Source: PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROJECT: NATIONAL CONSORTIUM FOR RURAL GEOSPATIAL INNOVATIONS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0221871
Grant No.
2010-34558-21128
Cumulative Award Amt.
$1,161,474.00
Proposal No.
2010-02549
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 1, 2010
Project End Date
Jan 31, 2013
Grant Year
2010
Program Code
[EL]- Geographic Information System
Project Director
Day, R. L.
Recipient Organization
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
208 MUELLER LABORATORY
UNIVERSITY PARK,PA 16802
Performing Department
Crop & Soil Sciences
Non Technical Summary
Emerging issues such as the economic downturn, global climate change and alternative energy development target rural communities. Geospatial technologies provide powerful tools to assist rural communities in addressing these issues but often use and expertise is lacking due to resource limitations. The National Consortium for Rural Geospatial Innovations in America (RGIS) seeks to provide research, tools and education to rural communities in uses of geospatial technologies for a variety of applications. Geospatial technologies provide tools to evaluate impacts of climatic change on issues such as drinking water supplies, drought vulnerability for farmers and more. Increasing energy costs associated with transportation, residential heating and manufacturing also increase pressures on rural communities. Increasing regulatory pressures on farmers presents challenges where geospatial technologies can provide solutions.in planning and management. Alternative energy development provides economic opportunities for rural communities if they are poised to effectively address the economic and environmental issues associated with development of biofuel, wind, solar and natural gas resources. As land is converted from traditional use to use for alternative energy, local communities must have geospatial tools, data, and expertise available to them to insure that environmental impacts are minimized and that the local economy is enhanced. Geospatial information technologies will play a role in the rural economic recovery and migration to alternative energy development. Appropriate development can provide a stimulus to local economies, including investments in sustainable development and conservation intended to mitigate climate change and alternative energy development impacts. Geospatial information can help local communities attract and site new businesses; identify deficiencies in infrastructure and guide its development; enhance sustainable land management strategies in resource-dependent areas; evaluate environmental impacts of alternative energy development; and provide "telecommuting" and traditional employment. Geospatial tools also play a critical role in land use planning and disaster planning and mitigation for drought, floods, wildfires, disease outbreaks, other natural disasters, and emergency evacuations. In all these situations, that the benefits of geospatial technologies are best realized when brought closest to those making decisions about the land - local officials, active citizens, interested businesses, public agency staff, and others involved in decision-making. Our research is aimed at determining what technologies and approaches work in various circumstances and for different issues. RGIS has a long-term commitment to stakeholders through involvment in pilot and demonstration projects. RGIS has built a reputation of providing needed and focused direct technical assistance and training programs, and recently, high quality conferences. Further RGIS is developing online tools to assist rural communities, agricultural producers, and environmentalists in planning and management to insure efficient utilization of resources.
Animal Health Component
35%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
20%
Applied
35%
Developmental
45%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
1120199206010%
1120210206010%
1310199206010%
1310210206010%
1320199206010%
1320210206010%
6080199206010%
6080210206010%
9030199206010%
9030210206010%
Goals / Objectives
The National Consortium for Rural Geospatial Innovations in America (RGIS) was created to help bring the benefits of geographic information systems and related geospatial information technologies to rural and tribal America. Eight sites across the United States conduct projects and technology transfer activities in their regions to support a common mission. The entire group has several collective activities such as a website, software evaluation, and educational modules. Each site contributes unique expertise and the experience from regional activities to the collective accomplishments of the organization. Common objectives of the entire project, carried out by individual sites include: developing and implementing geospatial software, analysis methods, online decision support system, and models to empower local governments, industry, organizations, and citizens to understand and participate in decisions that affect their lands, resources, economy, and quality of life; developing and evaluating tools to enhance rural security by using information technologies to enable more effective emergency response and disaster management, and by stabilizing and building local economies; educating and training people in the use of geospatial technologies for rural issues through workshops and programs, through creation of educational modules, web resources, technical assistance guidelines, printed bulletins, and videos; demonstrating state-of-the-art solutions for local land information systems through implementation of GIS and related web-based technologies for information access and dissemination to support the use of spatial data in rural issues; and fostering linkage to regional, state, tribal, and national land information systems and cooperation with agencies and organizations involved in their development and use, including promoting the use of federal initiatives such as National Spatial Data Infrastructure and related components. In 2010, each RGIS site will conduct research in one or more priority areas: (1) rural response to climate change, (2) impacts and opportunities of alternative energy development, and (3) enhancing sustainable economic development in rural communities. Further, each site will (1) conduct local geospatial research on topics of interest to their particular state or region, (2) provide local support and services: training, technical assistance, facilitation and so forth for local and tribal governments; (3) conduct collaborative research where multiple RGIS sites participate in common objectives, and (4) participate in the RGIS Consortium. RGIS, through the individual and collective actions of its eight sites, will continue to be effective in assisting rural stakeholders deal with land-related issues through implementation and use of advanced geospatial information technologies.
