Progress 08/01/10 to 09/30/11
Outputs OUTPUTS: This project leveraged partnerships between the UW Precision Forestry Cooperative, public (USDA Forest Service), private (Watershed Sciences, Inc.) and non-profit (Cascade Land Conservancy) agencies to develop, calibrate, apply and demonstrate a rapid forest health assessment tool. We completed the following milestones: 1. Applied and made necessary adjustments of developed methodology to an urban study site (South Seattle). a. Applied the framework developed and tested for Arboretum (semi-urban study site) on the datasets acquired for South Seattle Zip Code (urban study site). b. Adjusted the segmentation and classification algorithms to incorporate the urban structure of the environment (the biggest challenge was to discern individual trees from man-made objects). 2. Compiled a hyperspectral signatures (126 bands) dataset incorporating all the trees used in the study. 3. Analyzed the hyperspectral data for comparison (band range and width) of two hyperspectral sensors: HyMap and CASI, for the purposes of distinguishing various tree species and tree health conditions within the species. PARTICIPANTS: L.Monika Moskal, Assistant Professor, University of Washington School of Forest Resources. Miles Logsdon, Reseach Assistant Professor, University of Washington School of Oceanography. Dylan G. Fischer, Faculty, Evergreen State College and the Evergreen Ecological Observation Network. Alexandra Kazakova, graduate student, University of Washington School of Forest Resources. TARGET AUDIENCES: Target audiences include the remote sensing research community, forest managers, educators, students, and the general public. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.
Impacts List of deliverables: 1) Georeferenced (using geometric look up values) Hymap imagery (5 flightlines). 2) Individual tree segments for the full extent of the study areas (shapefile). 3) OBIA classification and segmentation algorithm used for the creation of individual tree crown segments. 4) Segment centers (representing the geometrical center of each tree) (shapefile). 5) Apex points of each tree (the tallest point of the tree) (shapefile). 6) Data table that contains all the sampled trees and their spectral values in 125 bands. 7) A presentation containing graphs of various tree species signatures, band separations, tree health signatures (healthy vs unhealthy), and spectral variability within and between species.
Publications
- Kazakova, A. N., Moskal, L.M., and Styers, D.M. 2011. Hyperspectral remote sensing of urban tree species, 2011 AAG Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, AAG Paper Session:5219 Advancements in Hyperspectral Remote Sensing. Abstract available online at: http://meridian.aag.org/callforpapers/program/AbstractDetail.cfmAbst ractID=36105, link verified 1/6/2012.
|