Source: OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
EVALUATION OF NATURAL SULFITE-PRODUCING WINE YEAST FOR MAKING ORGANIC WINE
Sponsoring Institution
Agricultural Research Service/USDA
Project Status
ACTIVE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0427666
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 11, 2014
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2018
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
CORVALLIS,OR 97331
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
(N/A)
Animal Health Component
25%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
75%
Applied
25%
Developmental
0%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
21224101160100%
Goals / Objectives
1. Determine levels of sulfite and hydrogen sulfide produced during model grape juice fermentation by a limited number of sulfite-producing commercial wine yeast strains as a function of time, temperature, and available nitrogen. 2. In the above yeast strains, determine DNA sequences that control expression of the SSU1 gene encoding the native yeast sulfite efflux pump responsible for excretion of sulfite into wine.
Project Methods
Standard procedures will be employed to make small lots of wine or model wines using presumptive sulfite-producing commercial wine yeast strains. Strains under consideration include, but are not limited to Lalvin BM45, Lalvin ICV OKAY, Lalvin EC1118, Uvaferm WAM, Lalvin ICV Opale, and Lalvin K1 V1116. Sulfite and hydrogen sulfide will be measured over the course of the fermentations by standard methods. Student⿿s 2-tailed T test or the Wilcoxon⿿Mann-Whitney 2-tailed test will be used to assess the statistical significance of any differences observed in sulfite or hydrogen sulfide levels. In order to determine the DNA sequences that control expression of the SSU1 gene in the tested strains, DNA will be extracted and PCR and inverse PCR will be performed as described. Control or ⿿promoter⿝ sequences will be identified by comparison to the public Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome database (http://www.yeastgenome.org). Correlations between sulfite production and SSU1 promoter sequences will be sought as an initial step in rationalizing sulfite levels in wine. Amendment #3 adds funds to continue the current research objectives and will be used to retest promising strains and to assess the possibility of reducing sulfite levels.