of interdisciplinary experts (extension, nursing, social work [consultant], and statistics). Our overall goal is to strengthen these vulnerable families.The parenting information will assist kinship parents in understanding trauma and therefore, more effectively address their child's needs. The intervention will allow them to apply parenting strategies and therapeutic interactions with their child, as well as receive peer support in a group setting. After we have evaluated the project, we will disseminate our results from local to national stakeholders, including state-wide extension conferences and peer reviewed journals.
Animal Health Component
80%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
0%
Applied
80%
Developmental
20%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
80260203020100%
Goals / Objectives
Major Goal: The goal of this 1-year, pilot project is to promote kinship parents' psychological health in terms of the parental stress and parent-child relationship (nurturing), as well as improve the family environment through the implementation of an educational curriculum specific to rural dwelling kin parents whose children have experienced trauma. The curriculum will be delivered through a partnership between nursing faculty and three extension educators.Objective #1: Within the first two months of the project, nursing faculty and the project consultant will partner with and train (3) extension educators in Montgomery, Tipton, and White (Indiana) counties to deliver the 8-module Resource Parent Curriculum (RPC) that is specific to children who have experienced trauma.Objective #2: Across the three counties, approximately 120 kinship parents will attend and participate in at least 6 out of the 8 RPC modules by Month 7, which will be co-facilitated by one extension educator and one nursing faculty member. Objective #3: At the completion of Module 8 of the RPC, 75% of the parents will report an improvement (when compared to pre-curriculum reports) in their psychological health and well-being (i.e., overall family environment, a decrease in their child(ren)'s reported difficulties, an increase in their ability to nurture their child[ren], and a decrease in their parenting stress).Objective #4:At the end of the initial RPC sessions (Modules 1 & 2), and at the conclusion of all of the RPC implementations (Module 8), the team will meet via teleconferences and face-to-face meetings to formally gather, discuss and disseminate the pilot project data and feedback.
Project Methods
Efforts to Achieve Project Goals:Across the three counties, approximately 120 kinship parents will attend and participate in at least 6 out of the 8 RPC modules by Month 7, which will be co-facilitated by one extension educator and one nursing faculty member. Purdue University, as part of its land grant mission, has a network of extension educators who have been crossed trained to deliver a variety of content, including Human Development and Health and Wellness. As members of the communities they serve, extension educators are in key positions to deliver the Resource Parent Curriculum to kinship parents. The stigma to receiving mental health services cuts across urban and rural areas; however, the familiarity that is characteristic of rural communities exacerbates this stigma and often precludes individuals from seeking much needed services. By engaging extension educators and partnering with nursing faculty, as well as embedding this health education within the umbrella of Purdue Extension, the stigma associated with mental illness will be decreased.Since these families may not be monitored by the child welfare system, an opportunity to support children and all kinship parents is again through the network of Purdue extension educators. A benefit of extension educators implementing this curriculum is that they are well-known and well-respected in their communities and are familiar with the organizations and services available and often, resources available in adjacent counties. Should participants be identified as benefitting from more training or services, the educators will be able to provide referrals to access more intensive resources in the community. Dialogue and questions will be encouraged during the educational sessions. Ongoing feedback from educators will also be solicited as part of the project's process evaluation efforts. At least one extension educator and nursing faculty project team members will co-facilitate each session. Time will be allotted to accommodate questions from the adult learners.Methods to facilitate a safe, effective learning environment will be implemented, especially considering the sensitive nature of some of the content related to child trauma. The project director,is a Fellow in the Purdue Teaching Academy, a Service Learning Faculty Fellow, and is the recipient of several student-selected teaching awards at the School of Nursing. The project director also teaches Rural Nursing Theory (Winters, 2013) at the graduate level and is aware of the major constructs that apply to reaching and retaining rural-dwelling kinship