Source: UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND submitted to NRP
TAILORING THE EXPANDED FOOD AND NUTRITION EDUCATION PROGRAM TO OBESITY AND CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
1001894
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Dec 9, 2013
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2017
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND
19 WOODWARD HALL 9 EAST ALUMNI AVENUE
KINGSTON,RI 02881
Performing Department
Nutrition and Food Sciences
Non Technical Summary
Given the national and local childhood obesity epidemic especially among underserved populations it seems logical to build obesity prevention efforts around existing programs that reach these populations. The Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program already has an infrastructure for providing nutrition education to families that may be especially vulnerable to overweight, obesity and related chronic diseases. This proposal aims to build on the existing curriculum by developing modules that are tailored to better address obesity prevention. In order to do this, we will conduct formative research to assess the nutrition education, obesity prevention and cultural needs of parents of young children who participate in the EFNEP, to develop an adapted curriculum and test the new curriculum to see if it is successful in preventing obesity.
Animal Health Component
40%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
30%
Applied
40%
Developmental
30%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
70360201010100%
Goals / Objectives
The proposed research will continue to promote key aspects of nutrition education but will also evaluate the potential of targeting other behaviors which have shown to be involved in the development of obesity such as parental feeding practices, physical activity, adequate sleep, and reduction in screen time.Specific Aim 1: To explore attitudes, perceptions, beliefs and barriers regarding obesity related behaviors among The Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) participants using qualitative research methods.Specific Aim 2: To develop and adapt the existing EFNEP curriculum to incorporate obesity prevention topics for young children (establishing healthy household routines around sleep, physical activity, screen-time, feeding practices)Specific Aim 3: To test the newly adapted EFNEP curriculum vs. control (standard EFNEP curriculum) through a randomized controlled trial.
Project Methods
Specific Aim 1: Key informant interviews with staff working at the Providence EFNEP office will be completed. These interviews will assess the current needs and barriers of the program and discuss the feasibility of incorporating other obesity prevention components into the current curriculum. The data for the first aim of this project will be collected from a series of focus groups. Focus groups are proposed because unlike group interviews, or individual interviews, they can benefit from communication between research participants. Focus group participants are encouraged to talk to one another, asking questions, sharing experiences and commenting on others experiences and points of view. This method is useful in exploring people's knowledge and experiences and is used not only to see what people think but how they think about a certain subject.We, like others, believe it is beneficial to have homogenous groups (by ethnicity) in order to encourage open and candid discussion. It is probable that parents who have higher levels of acculturation will have different attitudes and perceptions about the behaviors they engage in with their child. Parents will be recruited from the EFNEP program in Providence, Centrals Falls and Pawtucket. At one of their EFNEP group sessions, the paraprofessional will briefly describe the study and ask if they would like to participate in a focus group. Parents will be recruited through the EFNEP offices and will draw from existing participants. In addition, flyers and posters as well as community outreach to markets, churches and community organizations will alert interested parents to the program and provide a telephone number that they can call to enroll. Parents will be eligible to participate in the focus groups if they meet the following criteria: 1) over the age of 18, 2) have a child between the ages of 2-8 years, 3) has participated or is participating in EFNEP.If eligible after brief phone conversation, parents who indicate interest in participation will provide their name and number. They will subsequently be called and informed on the time/date of the focus group. Parents interested in participating will be stratified based on their ethnicity, which will be assessed by asking to self-identify their ethnicity at the time of eligibility. A total of 6 focus groups are planned, 3 with parents who are Hispanic (depending on need may be Spanish speaking) and 3 with Non-Hispanic. The focus groups will be led by trained