Progress 10/01/11 to 09/30/14
Outputs Target Audience: Both academic and public audiences were reached by our efforts in this period. PI Hancock gave several public talks, including at alumni events, keynote talks and public lectures. The academic audiences targeted included Communication conferences and technology-focused meetings. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? One graduate student received support to collect and analyze social science data, and to write up results. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Primarily by journal publication and book chapters, as well as presentations at annual meetings. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
1. We conducted an empirical study to examine how often people lie in text messaging, providing some of the first evidence on this topic. We also examined how well people can detect deception in text messaging, discovering that there are low rates of accuracy. 2. We completed a study examining how pro-social primes can affect how much people are willing to disclose on a social network sites. The appearance of certain primes can increase how often people self-disclose sensitive information if that is perceived as the norm for the site. 3. We completed a project examining how deceptive advertising takes place online by examining how advertorials are processed. Advertorials appear to look like editorial writing, but in fact are paid content. The results reveal that people are often tricked into processing these ads less skeptically than typical ads, and have important implications for digital literacy. 4. We finished a project examining how cyber-grooming, in which sexual predators identify victims online and desensitize them to sexual talk, build up trust and eventually try to meet with the victim. Our project showed linguistic patterns consistent with grooming theory in online chat environments.
Publications
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2014
Citation:
Smith, M., Hancock, J.T., Birnholtz, J., & Reynolds, L. (2014). Everyday Deception or A Few Prolific Liars? The Prevalence of Lies in Text Messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 220-227.
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Awaiting Publication
Year Published:
2015
Citation:
Kim, S. & Hancock, J.T. (in press). Cognitive Processing and Persuasive Outcomes in Health Advertorials: The Effect of Advertisement Labeling and Message Structure. Communication Research.
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Awaiting Publication
Year Published:
2015
Citation:
Black, P., Wollis, M., Woodworth, M. & Hancock, J.T. (in press). A Linguistic Analysis of Grooming Strategies of Online Child Sex Offenders: Implications for our Understanding of Predatory Sexual Behavior in an Increasingly Computer-Mediated World. Child Abuse & Neglect.
- Type:
Book Chapters
Status:
Awaiting Publication
Year Published:
2015
Citation:
Hancock, J.T. & Guillory, J. (in press). Lies, damned lies and online lies. In S. Sundar (ed.) The Psychology of Communication Technology, Wiley Blackwell.
|
Progress 10/01/12 to 09/30/13
Outputs Target Audience: The target audiences reached last year include: 1) the academic communities in communication with presentations at the International Communication Association (London, UK) and in communication technology at CSCW2014 and 2) the alumni community with a talk at the Sigma Pi Delta 100 year anniversary, and 4) the local business community with a talk at the Tompkins County Area Development (TCAD) Board annual meeting. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? For the students involved in this project they have conducted data collection, analysis, and interpretation processes of social scientific research, including learning new kinds of statistical analysis. Graduate students also had the opportunity to train undergruate research assistants on how to code messages. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Yes, the academic community of communication and technology, and also the local business community. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? We will continue to find opportunities to disseminate the research to target communities, especially youth.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
The most important accomplishment last year was under goal #2 for advancing our understanding of social primes and how they affect cyberbullying behavior. We completed a project that showed that surveillance primes, such as the presence of eyespots on a computer screen, can affect anti-normative behavior, and that the private vs. public nature of the online context influences how surveillance primes operate in accordance with what is socially normative for public and private communication online.
Publications
- Type:
Journal Articles
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2013
Citation:
Birnholtz, J., Reynolds, L., Smith, M. Hancock, J.T. (2013). Everyone has to do it: A joint action approach to managing social inattention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2230-2238
- Type:
Conference Papers and Presentations
Status:
Published
Year Published:
2013
Citation:
Spottswood, E. & Hancock, J.T. (2013, June). The eyes have it: How publicness and surveillance primes influence prosoical communication on Facebook. International Communication Association 63rd Annual Conference, London, UK.
|
Progress 10/01/11 to 09/30/12
Outputs OUTPUTS: The research from the project were presented in a number of different venues and communities, including general talks to the public, industry talks, and a talk in Washington DC targeting policy makers. I gave two talks at Facebook in the summer of 2012 that discussed social psychological issues related to social media, including cyberbullying, deception, and the association between relationships and health. In October, I spoke at the National Science Foundation as part of the Washington Area Trustworthy Computing Hour (WATCH) seminar series. The most general talk discussing the research was a TEDx talk given in Winnipeg, Canada in Septemberfocusing on the future of lying. The talk has now been seen over 450,000 times. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals. Sunny Kim is a graduate student that has helped with literature review, design studies, and collect data. Jessie Taft is the Social Media Lab manager and has helped with organization functions, such as managing the lab space and schedule, and some help with designing studies and doing literature reviews. Collaborators. Jeremy Birnholtz (Assistant Professor), Lindsay Reynolds (PhD student), Madeline Smith (PhD student) have all worked on the social inattention project by helping design studies, collect data, and analyze and write-up results. Erin Spottswood (PhD student) has helped design studies on priming and behavior, collect data and analyze and writeup the results. Rachel Boochever (undergrad) helped analyze and write up results on psychopaths and social media. TARGET AUDIENCES: The target audiences for this research reached over the reporting period has included the general public, including young people and families, industry, including designers of social media products, and policy makers around online communication and security. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.
Impacts There were three outcomes from the project this year that changed our understanding of cyberbullying and negative behavior on social media. The first outcome was a study examining how people produce and perceive deception in online communication, such as text messaging. This work advanced our understanding in two important ways. The first was that people tend to be poor at detecting deception in everyday communication online, and that deception related to social inattention, which can often sometimes involve cyberbullying, is particularly difficult to detect. The second was that while social inattention is a frequent part of communication, repeated or intense episodes of inattention can be extremely painful to individuals. The second outcome was a study examining how primes, such as eyespots, can influence people's deceptive behavior in online contexts. This experiment manipulated the ads in Facebook to include either a set of eyes or no-eyes, and we then examined whether this affected people's lying behavior. We found that when faced with a difficult situation, such as when needing to give a friend negative feedback, the eyespots reduced deception and lead participants to be more honest with their friends. This research, though preliminary, has real potential to change people's deceptive behavior. The third outcome involved understanding how psychopaths, who can be extremely destructive interpersonally, can produce distinct linguistic patterns in their social media.
Publications
- Birnholtz, J., Hancock, J., Smith, M., & Reynolds, L. (2012). Understanding unavailability in a world of constant connection. Interactions 19, 32-35.
- Hancock, J.T., Woodworth, M.T, Morrow, R., McGillivray, H., & Boochever, R. (2012). Assessing credibility through text: A preliminary analysis for identifying psychopathy. Forty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS45).
- Reynolds, L., Smith, M.E., Birnholtz, J.P., & Hancock, J.T. (2013). Butler lies from both sides: Actions and perceptions of unavailability messaging in texting. Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2013).
|
|