Project Methods
RGIS-Chesapeake Wilkes will (1) provide strategic support for geospatial aspects of energy development, climate change, carbon management, wind farms and natural gas extraction from the Marcellus shale formation, (2) provide geospatial data, mapping, assessment, and environmental education materials through enhanced online virtual tools to communities of interest, and (3) continue baseline river ecosystem research and assessment. RGIS-Chesapeake Penn State will (1) continue development of the Pennsylvania OneStop Conservation Planning and Nutrient Management System to assist Pennsylvania agriculture, (2) develop an agricultural drought vulnerability assessment system for Pa, and (3) evaluate use of multi-return LiDAR data to quantify forest spatial configuration and composition. RGIS-Mid South will focus research on (1) disaster mitigation planning, support, and emergency response within Arkansas, (2) geospatial analytical methods for geographic indicators (GIs) in support for the American Origins Product, (3) on-line processing of high-resolution imagery, (4) visualization tools for economic development planning, and (5) online educational materials for local governmental employees. RGIS-Great Lakes will (1) continue development and dissemination of spatial information technologies and analyses that can assist Wisconsin's transition to a "bioeconomy", (2) evaluate the impacts of GIS and participatory processes in land use planning, and (3) develop tools and approaches for communities to locate and evaluate the potential of community and collective gardens for individual or small-scale commercial vegetable production. RGIS-Great Plains will focus research on (1) utilizing LiDAR data for defining roadside vegetation height to augment blowing snow models, (2) exploring opportunities with combining Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) with geospatial technologies for environmental monitoring, economic development, and agriculture. RGIS-Pacific Northwest will focus on (1) development of a public participation GIS assessing shoreline resources, (2) spatially analyzing rural economic competitiveness, (3) creation of an on-line geospatial database for mapping water rights and related hydrologic data, and (3) development of online tools to input, view and geospatially analyze ecological and geomorphic data collected through volunteer monitoring programs. RGIS-South Georgia will focus activities on (1) improving preparation and coordination for disaster response in Georgia, (2) correlation of river gauging station measurements with field measurements for emergency response, (3) providing hardware and technical support to rural communities when disaster strikes, and (4) continue leadership within the Georgia Regional Commission (RC) Association. RGIS-SIPI will (1) provide technology transfer through the use of short courses, community-based demonstration projects, and collaboration between tribes and students, (2) provide training and research that will aid in tribal workforce institutional knowledge and natural resource protection from urban development, and (3) provide training and research on community disaster resilience levels.

Progress 07/01/10 to 01/31/13

Outputs
Target Audience: Training and outreach efforts are targeted to rural geospatial technology users throughout the U.S., including tribes and tribal members, in all disciplines including agriculture, environment, climate, economics, rural development, and emergency response. In Pennsylvania, web applications for agriculture are aimed at the 60,000 farms that need conservation and nutrient management plans and the entire agricultural industry that can be assisted by online marketing support. Native Americans from across the county are served by RGIS-SIPI. Each RGIS site includes large audiences of GIS users and groups that benefit from educational materials, software tools provided by RGIS, or geospatial analyses conducted by RGIS. Changes/Problems: The work on the project ended in June 2012. The subcontracts did not clear within 90 days of the end date and the project needed to receive a request for an extension to allow payment to be made. Project was extended for financial reasons only; no further work was conducted since June 2012 on this grant. What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? RGIS Chesapeake - Penn State University continued development of the Pennsylvania OneStop Conservation Planning and Nutrient Management System, provided technical assistance, training and support to the GIS User Community in Pennsylvania, developed an agricultural drought vulnerability assessment system for Pa, and evaluated use of multi-return LiDAR data to quantify forest spatial configuration and composition. RGIS Chesapeake - Wilkes University developed and deployed beta versions of "Pollmap", a public opinion collection tool to provide support to the community of interest portal concept, and supported local government in the implementing geodpatial technologies. RGIS Great Lakes continued development and dissemination of spatial information technologies and analyses that can assist Wisconsin's transition to a "bioeconomy," developed tools and approaches for communities to locate and evaluate the potential of community and collective gardens for individual or small-scale commercial vegetable