bilingual/bicultural focus-group facilitator (in Spanish/English) with expertise conducting groups. The 1.5 hour sessions will include 6-12 participants and follow topic guides developed during the first months of the proposed project period. Examples of questions include: What health concerns do you have for your child? What do you think are healthy routines that you can establish in your household to ensure that your child grows to be healthy? How do you think, as parents you should help your child eat, sleep, and be active? Are those priorities for you as a family? Why or why not? If you are currently going through the EFNEP program, what else do you think can be incorporated to these classes for your family to learn to be healthier? Do you believe the current program to be culturally sensitive to your needs? Why or why not? What would you change? Participants will also be asked to complete a short socio-demographic survey to assess education, place of birth, time in country (if not born in US) age, number of children, and marital status. This information will help us understand our qualitative findings.Data Analysis: All focus groups will be audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. Content analysis will take place at different levels. First, we will develop categories that represent broad themes seen in the data (done primarily by graduate student). Once these categories are developed, a codebook will be created such that each code is defined, inclusion and exclusion criteria are stated, and examples of text that fit that definition provided. There will be discussion of these codes between the graduate student, Dr. Tovar and Linda Sebelia, faculty and director of EFNEP in Providence. These codes will then be put into a matrix constructed to conform to the project's conceptual framework. Recoding key phrases into the matrix will allow for a more detailed understanding of the key themes. All text analysis and coding will be done using NVivo 10, a software program that greatly enhances the analytical capacity of qualitative data. NVivo 10 will also be utilized to summarize differences and similarities between each of the 6 focus groups. Major themes from the focus groups will be summarized and differences across groups assessed.Specific Aim 2: Taking together the information from specific aim 1 and existing evidence from the literature around obesity prevention in young children, additional materials will be developed and if needed existing materials will be tailored to be culturally appropriate. We will work together with EFNEP staff, Dr. Linda Sebelia, EFNEP coordinator and URI faculty, Dr. Geoff Green, Chair of the Nutrition and Food Science Department to ensure the appropriateness of these materials. Building on past work with Hispanic mothers, Dr. Tovar will also incorporate key theoretical frameworks such as popular education and social cognitive theory to the development of the new curriculum[48]. In addition, the social contextual framework with attention to the social context in which families live will also be incorporated[56]. Modifications to the curriculum will be accomplished by adding the following topics to the already existing group sessions. Once materials are developed we will hold one more focus group to test the new materials. Participants will be recruited through the same methods as for aim 1. Questions will be directly targeted towards the new materials, for example "what do you think of these materials?" Do you think these are appropriate? What would you change?Specific Aim 3: Once the curriculum has been fully developed, we will test its effectiveness via randomized controlled trial. The EFNEP curriculum will serve as the control arm. With the newly adapted curriculum, the goal of the obesity prevention intervention will be test the newly developed curriculum. In addition, to the use of the new curriculum, these topics will also be reinforced though follow up phone calls utilizing motivational interviewing and text messaging to review goal setting with the parents. These techniques have been found to be successful in past obesity prevention programs.Parent-child dyads (children between ages 2-5 years) will be recruited over a 5-6 month period predominately from EFNEP, but with additional recruitment efforts in the greater Providence community through our community advisory board (to be established). Other recruitment strategies will include: broad community awareness through radio advertising, flyers and poster dissemination, community outreach to market, churches, beauty salons, community organizations, clinics and hospitals. The paraprofessionals that deliver the current EFNEP curriculum will also be delivering the newly adapted curriculum, and be trained in motivational interviewing techniques which have been successfully applied in health promotion settings with adults to improve diet and to increase physical activity among other health-related applications.

