Source: UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING submitted to
EVALUATION OF THE ROLE OF CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY IN EFFICACY OF EXPERIMENTAL ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE OF LIVE ATTENUATED RB51 VACCINE AGAINST BRUCELLOSIS IN CATTLE
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0228327
Grant No.
(N/A)
Project No.
WYO-480-12
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jan 1, 2012
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2014
Grant Year
(N/A)
Project Director
Adamovicz, JE.
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING
1000 E UNIVERSITY AVE DEPARTMENT 3434
LARAMIE,WY 82071-2000
Performing Department
Veterinary Sciences
Non Technical Summary
This project will test the idea that multiple does of RB51 vaccine will protect cattle against brucellosis better than single doses of RB51 vaccine by generation of a more robust immune response. We propose to measure specific aspects of the immune response to RB51 vaccine in cattle to provide a scientifically sound rationale for ranchers/veterinarians to provide RB51 vaccine boosts to cattle. A better immune response in the cattle may not only protect the cattle from disease caused by the brucella bacteria but also reduce the chance that infected cattle will pass the disease to other uninfected cattle. We also hope to demonstrate that the vaccine can be given to pregnant cattle without increasing the risk of spontaneous abortion that has previously been blamed on the vaccine. If we are successful this work will provide a scientifically sound alternative to the current RB51 vaccine schedule, and may dispel vaccine related myths. The ability to reduce disease transmission will also improve the overall health of cattle in and around the infected area of the greater Yellowstone park. Lastly, the reduction in brucellosis in cattle is an economically desirable goal, reducing disease related costs to both the produced and consumer.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
3083310109010%
3084010109010%
3113310109020%
3114010109010%
7123310109020%
7124010109010%
7223310109010%
7224010109010%
Goals / Objectives
The over-arching goal of this project is to gather data to better compare groups of cattle that are given one, two or three doses of RB51 vaccine; calfhood vaccinated, calfhood and adult vaccinated while pregnant, or calfhood vaccinated, heifer booster vaccinated, followed by adult vaccination while pregnant. It is our hypothesis that RB51 booster vaccination will provide increased cellular or humoral immune responses than calfhood vaccination alone. We intend to observe the effects of RB51 boosting by measuring humoral (related partner grant) and cell-mediated immunity. These data may provide a scientific rationale for the addition of booster vaccines to at-risk cattle. We have defined our objective as three specific aims: 1. Make clinical observations on pregnant cattle given RB51 boosts to determine the feasibility of a larger clinical study to refute the notion that RB51 boosting of pregnant cattle induces abortions directly. Additional funding for this objective has been requested by Dr. Schumaker. 2. Develop specific cell-based methodologies to assess the development of cell-mediated immunity induced by RB51 vaccination. 3. Down select the best cell mediated immunity assay and use this to follow the cattle's response to RB51 boosting. Make the data and methodology available to use as a rationale for veterinarians to decide when and if to boost at risk cattle. Expected Significance 1. Collection of controlled experimental data on the effects of RB51 boosts on pregnant cattle will provide a scientific basis for the inclusion or exclusion of pregnant cattle from vaccine regimens. In addition, the data collected during our study will serve as preliminary data for a larger clinical-type study on this phenomenon. When RB-51 boost studies are conducted in the field or combined with a live Brucella challenge they will provide powerful incentives to both producers and veterinarians to modify RB51 vaccine practices. This may result in increased protection from both Brucella infection and Brucella-induced abortions saving money, reducing cattle to cattle, cattle to wild-life and potentially cattle to human Brucella transmission. 2. New bovine-specific T-cell assays and reagents will further Brucellosis research in general and Brucella vaccine research in particular. The availability of a qualified assay to assess cell mediated immunity in cattle is critical. This assay will provide a fundamental tool for predicting and eventually determining the benefits of RB51 or other related experimental vaccines in cattle. 3. Understanding the utility and risks of boosting cattle with RB-51 vaccine may lead to a more rationale vaccine policy for the state of Wyoming, reduce disease incidence in an economically important food source and help reduce/break the cycle of brucellosis transmission from infected wildlife such as elk. We expect that the data will help producers and veterinarians make more rationale, cost-effective decisions on if/when to vaccinate at-risk cattle both within and outside the designated surveillance area. This proposal will provide a clear link between research and positive public/veterinary health problems.
Project Methods
Animal studies: To investigate the parameters of humoral and cellular immunity conferred by the RB51 vaccine, we will undertake a prospective collaborative study measuring both humoral and cellular responses using cattle kept in the vicinity of the Wyoming State Veterinary Laboratory. We will used a single group of vaccinate animals for all three studies. There will be three study groups: 1. Calfhood vaccinates without any subsequent vaccination (Controls), 2. Calfhood vaccinates with adult vaccination while pregnant (AV) 3. Calfhood vaccinates with booster vaccination as heifers and adult vaccination while pregnant (BV+AV). Our hypothesis is that the humoral and cellular immune response in BV+AV group will be statistically significantly higher than the titers in the AV or control groups. Measures of Cell Mediated Immunity (CMI): We will test multiple measures of CMI in preliminary studies to determine the best assays to pursue as measures for RB51 vaccinates in this study. The analyses we intend to pursue are briefly outlined below. Serologic cytokine analysis. Whole blood (WB) ex vivo stimulation is a useful tool to investigate cytokine responses to a variety of stimuli, including bacterial endotoxin (LPS), antigens, allergens, and antibiotics. Cytokine profiling by transcriptional analysis. AWB ex vivo stimulation assay is a two-step process: (1) antigenic or mitogenic stimulation of cells in whole blood and (2) analysis of either plasma or cells for resulting cytokine production using a variety of methods such as RT-PCR, ELISA, flow cytometry or multiplex analyses, such as the fluorescent bead-based Luminex x-Multi Analyte Profile (MAP) technology. Lymphocyte differentiation/proliferation. CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell populations will be differentially quantified from PBMC's using the methods of Olsen and others [19]. Brucellin Test (DTH) The Brucellin skin test has been used for screening unvaccinated cattle herds. In this test, a defined quantity of Brucellin (Synbiotics, Lyon France) antigen is injected into the caudal fold or side of the neck 7-14 days post vaccination. Macrophage Killing to assess the capacity of mouse macrophages, activated with either soluble cytokines or whole immune T lymphocytes, to control or reduce numbers of intracellular bacteria. "Measurement of killing" is inferred from a reduction in the number of colony-forming units (CFU) of bacteria at the end of a culture period, compared to the input numbers of CFU at initiation of culture, to the peak numbers of CFU measured during culture, or to a control group in which killing is expected to be poor. T cell Epitope Screening, a recent addition to the repertoire of epitope prediction methods is reverse vaccinology, a method that requires knowledge of the whole pathogenic genome sequence.

