Source: MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIV submitted to NRP
THE EFFECT OF CLIMATE ON THE RATE OF WOOD DECAY
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0231560
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2012
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2015
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIV
1400 Townsend Drive
HOUGHTON,MI 49931
Performing Department
School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science
Non Technical Summary
Fungi, especially the basidiomycetes, cause wood decay. Fungal decay only occurs when the wood is relatively wet and warm, and does not have protective chemicals (naturally occurring extractives or wood preservatives) present. The exposure climate has a large effect on how rapidly wood decays, because climate controls wood's moisture content and temperature. In the United States, decay in wood-in-use is controlled by keeping the wood moisture content below the minimum level required for fungal growth and/or treating with a wood preservative. Accurate prediction of wood decay rate in a given climate has a large number of potential benefits, especially: 1) providing the ability to tailor wood preservative loading to a particular climate (e.g. reducing the loading for low decay rate regions), thereby reducing the total pesticide load on our environment, 2) adjusting preservative loading for regions as climate change occurs, 3) providing a quantitative basis for correlating accelerating product testing in tropical climates to typical North American temperate conditions. This project will evaluate six different test methods (weight loss, compression strength parallel to grain, dynamic MOE, static MOE, static MOR, visual rating) to determine the optimum procedure for measuring decay rate. Small pine and aspen stakes will be exposed above-ground at seven field sites with distinctly different climates (Alberta, MI; Gainesville, FL; Eatonville, WA; Hilo, HI; Silsbee, TX; Moutain View, HI; and Belle Glade, FL.). At intervals, specimens will be removed from the field sites and evaluated for decay using the methods described above.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
51153201103100%
Goals / Objectives
Overall Objective:Determine climate variables that affect the rate at which wood decays. Sub-Objectives: 1.Evaluate the 6 different methods of measuring the extent of wood decay - weight loss, compression strength parallel to grain, dynamic Modulus of Elasticity (MOE), static MOE and Modulus of Rupture (MOR), and visual ratings. 2.Using the optimized method from Sub-Objective 1, determine the deterioration rate of wood exposed above-ground in seven distinctly different climates - Alberta, MI; Gainesville, FL; Eatonville, WA; Hilo, HI; Silsbee, TX; Moutain View, HI; and Belle Glade, FL. 3.Develop a model that predicts above-ground wood decay rate based on climate variables, e.g.: annual rainfall, monthly rainfall events, annual temperature, monthly mean temperature, total monthly rainfall, and mean monthly relative humidity. Expected Outputs: 1.Scientific Publications - We expect 2-3 publications in relevant journals such as Forest Products Journal, Journal of Wood Science and Technology, or Holzforschung. 2.Technical Presentations - At least 3 presentations at technical conferences organized by associations such as the American Wood Protection Association (AWPA), International Research Group on Wood Preservations (IRG), and the Forest Products Society (FPS). Timeline: Experimentation, data collection, and analysis will continue for the entire duration of the project. Manuscript submission will begin in the fall of 2013 and continue through 2014.
Project Methods
1. Test Specimens Southern pine sapwood (Pinus spp.) was hand selected to meet the requirements of American Wood Protection Association (AWPA) standard E7-01. Aspen (Populus tremuloides) was purchased locally. Specimens were machined from the radial face of the selected wood to generate stakes (6.5 x 38 x 254 mm) for field exposure and randomly allocated into groups designated for each field exposure site. 2. Field Exposure The field stakes were exposed horizontally above-ground at the seven field sites. The exposure rack was constructed of PVC tubing. The side rails of the racks had a full-length slot that faced inward, with drainage holes drilled to face the ground. The stakes were inserted horizontally into a pair of slots and slightly separated, such that the fully assembled rack with specimens installed had the appearance of twin xylophones. The installed stakes were about 0.6 m above the ground, and exposed to direct sunlight for at least part of the day. The stakes were inspected in the field after 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months of exposure. During each inspection, a visual decay rating was assigned, and nine stakes of each specimen type were removed and returned to Michigan Tech for laboratory evaluation using non-destructive static bend MOE, ultimate compression strength parallel-to-grain, and weight loss. 3. Measures of Decay 1.Field visual evaluation used the AWPA E7-01 scale. 2.Bending MOE determined using a non-destructive four-point static bend procedure on the specimens after conditioning to constant weight in an environmental chamber set to 20 degree C and 65 percent RH. Test specimens will be flexed to a constant load of 10 kg at a deflection rate of 1.25 mm/min. 3.Compression parallel to grain will be measured according to ASTM D143 (ASTM 2002). The specimens will be rigidly supported in a jig to ensure compression failure. 4.Weight losses due to decay will be determined from the pre- and post-field exposure oven-dry weights of the stakes. The specimens will be dried at 105 degree C for 24 hours immediately before final weights were obtained.

