Source: PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
MANAGEMENT OF THE BROWN MARMORATED STINK BUG
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0227290
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
NE-508
Project Start Date
Aug 1, 2011
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2013
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
208 MUELLER LABORATORY
UNIVERSITY PARK,PA 16802
Performing Department
Entomology
Non Technical Summary
Statement of Issue: The brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys Stal is a highly polyphagous stink bug of Asian origin. In its native range of China, Korea and Japan, it is considered an agricultural pest of soybeans, tree fruit and various ornamental crops. Since its introduction into the United States around 1996, it has spread to numerous states, become a homeowner nuisance wherever it occurs and in the eastern United States, become a severe agricultural pest with little or no management options. Need: A rapid response to this issue is warranted given the heavy losses incurred by agricultural producers in the eastern United States during the last two growing seasons. Justification: The brown marmorated stink bug was first observed in the United States in Allentown, PA around 1996 but was initially misidentified as a native pentatomid species. Following correct identification in 2001, it has been found throughout the United States east of the Mississippi river and in Arizona, California, however, their usage is not currently labeled in the United States and therefore, is not currently an option.. We anticipate this project to have the following impacts: 1. The IPM tactics we propose to develop will be adopted by farmers in 23 states thereby potentially impacting hundreds of thousands of people through reductions in pesticide residues on field, fruit, nursery and vegetable crops. It would result in the cessation of illegal pesticide applications to control H. halys by farmers. Adoption of this program over large areas also has the potential to reduce the spread of this invasive insect to agricultural areas in other states not currently impacted by BMSB. 2. This project will result in economic benefits in the form of decreased monetary looses due to yield reductions caused by this insect. It will also result in increased time being available for marketing of the crop that would otherwise be spent managing this insect. Finally, this project will ultimately result in fewer costs in managing this pest due to reductions in pesticide use.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2111110113050%
2111114113020%
2111113113015%
2113110113015%
Goals / Objectives
Assess the extent and nature of injury caused brown marmorated stink bug. Develop monitoring methods for brown marmorated stink bug. Determine the potential for biological control of the brown marmorated stink bug. Determine the toxicity and field efficacy of selected insecticides for brown marmorated stink bug control in field crops, fruit, nursery and vegetables Develop best management practices for the brown marmorated stink bug. Deliver research based IPM recommendations to growers
Project Methods
Objective 1. Assess the extent and nature of injury caused brown marmorated stink bug. We will establish research plots in fruit to evaluate damage caused by the brown marmorated sting bug. Beginning with the first appearance of adults, eggs or nymphs in plots, sentinel plants will be evaluated for damage on weekly basis. At harvest, yield estimates and damage evaluations from a subsample of plants within each plot. Objective 2. Develop monitoring methods for brown marmorated stink bug. We will establish research plots in fruit, to develop and evaluate monitoring methods in this crop. Plots will be maintained using standard practices but without the use of insecticide. Depending on the crop, adult brown marmorated stink bugs will be monitored using a combination of blacklight traps, pheromone traps, direct visual counts or sweep netting. Nymphal populations will be monitored using weekly direct counts only. Data collected for blacklight and pheromone traps will be correlated with the first presence of adults and nymphal BMSB in plots. All other methods will be compared for differences in population estimates between methods. Objective 3. Determine the potential for biological control of the brown marmorated stink bug. This objective will be fulfilled using the plots established for either objective 1 or 2. Sentinel brown marmorated stink bug egg masses will be outsourced on a minimum of eight randomly selected plants within plots. This will be initiated when naturally colonizing adults are observed in the plots and will be repeated every other week throughout the growing season. Each egg mass be examined 24 h later to detect predation. After 48-h, all egg masses will be collected, brought to the laboratory, examined for predation and then, held for emergence of adult parasitoids. The frequency of egg parasitization by a single parasitoid or combination of parasitoids will be calculated for the sentinel egg masses. Objective 4. Determine the toxicity and field efficacy of selected insecticides for brown marmorated stink bug control We will conduct small-plot field experiments in fruit in states where heavy infestations of brown marmorated stink bug occur to evaluate the efficacy of both conventional and organic insecticides/materials against brown marmorated stink bug nymphs and adults. A suite of conventional insecticides including, where appropriate, foliar contact, foliar systemic and soil-applied systemic products will be tested. Objective 5. Develop best management practices for the brown marmorated stink bug. Using the information, developed under objectives 1-3, we will develop crop specific best management plans for the brown marmorated stink bug. This will be done during the projects yearly annual meeting. Objective 6. Deliver research based IPM recommendations to growers. We will incorporate the information and BMP developed by this project into current grower recommendations. We will also deliver this information via websites, emails, newsletters, grower meetings etc.

