Progress 02/01/12 to 01/31/13
Outputs OUTPUTS: Efforts under this period were utilized to accomplish the projects objective 1 and 3. Objective 1 is the development and testing of the Digital Food Imaging Analysis (DFIA) system. For this period, objective 1 is subdivided into three separate goals: a.DFIA - Completion of DFIA systems of technologies. b.Sensitivity and Specificity Studies - In this sub-phase, the work plans are focused on the sensitivity and specificity of the DFIA. Sets of referential photographs for all food items were collected to calculate surface areas and volume for all food items to be analyzed and archived in the DFIA database management system. c.Validity and Reliability Studies - Reliability was examined by test-retest using Pearson correlation coefficient. Three days of DFIA, 24HDR, and FFQ were collected twice, either 2 or 3 weeks apart. The data collection was coordinated with school district food service administrators to assure that the same menu was served on the 2 data collection periods. It was arranged with 1 school district to serve the same menu every 2 weeks and with 2 school districts every 3 weeks. A similar arrangement to that in the school districts was coordinated with parents for home meals. Concurrent validity was examined by comparing DFIA with 24HDR with NDSR and FFQ using Pearson correlation. Three days of DFIA, 24HDR, and FFQ were collected in the same day and time. Objective 3 is the application of DFIA technologies in evaluating the USDAs national school lunch (NSLP) and breakfast programs (SBP). The DFIA was used to collect and analyze over 100,000 school lunches and breakfasts during the school year 2011-2012. The study was conducted in 61 elementary schools nested in 38 school districts across 5 states (New York, Arkansas, Iowa, Texas and Washington). A preliminary data analysis was conducted on NSLP in alignment with the USDAs new school nutrition standards as authorized by the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (HHFKA). The analysis was focused on meal composition of school lunch serving and dietary specification of food items served. Events: Echon, RM (2012) Digital Food Image Analysis: An application of adaptive neural-network protocols to resolve system (bias) and random errors in nutrient analysis. Annual Meeting for the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, Washington, DC Wells NM. Myers, EM, Echon, RM, Wilkins JL, & Militello R (2013) Lunch tray photography: Measuring childrens dietary intake at school. Annual Environmental Research Design Symposium, Chicago, IL. Services: Continued collaboration with Cornell University and Washington State Universitys USDAs funded (FNS Fed. Agreement: CN-CGP-11-0047) project entitled: "Healthy Gardens, Healthy Youth". Continued collaboration with the Baylor University DFIA evaluation services for the Texas Huger Initiatives PARTICIPANTS: 1.Roberto P. Trevino, MD - Principal Investigator 2.Ginger Mullaney - Project Manager 3.Eri Birkenfeld - Data Manager and Associate Programmer 4.JudyAnn Gonzales - Project Parent Coordinator 5.Albert Salinas - Technology Assistant 6.Chuya Pierce - Research Associate 7.Jeff Wilwon - Nutritionist 8. Katy Jechow- Registered Dieticians 9. Roger Echon - Co-Investigator, DFIA Technology Developer, Project Engineer, Lead Programmer& Project Statistician. TARGET AUDIENCES: Elementary School Children ages 6-10 years PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.
Impacts Change in Knowledge - Validity and Reliability Studies - A total of 200 students and their parents participated in the reliability/validity studies. Of the 200 students, 112 students had complete 3-day dietary data available for this progress report. Their mean age was 9.18+/-0.78 years. The mean energy intake by DFIA method at test and retest were 1224+/-380 and 1195+/-323, respectively. Pearson correlation was .70 (p<.001). The mean energy intake by 24HDR was 1023+/-456 and 1123+/-448, respectively (.34; p=.008) and for FFQ it was 1560+/-1322 and 907+/-542, respectively (.24; p=.064). The mean energy intakes by DFIA and 24HDR methods were 1224+/-380 and 1023+/-456, respectively. Pearson correlation was .46 (p<.001). The mean energy intakes by DFIA and FFQ were 1023+/-456 and 1560+/-1322, respectively (.17; p=.10) and by 24HDR and FFQ they were 1023+/-456 and 1560+/-1322, respectively (.06; p=.33). Application study - The meal pattern of serving from the evaluated elementary schools (national average) are as follows: For fruits 105.76+/-85.76 g or 0.42 cup is served daily with 43% of the students meeting the USDAs recommended half cup. For vegetables, 55.24+/-49.46 g or 0.22 cup is served daily with 16% of the students meeting the USDAs recommended one third cup. For grains 36.62+/-45.43 g or 1.08 oz is served daily with 39% of the students meeting the USDAs recommended 1 oz. For meat or meat alternative 56.76+/-59.02 g or 1.7 oz is served daily with 56% of the students meeting the USDAs recommended 1 oz. For milk 207.73+/- 93.51 g or 0.83 cup are served daily with 81% of the students meeting the USDAs recommended 1 cup. Lastly, for calorie tracking 468.72+/-178.54 Kcal are offered daily to students from 4.32+/-.87 food items with 42% of the students meeting the USDAs recommended 550-650 Kcal for this age group. In terms of nutrient compositions, the average daily energy intake is 419.56+/-.186.73 kcal per student (n=8,168). The average daily salt (Na) intake is 658.57+/-.425.68 mg per student (n=8,168). The average daily saturated fat intake is 5.10+/-.5.33 g per student (n=8,168). Change in Actions - DFIA is an innovative nutrient analysis that addresses random & system errors. System errors are mathematical errors resulting in over/underestimation of nutrient values. Random errors are operational errors due selection. Selection errors stem from the enormity of food items listed in sr24 database. Results from the sensitivity/specificity study clearly demonstrated the significance of system & random errors (76.6% of total variation). DFIA technology can eliminate human factor errors in food item selection by up to 99.5 %. Additionally, DFIA also negates system error (nutrient estimation). These two actions are significant contributions to the field of nutrition, if not a step toward system accuracy and specificity in unifying the field of nutritional assessments.
