Source: CORNELL UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
CHARCRETE: CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN CONCRETE
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0230956
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2012
Project End Date
Oct 1, 2015
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
CORNELL UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
ITHACA,NY 14853
Performing Department
Design & Environ Analysis
Non Technical Summary
The reasons for doing this research now is that global carbon dioxide emissions are reaching critical levels exceeding 350 ppm, the level that climate scientists have identified as being the tipping point in terms of irreversible climate change. Any and all efforts to "scrub" carbon from the atmosphere must be investigated as soon as possible. Biochar holds great promise as a way to do this but up to this point in time, its greatest use has been as a soil amendment. Although there has been much speculation about using biochar as a concrete additive as a way to sequester carbon, to date, no actual research has been done (Canadian Biochar Initiative, 2012). In a world of expanding populations and rising expectations for the quality of the built environment, there is an increasing demand for concrete for housing and urban infrastructure, such as sewers and roads. As it is the most widely produced material on earth, lowering the carbon footprint associated with concrete production could have a significance positive impact on global climate change. This affects everyone. This research program directly addresses the priority of climate change, particularly the section on mitigation as stated in the Cornell University Applied Research and Extension FY12-16 Priorities report: "because carbon dioxide emissions are one of the major causes of global climate change, the study of carbon sequestration is a major research emphasis". This is the exact focus of this proposal. Using biochar in concrete allows for the use of agriculture and forestry wastes to sequester carbon instead of releasing CO2 and methane associated with its disposal. In this way, it mitigates the climate change effects of concrete production as it mitigates the effects of agricultural byproducts.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
4020650202020%
4025399202020%
5110650202030%
5115399202030%
Goals / Objectives
Objectives 1) The first objective is to test the feasibility of using a variety of biochars to sequester carbon in Portland cement-based concrete without diminishing the structural performance. 2) The second objective is to test if biochar can be treated or mixed with another material to act as a pozzolan, a concrete additive or "cement extender that increases the long-term strength while reducing the need for CO2-intensive Portland cement in the concrete mix. 3) The third objective is to investigate the effect of biochar on air entrainment in Portland cement-based concrete mix. 4) The fourth objective is to investigate the effects of course aggregates on the strength of the best biochar concrete mix from the previous experiment. 5) A full life cycle assessment of the carbon footprint for the new 'green concrete' will be compared with regular Portland cement-based concrete as each objective is pursued.
Project Methods
All of the research labor for this project will be provided by the PI and undergraduate research assistants working for course credit, providing students an opportunity for active learning. All of the biochar for this research will be produced from the new fine biochar facility coming online in September 2012 in the College of Applied Life Sciences, Cornell University. Four different biochar feed stocks will be utilized: corn stover, hardwood wastes, mountain pine beetle (MPB) wood wastes, and rice hulls. All of the pours, cures, and tests will occur in the Bovay Lab of the Civil Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at Cornell University. To remove the confounding factor of aggregates, the first three phases of the research will be limited to the use of manufactured sand as a fine aggregate. Curing times will compare the standard 28-day schedule to a longer 56-day cure for each of the lab methodologies outlined below. All of the formulations will have a full LCA conducted for comparison to standard mixes. 1) The methodology for exploring the first objective will be limited to laboratory testing of concrete cylinder samples, following the ASTM C39 Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. Concrete cylinders will be filled with differing proportions of biochar to the standard ratio of sand, cement, and water. These samples will be subjected to compressive loads to failure. Analysis of these results will generate a performance profile of carbon-sequestering content. 2) The methodology for exploring the second objective will use concrete cylinder samples made up of equivalent proportions of biochar to the standard ratio of sand, cement, and water but with differing amounts of additives that are designed to increase the pozzolanic properties of the biochar, allowing it to increase strength and/or reduce the Portland cement content. These samples will be subjected to compressive loads to failure. 3) The third objective will be tested using concrete cylinder samples made up of equivalent proportions of biochar to the standard ratio of sand, cement, and water but with differing amounts of surfactants, additives that are designed to increase the air-entraining properties of the concrete. No fossil fuel-based air-entraining agents will be used. Instead, four classes of bio-based surfactants will be used (wood resin salts, proteinaceous salts, fatty acids, and organic salts of sulfonated hydrocarbons). These samples will be subjected to compressive loads to failure. 4) The best cement formulation from the previous set of experiments will be used to create concrete mixes using similar sized aggregates of differing textures, shape, and relative rigidity. Formulations will be mixed and set for workability and strength testing, including compression and elasticity. 5) SimaPro software from PRe consultants will be used to provide a lifecycle analysis and a carbon footprint assessment of the new formulations of carbon-enhanced cement (Charcement) and the resulting concrete (Charcrete) throughout the research period. These results will be compared to conventional cement/concrete formulations.

