Source: CORNELL UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
DENITRIFICATION HOTSPOTS IN A CHANGING CLIMATE
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0223924
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2010
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2012
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
CORNELL UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
ITHACA,NY 14853
Performing Department
Biological & Environmental Engineering
Non Technical Summary
The ultimate goal of this project is to improve our understanding about how to reduce nitrogen (N) loads to the nation's lakes, rivers, and, especially, estuaries. Although N from our nation's agricultural lands has substantially negative and persistent impacts on important aquatic ecosystems (e.g., Chesapeake Bay, Gulf of Mexico), roughly 50% of agricultural N sources are returned to the atmosphere through denitrification. Denitrification is the process of converting soluble forms of N into gaseous forms. Areas in the landscape that are prone to soil saturation are especially effective at denitrifying N i.e., denitrification hotspots. These areas can be leveraged to further reduce N-loads to waterways. Climate change is anticipated to have profound effects on precipitation in the northeastern US. These changes may alter the extent and duration of saturated conditions in these hotspots, which will, in-turn, impact how effectively they denitrify agricultural N. Unfortunately, predictions about climate change are largely based on large-scale, global models with coarse resolution (many square kilometers). It is not obvious how these coarse predictions translate to potential changes in small-scale (a few square meters) soil moisture patterns, which strongly influence dentirfication. We propose down-scaling modeled past and future climate scenarios and using this downscaled weather in watershed models to predict changes in soil moisture and temperature and, ultimately, denitrification. The results will provide a glimpse of whether we can expect our future environment to enhance or diminish the ecosystem service of denitrification. The results will also be translated into maps of denitrifying hotspots, both current and future, to help guide management decisions for reducing N loads to streams. For example, these maps can help identify land to be protected by programs like CRP or CREP to enhance its denitrification potential. These outcomes are especially relevant to NY because the state contributes agricultural runoff to important coastal ecosystems that experience chronic N-related problems, e.g., Chesapeake Bay. New York is also a part of the country where substantial changes in precipitation associated have already been documented. Another important outcome of this project is the establishment of a research team that combines recognized strengths unique to addressing this problem: watershed modeling to predict soil moisture patterns (Walter), climate modeling (P. Hess), nitrogen cycling (B. Richards, S. Kaushal, J. Regan), and effective integration of research and extension (L. Geohring, the USDA recognized our lab as a leader of this type of integration). Very recently researchers in Baltimore have manipulated urban streams in ways to promote saturated conditions in the near-stream soils and have shown that this is an effective way to promote denitrification and reduce N-loads in streams bound for the Chesapeake Bay. Similar innovations may be possible for agricultural landscapes by taking advantage of natural denitrification hotspots such as vernal pools, wetlands, and in- and near-stream areas.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
1120320205040%
1320330207040%
1330430202020%
Goals / Objectives
Our ultimate goal is to improve our basic understanding of the interactions among climate, hydrology, and biogeochemistry to inform new and more effective water quality protection strategies. Our specific objectives here are: 1) evaluate likely changes in landscape patterns and magnitudes of denitrification potential and 2) develop maps of current and future denitrification hotspots for use in developing agricultural N-management strategies. An additional objective of this project is to accrue sufficient proof-of-concept data to develop a proposal for a USDA, EPA, or NSF grant to carry-out a more comprehensive project that includes scaling up the types of landscape patterns we anticipate in this project to larger watershed or regional scale and developing lab and field experiments to more empirically evaluate potential climate change impacts on N-cycling.
Project Methods
Because it is not obvious how large scale climate model predictions can be meaningfully translated into changes at the scale of denitrification hotspots, this initial study will focus on modeling. Our strategy is to take the weather predictions from large-resolution global climate models and down-scale them to a watershed-scale through a downscaling strategy that maintains stochastic and spatial coherence of weather information. This weather information is then used to run a hydrologic model that predicts how soil moisture and soil temperatures are distributed across the watershed. The hydrologic model output (soil moisture and temperature) will be used to run a denitrification model. We will focus the Salmon Cr. watershed, near Ithaca, because we have measurements of both stream flow and soil moisture with which we can evaluate our hydrological model. The period 1975-2005 will represent recent conditions and 2030-2060 will be simulated as our "future" scenario. We recognize that we are ignoring lots of potentially important and dynamic factors such as nitrogen deposition, carbon quality, etc., which will be incorporated as static values based on literature, but we think this initial investigation is necessary before we add more realistic complexity.

