Source: LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
EFFECTS OF INSECTICIDE APPLICATION ON TARGET AND NON-TARGET SPECIES
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1002914
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
May 29, 2014
Project End Date
Apr 8, 2018
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
202 HIMES HALL
BATON ROUGE,LA 70803-0100
Performing Department
Entomology
Non Technical Summary
Insecticides are effective toxins: they kill insects that are susceptible to them. Unfortunately, there is a small percentage of insects that are not susceptible and are not killed. These resistant insects remain after the susceptible insects are killed, and may pose serious problems as agricultural pests, or as vectors of human or animal diseases. The major goal of the research proposed here is to develop methods to identify how resistant insects survive exposure to insecticides that are normally lethal, then to use this knowledge to develop strategies for overcoming resistance. The specific objectives of this research are to measure the susceptibility to insecticides in agricultural pests and mosquitoes, and use biochemical tests to determine how resistant insects differ from susceptible insects such that they can survive insecticide treatments. In addition, the effects of insecticides used in mosquito abatement efforts on domestic honey bee production will be determined. Once this is known, insecticide use strategies can be modified such that only the most effective insecticides are used, and contamination of the urban and agricultural environments by overuse of potentially harmful chemicals is minimized.
Animal Health Component
65%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
35%
Applied
65%
Developmental
0%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
21131101150100%
Knowledge Area
211 - Insects, Mites, and Other Arthropods Affecting Plants;

Subject Of Investigation
3110 - Insects;