parents. For example, the importance of work, seeking healthcare assistance from friends and family before professionals are consulted, and valuing self-reliance are important considerations (Winters, 2013).Evaluation of the Success of the Project:Evaluation of Objective #1:By the second month of the project, the project team will reach 100% consensus that the health education is ready to be presented to approximately 120 kinship parents across the three rural counties.The project director will lead the team, defining roles and responsibilities. Advertisements to solicit participation in the project will be discussed. The project coordinator will assist in drafting text and placing the advertisements in newspapers and social media, and printing of facilitator and participant manuals. Facilitators and barriers to recruitment will be discussed.Evaluation of Objective #2:Attendance sheets will record approximately 120 kinship parents' presence for at least 6 of the 8 Resource Parent Curriculum modules by Month 6. The project director and project coordinator will continually assess participation in the project. An Excel database will be established to track kinship parents' attendance. Reminder phone calls 24-hours prior to the sessions will be made to support attendance. If a parent misses a class, the project coordinator will contact them to support their continued attendance.Evaluation of Objective #3:At the beginning of the first week and at the end of the final week of the Resourc Parent Curriculum (RPC) (pre-post-tests), approximately 120 kinship parents will complete the Family Environment Scale, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Parent Report, the Child Rearing Practices Report (Nurturing Scale), and the Parenting Stress Index to determine the impact of the curriculum. Demographic information will also be collected.After informed consent has been obtained, parents will be assessed pre- RPC intervention (Week 1; baseline), immediately post-RPC education. Paper and pencil forms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Parent Report, The Child Rearing Practices Report - Modified (Nurturance), and the Parenting Stress Index will be completed and the feedback entered into a database for further analysis. These brief surveys will take approximately 25 minutes to complete.However, in order to offset participant burden and to fully assess the impact of the program, the Family Environment Scale (see Table 2) will be given (along with a stamped, addressed envelope) to the parents during the first session with instructions to mail the completed survey back to the research team or bring it with them to the second session. Similarly, at the conclusion of the education modules, the parents will be given a copy of the instrument and instructed to mail the Family Environment Scale back to the research team. Although there is a risk of unreturned surveys, the participant burden at the first and last session will be significantly reduced. The project coordinator will track responses, enter data, and send follow up reminders (via postcards) to participants so that missing data will be minimized. As a pilot project, the team will assess the effectiveness of this approach to data collection.Objective 3: Analyses of DataFirst, descriptive statistics will be calculated to summarize the characteristics of the sample and to compare baseline characteristics between the three (county) groups. Associations between the demographics of the kinship parent and the child, and the pre-post-curriculum effect will be investigated, which may be used for later confounding adjustment. After a normality check, typical paired comparison methods such as paired t-test will be used to elucidate pre- and post-RPC curriculum changes. Linear model or logistic regression, which incorporates demographical variables, will be used to investigate the pre-post intervention effects (improved family environment, improved [fewer] child difficulties, increased nurturing parental behaviors, and decreased parental stress). Cronbach's alpha will be computed for each scale used (Table 2) to determine acceptable internal consistency reliability. Evaluation of Objective #4:Based on the pilot project feedback, the team will create at least 2 presentations and 2 manuscripts to disseminate the project outcomes.A team-generated survey will be offered to parents to assess acceptability, accessibility and availability of the health education at the end of Module 1, and at the conclusion of all of the RPC implementations (Month 6). This feedback will be critical in moving forward with a larger, regional project. Team teleconferences will be scheduled to discuss feedback from both participants and educators. Formal feedback of the health information's impact on the family will be communication using various venues of dissemination. A framework of local to national platforms for dissemination will be conceptualized (see below: Communication and Dissemination Plan). An application for a larger project is planned to include regional rural counties in Indiana to "scale up" extension resources.