Progress 08/01/11 to 09/30/13

Outputs
Target Audience: The primary audiences of the research activities under this project are Pennsylvania and Mid-Atlantic fruit growers and farmers affected by the impact caused by invasive insect pest species brown marmorated stink bug. Pest management advisors and providers are also to benefit from the results of this project. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Participation in the collaborative regional research and extension activities related to BMSB Graduate student training Biological control workshops Cooperation with insect pest monitoring industry, testing of new and experimental approaches for BMSB monitoring How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Due to emergency situation created by BMSB in many Pennsylvania fruit orchards, the finding of our research were immediately disseminated to our grower community either by direct presentation during growers meetings, extension publications or by utilization of newest communication methods including web updates and electronic newsletters. Relevant information related to BMSB management and monitoring options and possibilities was provided to farmers using traditional information sharing routes such as in season twilight IPM grower meetings and posted on the web during weekly IPM updates “Insect Bytes”. New PSU Tree Fruit Production Guide, currently under revision will also include all information related to changes in available BMSB pest management tools. Two insecticide active ingredients (four commercial products), previously not registered for use on fruit: dinotefuran (neonicotinoid, IRAC group 4A) and bifenthrin (pyrethroid, IRAC Group 3A) received again Section 18 Emergency Registration from EPA for use on fruit in Pennsylvania during the 2013 season. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Multi-faced activities were undertaken to develop sustainable, IPM friendly BMSB management program(s) and monitoring options. Laboratory and field evaluations of insecticides against BMSB adults and nymphs conducted during the 2012 season tested the effectiveness of multiple insecticide chemistries registered for use on fruit. The most effective insecticide products were then utilized as part of the least IPM disruptive BMSB management programs which, were tested in grower orchards with a special emphasis on assessing their impact on beneficial insects, other major fruit pests and secondary orchard pests. Evaluations of available native biological control agents were also conducted in various environments, to assess their possible impact on BMSB populations. Extensive BMSB monitoring program utilizing experimental and commercially available lures was implemented in fruit orchards located in various parts of Pennsylvania. Various monitoring trap designs were also evaluated for their efficacy in capturing BMSB adults and nymphs. Three different designs of light traps, deployed in the field and field surroundings were also tested to determine their usefulness as monitoring and possible BMSB management tool. The movement of BMSB adults and nymphs in multi-crop system was evaluated to determine possible food preferences or other factors affecting dispersal of BMSB. Active ingredients belonging mostly to two groups of products: pyrethroids and neonicotinoids provided the highest mortality of BMSB adults and nymphs. However, the unfortunate combination of low residual activity of insecticides against BMSB coupled with BMSB ability for unrestricted movement and continuous re-infestation of orchards created a very challenging situation for pest management. In consequence, only multiple, frequent applications of broad spectrum insecticides proved effective to manage the pressure from BMSB. However, the preferred products used for such treatments, exhibit highly negative effect on most beneficial organisms present in the orchard environment. As the result of this unbalanced needs for insecticide treatments to control BMSB, some isolated orchards already experiencing outbreaks of mites, wooly apple aphids or scale insects. Only generalist predators were observed feeding on eggs and various BMSB instars. No BMSB specific parasitoids were identified up to this point, although sentinel eggs were deployed in commercial orchards and surrounding vegetation. At this stage, it appears that no native beneficial insects are capable to control BMSB populations. During each of the 2012 and 2013 seasons over 150 BMSB monitoring traps were deployed in multiple Pennsylvania orchards and at the PSU Fruit Research and Extension Center. Commercially available BMSB monitoring lures from Ag-Bio Inc. (Westminster, CO) and Sterling International, Inc. ( Spokane, WA) were compared with experimental lures provided by USDA ARS in Kearnesville, WV. Studies of various combinations of BMSB lures and attractants deployed in multiple designs of traps resulted in identification of best lures and traps. The results of this research were immediately communicated to growers and farm consultants. Also, although in our testing of commercial light traps during some warm summer nights (temperatures above 68F) we collected up to a thousand of adults BMSB, this control methods still requires further development and more detailed understanding of mechanisms behind stink bug attraction to light sources. Despite very high pressure form BMSB during the 2012 and 2013 seasons, the injury levels were lower by more than 50 percent compared to injuries observed during the 2010 season. Continuous control of BMSB only with broad spectrum, non-selective insecticides could lead to a severe destruction of balanced orchard sustainable ecosystem created by intensive adoption of IPM practices by Pennsylvania fruit growers. There is immediate and very urgent need to develop and evaluate other methods and products that are effective against BMSB so softer, more selective methods can be utilized in the future. And although the non-pesticidal control (e.g., biological or cultural methods) is the ultimate goal for the BMSB management, the short term solutions unfortunately still seems to rely mostly on insecticides.