production, and promoted and evaluated the impacts of GIS and participatory processes in land use planning. RGIS Great Plains assisted River Watch Teams with a GIS sedimentation loading analysis, conducted water quality data collection and collected dual-camera video mapping along Red Lake River, utilized LiDAR data to calculate vegetation height for blowing snow research, and conducted a test flight for a video mapping payload on an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS). RGIS Mid South developed an automated methodology for assessing image accuracy, developed 3D visualization tools for economic development and planning, developed a bio-fuel decision support tool to evaluate site selection, supported rural first responders and disaster mitigation planning efforts, and developed online educational materials for local governmental employees to expand geospatial skills and achieve professional certification . RGIS Pacific Northwest developed an online participatory GIS tool that provides an innovative forum and access to spatial data sets for shoreline management issues, devised an online geospatial tool that informs stakeholders of rights, uses, and potential resource conflicts in water-limited agricultural basins, and created a web-based map portfolio that allows shoreline managers and the public the ability to access long-term ecological data collected for 38 beaches in Island County. RGIS South Georgia developed a web-based disaster toolset for collecting and sharing spatial data among EMA, provided leadership to regional and rural governments in Georgia through participation in the Georgia association of regional commissions and the statewide Geographic information system coordinating committee, and developed a pilot project and methodology to correlate river gauging stations to actual river shorelines. RGIS SIPI Tribal Technical Center provided outreach to local tribes through educational programs at the Southwest Indian Polytechnic Institute (SIPI), helped maintain and support the Geospatial Technologies lab on the SIPI campus, and assisted other Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs) with geospatial curriculum. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Detailed documentation of individual impacts for each of the 8 RGIS sites is not possible here, so much of this discussion will be focused on collective impact. Firstly, RGIS sites collectively leveraged significant funding from other sources to support objectives funded by USDA-NIFA as part of this special project. RGIS sites engaged in educational outreach, training, and technical support that benefited geospatial technology users and local governments throughout the country, including tribal communities. Sites engaged in modeling, website development, online geospatial application development or analyses that provided valuable information and analytical tools for a variety of applications spanning multiple disciplines including land use planning, agriculture, environment, ecology, climatology, emergency management, and economics. Additionally, the scale of applications ranges from single agricultural fields, to counties, states and the nation. In Pennsylvania, a drought vulnerability model assesses land at the field scale whereas the PaGIS Consortium employs data sharing among regional user groups. In Pennsylvania, the PaOneStop project (http://paonestop.org) serves 40,000 farmers without current Ag E&S Plans and over 50,000 manure transfers each year. PaOneStop is a web tool that will serve all of those users. Tribal Technical Center hosted the First Annual Tribal GIS Conference, collaboration with tribes is expanding, and the number of students is increasing. During the past year, 11 SIPI interns were hired by Federal Agencies and Universities and more students are continuing their education beyond 2 years. At Chesapeake Wilkes the "Pollmap" project spatially evaluates public opinion and provides decisionmakers with an understanding of public perception. RGIS-GP's participation helped the Larimore River Watch Team earned the People's Choice Award for their presentation on soil types and sedimentation loading. In Wisconsin county-scale maps and accompanying statistics were developed statewide depicting the amount and location of marginal land in Wisconsin, and its suitability for production of various bioenergy alternatives. Their interactive web-mapping resource has been provided with a permanent institutional home at Energy Center of Wisconsin. In South Georgia, the disaster planning and management toolset is the first system that allows for sharing of data among all EMA officials in Georgia. Pacific Northwest's shoreline resource mapping project provides an innovative forum and access to spatial data sets for informed public input on a wide variety of shoreline management issues in the Puget Sound. In Arkansas, over the past eleven years, outreach and technical support has benefited well over 3,450 private citizens and many federal, state and local governments located roughly within a day's drive of Fayetteville. RGIS-GP has formed a relationship with a local hydrologic and environmental monitoring program called River Watch, a basin-wide citizen water quality monitoring program organized and delivered by the International Water Institute and its partners through high schools and communities.