Progress 01/01/12 to 09/30/14

Outputs
Target Audience: Target audience includes beef producers, veterinarians, and research scientists. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? One Master's level graduate student was trained in animal husbandry, bench level research, the scientific method, animal biosafety level three and biosafety level three biocontainment research resulting in completion of a masters thesis and masters degree. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Preliminary results have been disseminated at local scientific presenations for scientists and at local brucellosis meetings which included legislators and cattle producers. Additional lay-articles will be prepared on the results of this study for local Wyoming periodicals. A master's thesis has been generated based on this project and will be final published by May 2015. One or two peer-reviewed journal articles will be published in 2015. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? 1. Collection of controlled experimental data in our study strongly suggest there are no negativeeffects of RB51 boosts on pregnant cattle.These dataprovide a scientific basis for the inclusionof pregnant cattlein future vaccine regimens. In addition, the data collected during our study will serve as preliminary data for a larger clinical-type study on this phenomenon.Our resultsprovide powerful incentives to both producers and veterinarians to modify RB51 vaccine practices from a single calfhood vaccine to multiple annual vaccine boosts. The increse in RB51 vaccine doses resulted in increased protection from both Brucella infection and Brucella-induced abortions saving money, reducing cattle to cattle, cattle to wildlife and potentially cattle to human Brucella transmission. 2. Our results were less compelling for the use of new bovine-specific T-cell assays as our data was not equivocal. However, we were able to demonstrate an increase in CMI following multi-dose RB51 vaccination. 3. Understanding the utility and risks of boosting cattle with RB-51 vaccine may lead to a more better rationale for vaccine policy for the state of Wyoming, reduce disease incidence in an economically important food source and help reduce/break the cycle of brucellosis transmission from infected wildlife such as elk. We expect thatour compellingdata will help producers and veterinarians make more rational, cost-effective decisions on if/when to vaccinate at-risk cattle both within and outside the designated surveillance area and other areas in the world were B. abortus infection is present. We were able to demonstrate significantly decreased infection and bacterial load in multi-dose vaccinated cattle indicating a likely reduction in horizontal disease transmission risk. And for the first time we were also able to demonstrate a complete lack of infection in calfs of multi-dose infected cattle indicating that we were able to block vertical transmission of brucellosis.

