Source: Cycloptics Technologies, LLC submitted to NRP
NEXT GENERATION ENERGY EFFICIENT SUPPLEMENTAL LIGHTING FOR PLANT PRODUCTION
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0222891
Grant No.
2010-33610-21389
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
2010-02160
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2010
Project End Date
Feb 28, 2013
Grant Year
2010
Program Code
[8.13]- Plant Production and Protection-Engineering
Recipient Organization
Cycloptics Technologies, LLC
2358 Adirondack Trail
Dayton,OH 45409
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Greenhouse farming is an absolute necessity to revive and create local agriculture industries in northern climatically challenged regions with short growing seasons. Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) has made significant strides in greenhouse farming technology. State of the art CEA farming utilizes direct control of lighting, temperature and CO2 in a hydroponics environment. Key advantages of CEA greenhouse farming include reduced use of pesticides, faster and higher quality growth, minimal transport costs to local customers, and "vine ripened" produce with minimal spoilage and contamination risks. For CEA greenhouse farming to be adopted in rural northern climates, progress is needed to reduce greenhouse-operating costs. While temperature does play some role, lighting continues to be the most significant limiting factor in the growth of several specialty crops. Providing adequate amounts of photo synthetically active radiation (PAR) has been shown to increase greenhouse production capacity to a level capable of supporting large market demand. The challenge for northern climates is to implement such supplemental lighting systems at a cost that makes CEA greenhouse farming competitive with large out of state centralized farm and ship sources. In Phase 2 Cycloptics is combining recently available high intensity discharge (HID) bulb technology with its patent-pending, optimized reflector designs to achieve unprecedented plant growth lighting energy and cost savings. The new HID bulbs feature small emitters and high PAR efficiency relative to previous HID bulbs, making them ideal for compact and highly energy efficient growth luminaires. Cycloptics can design both direct and indirect lighting reflectors for these HID bulbs that can be precisely engineered to a highly uniform distribution over large arbitrary patterns and depths. HID bulbs have up to now been problematic as PAR luminaires for growth applications. Plants nearer the source tended to be burned, while others were not getting enough light. The design and optical performance of Cycloptics reflectors allow them to be placed closer to the plant canopy, enabling smaller volume highly efficient energy curtains for cooler months. The innovative compact reflector design will translate to less shadowing of natural lighting in warmer months. It is the combination of target efficiency, compactness, and HID lamp energy efficiency that ultimately yields the energy and cost savings for the proposed luminaire.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2041430202050%
2051430202050%
Goals / Objectives
Cycloptics Technologies goals and objectives of its SBIR Phase 2 project titled "Next Generation Energy Efficient Supplemental Lighting for Plant Production" are 1a) Achieve the optimum forming and assembly method for a 315W ceramic metal-halide HID supplemental lighting reflector/fixture for installation and testing in a 96 sq. ft. walk-in plant growth chamber. 1b) Evaluate and contrast the energy efficiency and plant production results of Cycloptics 315W HID system of fourteen reflectors versus a fluorescent configuration of forty-eight T12VHO 110W lamps and forty-eight 50W incandescent bulbs, and a T5 system consisting of 108 54W bulbs and ten 50W incandescent bulbs in identical 96 sq. ft. chambers each growing Lactuca sativa, cv Flandria (Bibb lettuce). 2a Achieve the optimum forming and assembly method for a 315W supplemental lighting reflector/fixture for installation and testing in a research greenhouse at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. 2b) Evaluate and contrast the energy efficiency and plant production performance of twenty Cycloptics 315W ceramic metal-halide HID fixtures installed in a Cornell University research greenhouse to existing 400W and 600W high pressure sodium and metal-halide HID fixtures. 3a) Achieve the optimum forming and assembly method for a 315W ceramic metal-halide HID supplemental lighting reflector/fixture for installation and testing in a CEA (controlled environment agriculture) hydroponic lettuce production greenhouse at Finger Lakes Fresh in Ithaca, NY. 3b) Evaluate and contrast the energy efficiency and plant production performance of forty Cycloptics 315W ceramic metal-halide HID fixtures installed over one bay at Finger Lakes Fresh in Ithaca, NY to their existing 600W high pressure sodium HID fixtures.
Project Methods
Cycloptics will start Phase 2 by designing and testing new, sequential iterations (beta and gamma) of the alpha prototype reflector it completed in Phase 1 to establish accurate tooling factors and tolerances for the plant growth chamber reflector fabrication process. The optical performance of the iterative prototype reflector designs for a 96 sq. ft. chamber will be verified through independent testing to determine planar and semi-spherical maps using linear and goniometer translation stages respectively. Spectral data will also be collected to determine optical wavelength content and uniformity for each map. Directionality will be determined based on the light sensor characteristics. As a baseline for the Cycloptics luminaire, several measurements will be taken without the reflector installed in the walk-in plant growth chamber. The overall "wall plug" efficiencies with and without the reflector will also be measured, as determined by optical PAR output vs. electrical power input. Cycloptics will correlate test data with simulation results. Modifications to the luminaire model will be made, and a final layout of the luminaires for the growth chamber at Cornell will be prepared. Performance metrics will include lighting lateral and depth uniformity, and daily light integral relative to that required for lettuce. The PAR efficiency, energy savings, and manufacturing cost of the new luminaire configuration will be compared to that for the existing T12 configuration as well as to configurations based on next generation T5 fluorescent lamps. As part of the "bottom line" economic impact portion of the proposed effort, the estimated volume procurement, installation and operation costs of the new luminaire design will be estimated and compared with existing fluorescent luminaires. The target audiences for the research results that Cycloptics achieves in Phase 2 for its Next Generation Energy Efficient Supplemental Lighting for Plant Production are U.S. land grant universities, agricultural research corporations and CEA greenhouses, and similar entities worldwide. Within these organizations the groups that will benefit from the projected 50% energy savings for plant growth chambers retrofitted with Cycloptics supplemental lighting, and the 50% reduction in electric demand for both supplemental lighting and air-conditioning for new chambers manufactured with Cycloptics supplemental lighting are the researchers, facility managers, trustees and general management.