Field Of Science
1150 - Toxicology;
Goals / Objectives
The major goal of this project is to optimize management strategies used against agricultural and urban pests in Louisiana by developing countermeasures for insecticide resistance where it develops, and by minimizing non-target effects of insecticide sprays. Specific objectives are to:1.) Use biochemical technologies to study mechanisms of resistance in Lepidopteran pests of agricultural crops.2.) Develop methods for detection and characterization of resistance mechanisms in populations of the Southern house mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus, an important vector of human and animal diseases in Louisiana.3.) Test the hypothesis that organophosphorus insecticides, when used at sublethal doses, can synergize toxicity of ester- containing insecticides against the Southern house mosquito, Cx. quinquefasciatus; and4.) Determine effects of insecticides used in urban mosquito control programs (mainly, pyrethroids and organophosphates) on non-target organisms, including the honey bee, Apis mellifera.
Project Methods
Insects (i.e., Lepidopteran pests and mosquitoes) will be collected from the field and reared in the laboratory. My approach for detecting metabolic resistance in both groups of insect pest will be similar to that taken in studying pyrethroid resistance inHeliothisvirescens. These previous studies suggest that two major groups of detoxifying enzymes (esterases and P450 monooxygenases) are associated with resistance to pyrethroids in this insect. In the current study, pharmacokinetic and spectrophotometric assays will be used to examine the role of insecticide- metabolizing enzymes (predominantly P450 monooxygenases, esterases and glutathione S-transferases) in resistance to insecticides in laboratory- selected and field-collected strains of pest insects.For biological assays with lepidopteran pests (Objective 1), susceptibility to insecticides will be examined using diet incorporation or topical bioassays. For diet incorporation assays, larvae (third stadium, day 1) will be placed on artificial diet containing various concentrations of insecticide (technical grade). Methods for biological assays with mosquitoes (Objective 2) will differ. For immature mosquitoes, larvae will be reared in pans containing distilled water and, at the first day of the thrid instar, trasfered to dishes containing measured concetratons of insecticide. Mortality will be determined at 2 days post-treatment, with "death" defined as he inability to move within 30 seconds after being prodded with a fine hair paintbrush. At least five concentrations (or doses) will be tested using 10 larvae per assay. In addition, susceptibility of adult Cx. quinquefasciatus to insecticides will be assayed using the WHO bottle assay, as described by Brogdon et al. (1999). Following evaporation of solvent, 10 adult mosquitoes will be placed into 15 ml scintillation vials that have been pretreated with insecticide solutions in acetone. Mortality will be scored at 1, 12, 24, and 48 hours, and insects will be considered dead if they are incapable of coordinated movement. At least five concentrations of each insecticide will be tested, and three determinations will be made for each concentration. Data will be analyzed as described above.Larval tissues (fat bodies and midguts) from fifth instars Lepidoteran pests or whole bodies of third instar mosquitoes will be dissected and homogenized in ice cold, 1.15% KCl using a glass on glass tissue homogenizer. The resulting homogenate will be centrifuged (1,000g, 10 min, 4oC) to remove debris, and then diluted into buffer of appropriate pH for measurement of enzyme activities. Protein concentrations will be determined according to the method of Bradford (1976), using bovine serum albumin (fraction V, concentrations corrected for impurities) as the standard.Spectrophotometry with model (non-insecticide) substrates (for example, 2, 4- dichloronitrobenzene, p-nitroanisole, and S-methyl thiobutyrate) will be used to determine involvement of detoxifying enzymes. The major advantage of spectrophotometric assays (relative to the thin- layer chromatography assay) is that they are rapid, less labor- intensive, and high throughput. In addition, in most cases, the products of these reactions are colored; thus, these assays are amenable to modification for use in-field without a spectrophotometer.For synergists tests with mosquitoes (Objective 3), non-toxic doses of a number of organophosphate compounds will be tested as inhibitors of esterase activity (in biochemical assays) and as synergists of resmethrin toxicity (in biological assays). For purposes of comparison, activities of each compound in the two assays will be compared to that of S- S- S- tributylphosphorotrithioate (DEF). Compounds to be tested include: dibrom, acephate, etrimfos, and chlorpyrifos. Each of these compounds has a relatively low mammalian toxicity (< 400 mg/kg, rat oral), and is considered an appropriate candidate for potential field use as an insecticide synergist.In preliminary tests, the maximal sublethal concentrations of each compound will be determined in topical bioassays. Ten, adult Cx. quinquefasciatus will be treated topically on the thoracic dorsum with serial doses of each compound (1 µl, in acetone), then introduced into 15 ml scintillation vials capped with moistened cotton plugs. Mortality will be scored at 1, 12, 24, and 48 hours, and insects will be considered dead if they are incapable of coordinated movement. In subsequent assays, adult mosquitoes (10 per dose) from field-collected or laboratory-susceptible strains will be treated topically with sublethal concentrations of synergists then, 30 minutes later, introduced into scintillation vials containing residues of resmethrin at a concentration equivalent to the LC30. Once again, mortality will be scored at 1, 12, 24, and 48 hours, and insects will be considered dead if they are incapable of coordinated movement. Control vials will contain either acetone only, resmethrin only, or insects pretreated with synergists but not exposed to resmethrin. Each assay will be done in triplicate, and three determinations will be made for each compound. Compounds will be considered synergists if mortality in the presence of the compound is significantly greater than in the presence of resmethrin alone. Mortalities will be compared using a generalized linear model (SAS, PROC GLIMMIX) with a binomial distribution.For Objective 4, topical bioassays with honey bees will be used to determine relative toxicities of insecticides used in local mosquito abatement efforts. These data will provide a measure of relative toxicity of these insecticides that is internally consistent and will serve as a foundation for studies comparing insecticide toxicities among honey bee strains. In addition, we will use these bioassays to evaluate effects of pre-exposure to commonly used miticides on insecticide toxicity. We hypothesize that Russian, Carniolan, and Italian bees will differ in their susceptibility due to different grooming behaviors and overall size, and that mite management strategies will impact insecticide toxicity.Toxicity will be measured in topical assays with five commonly used mosquito adulticides from different insecticide classes. Insecticides tested will include: malathion, naled, resmethrin, etofenprox, and a dual-action insecticide containing phenothrin and prallethrin. For all bioassays, insecticides will be dissolved in acetone, and applied as a 1 μl droplet onto the prothoracic dorsum of 3 day old bees that were pre-weighed and anesthetized with carbon dioxide. Five to eight concentrations will be used to define log dose-probit relationships for each insecticide. Each assay will be performed in triplicate (10 bees per replicate) and determined 3-5 times on different days and with different groups of bees. Mortality will be defined as absence of coordinated movement within 15 seconds of being prodded with a sharpened pencil and will be assessed 48 hours after treatment. Results will be analyzed as described above.Similar biological assays will be used to measure possible synergists effects between miticides and insecticides. Adult bees will be pretreated topically with a maximum, sublethal concentration of miticide (Amitraz or Thymnol) then, 30 min later, a dose of insecticide corresponding to the LD50 will be topically applied. Mortality (defined and measured as above) will be compared in the absence and presence of the miticide, and synergism ratios (SRs) will be calculated as: (mortality measured in treatments with insecticide+ miticide)/(mortality with insecticide alone). Ratios significantly greater than 1 will used as an indication of synergism.

