Progress 10/01/13 to 09/30/18
Outputs
Target Audience:During this reporting period, we have continued progress on assessing human and management effects on microbial communities in soil or those associated with plants. Our deliverables primarily target scientific community (students, scientists and researchers) but the more applied components benefit also policy makers, extension service personnel, and land managers. We have addressed target audiences 1) in scientific meetings (American Geophysical Union 2018 Meeting; Annual oSTEM Conference; 11thInternational Mycological Congress), 2) through publications (Freshwater Science), and 3) less informally through our collaboration with USDA Forest Service, agricultural extension service personnel, and students and visiting faculty, who received training in Jumpponen's laboratory. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Jumpponen recruited one new graduate student in addition to two recruited under the previous reporting period.These three students are engaged in experimental design, experimental execution and data analyses. Two of the students focus on effects of fire manipulations in forested or grassland systems, third aims to answer questions about fungal ecotypic adaptions to drought. During the evaluation period this project has served to train one visiting junior faculty. The training focused on dissecting microbiomes in crop grasses. Finally, this program has created personal development opportunities for local undergraduate (2) and graduate students (4), who conduct their independent research projects and have networked with peer scientists to generate and analyze environmental data. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?We have disseminated our research findings in professional meetings locally (Division of Biology Graduate Student Forum; Kansas State University Graduate Student Forum; Research and State:15thCapitol Graduate Research Summit), nationally, and internationally (11thInternational Mycological Congress). Additionally, we have been active in publishing and list those contributions under the "Products" Section. During this reporting period wehave continued ourcollaborationwiththe USDA Forest service to generate data to address short- and long-term microbial community responses to fire. These contacts have also provided avenues for less formal dissemination of our research outcomes. Finally, we continue our engagement of undergraduate and graduate students in the laboratory by providing students unique opportunities to conduct primary research.? What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We remain committed to disseminate our findings to various audiences. To do this, four graduate students and a minimum of one undergraduate will present their independent research at the Mycological Society of America Meeting in Minneapolis, MN, in August, 2019.We are currently preparing two manuscripts on microbiomes of foundation and crop grasses as well as two on ecotypic adaptation of fungi to drought. Additionally, we continue to generate vast volumes of data and continue to improve our protocols and pipelines to expedite data generation/analyses. We have built protocols on libraries of "batch commands" that permit automated data analysis streams and can be expediently applied to generated sequence data. We maintain funding to continue on microbial community responses to environmental change in phytobiomes of dominant, keystone grasses, and microbiome recruitment and establishment in the biofuel grasses (Miscanthus and Panicum).
Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals?
We completed analyses of data on grass microbiomes in the Great Plains and continue preparing publications in collaboration with students and faculty from Kansas State University and University of New Mexico. Fungi chosen to represent potentially drought tolerant isolates from collaborator's culture collection housed at Western Illinois University were exposed to drought in vitro and in planta. First analyses of these data suggest little evidence for ecotypic drought adaptation in fungal communities. However, many fungal strains are able to improve plant survival under drought conditions and productivity under increased temperatures. Under the second major goal of the project, we have successfully completed the fruitful collaboration with the USDA Forest service and generated data to describe soil community responses to prescribed fire manipulations that have been consistently maintained for more than half a century.
