Source: UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS submitted to NRP
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF EQUINE OPERATIONS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0225251
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
NE-1041
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2010
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2014
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS
(N/A)
AMHERST,MA 01003
Performing Department
Center for Agriculture
Non Technical Summary
Keeping horses on limited acres of land, especially in the Northeast where the average annual precipitation is over 40 inches, requires special care about preventing muddy conditions. Having a sacrifice area for keeping horses off the wet soil and pasture is strongly suggested by UMass Extension as an efficient practice for pasture management. However, sacrifice areas also should be kept mud free as much as possible to avoid diseases associated with standing of horses in mud and reducing non-point source pollution. Footing of sacrifice area and other high traffic areas therefore play an important role in reducing mud condition. This project also considers different methods of pasture grazing as it may improve feeding management of horses before they put to pasture and will allow safer pasturing and more frequent, efficient use of pastures.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
30701991060100%
Knowledge Area
307 - Animal Management Systems;

Subject Of Investigation
0199 - Soil and land, general;

Field Of Science
1060 - Biology (whole systems);
Goals / Objectives
Evaluate existing data and conduct research to better quantify environmental impacts on soil related to equine operations. Evaluate existing data and conduct research to better quantify environmental impacts on water quality measures related to equine operations. Integrate knowledge gained from the data into a system model to help improve best management practices on equine operations.
Project Methods
The efficiency and performance of different materials for use as footing in high traffic areas will be evaluated. The five materials will include gravel, sand, wood chips, bark chips (hogs fuel), and grass (tall fescue). The materials will be evaluated for reducing mud formation and soil beneath for soil nitrate. Each material will be applied to the plots which are 25 ft long and 8 feet wide. Treatments will be replicated three times (15 plots in total). Mud Condition: Scoring method by three individuals will be used for evaluation of mud condition. Evaluation will conducted two days after each rain incident and will continue until soil gets dried. Soil Nitrate: Soil nitrate level beneath materials in all plots will be monitored at two depths; 0-25 cm and 25-50 cm. Soil augers will be used for sampling. The design of the experiment is completely randomized block with three replications. Collected data will be statistically analyzed using SAS software. The site of research project is located at UMass Equine Center. The experiment will be used as a visual site for education of hundreds of annual visitors of the facility. Results will also be used in our MassAggie educational workshops presented each year at 3-4 locations throughout the state. These workshops are specifically targeting backyard horse owners which are suffering from mud condition in their property.Described above are the methods for this project that were originally reported in the CRIS system. One of the investigators being added to this project will be working towards a new objective with the following methods not previously reported under the CRIS system: An experimental paradigm will compare the same stand of grass; half that is harvested and half that is pastured. The hay is fed to the same horses a week after they had grazed the same grass as pasture. Serial blood samples are obtained before and after for several hours after entry on pasture. Differences in physiological parameters of these horses while eating these two forages should be predominantly due to the presence or absence of water in the ingested forage. Measuring metabolites, hormones and biochemical indicators of inflammation while comparing ingestion of the same forage as hay or grass will create a model which should enable modulation of the effects of grass pasture on laminitis. For example, feeding shorter hay particles and/or water added to hay in the barn could adapt horses to fructans and starch before entry on rich pasture. Such adaptation would allow efficient, shorter periods of pasturing on lush grass due to a much decreased risk of laminitis. Thus, decreased risk of laminitis allows shorter pasturing periods on lush grass, which will decrease over-pasturing and increase the quality of pasture and soils.

Progress 10/01/10 to 09/30/14

Outputs
Target Audience: The target audience was horseowners and undergrad students. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Sacrifice areas, pasture paradise, aerated composting systems are considered as permanent demonstrations and are available to the public to observe and receive hands on training. The detail of each project is described using self guided signs that are installed next to each project. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? The results of the research and demonstration projects were disseminated in several ways including: 1- Equine field days 2- Hands ontraining workshops 3- Local conference and events such as town meetings, riding clubs 4- Videos 5- National conference 6- factsheets and extension newsletter 7- UMass Extension Crops, Dairy, Livestock, Equine website What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Sacrifice areas are areas with multiple benefits including keeping off horses when pasturesand/or soils are wet to avoid soil compaction and pasture be destroyed. One major accomplishment of this project was successfuly evaluating and comparing various footing materials for establishment of a low cost yet effective sacrifice areas. Another major accomplishment of this project was to introduce a low cost areated comosting system designed for small equine operations. The system was tested and evaluated successfully at two locations.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2015 Citation: Masoud Hashemi and Atakan Kadi. 2015. Low Cost Aerated Static Composting Systems for Small Acreage Equine Operations. Waste to Worth conference, March 30 - April 3, 2015. Seattle, WA