Progress 09/01/14 to 08/31/16

Outputs
Target Audience:Our original goal was to recruit from three, rural Indiana counties and deliver trauma-informed parenting classes to 120 kinship parents. During the project period, we followed our submitted protocol faithfully. Recruitment proved to be extremely challenging,despite our efforts to expand to additional counties. Through communications with the program officer, we extended the outreach of the trauma-informed parenting classes to a total of 11 rural counties:Clay, Owen, Fulton, Fountain, White, Montgomery, Tipton, Cass, Clinton, Parke or Pulaski county. Approval was sought and received from the Department of Child Services in Indiana to offer these classes as foster parent training hours as an incentive for kinship parents to attend. Our second target audience was Extension Educators in the rural counties. Extension Educators were trained by the project consultant, a master's prepared social worker, Elizabeth Sharda,who was involved in the pilot of the curriculum through the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) or in the second year in the project, by the project director, Karen Foli. Recruitment occurred across 11 rural counties in Indiana with parenting classes ultimately offered in four rural counties (Clay, Owen, Clinton, and Montgomery)from 2014 to 2016. In total, five classes were held. Approximately 12 classes that were planned and advertized had to be canceled. Forty-three parents were registered for classes; however, 8 did not attend classes; 13 attended classes, but did not meet inclusion criteria/were not kinship parents or did not attend >75% of the classes; and 6 individuals registered incounties where classes were not offered due to low enrollment. The remaining 16 parents' data will be used in the final analysis.The average age of participants was 58.7 years; the majority were married (n=12), White/Caucasian (n=16); female (n=12), in very good or excellent health (n=10), with a high school diploma (n=6) or a high school diploma with technical/vocational training (n=4), and holding guardianship of the child(ren) (n=11). Kinship parents reported in half the cases that a birth parent was incarcerated or in the legal system (n=8). Twelve kinship parents reported that a birth parent had an "alcohol or drug addiction," with 7 participants reporting that the child had (possibly) suffered abuse and/or neglect. A third target audience, area youth workers, was added as a recruitment effort.The project director, Karen Foli, presented at the Indiana Youth Institute, Youth Workers' Cafeprogram in Clay County, Indiana, in April 2016: "Kinship Care: What It Is and What It Looks Like for Youth Workers." In attendance were approximately 45 individuals from various government agencies, including the Department of Child Services, Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA), and private citizens (parents). The NIFA sponsored project was described for these individuals during this presentation with upcoming classes announced. Recruitment flyers were also distributed. Changes/Problems:The original protocol/grant application's approach was sound. Our rationale was that by utilizing embedded "insiders" (Extension Educators) to assist in recruitment, implementation of the classes would follow our plannedtimeline. Each project change surrounded efforts to increase enrollment of parents as this proved to be unexpectedly challenging. The following list summarizes changes in response to the significantly lower than anticiapted enrollment: 1. Overall Strategies to Increase Enrollment: Strategies included a) new counties added to the original three (total of 11); b) revision of the recruitment materials, including the press release, the newspaper advertisement, the recruitment brochures, and the business letters; and c) increased recruitment activities. Multiple Instituational Review Board amendments were filed that reflected these changes. Hundreds of brochures were printed and disseminated in various ways. Extension Educators began to target additional organizations and requesting booth space at youth fairs. Communications between the project director and Extension Educators increased in frequency and duration. Additional teleconferences were conducted with fall and spring classes scheduled. Registration of classes were closely monitored via a spreadsheet on a secured, password protected server. 2. Addition of Clay and Owen Counites: A total of 11 counties were included in the project, and all but two met the NIFA definition of "rural." These two counties did not meet the criteria set forth by NIFA and therefore, were not originally included in the grant application. In January 2016, Karen Foli, Project Director, entered into a dialogue with the program officer, Aida Balsano, who upon reviewing the supporting data for therequest,agreed to addthese counties to the project. Supporting data includedstatistics from both the U.S. Census Bureau and the National Center for Health Statistics.In addition, the Extension partner in these counties was very interested in supporting kinship parents. This individual had hosted an information night in 2015 with attorneysand social workers discussing resources for these parents. However, the Extention Educator assessed that the participants wanted to know more about how to parent these children and saw a significant need for this program. 