Publications


    Progress 07/01/10 to 06/30/12

    Outputs
    OUTPUTS: RGIS Chesapeake - Penn State University continued development of the Pennsylvania OneStop Conservation Planning and Nutrient Management System, provided technical assistance, training and support to the GIS User Community in Pennsylvania, developed an agricultural drought vulnerability assessment system for Pa, and evaluated use of multi-return LiDAR data to quantify forest spatial configuration and composition. RGIS Chesapeake - Wilkes University developed and deployed beta versions of "Pollmap", a public opinion collection tool to provide support to the community of interest portal concept, and supported local government in the implementing geodpatial technologies. RGIS Great Lakes continued development and dissemination of spatial information technologies and analyses that can assist Wisconsin's transition to a "bioeconomy," developed tools and approaches for communities to locate and evaluate the potential of community and collective gardens for individual or small-scale commercial vegetable production, and promoted and evaluated the impacts of GIS and participatory processes in land use planning. RGIS Great Plains assisted River Watch Teams with a GIS sedimentation loading analysis, conducted water quality data collection and collected dual-camera video mapping along Red Lake River, utilized LiDAR data to calculate vegetation height for blowing snow research, and conducted a test flight for a video mapping payload on an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS). RGIS Mid South developed an automated methodology for assessing image accuracy, developed 3D visualization tools for economic development and planning, developed a bio-fuel decision support tool to evaluate site selection, supported rural first responders and disaster mitigation planning efforts, and developed online educational materials for local governmental employees to expand geospatial skills and achieve professional certification . RGIS Pacific Northwest developed an online participatory GIS tool that provides an innovative forum and access to spatial data sets for shoreline management issues, devised an online geospatial tool that informs stakeholders of rights, uses, and potential resource conflicts in water-limited agricultural basins, and created a web-based map portfolio that allows shoreline managers and the public the ability to access long-term ecological data collected for 38 beaches in Island County. RGIS South Georgia developed a web-based disaster toolset for collecting and sharing spatial data among EMA, provided leadership to regional and rural governments in Georgia through participation in the Georgia association of regional commissions and the statewide Geographic information system coordinating committee, and developed a pilot project and methodology to correlate river gauging stations to actual river shorelines. RGIS SIPI Tribal Technical Center provided outreach to local tribes through educational programs at the Southwest Indian Polytechnic Institute (SIPI), helped maintain and support the Geospatial Technologies lab on the SIPI campus, and assisted other Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs) with geospatial curriculum. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals/institutions: Penn State University- Rick Day, (PI), Robert Neiderer, Yuanghong Zhu, Leah Wasser, Valerie Mebane (research support). Wilkes University / Pa GIS Consortium - Dale Bruns (PI), Tom Sweet (research support), University of Wisconsin - Steve Ventura (PI), University of North Dakota Leon Osborne, (PI), Scott Kroeber, Damon Grabow (research support), University of Central Washington - Anthony Gabriel, David Cordner, (PIs), J. Murray, John Bowen, Michael Pease (research support), South Georgia Development Commission - Vance Roberts (PI), Chris Strom (research support), University of Arkansas - Fred Limp, Jack Cothren (PIs), Brian Culpepper (research support), Tribal Technical Center - Joan Goodman, Maggie Porter (PIs), Dario Rodriguez-Bejarano, Christel White (project support). Partner organizations: Penn State Cooperative Extension, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Pennsylvania State Conservation Commission, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Farm Bureau, Pennsylvania Association of Conservation Districts, Office of Surface Mining, Wisconsin Departments of Natural Resources and Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection, International Water Institute River Watch Program, North Dakota Department of Transportation, JDOSAS Center of Excellence for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Research, Education, and Training, University of North Dakota Surface Transportation Weather Research Center, WA; WSU Island County Beach Watcher's and Island County; WA Department of Natural Resources Aquatic Reserves Program.Training: All RGIS sites engage in training sessions throughout their regions through short-courses to a variety of audiences. Partner Collaborators from RGIS: Wilkes-University, Pa GIS Consortium, University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Arkansas-Fayetteville, Central Washington University, Southwest Indian Polytechnic Institute, University of North Dakota, South Georgia Commission. TARGET AUDIENCES: Training and outreach efforts are targeted to rural geospatial technology users throughout the U.S., including tribes and tribal members, in all disciplines including agriculture, environment, climate, economics, rural development, and emergency response. In Pennsylvania, web applications for agriculture are aimed at the 60,000 farms that need conservation and nutrient management plans and the entire agricultural industry that can be assisted by online marketing support. Native Americans from across the county are served by RGIS-SIPI. Each RGIS site includes large audiences of GIS users and groups that benefit from educational materials, software tools provided by RGIS, or geospatial analyses conducted by RGIS. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