Progress 12/09/13 to 09/30/17

Outputs
Target Audience:Childhood obesity, especially among low-income racial/ethnic minorities continues to be disproportionately high, especially in the state of Rhode Island. My research group focuses on these low-income racial/ethnic minority groups. Changes/Problems:As discussed under accomplishments, the overall goal and objectives of the initial grant were modified to reflect our initiial findings that other factors were impacting what young children were eating. To further explore this, we gathered data about what children were eating outside of the home (childcare) and also explored how other adult caregivers might be impacting what they eat. We also heard from parents that what their child eats is often out of their control and that greater environmental factors influence their choices. This brought us to better understand the larger community and its readiness to take on a community-wide intervention in the city of Providence. Our data suggestthat a multi-level interdisciplinary intervention is warranted- one that works with Extension but also other agencies to educate parents and also make the environments they live in healthier. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Undergraduate and graduate students have beentrained how to enter and manage data in NDSR software to be able to analyze what children are eating in family child care homes. Undegraduate students have also been trained on human subjects research and data quality management. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We have written up a summary of our results from collecting data in Head Startcenters and we are finalizing a letter that will be sent out to all centers that participated in the research. We are in the process of convening a community advisory board to work towards early prevention of childhood obesity in Providence and hope to discuss findings from the key informant interviews here and discuss next steps. Other results have been disseminated via conferences. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? In the first couple of years of this project and through some of our findings it became clear that when talking to parents that participated in ENFEP and educating them with regards to nutrition, the topic of eating outside the home, their broader community and in what they consumed in childcare came up. In response to what we found we explored what children were eating outside of the home and the feeding practices of child care providers. Findings from the previous yearsuggested that for children in Head Start classrooms and from family child care homes, they were not meeting the reccommendations for eating vegetables and whole grains. These results informed the next step of this resaerch- to explore the provider's feeding practices as well as starting to explore how greater community efforts could be harnessed to improve the environments for very young children. We used secondary data from 65 family child care homes in Rhode Island to explore the relationshipbetween providers feeding practices and their fruit and vegetable consumption. We found that mean whole fruit intake was 0.12±0.20 cups/day, mean total fruit intake was 1.35±1.07 cups/day, and mean vegetable intake was 0.54±0.41 cups/day. Provider encouragement and pressure to eat were both significantly positively correlated with child vegetable intake (r=0.27, p=0.03, and r=0.25, p=0.05, respectively). No other provider practices were significantly correlated with child whole fruit, total fruit, or vegetable intake. In order to inform a larger community wide effort to prevent childhood obesity among very young children in Rhode Island, we conducted 12 key informant interviews with key leaders in Providence, RI. Key informant interviews were with leaders working with 0-5-year-old children from the city of Providence using the community readiness model. The model was derived from the Trans-theoretical Model of Stages of Change and Community Development as a tool for addressing public health concerns. Participants were interviewed for approximately 60 minutesregarding the health and wellness efforts in Providence for 0-5 year-old children. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Descriptive statistics for eight questions regarding participant information were run in SPSS. Overall all key informant interviewees hold college degrees with 9-32 years of experience in the field. They represented the following sectors: department of health, health care, department of education, supplemental nutrition assistance program, child care, parks and recreation, and healthy community's office. The mean community readiness to change score was 7.2 (±3.4), which corresponds to a stabilization stage. Community knowledge of efforts received the lowest score (2.7) while leadership and resources ranked highest (11.1). Based on these results in the city of Providence, efforts to increase the community's knowledge of the causes, symptoms, and prevalence of childhood obesity may be warranted. The city appears to already be supporting activities related with prevention as reflected in a stabilization score. Given that childhood obesity continues to be a critical public health problem in the city, it will be important to capitalize on the city's leadership and resources to further support collaborative efforts

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Submitted Year Published: 2018 Citation: Boukarim, J. Leedal, S. Sebelia, L. Melanson, K. Tovar, A. Is the city of Providence, Rhode Island ready for an obesity prevention intervention? Submitted to American Society for Nutrition. Boston 2018.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Submitted Year Published: 2018 Citation: Carter, T. Risica, P. , Gans,K. Vadiveloo, M. McCurdy,M., Tovar,A.Are Feeding Practices of Family Child Care Home Providers Associated with Child Fruit and Vegetable Intake? Submitted to American Society for Nutrition. Boston 2018.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Submitted Year Published: 2018 Citation: Mena, N.,Risica, P. , Gans,K., Lofgren, I., Gorman, K., Tobar, F. Tovar, A. How Parents Communicate with their Family Child Care Home Provider Regarding Foods Young Children Are Eating. Submitted to American Society for Nutrition. Boston 2018.