3. Approval for Foster Parent Training: With the approval of Fay Russell, MS, Assistant Deputy Director, Staff Development, Department of Child Services, State of Indiana, we were authorized to add the following wording to our recruitment materials: "These classes are approved by the Indiana Department of Child Services for up to 15 hours of foster parent training." With this statement on our recruitment brochure, we hopedthat kinship parents, who were also foster parents, would be motivated to enroll and attend the classes for this free training. We sent certificates of completion to the kinship parents after they had attended the classes. 4. Extending the Project for an Additional Year. At the end of the first project year, it became evident that our efforts to increase enrollment were limited in effectiveness. The project director, Karen Foli, sought and obtained permission from Dr. Balsano for a 1-year extension to the project in the hope of achieving our target number. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This project provided training to threeExtension Educators and one Extension Specialiston trauma-informed parenting. This was conducted over approximately 8 hours of teleconference meetingsby the consultant for the project, Elizabeth Sharda, LMSW, Trainer and Consultant, Individual Affiliate, National Child Traumatic Stress Network. The fourth Extension Educator was trained by the project director, Karen Foli, who implemented the classes in Owen and Clay Counties. As mentioned previously, Dr. Foli also presented to the Youth Worker Cafe sponsored by the Indiana Youth Institute. During this presentation, Dr. Foli descibed the project, the positive reception of the course content by kinship parents, and the preliminary evidence of impact obtained from post-project interviews. This project's major goal was to positively impact kinship parenting behaviors based on increased knowledge and understanding of child trauma. It was also a project in which two organizations came to understand each other's mission, values and aims (School of Nursing and Extension). For example, faculty spend much of their time teaching and conducting research with an appreciation of institutional review boards, consenting individuals, and integrity of data. Incontrast, Extension Educators focus on disseminating educational activities, coordinating county fairs, and tracking constituencies served. As publications move forward, Extension Educators will have the opportunity to disseminate findings in both presentation and manuscript formats. Dr. Foli, who has extensive peer-reviewed publications, will be the lead author and mentor in these activities. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Planned dissemination activities: Planned Poster Presentation: Planned submission to Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society in Nursing: 44th Biennial Convention, Indianapolis, Indiana, November 2017. Foli, K. J., Kersey, S., Zhang, L., &Wilkinson, B. (poster presentation). Trauma-Informed Parenting: Reaching Rural Kinship Families through a Nursing and Extension Education Partnership Planned Publications: 1. Submission to the Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (special issue on trauma-informed care). This manuscript will be data-driven and include the quantitative and qualitative findings of the project. Foli, K. J., Kersey, S., Zhang, L., Woodcox, S., Wilkinson, B., Nagele, M., & Newcom, T. (in preparation).Trauma-Informed Parenting: Reaching Rural Kinship Families through a Nursing and Extension Education Partnership 2. Journal to be determined. This manuscript will describe the partnership between nursing faculty and Extension Educators and how the project was planned and implemented. Foli, K. J., Kersey, S., Zhang, L., Woodcox, S., Wilkinson, B., Nagele, M., & Newcom, T. (in preparation).Reaching Vulnerable Families through a Nursing and Extension Educator Parnership: A Transdisciplinary Project (working title) What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Major Goal: We have preliminary findings that support the major goal of the project/study. Our data are rich in that we have both qualitative and quantitative findings. In particular, our qualitative content analysis indicates that specific, positive parenting changes occured in relation to the trauma-informed parenting class. For example, our themes include: Clarification of caregiving role; increased support for the child; and specific parentng changes based on increased understanding of the child's past trauma. Participant quotes include: "I think before I yell": "It lit up a light bulb in me" and (child behaviors) "are easier for me to understand." The project director and statistician have been working on the quantitative data analysis. For continuous variables, such as the Parenting Stress Index, paired t-tests will be performed to find whether before and after reports were significantly different. For categorical variables, such as Child Rearing Practices Report, Fisher's exact test will be used for the analysis. All analysis will be conducted by using statistical software, R (R Development Core Team, 2008). Quanitative data are less conclusive; however, indivdual items in the certain questionnaires appear to be significant. The exception to this is the Parenting Stress Index, with pre-and post-intervention scores that did not produce significant results. We believe that the small sample size (n=16) negatively affected our ability to assess changes based on