    Impacts
    Detailed documentation of individual impacts for each of the 8 RGIS sites is not possible here, so much of this discussion will be focused on collective impact. Firstly, RGIS sites collectively leveraged significant funding from other sources to support objectives funded by USDA-NIFA as part of this special project. RGIS sites engaged in educational outreach, training, and technical support that benefited geospatial technology users and local governments throughout the country, including tribal communities. Sites engaged in modeling, website development, online geospatial application development or analyses that provided valuable information and analytical tools for a variety of applications spanning multiple disciplines including land use planning, agriculture, environment, ecology, climatology, emergency management, and economics. Additionally, the scale of applications ranges from single agricultural fields, to counties, states and the nation. In Pennsylvania, a drought vulnerability model assesses land at the field scale whereas the PaGIS Consortium employs data sharing among regional user groups. In Pennsylvania, the PaOneStop project (http://paonestop.org) serves 40,000 farmers without current Ag E&S Plans and over 50,000 manure transfers each year. PaOneStop is a web tool that will serve all of those users. Tribal Technical Center hosted the First Annual Tribal GIS Conference, collaboration with tribes is expanding, and the number of students is increasing. During the past year, 11 SIPI interns were hired by Federal Agencies and Universities and more students are continuing their education beyond 2 years. At Chesapeake Wilkes the "Pollmap" project spatially evaluates public opinion and provides decisionmakers with an understanding of public perception. RGIS-GP's participation helped the Larimore River Watch Team earned the People's Choice Award for their presentation on soil types and sedimentation loading. In Wisconsin county-scale maps and accompanying statistics were developed statewide depicting the amount and location of marginal land in Wisconsin, and its suitability for production of various bioenergy alternatives. Their interactive web-mapping resource has been provided with a permanent institutional home at Energy Center of Wisconsin. In South Georgia, the disaster planning and management toolset is the first system that allows for sharing of data among all EMA officials in Georgia. Pacific Northwest's shoreline resource mapping project provides an innovative forum and access to spatial data sets for informed public input on a wide variety of shoreline management issues in the Puget Sound. In Arkansas, over the past eleven years, outreach and technical support has benefited well over 3,450 private citizens and many federal, state and local governments located roughly within a day's drive of Fayetteville. RGIS-GP has formed a relationship with a local hydrologic and environmental monitoring program called River Watch, a basin-wide citizen water quality monitoring program organized and delivered by the International Water Institute and its partners through high schools and communities.

    Publications

    • Olson, E. R., S. J. Ventura, and J. B. Zedler. 2012. Merging Geospatial and Field Data to Predict the Distribution and Abundance of an Exotic Macrophyte in a Large Wisconsin Reservoir. Aquatic Botany (Accepted for Publication). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2011.09.007
    • Ventura, S., S. Hull, R. Jackson, G. Radloff, D. Sample, S. Walling, and C. Williams. 2012. Guidelines for Sustainable Planting and Harvest of Nonforest Biomass in Wisconsin. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 67(1): 17A-20A.
    • Warn, S., W. Emeneker, J. Gauch, J. Cothren, and A. Apon. 2010. Accelerating Image Feature Comparisons using CUDA on Commodity Hardware, Symposium on Application Accelerators in High Performance Computing (SAAHGPC 10). http://saahpc.ncsa.illinois.edu/10/papers/paper_15.pdf.
    • Wasser, L. 2012. Assessing Forested Riparian Buffer Ecological Integrity Using Lidar Data. Ph.D. Dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University. University Park, PA 16802. 188pp.
    • Wasser, L., R. Day, L. Chasmer, and A. Taylor. 2012. Influence of Vegetation Structure on Lidar-derived Canopy Height and Fractional Cover in Forested Riparian Buffers During Leaf-off and Leaf-on Conditions. PLOS ONE (Submitted).
    • Barnes, A., J. Cothren, and K. Niven. 2011. Guides to Good Practice: Close-Range Photogrammetry. Archaeology Data Service / Digital Antiquity: Guides to Good Practice. http://guides.archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/g2gp/Main.Available online: http://guides.archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/g2gp/Photogram_Toc
    • Day, R. L., R. Neiderer, and L. Wasser. 2011. Pa One Stop: Nutrient Management Planning Mapping Module. Penn State Cooperative Extension Factsheet. 2 pp.