Progress 10/01/15 to 09/30/16

Outputs
Target Audience:Low-income parents in the Greater Providence area including Pawtucket and Central Falls. In addition, several of the target audience is predominantly Hispanic. Changes/Problems:There have been some changes to the original goals given the feedback we got from parents. As a result we decided to more broadly explore what influences healthy eating of young children including child care centers. This change still aligns with the outcomes and goals of improving healthy eating of parents of young children. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Student training related to data collection, dietary data management and analysis. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We have yet to have the work published and upon publication we will dissseminate our findings. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We will publish the work from Megan Fallon, we will publish the work from Laura Otterbach (intervention with parents), we will completedata analysis for Maggie Tsai's work and publish the work for dissemination. We will also use the data to inform a future project.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? In the first couple of years of this project and through some of our findings it became clear that when talking to parents and educating them with regards to nutrition, the topic of eating outside the home and in childcare came up. In response to this we started to explore what children are eating outside of the home and exploring what children are eating outside of them home and the feeding practices of child care providers. As a result, Megan Fallon, one of the graduate students supported on this grant collected data of child care providers in 85 Head Start centers in Rhode Island. With another doctoral student, Megan found that participants were predominantly female (2 participants were male) and averaged 40 years (Range=19-63; SD = 11.37). On average, teachers had 14 years of experience and a little more than 7 years teaching at their current center. Head Start teachers reported consuming an average of 3.9 cups of fruit and vegetables per day and exercising an average of 3 to 4 days a week. More days of physical activity and lower self-reported 'other sugar sweetened beverage' consumption (i.e., sweetened coffee beverages, kool-aid, sports drinks, etc.) were both associated with increased nutrition knowledge. Overall, teacher's had high nutrition knowledge and nutrition attitude scores with head teachers scoring significantly higher than non-head teachers on both nutrition knowledge, and nutrition attitudes. Regarding observed mealtime behavior, total scores were relatively high as well. The model predicting observed support for autonomy found to be was significant. After controlling for age and experience, nutrition attitudes were found to be a significant predictor of observed support for autonomy. Regarding self-reported mealtime behavior, mean total scores were also relatively high. The model predicting self-reported self-efficacy was also found to be significant with nutrition knowledge and attitudes significantly predicting self-reported self-efficacy after controlling for age and experience. They also looked at how well observational measures compared to some of their self-report measures. Feeding practices are primarily assessed through self-report measures, but capturing these through self-report and observations may provide valuable information for future measures. Feeding practices were coded using a tool adapted from the Environmental Policy Assessment and Observation (EPAO) tool. Teachers completed a questionnaire adapted from the EPAO Self-Report to capture self-reported feeding practices. There was a higher level of agreement among self-reported and observed negative feeding practices (78.8-97.6% agreement) vs. positive feeding practices (11.8-20.0% agreement). Agreement among negative feeding practices were also found to occur in one direction (Never/Rarely) compared to positive feeding practices. Although self-report measures are typically used to capture feeding practices, inconsistencies between self-report and observation measures exist. The inconsistencies found among positive self-reported and observed feeding practices has implications for future research protocols, measurement refinement and training of child care teachers. Meanwhile, higher agreement among negative self-reported and observed practices suggest that Head Start policies and trainings that discourage their use are working. In another child care setting, family child care homes, Maggie Tsai, another graduate student is exploring what children are consuming. She is currently analyzing her data and in her primary findings. She is using secondary data from another study and has preschool-aged children (n = 104) (2-5 years old) enrolled in family child care homes (N = 34), that were observed during two meals and a snack over a two day, following a standardized protocol. Foods and beverages consumed were entered and analyzed in the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) 2015. Portion sizes consumed were compared to 2/3 of the daily intake recommendations established by the DGA 2015 for a 1000 kcal diet. One-sample t-tests were run to test for differences between the averaged amounts of food groups consumed compared to the national guidelines for each food group. She found that children were not consuming the recommended amount of vegetables (40% of the recommended 2/3 cups of vegetables were consumed; M = 0.27, SD = 0.21), whole grains (37% of the recommended 1 ounce was consumed; M = 0.37, SD = 0.37), and fiber (40% of the recommended 14 grams a day for this age group; M = 5.60, SD = 2.14). A sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for single-day observations and showed no effect on results. Consistent with child care centers, children in FCCH are not meeting national recommendations for vegetables, whole grain, and fiber. Future programs and policies should continue to find strategies to increase fruit, vegetable and whole grain intake in early child care settings. These results are helping to further inform future materials and curriculums that can be used in EFNEP settings as they related to healthy eating and feeding practices. These results will also help inform future interventions for parents where both the home and the child care environment can be targeted.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2016 Citation: Fallon M, Halloran K, Gorman, K, Tovar A. Exploring self-reported and observed feeding practices of Rhode Island Head Start teachers. Poster Presentation. Society for Behavioral Medicine. Washington DC.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Under Review Year Published: 2017 Citation: Fallon M, Halloran K, Gorman, K, Tovar A. Exploring self-reported and observed feeding practices of Rhode Island Head Start teachers. Manuscript Subited to Appetite Journal.