Progress 09/01/10 to 02/28/13

Outputs
Target Audience: Thefirst targetaudience for our work on this grant were plant reseachers at land grant universities; public and non-profit agriculture research institutions; and the manufacturers of plant growth chambers. The second target audience were management of the energy efficiency prgoramsand utilities at the land grant universities. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? As an active member of the NCERA-101 working group and the Association of Educational Research Greenhouse Curators (AERGC) Cycloptics shares the performance results of its product with the members and attends the meetings. Additionally the company attends and exhibits at international conferences such as GreeenSys and LightsSym. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? The following major goals of the project were completed: 1) The optium forming and assembly method to fabricate the luminaire 2) The energy efficincy and uniformity benefits of Cycloptics 315W CMH lighting as compared to T5 HO flouroescents was completed in testing at Cornell University. The goal of designing a working prototype of a luminaire using the 315W Elite Agro CMH lamp to test against 400W and 600W HPS lights in a research greenhouse was not accomplished. The design of the reflector was completed, but a manufacturing process to make the design was not found. This resulted in testing a similiar system in a CEA (controlled environment agriculture) hydroponic lettuce productin greenhouse not also being achieved.

Publications

  • Type: Conference Papers and Presentations Status: Published Year Published: 2012 Citation: Challenges for optimal plant growth chamber lighting are energy efficiency, uniformity and quality of light spectrum. T12 VHO lamps are obsolete with low efficiency in converting electrical energy into light that plants can use. T5 fluorescents and Cycloptics 315W CMH system were compared. Both systems use electronic ballasts and are dimmable that permit easy PPF-level and daily light integral control. The walls of two walk-in 2.44 x 3.66 m, 2.18 m high chambers were retrofit with diffuse white sheet metal with 80% reflectivity. One chamber served to evaluate the T12 system first operating 48 T12 VHO lamps after a 100-hour burn in. The T12 lamps were removed and the light cap was modified for 14 Cycloptics fixtures arranged in an optimized layout. The other chamber was retrofitted with 12 T5 HO fixtures. Each lighting system included a tempered glass barrier between the light-cap and chamber to facilitate heat removal. Electric power to operate the lamps and their ballasts was determined after lamps had undergone a 100 hour burn-in. True RMS wattage was recorded using a Amprobe DM-II Pro. Irradiation data was collected from 0.46 to 1.37 m in 0.30 m increments using two calibrated LI-COR quantum sensors and LI-250A light meters. One sensor was in a fixed position at the chamber center to serve as a reference while the second roving sensor recorded the local light intensity. Additional light mapping was done for Cycloptics system at 1.98 m below the ceiling with eight of the fourteen luminaires turned off, leaving a symmetric pattern of six luminaires. It was also done at 1.37 m below the ceiling with six of the fourteen luminaires turned off, leaving a symmetric pattern of eight luminaires. Cycloptics designed its reflector using proprietary software and Photopia" software permitted modeling the effects of varying wall, floor, and ceiling reflectance on light delivered to target planes, as well as losses in the reflector and overhead barrier. A major design goal was to distribute light as uniformly as possible throughout the full volume of the chamber from wall to wall. To achieve this goal, and provide light for plants coming from all directions, the chamber walls were deliberately incorporated in the reflector design process.
  • To maximize efficacy, the reflector was designed so as much light as possible left the reflector either directly or after only one reflection. The efficacies of the T12, T5, and Elite Agro lamps were previously determined by Philips Lighting to be 0.88, 1.24, and 1.91 �mol s-1 W-1. Based on the number and wattage of lamps in the chambers, values for total photosynthetic photon production were calculated as 9113, 6402, and 8414 �mol s-1, respectively, before any delivery losses. Despite requiring half the wattage of the T12 chamber, the average measured PPF in the T5 chamber was 50 to 60% more than in the T12 chamber, and the Cycloptics chamber provided more than twice the intensity. In measures of light uniformity, the Cycloptics system was better over the fluorescent systems at the greater distances from the light array. The T5 system had a slight advantage closer to the lamp array, although the differences were not statistically significant at the 5% level. Cycloptics system delivered 39 to 56% more PAR per second per watt than the T5 system, depending on distance below the luminaires. Prior Cycloptics modeling had led to higher expectations for magnitude and efficacy of delivered light than were reached. Uniformity was better than or equal to that of the T5 system on four of the five planes but was not as great an improvement as expected. Modeling indicated that substantial benefits in efficacy of delivered light and light uniformity are possible for the Cycloptics system when wall and ceiling reflectance is increased. This is expected because the walls are used deliberately as a means of light delivery.