Publications
- Echon, RM (2013). Random and system errors in nutrient analysis: An application of adaptive neural-network protocols,Journal of Food Engineering, 116(1):218-232.
|
Progress 02/01/11 to 01/31/12
Outputs OUTPUTS: Development of technical procedures to capture food images: (a)image capture system with streaming video(2), recording(2,8,17) & web-based application to upload photo via DFIA web site(2,16), (b)engineering & instrumentation of IP cameras(2,8), (c)data acquisition with wireless transceiver & receiver capability(2), (d)video/audio data overlay(2), optical data isolation, signal conditioning, & amplification(2), (e)CAT-5 wiring of cafeterias(8,17,14,15), (f)IT management (LAN/ WAN)(2,8,14,15,17), & (g)database management using LabView(2), Access(2,3), SQL(2,3), & iNET(16). Development of technical procedures to analyze food images using DFIA's adaptive neural network protocols: (a)menu planner(3), (b)menu analysis with linkage to sr24(2,9), (c)pattern recognition algorithms(2), (d)image artifact analysis(2), (e)RGB-color spectrum, classification, extraction, & threshold(2), (f)densitometry(2), (g)edge detection(2), (h)measurement of surface area/volume(2), & (i)data matrix reader(2). Sensitivity and Specificity Studies: In this sub-phase the work plans are focused on determining the sensitivity and specificity of the DFIA. These procedures are composed of (a)generation of unique identifiers for sr24 linkage(3), (b)generating data matrix for menu analysis, subject de-identifier, school menu reference & manufacturer/UPC code(7,8), (c)collection & archiving of 4 sets of reference photographs with top views to represent 100, 75, 50 & 25% of surface areas (length X width)(3,6,8,10), side views to represent volume (surface area X height) (3,6,8,10), (d)4 matching weight sets(6,8,10). Validity and Reliability Study: In this sub-phase the work plans are focused on testing the DFIA against well-established nutritional assessment tools such as the 24-hr dietary recall and the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). These procedures are composed of (a)school district coordination and communication for study approval and formalization of roles(1), (b)recruitment, data collection, & training(7), (c)parent coordination and communication for data collection at home or outside of schools(6), (d)training of parents to use DFIA website(6), (e)student/school record maintenance(10), (f)data collection of school meal photos(2,3,8,10), home meal photos(6), 24-H Dietary Recall(24-HDR)(4,5,7,12,13,18), and FFQ(4,5,7,12,13,18), (g)Nutrient Data System (NDS-R) data entry and analysis(5,12,13), (h)school food record menu analysis(4,5,9), (i)home food record menu analysis(2), (j)DFIA nutrient analysis(2), and (k)triangulation of DFIA, NDS-R and FFQ(2). Events: LabView training for objectives 1.a-c(2,3,5,7,8,10), & training on 24-HDR for validity and reliability objectives(5,11). Services: Provided consulting services to George Mason University to use DFIA for NIH grant application titled "School lunch waste project(2)". DFIA evaluation services for Cornell and Washington State University's USDA-funded (FNS Fed. Agreement: CN-CGP-11-0047) project titled: "Healthy Gardens, Healthy Youth(2)". Products: DFIA Software, Algorithms, & DFIA Website: www.dfia.sahrc.org Dissemination: Provided interviews with local, state, national and international media to disseminate DFIA(1,2). PARTICIPANTS: Participants: Project roles are referenced (parentheses) to accomplish the above objectives: 1.Roberto P. Trevino, MD - PI 2.Roger M. Echon, PhD - Co-I, DFIA technology developer, Proj. Engineer, Lead Programmer & Statistician. 3.Eri Birkenfeld, BS - Data Manager & Ass. Programmer 4.Julian Trevino, MPH - Proj. Manager 5.Elisa Garcia, BS - Proj. Nutritionist 6.JudyAnn Gonzales, MS - Parent Coordinator 7.Ginger Mullaney, BA - School Coordinator 8.Albert Salinas - Technology Assist. 9.Tricia Garcia, MPH - Research Assist. 10.Chuya Pierce - Research Assist. Collaborators & Contracts: 11.Liset Leal-Vasquez,MS - Staff Nutritionist 12.University of Texas Health Science Center: Dr. Cunningham, Nutrition Dept. 13.University of Incarnate Word: Dr. Elizabeth Senny-Duff, Nutrition Dept 14.San Antonio ISD: Sally Cody Nutrition Dept & Dago Garcia, IT Dept 15.Edgewood ISD: Janice Phelps, Nutrition Dept & Juan Gonzales, IT Dept 16.Denim Group: J Gonzales, B Mather, J Harris & S Chamber 17.Computer Kinetics: Keith Lytle TARGET AUDIENCES: Children 4-8 years of age. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Because parents were not downloading pictures correctly it resulted in significant delay & impacted on the rate of grant expenditure. Corrective measures are better training of parents & staff to pick up cameras. Thus, work plans under this phase will overlap (Phase II) for next funding year.
