Source: PURDUE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
BIOLOGY, IMPACT, AND MANAGEMENT OF SOYBEAN INSECT PESTS IN SOYBEAN PRODUCTION SYSTEMS.(S-1010)
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0226132
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
S-1039
Project Start Date
May 1, 2011
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2012
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
PURDUE UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
WEST LAFAYETTE,IN 47907
Performing Department
Entomology
Non Technical Summary
Soybean is a key crop in the U.S., which supplies 35% of the world's production. In 2006, more acres of soybean were harvested in the U.S. (74.6 million) than acres of any other crop, including corn (70.6 million). Soybeans are produced in 31 states and 3 provinces in the eastern, central, and southern U.S and Canada, from Quebec to Florida, and Delaware to Nebraska. Given this large acreage and wide distribution, it is not surprising that soybean continues to suffer from insect pests that impact plant growth, grain quality, and yield. Whether it is a result of accumulated years in soybean production, changes in cropping practices, or global climate change, the distribution and impact of native and established pests is increasing in soybean. The populations of soil pests such as slugs, grubs, and millipedes, and foliar and pod feeders such as bean leaf beetle and stink bugs, are increasing in many regions. The distribution of other insects, such as Dectes stem borer and pyrethroid-resistant Lepidoptera (such as corn earworm), appears to be growing. Producers are encountering insect problems that they have never seen or managed. From a research standpoint, changes in pest distribution and status require greater understanding of pest biology and movement, as well as the development or modification of scouting and control methods. As in many other production systems, invasive species in particular are also an increasing issue in soybean production. In the northern U.S. and eastern Canada, the discovery of the soybean aphid (SBA) in 2000 fundamentally changed soybean insect management. SBA feeding impacts all components of yield; under heavy aphid pressure, yield differences between treated and untreated research plots may reach 50%. Outcomes/Impacts * Obj 2b. Success in classical biological control will reduce populations of, and yield loss from, SBA. A partial success could save producers tens of millions of dollars in control costs alone, with societal benefits of reduced human exposure, reduced non-target impacts from pesticide use, and slower formation of insecticide resistance. A better understanding of North American natural enemies and their conservation will have similar impacts as a partial success in importation biological control. * Obj 2c. The introduction of resistant varieties will reduce grower inputs by protecting yield and reducing outputs for insecticides. As a further result of reducing insecticide use, resistant varieties will lessen human exposure and non-target impacts, and eliminate or slow the formation of insecticide resistance. Management of SBA through the use of aphid-resistant varieties may also manage plant viruses through changes in aphid behavior. Further, host plant resistance is highly compatible with biological, cultural and chemical control of pests, and as such is a key component of soybean IPM programs.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2111820113030%
2151820113040%
2161820113030%
Goals / Objectives
1. Characterize insect-soybean interactions and their impact on plant growth, grain quality, and yield. 2. Develop and validate tactics for management of key soybean insects. Outputs: * Obj 2b. Field releases of one or more species of exotic natural enemies of soybean aphid in participating states/province. Development of protocols to assess the risks and effectiveness of classical biocontrol releases for SBA. Increased understanding of the impacts of native natural enemies on soybean aphid, and how these impacts can be conserved and enhanced. * Obj 2c. Incorporation of aphid resistance into commercially available soybean varieties. Increased understanding of the mechanisms of resistance to SBA and Dectes stem borer. Increased understanding of the interaction between aphid resistance and biocontrol
Project Methods
Objective 2. Develop and validate tactics for management of key soybean insects. Sub-objective 2b. Enhance biological control of soybean aphid, using both conservation of natural enemies and classical biological control releases. [(IL, MN, USDA Beneficial Insect Intro Lab), IA, IN, MI, ON, QC, SD, VA, WI] Importation biological control efforts for the soybean aphid will include further exploration for new (Asian) natural enemies, quarantine evaluation of host-specificity, field and laboratory studies of potential non-target impacts, and release and evaluation of one or more Asian species. Collections will be made in China, Japan, and Korea. Natural enemies will be shipped to quarantine facilities at the USDA Beneficial Insect Unit in Delaware and the University of MN. In quarantine, the host specificity of select natural enemies will be evaluated against a suite of native and introduced aphid species. Non-target studies will include field sampling of native aphids to estimate population size and pre-release natural enemy load. We will develop a set of protocols to guide natural enemy releases and evaluate impact. In brief, we will use field cages to inoculate and increase natural enemy numbers, opening the cages to effect the release. SBA populations will be sampled to monitor the establishment of the natural enemies, and to measure their impact on aphid numbers and crop damage. Research will also focus on conserving and enhancing native and naturalized natural enemies. Work on generalist aphid predators (such as Syrphidae and Coccinellidae), fungal pathogens and parasitoids will continue in many states/provinces. Research will focus on how natural enemies delay or prevent aphid outbreaks, influence the growth of aphid populations between the economic threshold (currently 250 aphids/plant) and the economic injury level (ca. 660 SBA/plant), affect end-of-season dynamics, as well as impact production and survival of the overwintering aphid population. To conserve natural enemies, we will examine intercropping soybeans with other plants (e.g., annual rye), the effects of pesticide applications on the survival and efficacy of natural enemies, and the impact of host plant resistant on natural enemy-SBA dynamics.

