Progress 10/01/10 to 09/30/12
Outputs OUTPUTS: This 2 year project had 2 objectives. The Year 1 objective was to test the protective effect of a multivalent toxoid vaccine, with or without bacterin, against necrotic enteritis of chickens. The year 2 objective was to test the best performing vaccination regime as determine in objective 1 against necrotic enteritis caused by heterologous strains of C. perfringens. However, since the first vaccine constructs did not provide an encouraging level of protection, the contingency plan Objective 2 outlined in the original project proposal (to examine different adjuvants and doses) was carried out. Multiple vaccine formulations containing different amounts of antigen and 3 different adjuvants were prepared. One vaccine was given by the oral route and the rest were given parenterally (subcutaneous or intramuscular). These were tested in 2 animal experiments involving 244 chickens. Each experiment required the obtaining of day-old birds which were brooded and reared for an average of 5 weeks they were vaccinated twice 14 days apart and then challenged in a disease model by experimental infections. Outcomes were determined by performing clinical, gross pathological, and bacteriological examinations on all chickens. Blood samples were collected from all chickens at 3 time points. Selected samples were also collected and processed for histological examination. Two Masters students worked on this project and one has graduated. Some of the work was presented at Graduate Seminar series. Nine undergraduate students have been given extensive experiential learning opportunities working with the PI on this project PARTICIPANTS: Joan A Smyth (PI) designed vaccines, prepared the second batch of vaccines, designed experiments, performed clinical and pathological examinations on all experimental birds, collected some blood samples, interpreted and analyzed data and supervised the work of all students. Alicia Sobczynski (Graduate Assistant), prepared the vaccines and infectious inocula for experimental birds of Objective 1, assisted in the set-up and execution the experiment, did all bacterial cultures on the experimental birds, looked after birds once infections commenced, oversaw the experimental data logs. Masters student 2 (Abigail Brodsky) was trained in processes but left the Masters program and the project on grounds of ill health. She is now a lab technician. Nine undergraduate students were involved in the project over the course of the 2 years. They gained experience in multiple or all of the following: rearing, management and handing of chickens, injecting vaccines, collecting blood samples, serum separation, bacterial growth and recovery, preparing samples for histological examination, determining protein concentrations, assisting at necropsy examinations performed by a certified pathologist, ELISA development and testing, data management and record keeping, biological and chemical health and safety TARGET AUDIENCES: Scientific researchers and wider community will be targeted through eventual publication of the findings. Students have been educated through participation in the work program. Laboratory and practicum experiences were provided to 2 graduate students and 9 undergraduate students during the course of this project. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Since the first vaccine constructs did not provide an encouraging level of protection, the original objective 2 which was to test the best performing vaccination regime determined by Objective 1, against necrotic enteritis caused by heterologous strains of C. perfringens, the contingency plan Objective 2 outlined in the original project proposal (to examine different adjuvants and doses) was executed in year 2.
Impacts For Objective 1, preparation of toxoid and bacterin was completed, birds vaccinated and challenged. However, none of the vaccines produced satisfactory level of protection as determined by lesion scoring at necropsy. This led to a change from the original Objective 2 experiment to the contingency Objective 2. For the new Objective 2 experiment, different adjuvants were used, and one group was also inoculated by the oral route with an oral adjuvant. In some test groups of this second experiment, some but not all chickens were completely protected based on gross and histological examination. Two graduate students and 9 undergraduate students had extensive experiential learning by working closely with the PI on the project for between 1 and 4 semesters. Both graduate students are now working as lab technicians, one of these in a veterinary diagnostic laboratory. The undergraduate students gained experience in rearing, management and handing of chickens, injecting vaccines, collecting blood samples, serum separation, bacterial growth and recovery, preparing samples for histological examination, determining protein concentrations, assisting at necropsy examinations performed by a certified pathologist, data management and record keeping, biological and chemical health and safety. Two of these students will enter vet school in Fall, one is farming part time, the others continue their undergraduate studies.
Publications
- No publications reported this period
|
Progress 01/01/11 to 12/31/11
Outputs OUTPUTS: This 2 year project has 2 objectives. The Year 1 objective was to test the protective effect of a multivalent toxoid vaccine, with or without bacterin, against necrotic enteritis of chickens. The Year 2 objective was to test the best performing vaccination regime as determine in objective 1 against necrotic enteritis caused by heterologous strains of C. perfringens. The year 1 objective has been accomplished by the following activities. A C. perfringens type A strain known to consistently produce clinical necrotic enteritis was grown in a protein free medium. Bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation and inactivated by treatment with formaldehyde to create bacterin. Inactivation was confirmed by culture of the treated cells. Supernatants were filtered, concentrated , and inactivated using formaldehyde to create toxoid. Inactivation was confirmed by examining for loss of hemolytic activity. 125 day-old chickens were obtained and divided into 7 groups. Two groups of birds were vaccinated twice each with toxoid (50 or 200ug of protein per dose respectively) combined with Quil A as an adjuvant. Two groups were vaccinated with the same doses of toxoid but combined with bacterin. One group received a priming does of toxoid but a booster of filtered non-formaldehyde treated supernatant. A further group served as a positive control for the disease challenge system and the remaining group as a negative control. Birds were blood sampled at 14 days post first vaccine dose, and 7 days post the second vaccination, which was just prior to disease challenge. Disease challenge took place over the next 5 days. Birds were then observed for onset of disease, then subjected to necropsy and lesion scoring. Results were analyzed. An ELISA test was developed for detection of antibodies to alphatoxin, and blood samples were tested for antibodies to alphatoxin. A graduate student and 5 undergraduate students were trained in multiple laboratory techniques and experimental animal manipulations. PARTICIPANTS: The PI closely supervised a graduate student in the preparation of the vaccines, and actively carried out (and trained others in) vaccinations, bleedings and experimental vaccinations of birds. The PI, a pathologist, performed all necropsy examinations. A Graduate student (Masters) prepared the vaccines under supervision of the PI, prepared inocula for the disease challenge, worked with undergraduate students to set up experimental accommodation and care for experimental animals, and assisted the PI at necropsies. Undergraduate students gained experience by working closely with the PI, in experimental design, preparation of inocula, handling of chickens for tagging, weighing, intramuscular injections and bleeding, as well as assisting the PI at necropsies, data recording and data management. TARGET AUDIENCES: The work in this project will be of benefit to the poultry industry, and is of interest to scientists studying the disease necrotic enteritis. The work has provided substantial learning opportunities for a graduate student and 5 undergraduate students to date through laboratory instruction and practicum experience. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Since the first vaccine constructs did not provide an encouraging level of protection, the original objective 2 which was to test the best performing vaccination regime determined by Objective 1, against necrotic enteritis caused by heterologous strains of C. perfringens, the contingency plan Objective 2 outlined in the original project proposal (to examine different adjuvants and doses) will be executed.
Impacts Preparation of toxoid and bacterin was completed, birds vaccinated and challenged. However, none of the vaccines produced satisfactory level of protection as determined by lesion scoring at necropsy. ELISA testing revealed an antibody response in response to vaccination, but in lower dose groups, response was low. A graduate student and 5 undergraduate students had extensive experiential learning by working closely with the PI on the project for 1 to 2 semesters.
Publications
- No publications reported this period
|