Progress 10/01/12 to 10/01/15

Outputs
Target Audience:Civil engineers and architects. Changes/Problems:Due to the length of time it took to develop the predictive model, the beam tests were not conducted. However, we are extremely satisfied with the experimental results. The extra time to do this properly was worth it. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?In the last year of this research program, one graduate student worked as a research assistant and continued to learn about concrete testing protocols, as well as the literature regarding the carbon footprint of concrete production. This student is using the project as a basis for his own thesis, under the direction of myself and Dr. Ken Hover, one of Cornell's most respected professors of engineering. The data collection is finished and the thesis is being prepared for a defense within the next few weeks. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?The first publication will be the thesis of Wei Cheng which is expected within the next few weeks. Thereafter, Professor Hover and I will prepare a paper for submission to a reputable journal in the field of green building, concrete research, or material science. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? We have developed a predictive model for how the biochar influences strength of the concrete mortar product as the biochar is substituted for the sand by weight for different curing periods. The model treats the soft biochar as a void instead of an aggregate. Another way to think of this is that the biochar behaves as anti-sand. As a structural material, the "Charcrete" product is marginally useful at biochar loadings that are high enough to offer a carbon-neutral product, where the ratio of carbon sequestration to carbon creation in manufacture of cement. However, as a geo-material, very high volumes of carbon could be sequestered. This could have a great impact in the concrete industry regarding the construction of future transportation infrastructures. The objectives relating to the effects of air entrainment and course aggregates could not be investigated until we were able to develop the protocols for understanding the interactions of biochar and the concrete mix. These objectives could be investigated in further research. Now that a predictive model has been developed, we can do a lifecycle analysis on a particular mix that shows the most commercial promise.

Publications


    Progress 10/01/13 to 09/30/14

    Outputs
    Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems: As mentioned in the previous report, we discovered that the charcrete was actually losing strength with a longer cure time. Samples with a 56 day cure had less compressive strength than those with a 28 day cure. This is the opposite of normal concrete. This result was even more pronounced with the activated charcoal. Before we can attempt achieving the other goals stated in the proposal, this phenomenon has to be explained. This is leading in a somewhat different research direction than originally proposed. We are now trying a different protocol, where the biochar is substituted by weight for the sand, rather than the cement. We are also modifying the ratios of water, based on an ASTM 1611 protocol. This is producing two new parallel sets of data, one with a cement replacement strategy and one with a sand replacement strategy, both employing the 1610 protocol. We anticipate trying some beam tests during this last period of research, comparing charcrete beams to portland cement concrete beams. To do so, we procured some lifting equipment, a portable aluminum gantry crane with a beam clamp and chain hoist. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? One undergraduate student and two graduate students worked as research assistants and learned about concrete testing protocols, as well as the literature regarding the carbon footprint of concrete production. One graduate student is now working with clay based plasters for her thesis research and the other is using the project as a basis for his own thesis, under the direction of myself and Dr. Ken Hover, one of Cornell's most respected professors of engineering. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? The next (last) period's objective is to finish the two tests described above. If we obtain some good results, where the longer-cured samples have greater compressive strength than the shorter-cured samples, we can then apply the Simapro software to create a LCA of the various Charcrete formulations and compare them to regular concrete. The primary project objective is to create a lower carbon footprint material but it has to perform at least as well as the standard formulation before it is worth doing the LCA.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? We were not able to find success with the first objective. All of the other objectives depend on this one. Therefore we have changed the research protocols accordingly to find out why. For more information, see the "Project Changes" section.

    Publications


      Progress 10/01/12 to 09/30/13

      Outputs
      Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Two undergraduate students and one graduate student worked as research assistants and learned about concrete testing protocols, as well as the literature regarding the carbon footprint of concrete production. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Finish the activated charcoal tests. Initiated the air-entrainment tests. Apply the simapro software to create a LCA of the various Charcrete formulations.

      Impacts
      What was accomplished under these goals? Objective 1) Test show that adding various types of biochar in varying amounts will consistently degrade the compressive strength of the charcrete mortar sample in a direct proportion to the amount used. One unexpected result was that the longer cure times, which normally produce higher strengths in concrete, resulted in lower strengths for the biochar. This is attributed to the reaction of the carbon with the water in the lime water curing protocol. Objective 2) We are starting a trial using activated charcoal to see if there are different results. We have also started an informal relationship with Dr. Aaron Sakulich of the Worcester Polytechnic Insititute to try using the biochar with his slag-based caustic concrete formulations. His results mirror ours, showing a degradation in compressive strength. Objectives 3 and 4 have not been attempted yet.

      Publications