Progress 10/01/10 to 09/30/12

Outputs
OUTPUTS: This project generated field measurements of denitrification across an agricultural landscape and in a separate riparian area; measurements were restricted to saturated portions of the soil profile. Measurements spanned two years. In the first year we used the push-pull method to measure denitrification at fifteen points in the landscapes once a month with the caveat that we could not use this method if the shallow water table was deeper than 50 cm below the surface. The push-pull method involved injecting (pushing) isotopically labeled nitrate into the saturated soil profile, withdrawing (pulling) water out at regular intervals and analyzing the samples for the concentration of nitrogen compounds with isotopic label. (note, a preceeding year of push-pull measurements were also made as part of a separate grant). In year two we used a combination of isotopic analyses (natural abundance) and nitrate concentrations in groundwater, soil water, and stream water to calculate denitrification across a vernal pool complex and riparian area. These measurements were also made about once a month for one year. A coupled hydrologic-denitrification model was constructed and the field measurements were used to calibrate and test the model, which generally accounted for about 70-80% of the observed variability in our denitrification measurements. The model was then subjected to several different climate projections accounting for increased temperatures and precipitation, both combined and separately. The project supported two graduate students, one in each of the two years. Findings from this work were included in three presentations at two annual meetings of the American Geophysical Union (one in 2011, two in 2012, one of which was an invited talk) and at a seminar in the Cornell Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Five manuscripts are currently in preparation, two of which are completely based on the data and modeling from this project and three of which use a subset of these data in combination with other data. Two presentations based on our findings are scheduled in 2013, one to the Cornell Department of Crop and Soil Sciences (February 2013) and one to the Northeast Agricultural and Biological Engineering Conference (Summer 2013). PARTICIPANTS: Josephine Archibald and Janet Barclay were graduate students supported in-part by this project. Todd Walter was the project's principle investigator. TARGET AUDIENCES: The target audience for this project was researchers interested in the intersections of climate change, agriculture, and water quality. The project has implications for land managers and planners interested in water quality protection, especially in the context of potential climate change. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
There are two primary findings from this project. First, increases in temperature are likely to have a larger impact on denitrification than changes in precipitation, although both will increase overall denitrification. Second, only a small percentage (12%) of the watershed-wide denitrification occurs in the riparian zone, defined as the area within 10 m (30 ft) of a perennial stream channel while nearly 70% occurs in the wettest 15% of the watershed. Thus, there are important denitrification hotspots beyond the riparian zones that could be utilized to protect water resources from nonpoint source nitrate pollution. One of the implications of these findings is that managers may want to re-conceptualize the classical "riparian zone" practice for protecting waterways from nitrate pollution. Instead of the standard thirty-foot (or other fixed distance) setbacks, managers should identify areas particularly susceptible to soil saturation in the top 50 cm and employ practices that facilitate enriching these areas with carbon (e.g., no-tillage). There are a variety of tools that can help identify these locations (e.g., 55. Agnew et a,. 2006. Identifying hydrologically sensitive areas: Bridging science and application. Journal of Environmental Management 78: 64-76). One interesting implication of our findings is that climate change may be uniquely beneficial to reducing nitrate loads to streams because it has good potential into increase denitrification rates (although we are still working to quantify the magnitude of increase).

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 10/01/10 to 09/30/11

Outputs
OUTPUTS: The primary objectives of this project were to (O1) evaluate likely changes in landscape patterns and magnitudes of denitrification potential and (O2) develop maps of current and future denitrification hotspots for use in developing agricultural N-management strategies. In this first year we have successfully developed a distributed watershed model that incorporates denitrificaiton. Our first output is scheduled for a research symposium at Cornell in March 2012. PARTICIPANTS: In addition to the investigators and collaborators listed on our original proposal, Janet Barclay (MS/PhD) has been a primary contributor with collaborative efforts from Josephine Archibald (PhD). We have also appreciated collaborations with Zachary Easton (Asst. Prof., Virginia Tech) and Dan Fuka (PhD). All graduate students are in Cornell's Biological and Environmental Engineering Department. TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
This first year's activities focused on developing a landscape model and testing it against novel in situ measurements made under a parallel Hatch project, Hydrology- Biogeochemistry Interactions in Controlling Nitrogen Fluxes in Agricultural Ecosystems, which ended in 2011. Our initial results suggest that project temperature changes will likely have a larger impact on denitrification than changes in soil moisture status.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period