Source: Lucigen Corporation submitted to NRP
MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE FOR PENSIDE DETECTION OF VIRAL PATHOGENS ASSOCIATED WITH PORCINE RESPIRATORY DISEASE COMPLEX
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1003293
Grant No.
2014-33610-22114
Cumulative Award Amt.
$450,000.00
Proposal No.
2014-02607
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2014
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2016
Grant Year
2014
Program Code
[8.3]- Animal Production & Protection
Recipient Organization
Lucigen Corporation
2905 Parmenter Street
Middleton,WI 53562
Performing Department
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Non Technical Summary
Respiratory tract infection in pigs, commonly referred to as "Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex (PRDC)", is a major challenge for the swine industry as it causes significant production and economic losses to producers worldwide. Timely detection of causative agents is required to minimize the spread of infection and reduce economic loses. Current diagnostic methods such as ELISA and PCR are not suitable for field use because of the need for expensive equipment, highly-trained personnel, and a specialized laboratory. At present, no rapid molecular diagnostic kit is available for veterinary use in the field or in small clinics that lack infrastructural support. To address this unmet need, we propose to develop an easy to use "sample-to-answer" molecular diagnostic device for penside detection of the three viral pathogens associated with PRDC: porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSv), swine influenza virus (SIV), and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV-2).The proposed assay will be based on loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) using Lucigen's proprietary thermostable OmniAmp® polymerase, and performed on a simple, easy to use automated molecular detection platform currently being developed by Lucigen. Total assay time will be 40 minutes with minimal hands-on time and without need of any additional equipment, such as pipettes, centrifuge etc. Results will be displayed on-screen as positive or negative for a specific pathogen, minimizing error's caused by user interpretation. This diagnostic device has been designed keeping in mind that people without any specialized training can use it to perform the assay. Once developed, this technology will be used to rapidly develop diagnostic assays for point of care detection of additional veterinary pathogens.During Phase I, we demonstrated feasibility of LAMP assay to detect PRRSv (NA and EU), PCV-2, and SIV (H1N1 and H3N2). The sensitivity of the assays was equivalent to respective real time PCR assays. To facilitate penside testing, we also developed a rapid sample preparation method for extraction of nucleic acid from serum and oral fluid samples. For Phase II studies, our goal is to further optimize the sample preparation method and integrate it with the molecular detection platform being developed. The proposed molecular diagnostic device has three components:1). a sample collection module containing extraction buffer.2). a reaction cartridge.3). the instrument.The cartridge contains the port for nucleic acid extraction, a port for dried LAMP master mix and 16-wells which can be filled with target-specific primers. The cartridge is placed into the instrument which automatically performs all the necessary steps such as sample extraction, thermal incubation and fluorescent detection to generate a positive or negative result for the specific target, or an invalid run.Successful completion of this project will lead to:? Development of molecular diagnostic device for penside detection of PRRSv, SIV, and PCV2.? Total assay time of 40 minutes including sample preparation.? Detection of up to 3 pathogens (PRRSv, SIV, and PCV-2) in a single run.? Dried reagents for storage at ambient temperature.? Simple, easy to use device, with digital read-out and no user interpretation required.? A technology platform that can be used for detection of other pathogens.Development of this innovative molecular diagnostic device will significantly improve the ability of producers to monitor the health of their animals in real time without incurring significant testing costs. Use of this technology will be economically beneficial to producers as this will allow them to test samples penside, saving them money in terms of testing and shipping costs as well as time. Also, enhanced access to in-the-field diagnosis of pathogens will improve
Animal Health Component
50%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
0%
Applied
50%
Developmental
50%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
31140301101100%
Knowledge Area
311 - Animal Diseases;

Subject Of Investigation
4030 - Viruses;