  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Other Year Published: 2016 Citation: Otterbach L, Greene G, Redding C, Tovar A. The Impact of the Healthy Children, Healthy Families Curriculum on Maternal Feeding Practices Poster Presentation. Society for Behavioral Medicine. Washington DC.


Progress 10/01/14 to 09/30/15

Outputs
Target Audience:Our target audience is low-income parents or caregivers (over the age of 18) with a child between the ages of 2-12 years of age. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Parprofessionals that work with EFNEP were trained to deliver the modules and also trained with regards to importance of parental feeding, importance of physical activity and media awareness around food marketing to children. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?These data were presented to the EFNEP and SNAP-ed office. They also have access to the new materials and are using them as part of their outreach efforts. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We would like to learn more about parental feeding practices and what is working for parents and how they may be modified. A more in depth look at different mechanism on parental feeding practices is going to be explored this coming year. While the initial goal was to run an RCT trail to compare the modified curriculum to current EFNEP, it is unclear if there are enough EFNEP classes to do this at this time and to achieve sufficient power to test this design. If it is not possible to do this, we will continue to explore more novel ways in which parents can modify their parental feeding practices so that this information can be incorporated into existing systems such as EFNEP.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Given the results from aim 1 we were able to develop the existing curriculum and test it, measure pre-post outcomes and capture process evaluation measures. Although the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) is designed to reach low-income populations primarily through curricula addressing dietary intake, we found previously that including other target behaviors such as physical activity, screen time and child feeding practices may be beneficial. Three additional EFNEP modules were developed covering feeding practices areas. Parapfoessionals were trained to deliver the new modules. Five RI-EFNEP classes taught by paraprofessionals to parents of children ages 2-12 years (n=42) participated in this portion of the study. The process evaluation assessed fidelity, lesson observations, and participant feedback (surveys and focus groups). Analysis included frequencies and content analysis. Fidelity for all components of the modified curriculum was high (75-100%) except for goal setting, which occurred only 58.8% of the time. Observations show participants were attentive and open to discussion in 90-100% of the lessons. Participant feedback was positive for the new lessons and hands-on activities. However, participants expressed wanting more age specific information related to feeding together with hands-on activities, and information related to how food advertisements tailor to parents and children. With regards to other outcome data, there were significant with-in person improvements for 1 of 16 of the individual items on the behavior checklist which was used . There were within person improvement in parental consumption of soda (p=0.011) with a magnitude of change on the 5-point Likert style scale of -0.333. The post survey shows final parental soda consumption averaged was 3.96 on a 5 point Likert style scale which corresponded to"1-3 days each week" where the baseline score was 3.63 corresponding to "4-6 days each week". On average at baseline, home environment behaviors on the Likert scale scores ranged from 4.38 to 4.63 this corresponds to the participants eating meals as a family about "5-6 days each week", eating take out with their family "1-2 days each week", "more than half the time" fruit is available in their homes "and about half the time" did participants have energy dense snacks available to their children and did they let their child decide how much to eat about. Although non-significant, the largest magnitude of change was in parents letting a child's decide on how much to eat (change = -0.540, p=0.15) and having energy dense snack foods less available (change = -0.458, p=0.068). Of the participants 37.5% had at least 1-point for parent physical activity (37.5%). Furthermore, 33.3% of participants had at least a 1-point change for availability of energy dense foods and home fruit availability and 25% had a 2-point change. (See Figure). Overall, the curriculum was successful and will be revised to modify goal setting and include more age appropriate information as well as focus on the effects of advertising. Future studies can benefit from participant feedback to improve interventions that target obesity-related health behaviors in low-income families.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Accepted Year Published: 2015 Citation: S. Harper � A. Tovar � G. Greene � K. McCurdy � L. Sebelia No preview � Article � Sep 2015 � Journal of the American Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Process Evaluation of a Revised Nutrition Education Curriculum for Parents Targeting Obesogenic Behaviors