self-report surveys. With our publication plan, we will disseminate these results (see below). Objective #1: This objective was met. Extension Educators located in the originally planned three counties and the Extension Specialist were trained by the project consultant, Elizabeth Sharda. Subsequently, an additional Extension Educator was trained in the curriculum; this Educator was embedded in new counties (Clay and Owen)that had been added to increase enrollment. The project director, Karen Foli, trained the fourth Educator. Objective #2: This goal was partially met; while 43 individuals registered for the classes, due to factors such as not attending the entire curriculumand not meeting inclusion criteria,16 parents completed the course and submitted data that will be analyzed. The project director, Karen Foli, attests to thesignfiicant hours that were spent to strengthen recruitment and meet the target number of participants. In addition to direct recruitmentefforts such as face-to-face communicationand telephone calls, we sentletters to churches, local businesses andcontacted volunteers in each ruralcommunity. We strategicallyutilized social media (Facebook, Extension web pages, and the Purdue Today [daily electronic newsletter] section: "Research Participants Needed"). We used traditional media, such as radio spots withinterviews, and newspapers. Extension Educators worked diligently to communicate the project to local residents and peer organizations. A nursing faculty member on the team, Susan Kersey, who is a clincial nurse specialist in child and adolescent psychatric mental heatlh, was employed at aregional community mental health centers' satellite offices in two of the target counties. She distributed dozens of brochures to these organizations so that therapists who worked with kinship families would relay the project to interested parents. Hundreds of project brochures were distributed across the project time line. These were updated continuously as the project expanded to different counties or redesigned in more consumer-friendly formats. Another strategy to facilitate enrollment was seeking and obtaining approval from the State of Indiana Department of Child Services (DCS) to issue certificates of attendance/approved foster parent training hours. For those parents who were working with DCS, this was effective. We also contacted several organizations to assist us in "spreading the word" about the project. Extension Educators and when appropriate, Dr. Foli, contacted county DCS offices to explain the project goals. Brochures were sent electronically to multiple parties, including agencies such as Connect2Help 211, an Indiana-based organization that connects individuals with available resources. Objective #3: As described in the Major Goal accomplishment, we are in the process of final data analysis.Several participants believed that the class should be "mandatory" for kinship caregivers. These parents described significant traumatic events for both the children under their care and themselves. They reported receiving much needed support from the other parents in the class, and utlized the information in the manual after the classes were over. Our acceptability, accessibility and overal satisfaction data are strong. For example, 100% of the kinship parents were satisfied or very satisfied with the classes; 100% were satisfied or very satisfied with the location, distance driven, and registration; and 69% strongly agreed or agreed that providing childcare was important to attendance. Objective #4: This objective was met and will continue to be met as dissemination activities increase. Teleconferences were well attended and the as the Extension Educators are embedded within their respective counties, were logistically advantageous. When Extension Educators were on campus, meetings were held face-to-face.

Publications


    Progress 09/01/14 to 08/31/15

    Outputs
    Target Audience:We have implemented our protocol faithfully, with training of co-faciliators completed, and timely teleconferences with team members. To date, we have offered two classes, reaching 8 kinship parents. This is far short of our anticipated recruitment goals and we have responded by 1) requesting and receiving a one-year extension on the project to August 31, 2016; 2) expanding the geographical area from three to nine counties (rural counties per NIFA codes); 3) requested and received approval for the parenting classes to count as foster parent training, including the statement"These classes are approved by theIndianaDepartment of Child Servicesfor up to 15 hours of foster parent training" in our recruitment materials; and 4) increased recruitment efforts with key stakeholders in the counties, including systems of care, local churches and healthcare providers, as well as contacting local directors of theDepartment of Child Services. Specifically, our rural counties now includeRural (Non-metro) Indiana counties, Montgomery, Tipton, White, Parke, Pulaski, Cass, Clinton, Fountain, and Fulton Counties.These counties are located in west to northcentral Indiana and are surrounded by counties considered metropolitan areas.Criteria for participant inclusion are: kinshipparents who have been full-time caregivers for at least three months, regardless of whether they have formal foster care parentstatus or a more informal parenting arrangement. Recruitment of participants has beenthrough local avenues, and primarily conducted