Field Of Science
1101 - Virology;
Goals / Objectives
The goal of this project proposal is to develop an easy to use "sample-to-answer" molecular diagnostic device for penside detection of viral pathogens associated with PRDC that can be used to perform diagnostic assays in field settings. This assay will be based on LAMP technology and performed on an automated molecular detection platform. The results of the assay will be available within 40 minutes, allowing multiple samples to be tested in a short period of time.
Project Methods
Aim 1. Optimization of sample preparation method. In Phase I, we developed a buffer formulation for simple and rapid sample prep and showed its feasibility for extraction of nucleic acid from serum and oral fluid samples. In Phase II, we will further optimize the extraction procedure for detection of all three targeted pathogens (PRRSv, PCV-2, and SIV) from different sample matrices such as serum, oral fluid, and semen.In order to develop a simple and easy to use sample extraction method, sample matrices will be spiked with different concentrations of virus cultures (PCV-2 or SIV or PRRSv) and extracted using the extraction method developed in Phase I. Because of heterogeneity of different sample matrices, it is difficult to formulate a universal extraction buffer and method. To overcome this problem, a sample type-specific buffer formulation and extraction method will be developed. For each sample type the buffer formulation will be optimized by varying the concentration of components. Extraction conditions such as sample volume, buffer concentration, lysis time and temperature, will also be optimized to match the sensitivity of a PCR "gold-standard".Once developed, the extraction method will be used to test pre-characterized positive and negative clinical samples (20 each per virus). The samples will then be extracted and the lysate will be used as template in LAMP for each targeted virus and the results will be compared with those of real time-PCR.Criteria for success: Method will be considered suitable for extraction if it meets following benchmarks:1. Simple, easy to use, and rapid (total time taken for extraction < 5 min.).2. Extracted nucleic acid does not inhibit amplification in LAMP reaction.3. Matches sensitivity and specificity of "gold standard" method.Aim 2. Integration of LAMP assay with the diagnostic platform. The extraction method development and designing of the LAMP primers, as part of Aim 1 of this study, will be integrated into the SCM and reaction cartridge so that the reaction can be carried out on diagnostic platform.The SCM will be filled with the required volume (1-2 ml) of extraction buffer. In the reaction cartridge, the reaction wells will be filled with target specific LAMP primers (1 target/well), whereas the Master Mix well will be filled with the required volume of LAMP reagents (including OmniAmp polymerase). To ensure the room temperature stability of reagents, all components in the reaction cartridge will be dried. The reaction cartridge has a sample heating port for the heat lysis of the sample, which is introduced into the cartridge from the SCM.The device software will be modified so that the reaction wells can be maintained at the required temperatures. Device deigns allow for carrying out reactions at four different temperatures in a single run. As determined in the feasibility study, the optimum temperature for PRRSv and SIV LAMP is 72°C and for PCV-2, it is 70°C. However, it is possible that reaction temperature might need to be optimized further.Extraction from different matrices can require different lysis temperatures, time of incubation, and optimized extraction buffer, therefore each SCM will be bar coded for identification using the built-in bar code reader. This information will allow device software to control the time and temperature of "sample heating well" within preset limits as determined in Aim 1 for a given sample type. MS-2 bacteriophage will be added to the "sample-heating" well as a positive control for both extraction and amplification. Lucigen has already developed the LAMP method for MS-2, and these primers will be added to one of the reaction wells.For optimization of reaction conditions on the diagnostic device, such as lysis time and reaction temperature, the performance of reaction cartridge will be evaluated by testing different dilutions of viruses (SIV, PCV-2, PRRSv-NA, and PRRSv-EU) in extraction buffer.Aim 3. Specificity and sensitivity of the PRDC detection system. Sensitivity of the assay will be determined by testing different dilutions of each virus. For this, 10-fold serial dilutions of each virus will be prepared in different sample matrices (serum, semen, or oral fluid) and added to the SCM and tested in the reaction cartridge. Specificity will be determined by testing serum and oral fluid samples spiked with other swine pathogens, such as porcine respiratory coronavirus, porcine enterovirus, porcine parvovirus, porcine cytomegalovirus, PPV, PEDv and TGEV. These viruses will be obtained from MVDL or KSU.Criteria for success: PRDC molecular detection system will be considered acceptable if it meets the following benchmarks:1. Target amplification within 40 min.2. High specificity with no amplification of any of the non-targeted viruses.3. Sensitivity equal to or better than real time PCR.Aim 4.Clinical validation of PRDC molecular detection system. Once all the reaction conditions have been optimized, we will test a set of known positive and negative samples (serum, oral fluid, semen) on PRDC molecular detection systems. In the past, we have obtained clinical samples from Minnesota Veterinary Diagnostic Lab, Veterinary Diagnostic Labs at Kansas State University and South Dakota State University and for Phase II we will approach these labs for the clinical samples. These samples are usually tested in diagnostic labs, by real time PCR or ELISA, for detection of these pathogens. We will obtain these samples along with associated gold standard test results and use them for our evaluation study.For a given virus and sample type, we plan to test 25 positive and 25 negative samples. At Lucigen, these samples will be tested using the PRDC molecular detection system using the workflow as described earlier and outlined below. Briefly, the sample will be added to the SCM using a swab. The SCM will be inverted and attached to the reagent cartridge, and the bulb squeezed to introduce the extraction buffer containing sample into the cartridge. The SCM is removed, the cartridge placed in the instrument, and the lid closed. By pressing the "start" icon on screen, the run willinitiate. After 40 minutes of incubation, results will be displayed on the screen.Overall criteria for success:1. The PRDC LAMP detection system is simple, easy to use, and rapid (total time for result about 40 minutes).2. Sensitivity and specificity of the assay is equal to PCR-based testing.3. Rapid sample preparation method achieves similar results as standard sample preparation methods.4. The detection system has high clinical sensitivity/specificity and high PPV.