Progress 10/01/12 to 09/30/13

Outputs
Target Audience: The target audience were primarily horseowners. The research also provided valuable information to the students of "Pasture Management" course (STOCHSCH 211). Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Two educational workshops at Blue Star Equiculture and one field day at UMass Horse Farm have been provided to horseowners and students. In these events the following items have been presented: 1) Paddock Paradise as an innovative Pasture Management 2) Aerated composting Bins 3) Sacrifice areas with various footing and the cost of installations How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? The results were presented in various forms: 1) Extension Newsletter; Crops, Dairy, Livestock, Equine Newsletter 2) Workshops (Powerpoint presentations) 3) Self-guided laminated posters What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? 1) Instalation and demonstration of sacrifice areas at Blue Star Equiculture 2) Aerated composting pile at both Blue Star and UMass Horse Farm 3) Pasture renovation project at UMass Horse Farm

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The data on reducing of amount of nutrients and pathogen has been partially collected. Once completed, the results will be included in the final report.

Publications

  • Type: Other Status: Published Year Published: 2013 Citation: Moshimer, P and P. Rickenbach. 2013. Blue Star Equiculture: Practicing Innovative Pasture Management. Crops, Dairy, Livestock, Equine Newsletter. 16(1): 6-7. Magin, M. and P. Moshimer. 2013. Innovative Best Management Practices at Blue Star Equiculture. Crops, Dairy, Livestock, Equine Newsletter. 16(2): 2-4.


Progress 10/01/11 to 09/30/12

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Several best management practices were implemented in two selected equine facility: A- Hadley Horse Farm: six paddocks with various footing materials were established to be used as exercise (sacrifice)lots to protect pastures when either in non-active growth stage and/or pasture is wet. Each paddock was 50'X 50' After 12" of soil was scraped out 3 footing materials were used, each with and without using geofabric under the materials: 1- compacted gravel (12") 2- gravel (6") plus compacted stone dust (6") 3- Pine wood chips (12") Other BMPs demonstration in this location included using raised beds to demonstrate the most common pasture grasses and legumes in New England. Each species is identified witha laminated sign which describes the most important feature of the plant species including tolerance to winter hardiness, drought, frequent cutting(grazing), as well as nutritive value and palatability. B- Blue Star Sanctuary of Draft Horses: Establishment of paddock paradise. Paddock Paradise is an alternative natural boarding concept which encourages more movement to benefit overall health of the horse and being used as sacrifice lots for better pasture management. All wooden horse for keeping off horses from pastures and some fencing have been installed. The project will be continues and finished in spring 2013. Other activity in this location is fencing off horses from wetlands and stream that passes through the property. PARTICIPANTS: 1- Dr. Masoud Hashemi, Extension faculty, University of Massachusetts. PI and director of the project. 2- Dr. Sarah Weis, Associate researcher, University of Massachusetts. Responsible for pasture identification, sampling and analysis. 3- Kyle Bostrum. Hadley Farm Manager. Installation of sacrifice lots, and fencing. 4- Pamela Rickenbach, Director of Blue Star Equiculture. Non-profit organization. Help with developing paddock paradise concept and management at the Blue Star facility. 5- Paul Moshimer, Blue Star Equiculture Operation Manager, Non-profit organization. Help with installation of wooden posts and installation of fences. TARGET AUDIENCES: The target audiences include: Horse owners Horse industry Equine Program students 4-H Program young children Veterinary and Animal Science students PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
Currently there are over 30 horses at Blue Star Sanctuary with only 7 acres of usable land for pasture. Paddock paradise is a new concept and is implemented for the first time in Massachusetts. This practice not only minimizes point and non-point source pollution from this facility to the three rivers surrounding the land and maintains their water quality but also can save pastures (currently the lands are just bare soil with no plant growing in it). Several horse owners, mainly those with limited land acreage, have contacted us and are eagerly waiting to see the finished project so they can implement it on their facility. This and other BMPs that has been planned for this location will be used in annual barn meetings in April-May. The projects in Hadley farm have already been used to increase the knowledge of Stockbridge School of Agriculture students with Equine Program major. They learned from the project as a hands-on workshop and have practiced to calculate how much material is was needed, the cost of establishment of each exercise lot. Each year several thousands of visitors are coming to the facility either for riding, education and various events. All projects will be used as training tool to increase the knowledge of visitors. The first UMass Equine Field Day has been scheduled for April 26, 2013. All of these projects along with previous projects will be used in hands on various workshops.

