Recipient Organization
SOUTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
ORANGEBURG,SC 29117
Performing Department
Home Economics/Human Services
Non Technical Summary
When reviewing all child care programs in South Carolina, only a few can be thought of providing quality early care and development based on national accreditation best practice or regulatory compliance. The shared problem among these two different standards of quality in South Carolina differs little from what most research concludes: quality is highly correlated with a developmentally appropriate curriculum and the consistent implementation of developmentally appropriate practice in regard to teacher/child interactions. Inadequate implementation of developmentally appropriate practice in a child care center often translates as poorly implemented child care center. Parents who send their children to such programs--many of which are often the most affordable to them--are at a disadvantage and are endanger of being unprepared for formal schooling.The purpose of this study is (1) to explore the quality of assessment, curriculum, and interaction between early childhood educators and children in Orangeburg, Calhoun, Bamberg, Barnwell, Allendale early childhood programs; and (2) to record the structural characteristics of these early childhood programs. Data will collected in 10 center based early childhood private/non-profit programs in OCAB (Orangeburg, Calhoun County, Allendale, Bamberg, Barnwell) Head Start Geographic Area using the ECERS, CLASS, and ASQ early childhood classroom structural/environmental instruments. Collected data analyzed using quantitative (correlational) and qualitative (content analysis methods) and decisions will be made as to whether differentiated levels of technical assistance are needed to raise child care centers in these counties as whole to a higher level of quality or whether a new curricular approach needs to be designed to meet such needs for these centers because of their unique characteristics and child nurturing needs. Expected results are that rural based early childhood programs utilize less high quality assessment curricular practices than more urban-based centers and that both rural and more urban centers practice a very similar type of developmentally appropriate teaching approach. Benefits to the university education early childhood program for accreditation purposes are set as possible medium and long term goals.
Animal Health Component
25%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
75%
Applied
25%
Developmental
(N/A)
Goals / Objectives
The goals of this project are: (1) to explore the quality of assessment, curriculum, and interaction between early childhood educators and children in Orangeburg, Calhoun, Bamberg, Barnwell, Allendale early childhood programs; and (2) to record the structural characteristics of these early childhood programs.
Project Methods
This will be a mixed-methods, comparative and contrasting study which will utilize semi-structure interviews, Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) Observational Data, CLASS Teacher Observational Data, Class Artifact Collecting, and electronic surveys. The population will be all early childhood child care center-based programs in Orangeburg Consolidated School Districts 4,5,6; Calhoun County School District; Allendale School District; Barnwell School District 19; Bamberg County School District 2 Correlations among structural characteristics (i.e. caregiver educational level, curriculum, adult:child ratio, daily schedule, etc.) and type of interaction are examined along with a qualitative investigation (via participant observation) of adult/child and child/child interactions. Correlations will be conducted using the "curriculum" and "interaction" and "schedule" scales of the Early Childhood Environmental Scale (ECERS), the interaction scales for the ASQ, and the teacher practice section of the CLASS. Qualitative investigation will be conducted via participant observations using running records, anecdotal records, checklists, and teacher interviews. First, the PI will identify two centers each in Orangeburg, Calhoun, Allendale, Barnwell, and Bamberg that are considered high quality based on whether they have (1) NAEYC Accreditation or (2) attain a "A" or "B+" rating on the SC Department of Social Services ABC Scale. The necessary IRB permissions will be attained to solidify the participant list of centers. Second, the PI will schedule a time to (a) visit the center staying all day or from 8am-12pm so that he can see a full cycle of the daily schedule and (b) interview that center's lead teacher on their curricular and teacher/student interactions. During the observation period, the PI will score the environment using the ECERS-R (which takes two hours), ASQ, and CLASS. The PI will also collect qualitative data on the environment. Third, the PI in conjunction where necessary with 1890 Research staff will analyze and disaggregate the data. Fourth, the research questions will be answers and a decision will be made as to whether the current centers only need more technical assistance or whether there is a significant, evidence-based need to design a curriculum to meet the needs of these populations of children.This is a basic chronological step-by-step breakdown of how the study's methodology will proceed:1. Invite among centers in Orangeburg, Calhoun, Allendale, Bamberg, Barnwell Counties to participate in study on DAP Assessment, Curriculum, and Strategies utilized in their centers. (SUMMER 2014) 2. Oriented centers that volunteer for project on how the process will proceed. (SUMMER 2014)3. Train self and staff to utilize assessment instruments. Assign a staff member to each county to conduct observations/interviews. (FALL 2014)4. Staff members observe utilizing Assessment Instrument 1 on a regular basis conducting three observations each week for six months.(JANUARYJUNE 2014)5. Staff members analyze/disaggregate/share results with stakeholders at conferences/programs.6. Staff members observe utilizing Assessment Instrument Two on a regular basis for six months conducting three observations each week. (JULY 2014-DECEMBER 2014)7. Staff members disaggregate/analyze/share data results with stakeholders at conferences and with specific child care programs. (JANUARY 2015-JUNE 2015)8. Data from both iterations are compared and contrasted with conclusions being drawn about the level and type of DAP Assessment, Curriculum, and Practices being utilized in participant programs according to objectives and goals. (June 2015-July 2015)9. Specific Assessment, Curriculum, and Teaching Practice interventions designed in response to research data analysis. (July 2015-May 2016)10. Specific Assessment, Curriculum, and Teaching Practice Interventions presented to stakeholders (i.e. 1890 Research and Extension) at Conferences and aimed at specific programs. (June 2016- end of research)