Progress 05/29/14 to 04/08/18

Outputs
Target Audience:Local and national beekeeping organizations benefited directly from results of studies. In addition, mosquito abatement personnel(specifically, the office inEast Baton Rouge Parish) were directly involved and benefitted by this work. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Two graduate students, Vivek Pohkel and Nic DeLisi, received extensive training in toxicology and biochemistry in my lab during the duration of this project. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results from this project were presented annually at statewide and national meetings of the Mosquito Control Association. In addition, local mosquito abatement districts (notably,East Baton Rouge Parish) were directly involved in these studies and were updated regularly on their progress. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1- Distribution of neonicotinoid insecticides within rice plants was studied and correlated with observed toxicity in life stages feeding on various plant parts. These data explain the differential toxicity observed between neonicotinoid insecticides, and among different life stages of the rice water weevil, an important lepidopterous pest of rice in Louisiana. Objective 2- Baselines for insecticide toxicity in the Southern house mosquito, an important vector of the virus causing West Nile Disease in the southern US. Toxicities of chlorpyrifos (an organophosphate) and permethrin (a pyrethroid) were measured in a laboratory- susceptible strain of this mosquito. Objective 3- Mixtures of chlopyrifos and permethrin were shown to be highly synergistic in susceptible Cu. quinquefasciatus. Objective 4- Toxicities of a variety of pyrethroid and organophosphorus insecticides that are used in urban mosquito abatement programs were tested in laboratory and field bioassays against honey bees from four different strains. Susceptibility varied among insecticides, and was strain- and age- dependent. We also showed that insecticides used in abatment programs, when used according to label, had minimal, adverse effects on backyard hives of honey bees.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Accepted Year Published: 2018 Citation: Pokhrel, V., DeLisi, N., Danka, R., Walker, T., Ottea, J., and Healy, K. (2018). Effects of truck- mounted, ultra low volume mosquito adulticides on honey bees (Apis mellifera) in a suburban field setting. PLoS One 13 (3): e0193535


Progress 10/01/16 to 09/30/17

Outputs
Target Audience: Changes/Problems:We will continue to focus on effects of exposure to insecticides from abatement efforts on insecticide susceptibility, but will expand inquiry into other, off target selection by agricultural insecticides and industrial byproducts. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This project has provided extensive opportunity for graduate training in both field and laboratory aspects of mosquito toxicology. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Results have been presented to mosquito abatement personell, industry representatives, and academic scientists at the American Mosquito Control Association meetingand at regional scientific meetings (e.g., the Southeastern Branch of the Entomological Society of America). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Efforts will be expanded to examine effects of exposure to larvicides on adult susceptibility. Also, effects of effluents from agricultural fields and industrial plants on larval susceptibility to insecticideswill be described.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Effects of frequent insecticide applications for the control of mosquitoes in East Baton Rouge Parish on susceptibility of wild Cx. quinquefasciatusto three larvicides (Bacillus sphaericus, spinosad, and temephos) were measured. Susceptibilities of mosquito populationsfrom sites in three Parishes where frequencies of insecticide applications varied were measured and compared to a susceptible reference colony. Whereas widespread susceptibilitiesto Bacillus sphaericusandspinosad were measured, four-fold resistance totemephos (an organophosphate) was detected at one site in East Baton Rouge Parish in the spring of 2016, which increased to eight-fold resistance by the end of the mosquito season. Activities of esterases were found to be elevated in these mosquitoes, indicating a potential role for enhanced metabolism bythese enzymes as a mechanism of resistance. The results of this study provide a baseline of comparison that will be expanded uponin 2018.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Accepted Year Published: 2017 Citation: N DeLisi, J Ottea, K Healy; Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Southern Louisiana to Larval Insecticides, Journal of Economic Entomology, , tox244, https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tox244 Rinkevich, F. D., J. W. Margotta, V. Pokhrel, T. W. Walker, R. H. Vaeth, W. C. Hoffman, B. K. Fritz, R. G. Danka, T. E. Rinderer, R. L. Aldridge, K. J. Linthicum, J. A. Ottea, and K. B. Healy. 2017. Limited impacts of truck-based ultra-low-volume applications of mosquito adulticides on mortality in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Bull Entomol Res: 1-10.


Progress 10/01/15 to 09/30/16

Outputs
Target Audience:American Mosquito Control Association professionals, academics, Louisiana beekeepers, East Baton Rouge Mosquito and Rodent Control. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?This objective provides an excellent opportunity for graduate student training in both laboratory and field situations. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?Results have been presented to beekeepers and at regional scientific meetings (e.g., the Southeastern Branch of the Entomological Society of America). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?During 2017, synergism of the toxicity of pyrethroid insecticide in southern house mosquitoes will be examined.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Effects of mosquito adulticides applied as ultra-low volume sprayson the health of honey bees were examined. Nine experimental sites were established that contained domesticated/commercial hives of honey bees. Five were exposed to routine sprays (i.e., as needed, < 30 minutes after sundown)from trucks of the East Baton Rouge Mosquito and Rodent Contol, and four were unsprayed. Mortality from all nine sites was very low (<2%) and did not differ significantly among treatment and controls. Other parameters of colony health (i.e., brood size and number) also did not differ significantly among control and treated sites. Inaddition to colony health and mortality, detoxication enzyme activities were measured from samples of bees collected at experimental sites in an attempt to validate use of these activities as biomarkers for insecticide exposure. Whereas deposition of insecticide droplets was measured at stations near the colonies, no differences in either esterase or glutathione S-transferase activities were measured among sprayed and unsprayed colonies. Thus, it appears that these enzymes are not useful markers for real world levels of exposure to the insecticides sprayed.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2016 Citation: Rinkevich, F. D., Margotta, J. W., Pittman, J. M., Ottea, J. A., and Healy, K. B. (2016). Pteridine levels and head weights are correlated with age and colony task in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Peer J. 4:e2155.