Publications
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Accepted
Year Published:
2019
Citation:
Poudel, R., Jumpponen, A., Kennelly, M., Rivard, C., Gomez-Montano, L., Garrett, K. 2019. Rootstocks shape the rhizobiome: rhizosphere and endosphere bacterial communities in the grafted tomato system. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2018
Citation:
Veach, A.M, Troia, M.J., Jumpponen, A., Dodds, W.K. 2018. Topdown effects of a grazing, omnivorous minnow (Campostoma anomalum) on stream microbial communities. Freshwater Science 37: 121-133. DOI: 10.1086/696292
|
Progress 10/01/16 to 09/30/17
Outputs
Target Audience:During this reporting period, we have continued to make progress on the project focusing on human and management effects on microbial communities in soil or those associated with plants. Our deliverables primarily target scientific community (students, scientists and researchers) but the more applied components benefit also policy makers, extension service personnel, and land managers. We have addressed target audiences 1) in scientific meetings (Evolution 2017; Joint Meeting of the Missouri and Missouri Valley Branches of the American Society of Microbiology; Annual oSTEM Conference; American Phytopathological Society; Annual Ecological Genomics Symposium; Annual Meeting of the American Society of Agronomy), 2) through publications (Forest Ecology and Management; Molecular Ecology), and 3) less informally through our collaboration with USDA Forest Service, agricultural extension service personnel, and students, visiting post-doctoral associates, and visiting faculty, who received training in Jumpponen's laboratory. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?Jumpponen recruited two new graduate students and has trained two undergraduate students in his laboratory. Two additional students are currently being recruited to join the laboratory during 2018-2019 academic year. These students will have been trained and engaged in experimental design, experimental execution and data analyses. During the evaluation period this project has served to train visiting and local faculty/students. These training collaborations include research programs that focus on microbiomes in foundation and crop grasses, and microbial community dynamics under different experimental manipulations. Finally, this program has created personal development opportunities for local undergraduate (2) and graduate students (2), who networked with peer scientists to generate and analyze environmental data. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?In the course of the project activities, we have disseminated our research findings in professional meetings locally (KSU Ecological Genomics Forum, Division of Biology Graduate Student Forum), nationally, and internationally (Annual Meeting of the American Phytopathological Society). Additionally, we have been active in publishing and list those contributions under the "Products" Section. During this reporting period we have also engaged collaborators within the USDA Forest service to generate data to address short- and long-term microbial community responses to fire. These contacts have also provided avenues for less formal dissemination of our research outcomes. Finally, we continue our engagement of undergraduate and graduate students in the laboratory by providing students unique opportunities to conduct primary research. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We continue to generate vast volumes of data and streamline protocols and pipelines to expedite. We utilize libraries of "batch commands" that permit automated data analysis streams and can be expediently applied to generated sequence data. We maintain funding to continue on microbial community responses to environmental change in phytobiomes of dominant, keystone grasses, and microbiome recruitment and establishment in the biofuel grasses (Miscanthus and Panicum). In the course of the next reporting period, we aim to continue reporting and publishing in peer reviewed journals and professional meetings. We plan to attend the International Mycological Congress in 2018 to describe our ongoing research.
Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals?
We completed data generation of data characterizing host microbiomes in the Great Plains and continue analyses of these data in collaboration with students and faculty from Kansas State University and University of New Mexico. Preliminary data from drought manipulation experiments suggest that while there are some host specific responses, the host-associated microbiomes are universally responsive to drought. These data are currently used to choose potentially drought tolerant isolates from collaborator's culture collection housed at Western Illinois University to evaluate their use as drought-modulating synthetic microbiomes. Under the second major goal of the project, we have expanded the fruitful collaboration with the USDA Forest service and initiated a new program to evaluate microbial community and functional responses to recurring prescribed fires that have been consistently maintained for more than half a century.
Publications
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2016
Citation:
Poudel, R., Jumpponen, A., Schlatter, D., Paulitz, T., Gardener, B.M., Linkel, L., Garrett, K. 2016. Microbiome networks: A systems framework for identifying candidate microbial assemblages for disease management. Phytopathology 106: S12.56.
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2017
Citation:
Reazin, C., Clark, S., Baird, R., Jumpponen, A. 2017. Hybridization of American and Chinese chestnuts alters seedling recruitment of fungal symbionts from shared nursery soil. Joint Meeting of the Missouri and Missouri Valley Branches of the American Society of Microbiology, Springfield, MO, March 17-18, 2017. Poster Presentation and an Abstract.