Impacts Change in Knowledge - DFIA is an innovative nutrient analysis that addresses random & system errors. System errors are mathematical errors resulting in over/underestimation of nutrient values. Random errors are operational errors due to selection. Selection errors stem from the enormity of food items listed in sr24 database. Change in Actions - Results from the sensitivity/specificity study clearly demonstrated the significance of system & random errors (76.6 percent of total variation). DFIA technology can eliminate human factor errors in food item selection by up to 99.5 percent. Additionally, DFIA also negates system error (nutrient estimation). These two actions are significant contributions to the field of nutrition, if not a step toward system accuracy and specificity in unifying the field of nutritional assessments.
Publications
- Echon, RM. 2012. Digital Food Image Analysis: An application of adaptive neural-network protocols to resolve system (bias) and random errors in nutrient analysis. Annual Meeting for the Society for Nutrition, Education and Behavior, Washington, DC.
- KSAT 12 News, 2011. ABC News local affiliate in San Antonio, Texas http://www.ksat.com/newsarchive/27859182/detail.html
- WOAI News 4, 2011. NBC News local affiliate in San Antonio, Texas - http://www.woai.com/content/health/story/School-spending-2-Million-do llars-to-track-what/u5zRCFhVUkiwpX70HuXCCg.cspx
- MSNBC, 2011. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42994465/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/t/s mile-kids-youre-calorie-camera/
- Fox News, 2011. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/05/11/texas-schools-pictures-worth-100 0-calories/
- The Today Show, 2011. http://www.todayonline.com/World/EDC110514-0000248/Smile,-US-students ,-youre-on-calorie-camera
- CBC News, 2011. http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2011/05/12/school-lunch-trays-pho tograph.html
- CBN News, 2011, https://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/healthscience/2011/May/Calorie-Camera-New -Childhood-Anti-Obesity-Tool
- KCRW 89.9 FM, 2011. Good Food with Evan Kleiman,Includes interview with Dr. Roger Echon on details how the San Antonio School District is combating obesity with a video camera. http://www.kcrw.com/etc/programs/gf/gf111022frito_pie_gut_instin
- Agritalk, 2011. The Voice of Rural America,San Antonio schools photographing school lunches. Includes interview with Dr. Roger Echon http://www.agritalk.com/podcast/p=episode&name=2011-05-17_may_1711.m p3
- Associated Press, 2011. In Texas schools, a picture worth 1000 calories by Paul Weber includes interview with Dr. Echon http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700134524/In-Texas-schools-a-pictu res-worth-1000-calories.html
- San Antonio Express-News, 2011. Skipping those veggies The Cafeteria lady knows by Don Finley,Front page article includes interview with Dr. Roberto Trevino www.mysanantonio.com/news/local_news/article/Skipping-those-veggies-T he-cafeteria-lady-knows-1376032.php
- Washington Times, 2011. Front page article includes interview with Dr. Roger Echon by Tom Reel http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/may/11/in-texas-schools-a-pi ctures-worth-1000-calories/
- San Angelo News, 2011. http://www.gosanangelo.com/photos/2011/may/11/46746/
- Huffington Post, 2011. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/11/texas-calorie-camera_n_86077 1.html
- Whittaker, Nicholas, 2011. Fighting obesity has become high tech in San Antonio schools. www.imperfectparent.com/topics/2011/05/12/fighting-obesity-has-become -high-tech-in-san-antonio-schools/
- www.sanantonio.yalwa.com, 2011. http://sanantonio.yalwa.com/ID_100640869/Associated-Press-News.html
- www.sglinks.com, 2011. http://sglinks.com/pages/676526-world-smile-us-students-re-calorie-ca mera
- www.dailymail.co.uk, 2011. Mail Online- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1386177/Texas-school-pilots -nationwide-project-photograph-students-eating-lunch.html
|