Progress 10/01/14 to 09/30/15

Outputs
Target Audience:East Baton Rouge Mosquito Abatement and Rodent Control, Clarke Chemical Company, Louisiana Beekeepers, Academics Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?One postdoctoral and two graduate students participated in these studies. All personnel had the opportunity to learn basic and applied priniciples of insecticide toxicology. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?These results have been presented at the National Meeting of the Entomological Society of America, at numerous local meetings of the Louisiana Beekeepers Association, and at national meetings of the Louisiana and American Mosquito Control Associations. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?Southern house mosquitoes will be collected from across the state during 2016, and the susceptibilities of both larval and adult stages to currently used insecticides will be measured and compared with that of the laboratory reference strain. For strains in which susceptibility is reduced, methods will be developed to determine the associatedmechanisms.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? A reference-susceptible strain of Culex quinquefasciatus was established in the laboratory, and its toxicological profile is being established for comparisons with field-collected strains.Detoxication enzyme activities (esterases and glutathione S-transferases) were measured in these insects, and were found to be similar to those published previously. In addition, a project was initiated to measure insecticide susceptibility in larval insects from this strain, and compare them with those from field collections made in 2016. The susceptibilitiesof adult mosquitoes and honey bees to commonly sprayed pyrethroid and organophosphate insecticides were measured and compared in field trials. Results suggest that there areconsiderable difference in susceptibility to these insecticides between the two species and that, for most of the insecticides tested, honey bees were less susceptible than mosquitoes. In addition, we initiated studies to determine effects of miticides (amitraz and coumaphos) on honey bee health. Results to this point suggest that coumaphos has lasting effects on esterase activities in adult bees. The ramifications of these effects on honey bee health are being explored further.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2015 Citation: Genetics, Synergists, and Age Affect Insecticide Sensitivity of the Honey Bee, Apis mellifera Rinkevich FD, Margotta JW, Pittman JM, Danka RG, Tarver MR, Ottea, JA, and Healy, KB (2015) Genetics, Synergists, and Age Affect Insecticide Sensitivity of the Honey Bee, Apis mellifera. PLoS ONE 10(10): e0139841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139841


Progress 05/29/14 to 09/30/14

Outputs
Target Audience: East Baton Rouge Mosquito Abatement and Rodent Control; Clarke Chemical Company Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Two postdoctoral scientists participated in these studies. Both learned basic and applied principles of insecticide toxicology. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Results were presented at the National Meeting of the Entomological Society of America during a section dedicated to honey bee health. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Emphasis will be placed on Objectives 2-4. We will use field collections of mosquitoes to measure and characterize resistance to organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides. In collections for which resistance is measured, we will explore potential for insecticide synergism by determining the efficacy of insecticide mixtures. Finally, we will measureeffects of mites (and miticides) on susceptibility to insecticides in honey bees.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1- Distribution of neonicotinoid insecticides within rice plants was studied and correlated with observed toxicity in life stages feeding on various plant parts. These data explain the differential toxicity observed between neonicotinoid insecticides, and among different life stages of the rice water weevil, an important lepidopterous pest of rice in Louisiana. Objective 2- We continue to establish baselines for insecticide toxicity in the Southern house mosquito, an important vector of the virus causing West Nile Disease in the southern US. Toxicities of chlorpyrifos (an organophosphate) and permethrin (a pyrethroid) were measured in a laboratory- susceptible strain of this mosquito. Objective 3- Mixtures of the insecticides used in Objective 2 were tested to determine potential synergistic effects. Objective 4- Toxicities of a variety of pyrethroid and organophosphorus insecticides that are used in urban mosquito abatement programs were tested in laboratory and field bioassays against honey bees from four different strains. Susceptibility varied among insecticides, and was strain- and age- dependent.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2014 Citation: Lanka, SK, Stout MJ, Beuzelin JM, and Ottea J. A. (2014) Activity of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam seed treatments on life stages of the rice water weevil as affected by the distribution of insecticides in rice plants. Pest Manag. Sci. 70: 338-44.
  • Type: Books Status: Published Year Published: 2014 Citation: Stout, M. and Ottea, J. (2014). Conversations at the Intersection of Science and Society. 2nd Edition. Cognella Publishing, San Diego.