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2016
Citation:
14. Reazin, C., Morris, S., Smith, J.E., Cowan, A.D., and Jumpponen, A. Fires of differing intensities rapidly select distinct soil fungal communities in a Northwest US ponderosa pine forest ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management. 377: 118-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.07.002
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2016
Citation:
Veach, A.M., Stagen, J.C., Brown, S.P., Dodds, W.K. and Jumpponen, A. 2016. Spatiotemporal and successional dynamics of stream biofilm microbial communities in a grassland stream ecosystem. Molecular Ecology. 25: 4674-4688. DOI: 10.1111/mec.13784
|
Progress 10/01/15 to 09/30/16
Outputs
Target Audience:During this reporting period, we continue progress on the project focusing on human and management effects on microbial communities in soil and those associated with plants. Our program deliverables mainly target scientific community (scientists and researchers) but the more applied components benefit also policy makers, extension service personnel, and land managers. We have addressed target audiences 1) in (inter-)national scientific meetings (Annual Meeting of the American Phytopathological Society, Annual Ecological Genomics Symposium, Florida Genetics symposium, European Geosciences General Assembly, 16th International Society of Microbial Ecology Meeting; 2) through publications (Microbial Ecology, International Journal of plant Sciences, Phytopathology, Forest Ecology and Management, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution), and 3) less informally through our collaboration with USDA Forest Service, agricultural extension service personnel, and students/visiting post-doctoral associates and faculty who received training in Jumpponen's laboratory. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?We continued addressing the research questions and experiments established under this program in an undergraduate student classes. In collaboration with faculty in agriculture (Charles W. Rice and DeAnn Presley) and with extension appointments (DeAnn Presley), we have designed and executed experiments to evaluate the use of microbial inocula for winter wheat. Jumpponen also recently recruited two new graduate students and maintained three undergraduate students who participated in research under this project. These students in the program leader's laboratory have been engaged in experimental design, execution and data analyses. During the evaluation period this project has served to train visiting and local students and visiting faculty representing both local and national research groups. These loose training collaborations include research programs that focus on microbial pathogens in living environment, recruitment and establishment of microbiomes in foundation and crop grasses, and community dynamics under different experimental manipulations. Finally, this program has created personal development opportunities for local undergraduate (3) and graduate students (3), who networked with peer scientists to generate and analyze environmental data. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?
Nothing Reported
What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We continue to generate vast volumes of data and adopt new protocols as well as pipelines to expedite and streamline data generation and analyses. We have generated libraries of "batch commands" that permit automated data analysis streams and can be expediently applied to generated sequence data. We maintain funding to continue on microbial community responses to environmental change in phytobiomes of dominant, keystone grasses; and have also secured additional funding to dissect microbiome recruitment and establishment in the biofuel grass Miscanthus and will target the microbiomes of that host in due course. We will acquire additional personnel to complete fieldwork as well as to generate and analyze high throughput sequencing data. In the course of the next reporting period, we aim to continue reporting and publishing in peer reviewed journals and professional meetings. We plan to attend the Ecological Society of America in 2017 to describe our phytobiome research.
Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals?
We continued to generate and analyze data from our project focusing on the soil and host microbiomes in the Great Plains. These datasets inform management decisions on public and private lands and record the biodiversity in these systems. In the course of these activities we have also participated in statistical tool development - specifically network analyses. The latter effort has been published in Phytopathology, whereas the results from the former continue to be analyzed. Under the second major goal of the project, we have continued the fruitful collaboration with the USDA Forest service and reported fast and distinct community responses to fire - now published in Forest Ecology and Management.