Progress 12/09/13 to 09/30/14

Outputs
Target Audience: We are working with parents of 3-12 year old children who participate in the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program in Rhode Island. Changes/Problems: Although focus groups were initially proposed to gather feedback from parents, and two of them were able to be completed, logistically it was very difficult to recruit these parents to come together. Therefore, interviews were completed for the remaining participants. We believe the data collected through this method was not compromised as participants appeared to be candid about their responses. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Traning for one master level student as well as one undegraduate student who was involved with the project. Paraprofessionals who deliver the EFNEP curriculum to parents were trained on the new modules of the curriculum and learned more about feeding practices, marketing unhealthy foods to children and physical activity in children. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? The results of Part 1 were presented at Experimental Biology in San Diego and the manuscript is being revised for sumbission for peer-reviewed journal. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? The new modified curriculum is currently being tested in a quasi-experimental study with 40 EFNEP participants. The data will then be analyzed and the curriculum further modified as needed.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? During this year two parts of the project were developed: 1) to explore attitudes, perceptions, beliefs, and barriers regarding obesity-related behaviors in EFNEP (Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program) participants using qualitative research methods, and 2) to develop and adapt the existing EFNEP curriculum to incorporate obesity prevention topics for young children. Part 1 has been completed and a manuscript is being prepared for publication using this data. For part 2, the EFNEP curriculum has been modified and is currently being implented with four EFNEP parent groups in Rhode Island. Part 1: We completed 23 individual semi-structured interviews and two focus groups (n= 15) with parents who had participated in EFNEP and had a young child. The goal of conducting these interviews wsa to gather feedback on the current EFNEP program and to provide insight into what more the participants wanted out of the program. We focused questions on four main concepts 1) Participant satisfaction, 2) Cultural appropriateness, 3) Discussion of obesity-related behaviors, and 4) Current parenting practices to raising healthy children. Part 2: Using the data obtained from the interviews and focus groups, three new EFNEP lesson plans were created (parental feeding, media literacy, and physical activity & screen-time). Collaborating with the EFNEP program director, it was decided that the EFNEP program would be increased from 6 sessions to 8 sessions. The three new lessons have been incorporated into the EFNEP sessions and are being pilot tested through a quasi-experimental study this Fall 2014. Part 1: The feedback provided from past EFNEP participant parents was essential in revising the EFNEP curriculum to parents. We heard directly from parents about their needs and expectations (parents with young children) and created additional lesson plans, as indicated by the results/feedback. Part 2: The tailored curriculum is currently being tested. The goals of the newly tailored curriculum are 1) Parents will improve their confidence when feeding their child around mealtimes, 2) Improve parents’ media awareness around unhealthy food advertisements, and 3) Increase weekly hours of family physical activity and decrease daily family screen-time. If successful, EFNEP can have a curriculum specifically dedicated to parents of young children that target other obesity related behaviors besides diet composition. In addition, further work can be done to assess the impact/improvement in the health of this population with regards to obesity and chronic disease prevention.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2013 Citation: VanAsch P, Melanson, K, Gorman K. Tovar A. Parental Perception of the Rhode Island Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program. Experimental Biology, San Diego CA. April 2014
  • Type: Theses/Dissertations Status: Published Year Published: 2013 Citation: PARENTAL PERCEPTIONS OF THE RHODE ISLAND EXPANDED FOOD AND NUTRITION EDUCATION PROGRAM BY PATRICK COOPER VAN ASCH.A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NUTRITION AND FOOD SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND. 2014