Progress 05/01/11 to 09/30/12

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Insecticidal seed treatments (e.g. CruiserMaxx) may offer soybean growers an opportunity to reduce or eliminate scouting and insecticide sprays for soybean aphids, at least early in the season. However, these options may be a poor choice for producers if they result in a reduction of natural enemies. In some states, a major early season natural enemy of soybean aphids is Orius insidiosus, the minute pirate bug (MPB) (Rutledge and O'Neil 2005). This predator also feeds on soybean thrips (an insect present in all soybean fields, but not a pest of economic importance). Both MPB and thrips populations may be reduced by feeding on plants containing the active ingredient in Cruiser (thiamethoxam) (Liburd and Arevalo, 2005). The extent to which this happens and the concentration levels of the insecticides in the tissues are not clear. Soybeans treated with Cruiser are widely available, but there is almost no independent research available on their performance, the amount of time the insecticide is present in the plant tissues or their effects on predators. This work is necessary so that soybean producers can determine whether seed treatments would offer a net benefit to their operation - for example, where soybean aphids colonize fields early in the season (MN), the benefits of treated seed may outweigh the costs. However, where aphids typically colonize in mid to late summer (IN), seed treatments may offer no advantages for pest management and be detrimental to biological control efforts. Our work examined the contributions of host plant resistance (Rag1) and seed treatments (Cruiser) both separately and in combination. We determined that although Rag1 varieties may provide a season-long benefit to Indiana soybean growers in slowing SBA population growth, the addition of an insecticidal seed treatment offers no quantifiable benefit. This is primarily because soybean aphid arrives too late in Indiana for insecticide levels to remain high enough to offer control. 2011 work expanded on this by examining seed treatment effects on a beneficial insect, the predator Orius insidiosus. Preliminary results (to be presented this winter) indicate a negative effect on early season populations of Orius, which adds another reason not to use seed treatments in Indiana. Our message to producers is simple: seed treatments are not efficacious for SBA management in Indiana except in situations of extremely late planting or double-crop beans. PARTICIPANTS: Many individuals from land grant universities across the Midwest are involved in this work. They include: Soybean aphid management in the North Central States; George Heimpel , Matt O'Neal, Erin Hodgson and Silvia Cianzio (Iowa State University), Chris DiFonzo and Dechun Wang (Michigan State University), Christian Krupke (Purdue University), Mike Gray and Brian Diers (University of Illinois and the Illinois Natural History Survey), John Reese, Brian McCornach and Bill Schapaugh (Kansas State University), Tom Hunt and Tiffany Heng-Moss (University of Nebraska), Kelley Tilmon (South Dakota State University), David Hogg and Eileen Cullen (University of Wisconsin), Deirdre Prischmann and Janet Knodel (North Dakota State University), Andy Michel and Rouf Mian (The Ohio State University), Rouf Mian (USDA/ARS/Ohio State), and Keith Hooper and Kim Hoelmer (USDA/ARS/Beneficial Insect Introduction Research Unit). TARGET AUDIENCES: The main target audiences are fellow scientists (both public and private sector), growers and consultants and other ag-business staff that work in the soybean pest management industry. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.

Impacts
Research done in MN and at Purdue University found that the combination of Rag1+seed treatment (Cruiser) was the most effective at reducing aphid population increase in the field despite the fact that effects of the seed treatment begin to wane after approximately 35 days in the greenhouse. Rag1 alone was more effective than susceptible varieties without resistance traits but there were several instances where plants developed high numbers of aphids. Yields were statistically similar throughout. Financial benefit is primarily by saving growers unnecessary cost of seed treatments. There are currently no significant pests of Indiana soybeans other that SBA, so seed treatments are not advisable from an economic standpoint. At a cost of $13-$15/acre, this is significant.

Publications

  • Schmidt. N.P., M.E. ONeal, P.F. Anderson, D. Lagos, D. Voegtlin, W. Baily, P. Caragea, E. Cullen, C. DiFonzo, K. Elliott, C. Gratton, D. Johnson, C.H. Krupke, B. McCornack, R. ONeil, D.W. Ragsdale, K.J. Tilmon and J. Whitworth. 2012. Spatial distribution of Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae): A summary of the suction trap network. Journal of Economic Entomology 105:259-271