Source: CONNECTICUT AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION submitted to NRP
INTERACTIONS BETWEEN BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL CONTROL METHODS FOR MILE-A-MINUTE WEED.
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0227869
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jan 1, 2012
Project End Date
Dec 31, 2014
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
CONNECTICUT AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION
PO BOX 1106
NEW HAVEN,CT 06504
Performing Department
Valley Laboratory
Non Technical Summary
Mile-a-minute weed (MAM) is a non-native invasive plant. Its botanical name is Persicaria perfoliata. MAM is a rapidly growing annual vine that can reach lengths up to 8 meters (26 feet) in a year. Sharp barbs occur on its stems. MAM is a serious invasive weed because it spreads aggressively in natural and disturbed sites. Originally from eastern Asia, MAM was introduced accidentally into York County, PA in the 1930s. By 1990, it had become established in eight eastern states. MAM was first identified in Connecticut in 2000 at the southwestern corner of the state. Since then, several MAM patches have been found throughout CT. Massachusetts and Rhode Island also have MAM populations. MAM has been declared a noxious weed or an invasive plant in many states. MAM seeds, which can remain viable in soil for at least 6 years, begin germinating in early spring. The vines grow rapidly over the top of other vegetation and climb tree trunks. Dense prickly mats of MAM can smother native plants, nursery stock and Christmas trees. Dispersal of MAM seeds is facilitated by animals that eat its blue fruits (berries); the hard seeds often remain intact after passing through the digestive system. Seeds can also float in water for several days, then are deposited along river banks downstream. Many MAM sites in Connecticut are along streams or in wetlands where herbicide use may be restricted. Several herbicides are effective in controlling MAM. A viable biological control option for MAM is also available. A small weevil (Rhinoncomimus latipes) native to China has high specificity for MAM as a host plant and has been designated an effective biological control agent. R. latipes weevils are entirely dependent on MAM for all stages of its life cycle. Adult weevils feed on leaves and shoot tips, and larvae bore into MAM stems. After extensive testing, R. latipes was approved by the USDA in 2004, and weevils were released at MAM-infested sites in Delaware and New Jersey. In subsequent years, thousands of weevils have been reared in a laboratory and released in DE, MD, NJ, PA and WV. Significant decreases in MAM populations have occurred where weevils have been released with no damage to other plants. In 2009, Connecticut joined a regional program for the first releases of R. latipes in New England. Since then approximately 20,000 weevils have been released at several MAM sites in CT. Effects on MAM populations have ranged from minor to substantial. No weevil damage has been observed on other plants. Potential impacts of herbicides on R. latipes are unknown. Results from the proposed project will be useful in developing an integrated weed management plan for MAM. In CT, MAM infestations occur in a wide variety of habitats. Biological control is a major component of our MAM management plan. However, where new MAM stands are found, an initial application of herbicide may be appropriate to control MAM before seeds are produced. In such cases, weevils may be exposed to herbicide, either directly or indirectly. Thus, I will study the impacts of several herbicides used to control MAM on weevil survival, feeding and reproduction.
Animal Health Component
50%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
50%
Applied
50%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2133110113010%
2133110114010%
2135220113010%
2135220114010%
2153110113010%
2153110114020%
2155220113020%
2155220114010%
Goals / Objectives
My objective is to evaluate several herbicides used in invasive plant control for their impacts on Rhinoncomimus latipes, a weevil species that is a biological control agent for mile-a-minute weed (Persicaria perfoliata), a non-native invasive plant. Weevils will be monitored for survival, vigor, feeding and other activities following either direct or indirect exposure to one of five different herbicides applied to mile-a-minute leaves. Results of this study will be valuable in determining which herbicides could be used safely as part of an integrated management program at mile-a-minute sites where R. latipes is present or will be released subsequently. The goal is to develop effective and environmentally sound management practices for mile-a-minute weed. Information gained from this project will be disseminated to a wide range of stakeholders, including federal, state and local government agencies, land trusts and other conservation organizations, ecological researchers, vegetation management specialists, nurserymen and other farmers. Expected outputs will include publication of experimental results in journal articles, oral and/or poster presentations at scientific conferences and land management workshops, and field days.
Project Methods
For Experiment 1, mile-a-minute weed (MAM) grown in containers will be sprayed with different herbicides. Leaves will be collected from treated plants and fed to Rhinoncomimus latipes weevils (indirect exposure). In April 2012, MAM seeds will be planted in potting media in greenhouse cell trays. The most vigorous seedlings will be repotted and grouped into plots, each consisting of three plants. Herbicide treatments will be applied to plots when vines are about 50 cm long. Using small spray bottles, each herbicide will be applied at the dose recommended on its product label. In addition to an untreated control, treatments will consist of 0.25% non-ionic surfactant (NIS), imazapic + NIS, sulfometuron + NIS, aminopyralid + NIS, triclopyr + NIS, and glyphosate + NIS. One hour after spraying MAM plants, several leaves will be clipped off, collected, labeled, then immediately refrigerated, as will leaves from untreated plants. Approximately the same surface area of MAM leaves from each plot will be placed in large Petri dishes (three per plot). Each petiole will be cut, then wrapped in a small cotton ball soaked with water to insure that the leaf will remain hydrated. Six R. latipes adults will be placed in each dish. Weevils will remain in the same dish. After the first 72 h, the remainder of treated MAM leaves will be removed from dishes and replaced with fresh untreated leaves, which will remain for 1 wk. Then these leaves will be replaced with fresh untreated leaves for 1 wk. This process will be repeated until weevils have spent 31 d in dishes. Each time MAM leaves are removed, the leaves will be scanned using a flatbed scanner to document the holes created by weevil feeding. A leaf area software program will determine the total area of missing leaf tissue. Data for weevil survival and activity over time, leaf tissue consumed, egg laying and egg hatching will be collected. Experiment 1 will be repeated in 2013 with a new set of MAM plants. For Experiment 2, potted MAM plants will be enclosed within separate cages. After introducing weevils, herbicide treatments will be sprayed onto the plants (direct exposure). In May 2012, MAM seeds will be planted and vigorous seedlings selected as before. Each potted MAM will be enclosed within a netted cage to keep weevils from exiting or entering. When vines are an average of 50 cm long, 12 R. latipes adults will be introduced into each cage. A herbicide treatment (same as in Experiment 1) will then be sprayed onto each plant. Cages will be monitored twice a day for 3 d, and data will be collected on weevil survival and activity, feeding damage on leaves, and herbicidal activity on MAM. Surviving weevils will be transferred to large Petri dishes and provided with untreated MAM foliage (for four 1-wk intervals as before). Data will be collected as in Experiment 1. Experiment 2 will be repeated in 2013. Statistical analyses will consist of ANOVA with means separation for herbicide treatment effects on MAM. Weevil survival and activity data will be analyzed using non-parametric ANOVA. Data will be analyzed, reports written, and a manuscript submitted in 2014.