Publications

  • Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2013 Citation: Krawczyk, G., N. Ellis, T. R. Enyeart, B. Lehman and L. A. Hull. 2013. Understanding biology and behavior of brown marmorated stink bug as a basis for development of management programs in fruit orchards. Pennsylvania Fruit News 93(1):28-34
  • Type: Websites Status: Other Year Published: 2013 Citation: Krawczyk, G. 2013. Monitoring brown marmorated stink bug still a challenge. Fruit Times Newsletter, April 2013 feature article: http://extension.psu.edu/plants/tree-fruit/news/2013/monitoring-brown-marmorated-stink-bug-still-a-challenge
  • Type: Websites Status: Other Year Published: 2013 Citation: Krawczyk, G. 2013. Monthly insect updates. The Fruit Times Newsletter, monthly issues from April to October. Penn State University, College of Agricultural Sciences. University Park, PA; http://extension.psu.edu/plants/tree-fruit/news
  • Type: Websites Status: Other Year Published: 2013 Citation: Krawczyk, G. 2013. Growing Season Updates. Weekly Updated Insect Bytes. http://agsci.psu.edu/frec/growing-season-information


Progress 10/01/11 to 09/30/12

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB) Halyomorpha halys (Stal) (Heteroptera- Pentatomidae) is an exotic pest introduced into North America in mid 1990's. Since the 2010 BMSB established itself as the most devastating fruit pest in Pennsylvania and other Mid-Atlantic states. Feeding damage on fruit caused by BMSB can occur throughout almost entire growing season; it can result in misshapen fruit (early season injury) or fruit with necrotic tissue (corking) close to the skin surface occurring after feeding on mature fruit late in the season. Although the levels of damage caused by BMSB can differ significantly among various locations, during last two seasons in some stone or pome fruit orchards we observed more than 60 percent of injured fruit. Multi-faced activities were undertaken to develop sustainable, IPM friendly BMSB management program(s) and monitoring options. Laboratory and field evaluations of insecticides against BMSB adults and nymphs conducted during the 2012 season tested the effectiveness of multiple insecticide chemistries registered for use on fruit. The most effective insecticide products were then utilized as part of the least IPM disruptive BMSB management programs which, were tested in grower orchards with a special emphasis on assessing their impact on beneficial insects, other major fruit pests and secondary orchard pests. Evaluations of available native biological control agents were also conducted in various environments, to assess their possible impact on BMSB populations. Extensive BMSB monitoring program utilizing experimental and commercially available lures was implemented in fruit orchards located in various parts of Pennsylvania. Various monitoring trap designs were also evaluated for their efficacy in capturing BMSB adults and nymphs. Three different designs of light traps, deployed in the field and field surroundings were also tested to determine their usefulness as monitoring and possible BMSB management tool. The movement of BMSB adults and nymphs in multi-crop system was evaluated to determine possible food preferences or other factors affecting dispersal of BMSB. PARTICIPANTS: Greg Krawczyk, project PI: is one of the PSU leaders of brown marmorated stink bug research activities and a member of NE IPM BMSB Working group. His laboratory conducts pome and stone fruit related research and extension objectives, collaborates with other researchers, growers and ag-chem industry to develop program priorities, cooperates with industry researchers, contribute to data collection, collaborate with farmers and PSU county based extension educators to identify problems, provides presentations at research conferences and extension meetings. Ms. Deonna Soergel is a Master of Science graduate student also participating in the project. Dr. David Biddinger specializes in the biological control of fruit pests and provides systematics and insect identification expertise. TARGET AUDIENCES: The primary audiences of the research activities under this project are domestic growers of pome and stone fruit and food processors. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