Progress 09/01/15 to 08/31/16

Outputs
Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The overall goal of this project was to develop an easy to use "sample to answer" molecular diagnostic devicefor penside detection of viral pathogens associated with PRDC that can be used to perform diagnostic assays in field settings. Towards this, we previously: 1. Developed LAMP assay for detection of all four target viruses (PRRS-NA, PRRS-EU, PCV-2, and SIV) in under 40 minutes. 2. Designed LAMP assay with single optimum temperature for all four amplification reactions: 70°C. 3. Evaluated sensitivity and specificity of the LAMP assays. 4. Lyophilized complete LAMPformulation to ensure long term stability of reagents. 5. Developed a simple, easy to use sample preparation method for extraction of viral nucleic acid from oral fluid and tissue samples. In this project period, we tried to further optimize the sample preparation method and also tested samples on the molecular diagnostic platform (ClariLight). Results are presented below. 1. Optimization of sample preparation method: Previously, we have developed a simple, rapid, and easy to use sample preparation method for the extraction of nucleic acid from different sample types. This method involves dilution of sample in dilution buffer, filtration, followed by heat lysis (incubation at90°C for 3 min). After lysis, samples(50µL)were used directly to reconstitute lyophilized LAMP formulation followed by isothermal incubation. Using this rapid sample preparation method, viral pathogens (SIV, PCV-2, PRRS-EU, and PRRS-NA) could be detected from different sample matrices, the sensitivity of this method was found to be relatively poor as compared to traditional methods of sample preparation. To further improve the performance of rapid sample preparation method, we tried different strategies such as different levels of sample input, different combination of lysis time and temperature, reformulating dilution buffer and LAMP master mix. However, none of these modification yielded the desired result (>95% sensitivity and specificity) in improving the performance of the sample performance method. 2. Development of Molecular Diagnostic (MDx) Platform: In order to enable on-farm diagnostics, Lucigen has developed a MDx platform, ClariLight™, that circumvents traditional sample preparation steps, and amplifies RNA. The ClariLight™ instrument and related components are being developed as part of Lucigen's effort to develop MDx platform appropriate for use in point-of-care (POC) and development of this platform is funded by Lucigen. We used this platform to develop a "sample to answer" molecular diagnostic devicefor penside detection of viral pathogens. For this, reaction conditions were optimized and individual targets were tested at a moderate level of 102 copies per reaction on separate cartridges. Results were evaluated for inter-assay specificity, background, and resolution; resolution being the ability to differentiate a true positive at from non-specific or background amplification. Sample matrices (oral fluid, serum, and semen) spiked with different levels of targeted virus, were also tested. Results showed All four targets could be detected using this MDx platform. Using extracted RNA, all four targets could be detected with high sensitivity within 30 minutes In presence of sample matrices, PCV-2 could be detected with high sensitivity in all three matrices (oral fluid, serum, and semen). While both SIV and PRRS-EU could be detected directly from sample matrices, sensitivity of assay was poor.