Publications

  • Type: Theses/Dissertations Status: Awaiting Publication Year Published: 2015 Citation: Kesterson, Alexandria.E. Evaluation of the Role of Cell-Mediated Immunity and Efficacy of Experimental Alternative Schedule of Live Attenuated RB51 Vaccine against Brucellosis in Cattle, MS, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Wyoming
  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Awaiting Publication Year Published: 2015 Citation: Efficacy of Experimental Alternative Schedule of Live Attenuated RB51 Vaccine against Brucellosis in Cattle


Progress 12/28/12 to 09/30/13

Outputs
Target Audience: Cattle ranchers, clinical veternarians Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? This project has provided training opportunites for two undergraduate and two graduate students in bovine husbandry, veterinary care and treament, vaccination, artificial insemination, research methods development and application of the scientific method. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? During this reporting period the results have been disseminated to the Wyoming livestock board via presentation. We also provided a scienfic presentation to the Brucellosis Coordination team. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? During the next reporting period we project to complete all our planned studies on the immunological response to multiple RB-51 vaccinations. In addition, we have expanded the study with other resources to include a field strain (virulent) brucellosis challenge of pregnant cattle given 0/1/2/or 3 doses of RB-51 vaccine. These additional studies will strengthen the relavance of the proposed studies and increase their relevance to the scientific community, veternarians, cattle producers and the USDA.

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? 2nd dose of vaccine administered. Cell methodologies to assess proliferation to RB51 developed. New bovine macrophage cell line developed and tested. Study expanded to include field strain brucellosis challenge of vaccinated cattle (June 2014).

Publications


    Progress 01/01/12 to 12/27/12

    Outputs
    OUTPUTS: No discernable outputs have been achieved as the study has not reached a definitive milestone as of December 2012. PARTICIPANTS: Dr. Jeff Adamovicz, Ph.D., RBP, lead investigator; Dr. Brant Schumaker DVM; Dr. Walt Cook DVM; Dr. Scott Lake DVM; artifical insemination Ms. Alex Kesterson, MS candidate; Dr. Steve Olsen, Ph.D. ARS, USDA Collaborator for challenge studies TARGET AUDIENCES: Clinical veterinarians, ranchers, beef producers, wildlife managers PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: We have arranged to have our pregnant cattle challenged with virulent Brucella abortus in the ARS, USDA ABSL-3 facility in Ames, Iowa. This goal was not part of our original proposal but will significantly improve the relevance of our data and conclusions. This effort is separately funded.

    Impacts
    Our proposed cattle vaccinations are underway. We have written and received approval for our experimental animal use cattle protocol. We have bred and delivered 25 healthy calves. We have administered the first dose of RB-51 vaccine to these cattle along with other standard veterinary care. We have collected and stored white blood cells from these cattle per our experimental protocol. During this past year we have developed methodologies to measure cell mediated immunity in cattle. This development effort will allow us to achieve our specific aim two. In addition, the use of these methods will support future research on Brucellosis in cattle. Our research is proceeding per our proposal and our staff has procured straws to inseminate our test cattle.

    Publications

    • No publications reported this period