Progress 01/01/12 to 12/31/14

Outputs
Target Audience: The target audience for this project includes land managers with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service's Conte Refuge and other properties infested with invasive weeds, U.S. Forest Service and USDA-APHIS, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, land trusts, weed scientists, ecologists, landscapers, vegetation control specialists, property owners, and regulators. Changes/Problems: The project director, Dr. Todd Mervosh, resigned his position at the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station in September 2014. As there is only one year left on the project, it is being terminated early. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The weevil Rhinoncomimus latipes is used as a biological control of the invasive weed Persicaria perfoliata (mile-a-minute weed). Adult weevils were placed on detached foliage of mile-a-minute weed that had been treated with Garlon 3A (triclopyr), Formula 40 (2,4-D), Rodeo (glyphosate), Milestone (aminopyralid), and Plateau (imazapic) herbicides for 3 days of exposure. After 3 days, weevils were transferred to additional leaves that had not been treated with herbicides. No significant weevil mortality was observed over a one-month period. Herbicides were not applied directly to weevils. Rodeo (glyphosate), Milestone (aminopyralid), and Plateau (imazapic) applied to leaves had little or no direct or indirect impact on the adult weevil as the R. latipes survived and continued to feed on both treated and subsequent untreated leaves. Garlon 3A (triclopyr) and Formula 40 (2,4-D) herbicides did not directly impact adult weevils but feeding on treated leaves was reduced, perhaps due to leaf damage and reduced palatability from the herbicide application. These results suggest that R. latipes may be safely released in mile-a-minute infested sites previously treated with these herbicides to control Persicaria perfoliata. Herbicide application to mile-a-minute weeds resulting in plant death may result in weevils searching for plants which escaped herbicide application upon which to feed, concentrating biocontrol on those plants and enhancing overall weed control, or dispersing from the treated area to seek out additional weed-infested sites.