Publications


    Progress 09/01/14 to 08/31/16

    Outputs
    Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? The overall goal of this project was to develop an easy to use "sample to answer" moleculardiagnostic devicefor penside detection of viral pathogens associated with PRDC that can be used to perform diagnostic assays in field settings. Significant achievement: 1. Developed LAMP assay for detection of all four target viruses (PRRS-NA, PRRS-EU, PCV-2, and SIV) in under 40 minutes. 2. Designed LAMP assay with single optimum temperature for all four amplification reactions: 70°C. 3. Evaluated sensitivity and specificity of the LAMP assays. 4. Lyophilized complete LAMPformulation to ensure long term stability of reagents. 5. Developed a simple, easy to use sample preparation method. 6. Detection of viral pathogens using a fully automated "sample to answer" molecular detection system (ClariLight™). Optimization of LAMP assay:While LAMP assay for each of the targeted viruses were designed and optimized in Phase I, we reoptimized reaction conditions so that all four assays could be carried out at the same temperature. For all four assays 70°C was found to be optimum. Furthermore, we compared the sensitivity of all four assays with real time RT-PCR using commercial kits (Table 1). Table 1. Comparison of sensitivities of real time PCR and PRDC LAMP assay. Dilutions PRRS-NA PRRS-EU SIV H1N1 SIV H3N2 PCV-2 RT-PCR LAMP RT-PCR LAMP RT-PCR LAMP RT-PCR LAMP RT-PCR LAMP 1:10-1 18.88 15.55 16.50 9.14 20.65 15.32 18.75 16.30 16.03 10.25 1:10-2 22.16 14.97 20.19 7.80 24.05 14.38 22.25 14.44 18.30 11.58 1:10-3 25.44 17.15 23.93 10.35 27.75 16.37 25.85 18.36 21.80 13.35 1:10-4 28.75 19.92 27.59 19.14 30.95 21.77 28.95 26.24 25.40 15.08 1:10-5 32.01 27.08 31.15 34.15 33.80 32.50 31.85 33.81 29.23 17.35 1:10-6 35.09 ND* 34.44 26.00 36.30 43.33 33.55 33.91 32.80 21.00 1:10-7 39.81f ND NT** NT 38.15 NT 34.55 NT 36.70 25.15 *ND: not detected;**NT: not tested Lyophilization of LAMP reagents and stability studies:In order to ensure room temperature stability of amplification reagents, complete LAMP reagent formulation (enzyme, buffers, dye, and target specific primers) sufficient for a single reaction was dispensed and lyophilized in PCR strip tubes. Tubes were packed with a desiccant and stored at different temperatures (22°C and 35°C). Reaction tubes were tested at different intervals of time and reagent stability was assessed on the basis of LAMP performance.Results showed that lyophilized formulations were stable at 22°C for up to 1 month without any significant loss in activity. Development and optimization of sample preparation method: In order to facilitate the extraction of viral nucleic acid from samples (oral fluid, nasal swabs, blood) in the field, a rapid, simple, and easy sample preparation method was developed. For this purpose, we developed a proprietary buffer which is stable at room temperature and does not contain any harmful chemicals. This method involves: dilution of the sample (2% for oral fluid and 3% for tissue) in the extraction buffer followed by incubation at 90°C for 3 min. After incubation,the resultant solution is used as a template. This method was validated by testing oral fluid samples spiked with virus (PCV-2 or PRRS-EU). Oral fluid samples were spiked with different dilutions of virus (PCV-2 or PRRS-EU) and nucleic acid was extracted using the method described above. For use as a control, extraction buffer was spiked with different dilutions of virus followed by heat lysis. Results presented in Table 2, show that using this rapid sample preparation method, viral pathogens (SIV, PCV-2, PRRS-EU, and PRRS-NA) could be detected from different sample matrices, the sensitivity of this method is relatively poor as compared to traditional methods of sample preparation. To further improve the performance of rapid sample preparation method, we tried different strategies such as different levels of sample input, different combination of lysis time and temperature, reformulating dilution buffer and LAMP master mix. However, none of these modification yielded the desired result (>95% sensitivity and specificity) in improving the performance of the sample performance method. Table 2. Testing of clinical samples by PRDC LAMP assay Sample type Target virus Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Oral fluid PCV-2 82 (n=11) 100 (n=8) PRRS-EU 92 (n=12) 57 (n=7) PRRS-NA 88 (n=8) 100 (n=4) Tissue PCV-2 89 (n=9) 45 (n=11) Development of Molecular Diagnostic (MDx) Platform: In order to enable on-farm diagnostics, Lucigen has developed a MDx platform, ClariLight™ that circumvents traditional sample preparation steps, and amplifies RNA. This platform consists of three components: a sample collection module (SCM), cartridge, and instrument.We used this platform to develop a "sample to answer" molecular diagnostic devicefor penside detection of viral pathogens. For this, reaction conditions were optimized and individual targets were tested using extracted RNA (clean system) as well as in the presence of clinical matrix (using spiked samples). Clean system performance: Cartridges were prepared with each of the four assays per cartridge; each assay specific primers were air dried in each of the blocks of wells. Individual blocks contain four separate reaction wells; individual blocks can be set to different temperatures. In this case blocks were set to the assay specific LAMP temperatures, Block 1: PRRS-EU 74°C, Block 2: PRRS-NA 72°C, Block 3 SIV 72°C, Block 4 70°C. Individual targets were tested at a moderate level of 102 copies per reaction on separate cartridges. The results were evaluated for inter-assay specificity and background. Results presented below in Table 3, shows that are 4 targets could be detected within 30 minutes. Table 3: Detection of PCV-2, SIV H1N1, PRRS (EU and NA) on ClariLight MDx. Target Positive Time To Result (TTR) min Negative TTR (min) PRRS-EU 14.0 34.4 PRRS-NA 14.7 32.7 SIV H1N1 10.5 34.0 PCV-2 9.6 ND* *ND = Not detected. No amplification was detected at indicated dilution. Sensitivity: Analytical sensitivity on cartridge was demonstrated with SIV being a representative assay. SIV (H1N1) target was diluted down to 101 copies/RxN and run in a clean system. Cartridges were prepared with all four assay specific primers dried in the reaction wells in each of the block of wells. Target levels tested were 6.0E+02, 6.0E+01, and NTC with single cartridge per level. Results are presented below in Table 4.These results indicate that viral targets can be detected using this MDx platform with high sensitivity and there is no non-specific amplification. Table 4: Analytical sensitivity of LAMP assay for the detection of SIV H1N1 using ClariLight MDx Target Concentration (copies per reaction) Time to result (min) 6.0E+02 10.88 6.0E+01 16.75 Negative control ND* *ND = Not detected. No amplification was detected at indicated dilution. Relative Sensitivity in Matrix: Sensitivity impacted by matrix was tested with targets PRRS-EU, SIV (H1N1), and PCV-2. Each target/matix was tested by spiking tissue culture samples into swine oral fluid, semen, or serum. Each target was tested concurrently with target added in a serial dilution fashion in 2% of a given matrix. Each matrix was spiked with 1:10, 1:100, and 1:1000 tissue culture: matrix. 34µL of the tissue culture diluted in matrix was added to 1666µL of buffer (2%) which was directly added to the cartridge. Sample matrices (oral fluid, serum, and semen) spiked with different levels of targeted virus, were also tested. Results showed All four targets could be detected using this MDx platform. Using extracted RNA, all four targets could be detected with high sensitivity within 30 minutes In presence of sample matrices, PCV-2 could be detected with high sensitivity in all three matrices (oral fluid, serum, and semen). While both SIV and PRRS-EU could be detected directly from sample matrices, sensitivity of assay was poor.

