Source: RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY submitted to
AGRICULTURAL BIOETHICS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0231496
Grant No.
(N/A)
Project No.
NJ06635
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
NCCC-_OLD209
Program Code
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2012
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2013
Grant Year
(N/A)
Project Director
Fagan, JU.
Recipient Organization
RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
3 RUTGERS PLZA
NEW BRUNSWICK,NJ 08901-8559
Performing Department
Animal Sciences
Non Technical Summary
The talk of the town, so to speak, is agricultural bioethics. Consumers, students, producers, professors, activists and the like are all ready to pounce on the subject with their own opinions but are without any one entity to lead the way. Currently, bioethics is not a part of traditional agricultural training programs. There is interest in the development of material to prepare faculty to be better prepared to teach bioethics. One of the objectives is to develop a web-based program to facilitate the access to the training to those interested and who may be concerned that they may not know the material or may feel uncomfortable leading discussions on bioethics. Researchers, who are not trained in bioethics, also need bioethicists. The Agricultural Bioethics committee hopes to help promote the importance and need for guidance in this area to the USDA so that the USDA can play a leadership role. The Multistate NCCC 209 Agricultural Bioethics group, formed in 2008, would like to encourage the USDA to become more involved with providing guidance in this area and has suggested that a model curriculum be adopted that could be utilized, or used as a jumping off point, to have academic discussions on the bioethical issues. It was also suggested that this group, in rewriting its goals and objectives, receive input from college students with an interest in the animal sciences as well as bioethicists to provide a broader and more current perspective. Both the development of a model curriculum and identification of issues that need to be addressed will have an immediate positive impact on all interests groups (producer, consumer, student, professor, activist and others in the animal industry). A new online journal is in the works that will publish papers written in the area of agricultural bioethics that will inform the lay audience about the issues.
Animal Health Component
0%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
3153910302050%
3153910303050%
Goals / Objectives
Provide a forum in which animal scientists and non-animal scientists (philosophers, social scientists, etc.) may work together to examine and discuss contentious social and ethical issues. Encourage the development and coordination of teaching, extension and research activities dealing with agricultural bioethics. Develop mechanisms of outreach that would facilitate useful and open discussion between animal scientists and members of the public concerned about contemporary animal agriculture and its impacts.
Project Methods
In the last annual Agricultural Bioethics meeting on Sept 10, 2012, it was my suggestion to involve students in the rewrite of NCCC209 to be submitted Sept 2013. There is increasing interest in the field of bioethics among students and under proper supervision, they could assist with some of the research for the update and also provide a "younger" perspective on the objectives of the group. This idea was well received by the Ag Bioethics team. As such, I have engaged a group of college junior/ senior animal science students and have given them the charge to develop a model document that would be submitted to the Ag Bioethics writing team for consideration. Another group of students is working on developing a 2 credit course in Animal Welfare. To prepare such documents, under my guidance, they will identify, then research the various topics, and provide recommendations of focus, importance and issues that are due for reconsideration in how we manage and treat animals. The student's work will be published in a new on-line journal that I am in the process of starting that will be written such that the lay person will understand it and, most importantly, that will explain the science and the issues in detail, its potential solutions, and ramifications to society.

Progress 10/01/12 to 09/30/13

Outputs
Target Audience: Students studying Animal Science at Rutgers University were the initial target audience. Specific agricultural bioethics issues of interest/concern to students enrolled in an "Issues in animals and agriculture" class were studied. They were charged with learning about the issue in detail and then coming up with a plan of action to improve the issue of concern. The information was then disseminated to the general public, the second target audience, in the form of a video.Three student-produced videos are now up on YouTube that reflect their findings on their specific agricultural bioethics topic. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? The freedom to explore agricultural bioethics issues collaboratively with peers and a mentor, provides a sense of accomplishment and deep understanding of the topic. Students that become passionately involved in issues dear to them, tend to go on to make a difference in that field of study in some capacity. Some may go on to earn higher degrees or certificates while others may actively participate in community action groups that seek change How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Videos of the student projects are up on YouTube and can be viewed by the public What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Students researched the scientific literature on three separate topics. 1.Lack of regulation on the living conditions of farm animals. In this project, the students examined the regulations/best practices of the living conditions of food producing animals. They found that there are no mandatory regulations regarding farm animal living conditions. They felt that the laws that supposedly protect farm animals in the United States are inadequat Proposition 2. In an effort to enact new legislation to improve the living conditions of farm animals, it was proposed that each state create new laws similar to Proposition 2. 2.Organic vs non-organic cattle. Although organic cattle are raised separately and with different regulations than non-organic cattle, when the beef is processed there is little to no difference (even though organic meat cannot be processed at the same exact time as non-organic meat in a given facility, it can be processed using the same machinery in the same exact way). This raises questions as to whether organic and non-organic meat are actually different and whether processing facilities are carrying out the necessary precautions to make sure there is no cross-contamination of the meat being labelled as "organic". 3. Hygiene and Welfare in the Dairy and Beef Industries. These students felt that some of the existing laws and practices concerning the welfare and hygiene in dairy and beef cattle were outdated and needed changing. They identified specific practices in four main areas; husbandry, housing, transportation, and slaughter of cattle that they thought should be reevaluated. and new laws should be put into place. One law that will improve animal living conditions in the coming years is California's

Publications