Publications
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2016
Citation:
Reazin, C., Morris, S., Smith, J.E., Cowan, A.D., and Jumpponen, A. 2016. Fires of differing intensities rapidly select distinct soil fungal communities in a Northwest US ponderosa pine forest ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management. 377: 118-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.07.002
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2016
Citation:
Poudel, R., Jumpponen, A., Schlatter, D.C., Paulitz, T.C., McSpadden, B., Gardener, L., Kinkel, L., Garrett, K.A. 2016. Microbiome networks: a systems framework for identifying candidate microbial assemblages for disease management. Phytopathology 106: 1083-1096. DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-02-16-0058-FI
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2016
Citation:
Veach, A.M., Stagen, J.C., Brown, S.P., Dodds, W.K. and Jumpponen, A. 2016. Spatiotemporal and successional dynamics of stream biofilm microbial communities in a grassland stream ecosystem. Molecular Ecology. 25: 4674-4688. DOI: 10.1111/mec.13784
|
Progress 10/01/14 to 09/30/15
Outputs
Target Audience:During this reporting period, we have continued to make progress on the project focusing on human and management effects on microbial communities in soil or those associated with plants. Our deliverables primarily target scientific community (scientists and researchers) but the more applied components benefit also policy makers, extension service personnel, and land managers. We have addressed target audiences 1) in scientific meetings (Annual Meeting of the Kansas Academy of Science, Annual Meeting of the American Society of Agronomy, Annual Meeting of the American Phytopathological Society, International Conference on Mycorrhizae, Midwest Organic Farming And Sustainable Education Service Meeting, Phytobiomes 2015: Designing a New Paradigm for Crop Improvement), 2) through publications (FEMS Microbiology Ecology, Forest Ecology and Management, Fungal Ecology, Journal of Fungi, Mycorrhiza), and 3) less informally through our collaboration with USDA Forest Service, agricultural extension service personnel, and students/visiting post-doctoral associates who received training in Jumpponen's laboratory. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?We have adopted the research questions and experiments established under this program into undergraduate student classes. In collaboration with faculty in agriculture (Charles W. Rice and DeAnn Presley) and with extension appointments (DeAnn Presley), we have designed experiments to evaluate the use of microbial inocula for major crops. These experiments are currently underway and will be analyzed undergraduate students enrolled in BIOL604 - Biology of Fungi. Jumpponen also recently recruited three new undergraduate students to participate in research under this project. These students in the program leader's laboratory have already been engaged in sequence data analyses. During the evaluation period this project has served to train students, post-doctoral fellows, and sabbatical faculty from other laboratories and research groups locally, nationally and internationally. These loose training collaborations include research programs that focus on urbanization, microbial pathogens in living environment, and community dynamics and succession during composting. Finally, this program has created personal development opportunities for local undergraduate (3) and graduate students (3), who networked with peer scientists to generate and analyze environmental data. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?In the course of the project activities, we have disseminated out research findings in professional meetings locally (KSU Ecological Genomics Forum, Division of Biology Faculty Data Blitz) regionally (Annual Meeting of the Kansas Academy of Science, Midwest Organic Farming And Sustainable Education Service Meeting), nationally, and internationally (Annual Meeting of the American Society of Agronomy, Annual Meeting of the American Phytopathological Society, International Conference on Mycorrhizae, Phytobiomes 2015: Designing a New Paradigm for Crop Improvement). Additionally, we have been active in publishing and list those contributions under the "Products" Section. During this reporting period we ahve also engaged faculty in agriculture, entomology, horticulture, and plant pathology as well as faculty with extension service appointments to continue applied research on management impacts. Less formal dissemantion has taken place through our collaboration with USDA Forest Service and students/visiting post-doctoral associates who received training in Jumpponen's laboratory. Finally, we continue our engagement of undergraduate students in the laboratory by providing students unique opportunities to condict primary research. Further, we continue to engage REU (Research Experiences for Undergraduates) and URM (Undergraduate Research Mentoring) students in presentations and through personal contact. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?We continue to generate vast volumes of data and adopt new protocols as well as pipelines to expedite and streamline data generation and analyses. We have secured additional funding to continue on microbial community responses to environmental change in phytobiomes of dominant, keystone grasses. We will acquire additional personnel to complete fieldwork as well as to generate and analyze high throughput sequencing data. Additionally, we have secured funding to continue research on fire dynamics and will generate and analyze additional data on these as well. In the course of the next reporting period, we aim to continue reporting and publishing in peer reviewed journals and professional meetings. We plan to attend the International Society of Microbial Ecology Conference in 2016 to describe our phytobiome research as well as to present posters on the fire management in the Mycological Society of America meetings.
Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals?
Previously we generated several next-generation sequencing datasets on environmental change with ancillary datasets from experiments on prescribed burning and woody encroachment removal in the grassland ecosystems. These experiments aim to elucidate the effects of management choices on soil-inhabiting and root-colonizing fungi. Previously completed datasets have been published in Forest Ecology and Management and in FEMS Microbiology Ecology, respectively. These datasets inform management decisions on public and private lands. An additional, technology evaluation contribution focusing polymerase choice in environmental analyses was recently published in Fungal Ecology highlighting the importance of using a "proof-reading" enzyme in generating environmental datasets. While this protocol evaluation was rather minor, it has been already highlighted as "Hot Paper" and "Highly Cited Paper" in Thomson Reuter's Web of Science. In the course of the current evaluation period, we also actively sought funding to expand the fire management research. We have successfully secured two projects: 1) a direct continuation of the effort in Piedmont National Forest in Florida and 2) a new project with focus on comparing the effects of burn intensity on the soil fungal communities.
Publications
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2015
Citation:
Brown, S.P., Veach, A.M., Grond, K., Lickteig, S.K., Lothamer, K., Oliver, A.K., Rigdon-Huss, A.R. and Jumpponen, A. 2015. Scraping the bottom of the barrel: are rare high throughput sequences artifacts? Fungal Ecology 13: 221-225. DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2014.08.006
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2015
Citation:
Jumpponen, A., Brown, S.P., Trappe, J.M., C�zares, E. and Str�mmer, R. 2015. Analyses of sporocarps, morphotyped ectomycorrhizae, environmental ITS and LSU sequences identify common genera that occur at a periglacial site. Journal of Fungi 1: 76-93. DOI: 10.3390/jof101007
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2015
Citation:
Mandyam K.G. and Jumpponen, A. 2015. Mutualism-parasitism paradigm synthesized from results of root-endophyte models. Frontiers in Microbiology 5: e776. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00776
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2015
Citation:
Oliver, A.K., Brown, S.P., Callaham, M.A. and Jumpponen, A. 2015. Polymerase matters: non-proofreading enzymes inflate community richness estimates by up to 15%. Fungal Ecology 15: 86-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2015.03.003
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2015
Citation:
Oliver, A.K., Callaham, M.A. and Jumpponen, A. 2015. Soil fungal communities respond compositionally to recurring frequent prescribed burning in a managed southeastern US forest ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management 345: 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.020
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Accepted
Year Published:
2015
Citation:
Veach, A., Dodds, W. and Jumpponen, A. 2015. Woody plant encroachment, and its removal, impact bacterial and fungal communities across stream and terrestrial habitats in a tallgrass prairie ecosystem. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. In Press.
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2014
Citation:
Brown, S.P., Huss-Rigdon, A. and Jumpponen, A. 2014. Analyses of ITS and LSU gene regions provide congruent results on fungal community responses. Fungal Ecology 9: 65-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2014.02.002
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2014
Citation:
Poudel, R., Jumpponen, A., Garrett, K.A. 2014. Exploration of phyllosphere fungal communities of Quercus macrocarpa using network analysis. Phytopathology 104: S3.93
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2014
Citation:
Garrett, K.A., Gomez-Montano, L., Jumpponen, A., Kennelly, M. 2014. Soil microbial networks in organic and conventional tomato: Comparing long-term and transient communities by soil RNA. Phytopathology 104: S3.44
|
Progress 10/01/13 to 09/30/14
Outputs
Target Audience: During the 2014 reporting period, the project generated data on human effects on microbial communities in soil or associated with plants. These deliverables targeted primarily scientists and researchers, but also policy makers and land managers. These target audiences were addressed 1) in scientific meetings (American Society for Horticultural Science Annual Conference, DOE Genomics Grantee's Meeting, Annual meeting of the International Society of Microbial Ecology, Annual meeting of the Mycological Society of America, Ecological Genomics Symposium, Joint Meeting of the American Phytopathological Society and the Canadian Phytopathological Society), 2) through publications (Fungal Ecology, Frontiers in Microbiology, Mycorrhiza), and 3) less informally through our collaboration with USDA Forest Service and students who received training in Jumpponen's laboratory. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? The lessons learned from this program were utilized in lectures used in two undergraduate student classes: Microbial Ecology and Biology of Fungi. Further, graduate students in the program leader's laboratory were engaged in broad collaborations that transfer their experiences in sequence data analyses to other laboratories and research groups locally, nationally and internationally. This program also created personal development opportunities for local undergraduate and graduate students, who networked with peer scientists to generate environmental data and analyzed those data. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? In the course of these activities, we have disseminated our findings in professional meetings nationally (American Society for Horticultural Science Annual Conference, DOE Genomics Grantee's Meeting, Annual meeting of the International Society of Microbial Ecology, Annual meeting of the Mycological Society of America, Ecological Genomics Symposium, Joint Meeting of the American Phytopathological Society and the Canadian Phytopathological Society), in peer-meetings locally (KSU Ecological Genomics Forum, Faculty Data Blitz). Some results have been published as show above in "Products" section. Additionally, these activities have been highlighted locally to undergraduate students (Research Experiences for Undergraduates, REU, Summer Seminar Series). What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? The program continues to generate vast volumes of data. The goal for the reporting period 2015 is to continue data analyses and reporting in peer reviewed journals and professional meetings. We plan to attend the International Conference on Mycorrhizae in 2015 to describe our endophyte realted work as well as to present posters on the prescribed burning program.
Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals?
We generated several next-generation sequencing datasets with ancillary environmental datasets for the climate change and prescribed burning to elucidate the effects of recurring prescribed burning on soil-inhabiting and root-colonizing fungi. Two of these datasets are completed and additional ones await further analyses. The first of these described the importance of polymerase choice in environmental analyses (manuscript is currently evaluated for publication in Fungal Ecology); the second describes broadly soil-inhabiting community responses to prescribed burning (Manuscript is currently under evaluation for publication in Forest Ecology and Management). These data were also presented in the Annual meeting of the Mycological Society of America. These datasets inform prescribed burning decisions on public and private lands.
Publications
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2013
Citation:
Brown, S.P., Oliver, A.K., Callaham, M.A., and Jumpponen, A. 2013. Deep Ion Torrent sequencing identifies soil fungal community shifts after frequent prescribed fires in a southeastern US forest ecosystem. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 86: 557-566. DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12181
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2014
Citation:
Jumpponen, A. and Jones, K.L. 2014. Tallgrass prairie soil fungal communities are resilient to climate change. Fungal Ecology In Press
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2013
Citation:
Jumpponen, A., Zeglin, L., David, M., Prestat, E., Brown, S. P., Lothamer, K., Hettich, R., Jansson, J., Rice, C.W., Tringe, S., and Myrold, D. 2013. Fungal community responses to discrete precipitation pulses under altered rainfall intervals. Phytopathology 103:S2.182
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2013
Citation:
Lothamer, K, Brown, S. P., Mattox, J. D., and Jumpponen, A. 2013. Composition, diversity, and resilience of fungal communities colonizing the roots of native and exotic hosts in an urban environment. Phytopathology 103: S2.86
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2013
Citation:
Oliver, A. K., Brown, S. P., Callaham, M, and Jumpponen, A. 2013. Ectomycorrhizal community responses to recurring prescribed fires in yellow pine forests: Effects of fire intervals and season. Phytopathology 103(Suppl. 2): S2.107
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Accepted
Year Published:
2015
Citation:
Mandyam K.G. and Jumpponen, A. 2015. Mutualism-parasitism paradigm synthesized from results of root-endophyte models. Frontiers in Microbiology In Press
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Awaiting Publication
Year Published:
2015
Citation:
Brown, S.P., Huss-Rigdon, A. and Jumpponen, A. 2015. Analyses of ITS and LSU gene regions provide congruent results on fungal community responses. Fungal Ecology 9: 65-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2014.02.002
|
|