    Publications


      Progress 09/01/14 to 08/31/15

      Outputs
      Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?1. Stability study of lyophilized LAMP reagents:We have presented preliminary data in year 1 report. We plan to continue this study and aim is to genrate6-month and 1-year stability data for all targeted viruses (PRRS, PCV-2, and SIV). Stability will be assessed based on LAMP performance using positive and negative controls. Performance of stored reagents will be assessed on several criteria including: 1) time to results; 2) no background or non-specific amplification within 40 minutes; and 3) Sensitivity and specificity. 2. Optimization of sample preparation method: The rapid sample preparation method will be further optimized in order to increase its sensitivity and specificity. Preliminary results presented in year 1 report, shows that sample preparation method has low specificity. Our aim is to have > 95% sensitivity and speificty for the assay. Sample preparation method will be further optimized in order to achieve this target. 3. Integration of LAMP assay with the diagnostic platform: Once molecular diagnostic platform and its associated component are ready, we will integrate thesample preparation method with LAMP assay using lyophilized reagents, so that the reaction can be carried out on thediagnostic platform. Sensitivity of the assay will be determined by testing different dilutions of each virus. For this, 10-fold serial dilutions of each virus will be prepared in different sample matrices (serum, semen, or oral fluid) and added to the SCM and tested in the reaction cartridge. Specificity will be determined by testing serum and oral fluid samples spiked with other swine pathogens, such as porcine respiratory coronavirus, porcine enterovirus, porcine parvovirus, porcine cytomegalovirus, PPV, PEDv and TGEV. 4. Clinical validation of PRDC molecular detection system: Once all the reaction conditions have been optimized, we will test a set of known positive and negative samples (serum, oral fluid, semen) on PRDC molecular detection systems.These samples will be obtained from ISU, AMes, IA.We will obtain these samples along with associated gold standard test results and use them for our evaluation study. For a given virus and sample type, we plan to test 25 positive and 25 negative samples. At Lucigen, these samples will be tested using the PRDC molecular detection system using the workflow as described in year 1 report. Briefly, the sample will be added to the SCM using a swab (step 1). The SCM will be inverted and attached to the reagent cartridge (step 2), and the bulb squeezed to introduce the extraction buffer containing sample into the cartridge. The SCM is removed, the cartridge placed in the instrument, and the lid closed (step 3). Clinical evaluation of the PRDC LAMP system will be done using blinded clinical samples and test performance will be calculated using the criteria as described below. 5. Publications: We plan to publish our work in peer reviewed scientific journals. We will also approach various veterinary diagnostic labs for demostration of PRDC test system and get their feedback.

