Progress 05/01/12 to 04/30/17
Outputs Target Audience:
Nothing Reported
Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?
Nothing Reported
How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?
Nothing Reported
What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Project ended. PI retired.
Publications
|
Progress 10/01/15 to 09/30/16
Outputs Target Audience:
Nothing Reported
Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?
Nothing Reported
How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?
Nothing Reported
What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Project ended. PI retired.
Publications
|
Progress 10/01/14 to 09/30/15
Outputs Target Audience:
Nothing Reported
Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?
Nothing Reported
How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?
Nothing Reported
What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Project ended. PI retired.
Publications
|
Progress 10/01/13 to 09/30/14
Outputs Target Audience:
Nothing Reported
Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?
Nothing Reported
How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?
Nothing Reported
What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Project ended. PI retired.
Publications
|
Progress 01/01/13 to 09/30/13
Outputs Target Audience:
Nothing Reported
Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided?
Nothing Reported
How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest?
Nothing Reported
What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
Project ended. PI retired.
Publications
|
Progress 05/13/12 to 12/31/12
Outputs OUTPUTS: Recognizing that consumers make choices among available products, the appearance and texture of these reformulated peanut butters were compared with those in the marketplace using non-sensory techniques typical of quality control. Eleven commercially-available peanut butters (4 labeled natural) and 4 laboratory prototypes enhanced with peanut skins at 0, 2.5 (dry-blanched and light roasted) and 5.0% (dry blanched) were evaluated. For commercial peanut butters, samples were from two different production lots; the laboratory prototypes were produced from peanuts harvested in two different years. Mixed ANOVA was used for data analysis with PDIFF for LS-means separation (p<0.05). In addition, the functional performance of 3 value-added peanut butter prototypes (reformulated with 2.5% dry blanched, 2.5% light roasted, or 5% dry-blanched peanut skins) was investigated in a food system (cookies) with objective and consumer sensory techniques. A peanut butter devoid of peanut skins served as the control; all remaining ingredients, mixing and baking procedures were held constant. Two replications were obtained for all objective tests; 63 sensory panelists evaluated appearance, flavor, texture and overall acceptability of the cookies. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and SNK (P<0.05). PARTICIPANTS: Jackie Harrison and Anna Cheely are Dept of Foods and Nutrition graduate students involved in data collection, analysis, summary and presentation. WL Kerr is a Dept of Food Science and Technology collaborator involved in the production of the peanut butter prototypes. R Pegg (Dept Food Science and Technology) and J Hargrove (Dept of Foods and Nutrition) are collaborators involved in chemical analysis of the peanut butter prototypes. TARGET AUDIENCES: Results were presented to dietetic/nutrition professional group. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.
Impacts Appearance [both color and perceived particulate presence] of the reformulated peanut butters did not differ from the 11 commercial products representative of the spectrum of products in the product class. Instrumentally, reformulated peanut butters exhibited increases in firmness and adhesiveness, and decreases in gumminess. Ease of spreadability also decreased. In general, 2.5% peanut skin incorporation resulted in the fewest changes in the physical properties and dry blanching maximized the phenolics content. Although significant textural differences were found between the prototypes and products currently in the marketplace, actual differences in physical properties were small. When coupled with previous consumer sensory results, these reformulated peanut butters appear to hold promise within the product class as a functional food. Functional performance as a food ingredient of 4 value-added laboratory produced prototypes was investigated in peanut butter cookies. Peanut butter formulation did not affect cookie dough pH, cookie spread or baked cookie color. Further, cookie fracturability did not differ. Use of peanut butters prepared with either 5% dry blanched skins or 2.5% light roasted skins decreased cookie hardness; no differences were found with use of peanut butters containing 2.5% dry blanched peanut skins. Consumer sensory panelists rated all peanut butter cookies (p>0.05) as moderately acceptable for appearance, flavor, texture and overall acceptability. Thus, limited effect on product quality and consumer acceptability was found when high phenolic/ high fiber peanut butter prototypes were substituted for the traditionally formulated counterpart. These high phenolic/high fiber peanut butter reformulations appear to be suitable for use as a food ingredient as well as as-is consumption.
Publications
- Harrison, J, Hargrove, J, Kerr, W, Pegg, R and Swanson, R 2013. Value-added high-phenolics, high-fiber peanut butter prototypes as members of the product class: A comparison of quality characteristics. Georgia Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and Georgia Nutrition Council Annual Meeting Abstracts.
- Cheely, AN, Kerr, WL, Hargrove, J, Pegg R and Swanson, RB 2013. Sensory and objective evaluation of the functional performance of high fiber-high phenolics value-added peanut butters in peanut butter cookies. Georgia Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and Georgia Nutrition Council Annual Meeting Abstracts.
|
|