by the Extension Educators. Hundreds of recruitment brochures have been distributed to various agencies and organizations in these counties. As the additional six new counties have just been onboarded, we anticipate increased recruitment activities.Community mental health satellite clinics have also been made aware of this health educational offering and we have received several parents through this. Extension educators have verified that meeting rooms are availableto hold the health education classes with adjacent space for childcare. Nursing students were recruitedthrough the School of Nursing electronic newsletter to provide childcare at the first class that was held and education for the children in attendance (Healthy Eating) was delivered. Changes/Problems:The project as outlined in the proposal was realistic, and the partnership between nursing educators and Extension Educators has worked well. The major problem has beenreaching the kinship parents/participants to enroll in the program. In this progress report, wehave outlined our strategies to try to overcome this challenge. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The county Extension Educators in Montgomery, White, and Tipton Counties, as well as two nursing faculty and an Extension Health and Wellness specialist were trained in how to implement the program/curriculum by Liz Sharda, the project consultant. Each module's content was reviewed and questions answered. The six individuals gained knowledge and expertise from the training. Feedback after the parentingclasseswas also shared, and included group dynamics and areas for growth. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?As previously outlined, we have expanded from 3 to 9 counties and continue aggressive recruitment activities. We have printed hundreds of new brochures, designing them to be more colorful. We have created a project chart that outlines the classes in each countywith those responsible for facilitating, as well as recruitment/advertisement ideas, and are hopeful that our efforts will assist us in reaching our goals. This will be reviewed during the next scheduled conference call (August 26).

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? Major Goal: We have made significant progress toward our major goal. The infrastructure to deliver the project is in place and includes the completion of training to the facilitators and a network of communication. Now, it is an issue of recruiting kinship parents to enroll in the classes. Objective #1: This objective has been met. The three original Extension Educators, the Extension Health and Wellness Specialist,and two nursing faculty members have been trained to deliver the curriculum. Objective #2: We are short of reaching this objective, having held two classes in Montgomery County witha total of 8 kinship parents. Although scheduled, we have been forced to cancel several classes due to the lack of enrolled participants. In response to this, Karen Foli, Project Director, reached out toAida Balsano, Program Officer, for our project to discuss the situation; Ms. Balsanogave verbal authorization in April to expand the geographical reach of our project to additional counties that met the NIFA rural-urban continuum codes. We submitted an amendment to the IRB to recruit from a total of nine counties, which was received. A teleconference with all of the Extension Educators and nursing faculty is scheduled for August 26. During this conference, we will "kick off" our push to increase enrollment in the project. We also requested and received approval from Fay Russell, Assistant Deputy Director Staff Development, Indiana Department of Child Services (DCS), for approval for the kinship classes as foster parent training (up to 15 hours) in all nine counties and include this in our recruitment materials. The team has participated in several teleconferences to discuss strategies to increase our enrollment, and key stakeholders and volunteershave contacted us to learn more about the program. Local DCS directors have also been contacted and the program described to them. A radio spot has been scheduled in September in one of the new counties. Newspaper articles have been written to describe the project to rural dwelling kinship parents.The timing of the classes has also been adjusted to meet the needs of the participants' schedules (evenings and Saturday offerings). We are hopeful that these additional activities will result in higher enrollment in the project. Objective #3: With such a small number of parents who have completed the project, we have not analyzed thedata to date. However, our codebook has been written and approved by our statistician on the project. Data have been collected as outlined in the project proposal. Follow up interviews have been conducted on all 8 participants. The feedback thus far has been overwhelmingly positive. Objective #4: This objective has been met. The team and our consultant havemet via teleconference to discuss the curricular content, how to optimize co-facilitation (nurse faculty pair with Extension Educators), and best practices on leading group discussions within the context of the educational offering. Feedback has been shared by team members and regular conference calls are scheduled and held. Informal feedback from participants has been shared with the team. There is strong team commitment to continue our efforts to recruit to the wider geographic areas.

    Publications