Active ingredients belonging mostly to two groups of products: pyrethroids and neonicotinoids provided the highest mortality of BMSB adults and nymphs. However, the unfortunate combination of low residual activity of insecticides against BMSB coupled with BMSB ability for unrestricted movement and continuous re-infestation of orchards created a very challenging situation for pest management. In consequence, only multiple, frequent applications of broad spectrum insecticides proved effective to manage the pressure from BMSB. However, the preferred products used for such treatments, exhibit highly negative effect on most beneficial organisms present in the orchard environment. As the result of this unbalanced needs for insecticide treatments to control BMSB, some isolated orchards already experiencing outbreaks of mites, wooly apple aphids or scale insects. Only generalist predators were observed feeding on eggs and various BMSB instars. No BMSB specific parasitoids were identified up to this point, although sentinel eggs were deployed in commercial orchards and surrounding vegetation. At this stage, it appears that no native beneficial insects are capable to control BMSB populations. Also, although in our testing of commercial light traps during some warm summer nights (temperatures above 68F) we collected up to a thousand of adults BMSB, this control methods still requires further development and more detailed understanding of mechanisms behind stink bug attraction to light sources. Despite very high pressure form BMSB during the 2012 season, the injury levels were lower by more than 50 percent compared to injuries observed during the 2010 season. Continuous control of BMSB only with broad spectrum, non-selective insecticides could lead to a severe destruction of balanced orchard sustainable ecosystem created by intensive adoption of IPM practices by Pennsylvania fruit growers. There is immediate and very urgent need to develop and evaluate other methods and products that are effective against BMSB so softer, more selective methods can be utilized in the future. And although the non-pesticidal control (e.g., biological or cultural methods) is the ultimate goal for the BMSB management, the short term solutions unfortunately still seems to rely mostly on insecticides. Due to emergency situation created by BMSB in many Pennsylvania fruit orchards, the finding of our research were immediately disseminated to our grower community either by direct presentation during growers meetings, extension publications or by utilization of newest communication methods including web updates and electronic newsletters.

Publications

  • Krawczyk, G., T. R. Enyeart, and L. A. Hull. 2012. Understanding biology and behavior of brown marmorated stink bug as a basis for development of management programs in fruit orchards. Pennsylvania Fruit News 92(1):22-27.
  • Krawczyk, G. and L. A. Hull. 2012. Monthly insect updates. The Fruit Times Newsletter, monthly issues from April to October. Penn State University, College of Agricultural Sciences. University Park, PA. http://extension.psu.edu/fruit-times/news/2012.
  • Krawczyk, G. and L. A. Hull. 2012. How can we control brown marmorated stink bug in eastern U.S. fruit orchards. Abstracts from the 86th Orchard Pest Management Conference. Portland, OR. Jan 11-13, 2012. p. 58.
  • Krawczyk, G. 2012. Brown marmorated stink bug impact on IPM programs in Eastern U.S. apples. Proceedings of the 7th International Integrated Pest Management Symposium. Memphis, TN. March 27-29. p. 50.
  • Krawczyk, G. and L. Hull. 2012. Growing Season Updates. http://agsci.psu.edu/frec/growing-season-information.
  • Krawczyk, G. and L. Hull. 2012. Brown Marmorated Stink Bug Management Spotlight. http://extension.psu.edu/fruit-times/news/2012/management-options-aga inst-brown-marmorated-stink-bug-in-pennsylvania-fruit-orchards-2012-p erspective.