Publications

  • Weis, Sarah, Masoud Hashemi, and Stephen Herbert. 2012. Effectively reseeding pasture. Crops, Dairy, Livestock, and Equine News. Fall Issue: Pages 9-12. Howe, George. 2012. Equine pasture management. Crops, Dairy, Livestock, and Equine News. Fall Issue: page 13. Prostak, Randall. 2012. Weed management for pasture and hayfields. Crops, Dairy, Livestock, and Equine News. Winter Issue: Page 9.


Progress 10/01/10 to 09/30/11

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Several pads or floorings are demonstrated to show the effectiveness of various floorings in reducing mud in exercise (sacrifice) areas. The footings consisted of the following: - Compacted gravel - Bark chips (hog's fuel)on top of geotextile - Bark chips (hog's fuel)without using geotextile - Control (untreated soil) Reducing mud in high concentration area. Best management practices for this purpose included the following: - Installation of gutters and downspouts - Sloped the land and install drainage pipe and directed the runoff water - Installing surface drain for controlling runoff water - Using compacted stone dust in high traffic area to allow water to drain into surface drain Overseeding a pasture and then using aerway to remediate hoof compaction and soil damage made to pasture by horses during wet periods. Then we dragged behind the aerway. PARTICIPANTS: Masoud Hashemi, Principle investigator., Faculty extension, UMass. Kyle Bostrum, Hadley Farm Manager, UMass. Provided technical assistance, machinery and materials. Neal Woodard, Technical adviser, UMass, provided technical assistance and helped implementation of best management practices at Hadley Horse Farm. TARGET AUDIENCES: Each year more than 2000 horse owners are participating in various events at the Hadley Horse Farm. Through this project, participants as well as students from Veterinary and Animal Science Department and Equine program of Stockbridge School of Agriculture will learn about implementation of best management practices to reduce the impact of equine operation on environment. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: We did not measured the amount of N leaching from paddocks with various footing. However, we added several more best management practices to demonstrate at the site to educate horse owners.

Impacts
More than 2000 individuals are visiting Hadley Farm annually. Demonstration of selected best management practices is an efficient training tool where visitors are able to compare treated and untreated areas and implement the appropriate practices on their own farm. Similar rechnique will be used in 2012 in another location in Massachusetts. Generated factsheets were posted on Crops, Dairy, Livestock, and Equine website (http://extension.umass.edu/cdle/) and also were handed out to the attendants of several educational workshops in 2011.

Publications

  • We have generated 15 factsheets about various best management practices for equine. The titles of the factsheets follow: Hashemi, M. (2010). Basics for Livestock and Equine Nutrition. Hashemi, M. (2010).Basics of Pasture Management. Hashemi, M. (2010).Bedding Options for Livestock and Equine. Hashemi, M. (2010).Composting Horse Manure. Hashemi, M. (2010).Fly Control Measures. Hashemi, M. (2010).Housing for Horses. Hashemi, M. (2010).Manure Inventory. Hashemi, M. (2010).Manure Spreader Calibration. Hashemi, M. (2010).Manure Spreader Capacity. Hashemi, M. (2010).Mud Management for Horse Operations. Hashemi, M. (2010).Odor Control. Hashemi, M. (2010).Managing Pasture Weeds. Hashemi, M. (2010).Rodent Control on Farms. Hashemi, M. (2010).Sampling Soils for Meaningful Results. Hashemi, M. (2010).Transporting Animals.