Publications


    Progress 01/01/13 to 09/30/13

    Outputs
    Target Audience: The target audience for this project includes land managers with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service'sConte Refuge and other properties infested with invasive weeds, U.S. Forest Service and USDA-APHIS, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, land trusts, weed scientists, ecologists, landscapers, vegetation control specialists, property owners, and regulators. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? I willspeak to pesticide applicators and to managers of properties where Rhinoncomimus latipes weevils have been released about the potentialrisks of sprayingherbicides on those properties.Even if an herbicide does notimpactweevil survival or feeding directly, it isbest to avoid or limit herbicide applicationwhere weevils are present so that the weevils havesufficientmile-a-minute weed (theirsole food source) to survive and multiply.

    Impacts
    What was accomplished under these goals? Based on results obtained from the experiment conducted in 2012,the following statements can be made. A total of 45 weevils (3 replicates, 3 petri dishes per replicate, 5 weevils per petri dish) were exposed to each treatment. Of those 45, the number of weevils that died during the 30-day period following initial exposure to herbicide-treated leaves: no herbicide,1; Rodeo (glyphosate), 2; Garlon 3A (triclopyr), 4; Formula 40 (2,4-D), 6; Milestone (aminopyralid), 1; Plateau (imazapic), 3. Some of these weevils were covered in white fungal growth when they died, so the cause of death was not clear in all cases. After correcting for the number of weevils feeding within a given petri dishin each time period, the least amount of leaf feeding(measured by total area of holes in leaves) was in dishes containing leaves sprayed with either 2,4-D or triclopyr. One complicating factor is that leaves treated with 2,4-Dand triclopyr began to wilt andlose their green colorearlier than leaves exposed to the other treatments, thus those leaves may have been less palatable to the weevils. But regardless of direct and indirect effects, glyphosate, aminopyralid and imazapic had little to no impact on weevil survival and feeding, whereas 2,4-D and triclopyr suppressedweevil feedingon the leaves of mile-a-minute weed.

    Publications


      Progress 01/01/12 to 12/31/12

      Outputs
      OUTPUTS: The goal of this project is to determine the effects of several herbicides commonly used to control invasive plants on Rhinoncomimus latipes, a weevil species that is a biological control agent for the invasive mile-a-minute weed (Persicaria perfoliata). An initial experiment was conducted in the summer of 2012, in which individual mile-a-minute plants grown in greenhouse pots were sprayed with one of six different herbicide treatments. Sprayed leaves were cut off and placed in petri dishes, then five weevils were placed in each dish. Weevils were monitored over time for survival, feeding activity, and other functions. One year of experimental data have been collected, but the experiment needs to be repeated in 2013 before results will be disseminated. Results of this study will be valuable in determining which herbicides can be used safely as part of an integrated management program at mile-a-minute sites where R. latipes is present or will be released subsequently. The goal is to develop effective and environmentally sound management practices for mile-a-minute weed. Information gained from this project will be disseminated to a wide range of stakeholders, including federal, state and local government agencies, land trusts and other conservation organizations, ecological researchers, vegetation management specialists, nurserymen and other farmers. Expected outputs will include publication of experimental results in journal articles, oral and/or poster presentations at scientific conferences and land management workshops, and field days. PARTICIPANTS: Dr. Carole Cheah - Assistant Scientist II, Department of Entomology, Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, Windsor, CT. Donna Ellis - Senior Extension Educator, Department of Plant Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT. Thomas Dorsey and Jennifer Desio - Entomologists, Phillip Alampi Beneficial Insects Laboratory, New Jersey Department of Agriculture, Trenton, NJ. TARGET AUDIENCES: The U.S. Forest Service and USDA-APHIS, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, land trusts, weed scientists, ecologists, landscapers, vegetation control specialists, property owners, and regulators. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Five weevils, instead of six weevils, were placed in each petri dish. The herbicide 2,4-D was included as a treatment instead of sulfometuron.

      Impacts
      The weevil species Rhinoncomimus latipes is an effective biological control agent for mile-a-minute weed. Herbicides are often applied to control various invasive plants at a site. If mile-a-minute weed is one of the invasive plants present at a site, a broad-spectrum herbicide treatment might be sprayed to control all the invasives present. Thus it is important to know the possible impacts of different herbicides on this weevil species. A set of experiments is being conducted to determine the effects of several different commonly used herbicides on the survival and feeding activity of R. latipes weevils. If an herbicide is to be applied in an area where weevils already exist or will be released, a product that will have minimal impact on the weevils should be chosen. Results from this project will be useful in developing a safe, effective and practical integrated weed management plan for mile-a-minute weed.

      Publications

      • No publications reported this period