Progress 10/01/12 to 09/30/15

Outputs
Target Audience:Companies developing wood preservatives and treated wood products. Wood products research community interested in the process of biodeterioration caused by fungal decay and in the use of non-destructive testing of wood-in-use and of wood quality. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?The researcher/student overseeing the bulk of this work, Glenn Larkin, continued developing new skills in non-destructive decay-testing technologies. This required reviewing papers/documents on non-destructive testing,consultations with ForestService personnel, and hands-on experimentation. Mr. Larkin also had the opportunity to demonstrate, explain, and teach these skills to others. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?1. Revised paper resubmitted to Journal of Wood Science and Technology. Technical presentations during previous reporting periods. Additional papers and a dissertation in late stages of preparation (to be deseminated in 2016). 2.Ultrasound equipment purchased during this and the last reporting period was demonstrated for assessment of wood quality (decay condition and figure of grain) for tropical woods intended for use in musical instruments. This was done for a potential collaborator and is expected to lead to new funding from industry. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? 1. Continued revision of previously submitted manuscript and resubmission to Journal of Wood Science and Technology. Four additional manuscripts inpreparation (To be submitted in first half of 2016 to Forest Products Journal, Wood and Fiber Science, Holzforschung, and Journal of Wood Science and Technology). Dissertation in preparation to be completed and defended in first half of 2016. 2. Five methods to measure the extent of wood decay were evaluated (MOR was not evaluated) and dynamic MOE was selected as the optimal method for among those evaluated(paper resubmitted). Lab measurements of reconditioned field-exposed specimens and in-situ field measurements were compared to establish whether or notfield measurement of decay by dynamic MOE is feasible (paper in preparation for submission to Forest Products Journal: Comparison of non-destructive assessment of wood decay in the laboroatory and in the field). 3. Above-ground decay rate measured and modeled based on climate variables developed (paper in preparation for submission to Wood and Fiber Science: A test of the validity of the Scheffer Index for short-term field exposures using non-destructive assessment of decay). Additionally, ground-contact decay rate measured and modeled based on climate variables (paper in preparation for submission to Wood and Fiber Science: Areabove-ground decay/climate models able topredictdecay in short-termground-contact field exposures using non-destructive assessment of decay). Comprehensive model to predict above-ground and ground-contact decay rates developed (paper in preparation for submission to either Holzforschung or Journal of Wood Science and Technology: A unified model to predict decay in wood during short-term field exposures). Dissertation containing all of above in preparation. 4. Purchased accessories for use with ultrasound equipment for non-destructive evaluation of the extent of decay purchased during last reporting period. 5. Premilinary studies to measure the extent of decay using the ultrasound equipment were initiated in May 2015. Specimens were exposed using AWPA standards E9 (for millwork) and E16 (for exterior decking). 5. Purchased some equipment necessary for in-field non-destructive evaluation of decay using ultrasound.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Submitted Year Published: 2016 Citation: G.M. Larkin and P.E. Laks. 2016. Comparing measures of decay for wood tested in short-term above-ground field exposures. Journal of Wood Science and Technology, resubmitted.


Progress 10/01/13 to 09/30/14

Outputs
Target Audience: Companies developing wood preservatives and treated wood products. Wood products research community interested in the non-destructive testing of wood-in-use. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? The researcher/student overseeing the bulk of this work, Glenn Larkin, is developing new skills in non-destructive decay testing technologies. This required reviewing papers/documents on non-destructive tesing and consultations with Forest Service personnel. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Revised paper resubmitted to Journal of Wood Science and Technology. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Continue data analysis and further preparation of two manuscripts: 1. Comparison of non-destructive assessment of wood decay in the laboroatory and in the field 2. A test of the validity of the Scheffer Index for short-term field exposures using non-destructive assessment of decay

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Continued revision of previously submitted manuscript and resubmission to a different journal. Two manuscripts in preparation. Purchased some equipment necessary for in-field non-destructive evaluation of decay using ultrasound. Exploratory use of the equipment was started.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Under Review Year Published: 2015 Citation: G.M. Larkin and P.E. Laks. 2015. Comparing measures of decay for wood tested in short-term above-ground field exposures. Journal of Wood Science and Technology, in review.


Progress 10/01/12 to 09/30/13

Outputs
Target Audience: Companies developing wood preservatives and treated wood products. Wood products research community interested in the use of non-destructive testing of wood-in-use. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? The researcher/student overseeing the bulk of this work, Glenn Larkin, gave two presentations on his work at science conferences. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? A paper submitted to a major wood science journal A presentation made and proceedings paper submitted for a conference on non-destructive testing. A presentation made to a conference of wood protection professionals. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Continue analysing data and submit two papers for publication in wood science journals.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Sub-Ojective 1 is to "evaluate the six different methods of measuring the extent of wood decay - weight loss, compression strength parallel to grain, dynamic Modulus of Elasticity (MOE), static MOE and Modulus of Rupture (MOR), and visual ratings." The work under this subobjective was finished during the past year. Dynamic MOE was found to give the quickest (earliest) indication of decay. This method will be used to compare decay rate at the seven field sites.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Submitted Year Published: 2013 Citation: G.M. Larkin and P.E. Laks. 2013 An Assessment of Stress Wave Analysis for Quantifying Decay in Above Ground Field Exposures. Proceedings of the 18th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium. Madison, WI, Sept 26, 2013.
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Submitted Year Published: 2014 Citation: G.M.Larkin and P.E. Laks. 2014. Comparing measures of decay for wood tested in accelerated above-ground field exposures. Holzforschung, submitted.