      Impacts
      What was accomplished under these goals? Significant achievements: Under 40 minute detection of all four target viruses (PRRS-NA, PRRS-EU, PCV-2, and SIV). Single optimum temperature for all four amplification reactions: 70°C. Sensitivity and specificity of the LAMP assays is similar to real time RT-PCR. To ensure shelf stable reagents, complete LAMP formulation was lyophilized. Stability studies are in progress. Developed a simple, easy to use sample preparation method for extraction of viral nucleic acid from oral fluid and tissue samples. 1. Optimization of LAMP assay: While LAMP assay for each of the targeted viruses were designed and optimized in Phase I, we reoptimized reaction conditions so that all four assays could be carried out at the same temperature. For all four assays 70°C was found to be optimum. Furthermore, we compared the sensitivity of all four assays with real time RT-PCR using commercial kits. 2. Lyophilization of LAMP reagents and stability studies: In order to ensure room temperature stability of amplification reagents, complete LAMP reagent formulation (enzyme, buffers, dye, and target specific primers) sufficient for a single reaction was dispensed and lyophilized in PCR strip tubes. Tubes were packed with a desiccant and stored at different temperatures (22°C and 35°C). Reaction tubes were tested at different intervals of time and reagent stability was assessed on the basis of LAMP performance. We will continue to assess long term (6 months to 1 year) stability of dried reagents. This will be done for all targets. 3. Development and optimization of sample preparation method: In order to facilitate the extraction of viral nucleic acid from samples (oral fluid, nasal swabs, blood) in the field, a rapid, simple, and easy sample preparation method was developed. For this purpose, we developed a proprietary buffer which is stable at room temperature and does not contain any harmful chemicals such as Guanidine thiocynate, a reagent which is commonly used in commercial DNA and RNA extraction kits. This method involves: dilution of the sample (2% for oral fluid and 3% for tissue) in the extraction buffer followed by incubation at 90°C for 3 min. After incubation, the resultant solution is used as a template. This method was validated by testing oral fluid samples spiked with virus (PCV-2 or PRRS-EU). Oral fluid samples were spiked with different dilutions of virus (PCV-2 or PRRS-EU) and nucleic acid was extracted using the method described above. For use as a control, extraction buffer was spiked with different dilutions of virus followed by heat lysis. Results showed that this newly developed sample preparation method can be used for extraction of nucleic acid from oral fluid samples and there was no inhibition of amplification reaction. This sample preparation method was used to test clinical samples. Clinical samples were provided by Dr. Kyoung-Jin Yoon, Iowa State University (ISU), Ames, IA. All these samples were previously tested by real time RT-PCR at ISU. At Lucigen, samples were extracted using the sample preparation method as described above. Resultant template was used to reconstitute lyophilized LAMP reagents followed by incubation at 70°C in a thermocycler. These studies are ongoing and preliminary results shows good sensitivity of this method for detection of PCV and PRRS viruses in oral fluid samples. However, sensitvity of this method was found to be lower.Our aim is to further optimize the sample preparation method to achieve >95% sensitivity and specificity. For this,we will further optimise the sample preparation method as well as reaction conditions to achieve targeted sensitivity and specifcity. 4. Development of Molecular Diagnostic (MDx) Platform: In order to enable on-farm diagnostics, Lucigen has developed a MDx platform that circumvents traditional sample preparation steps, and amplifies RNA. This platform consists of three components: sample collection module;reaction cartridge; and instrument. All 3 components are in final stages of design, with manufacturing beginning in another month or so. Currently, we are in integration phase where all three components will be tested together to ensure proper workflow. Once this step is complete (by the end of 3rd quarter) production will start. The ClariLight™ instrument and related components are being developed as part of Lucigen's effort to develop MDx platform appropriate for use in point-of-care (POC) and CLIA-waived settings. Development of this platform is funded by Lucigen.

      Publications