    • Chi, G. and S. J. Ventura. 2011. An Integrated Framework of Population Change: Influential Factors, Spatial Dynamics, and Temporal Variation. Growth and Change 42(4): 549-570.
    • Cothren, J. and B. Schaffrin. 2010. Comparison of Error Propagation in Block Orientation: An Analytical Approach. Archives of the International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. ISSN 1682-1777, Vol. 38. No. 7A. pg. 25-30.
    • Day, R. L. 2011. PaOneStop: Online Nutrient Management and Conservation Planner. Penn State Field Crop News article. Vol. 11: 16. June 2011. http://extension.psu.edu/field-crop-news/news/2011/june-28#i.
    • Limp, W. F., A. Payne, S. Winters, A. Barnes, and J. Cothren. 2010. Approaching 3D Digital Heritage Data from a Multi-technology, Lifecycle Perspective. Fusion of Cultures: 38th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Analytical Methods in Archaeology. April 8, 2010. Granada, Spain. P. 519-522.
    • Limp, W., A. Payne, K. Simon, S. Winters, and J. Cothren. 2011. Developing a 3D digital heritage ecosystem: From object to representation and the role of a virtual museum in the 21st century. Internet Archaeology. Publication Available at: http://www.internetarchaeology.org/ (In Press).
    • Madden, M. 2011. A Growing Conservation Straw Mulch Market. Field Crop News article. Vol. 11:14. June 2011. http://extension.psu.edu/field-crop-news/news/2011/june-14#g.
    • Moeller, B. E. and S. Ventura. 2009. Aggregation Sites and Fuel Sources for Biomass Energy at the Charter Street Heating Plant. Report to Division of Facilities Planning and Management, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Wisconsin Department of Administration. 26 pages and 87 page appendix.
    • Williamson, M. and J. Cothren. 2012. Large Area Wetland Forest Characterization Using Mapping-Grade Remotely Sensed Data. Arkansas Natural Resources Commission, Little Rock, AR. 59 pages.


    Progress 07/01/10 to 06/30/11

    Outputs
    OUTPUTS: Chesapeake - Wilkes University developed and deployed beta versions of "Pollmap", a public opinion collection tool to provide support to the community of interest portal concept. Pollmap facilitates the collection of anonymous public input on a given issue based on the formulation and then publication of one to two questions with multiple choice answers They supported local government in the implementing geodpatial technologies. Chesapeake - Penn State University continued development of the Pennsylvania OneStop Conservation Planning and Nutrient Management System, provided technical assistance, training and support to the GIS User Community in Pennsylvania, developed an agricultural drought vulnerability assessment system for Pa, and evaluated use of multi-return LiDAR data to quantify forest spatial configuration and composition. Great Lakes developed software to generate farm and watershed scale scenarios for bioenergy crop production, and to evaluate impacts on erosion, carbon, and wildlife habitat, surveyed community gardeners to learn their location preferences and develop a site selection model, and evaluated land use planning efforts in rural communities and integrated multiple plans into a comprehensive model of rural land management. Mid South provided geospatial expertise to the American Origin Products Project involving the development of geographic indicators for the economic enhancement of rural food production, expanded an Emergency Resource Database project, and worked closely with the EAST Initiative within Arkansas. South Georgia developed web mapping and digital pen-based methodologies for river level monitoring and disaster assessments by local governments, delivered GIS software training courses benefitting rural governments in rural Georgia and Oklahoma, and supported U.S. Census Bureau activities and subsequent redistricting efforts. Great Plains assisted the Larimore, ND River Watch Team with a GIS sedimentation loading analysis, conducted water quality data collection and collected dual-camera video mapping along Red Lake River, utilized LiDAR data to calculate vegetation height for blowing snow research at the Surface Transportation Weather Research Center field site, and conducted a test flight for a video mapping payload on an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS). Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest created a GIS-based internet site providing methods, data and maps analyzing county economy competitiveness, devised an online geospatial Decision Support System of water rights and associated attributes for a pilot basin within WA, developed a web-based participatory geographic information system for mapping shoreline resources and uses, and created an interactive, web-based map portfolio that provides access to ecological beach data collected by volunteers. Tribal Technical Center continued it's outreach to local tribes through educational programs at the Southwest Indian Polytechnic Institute (SIPI), helped to maintain and support the Geospatial Technologies lab on the SIPI campus, and worked with other Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs) with the goal of assisting them in their geospatial curriculum PARTICIPANTS: Individuals/institutions: Penn State University- Rick Day, (PI), Robert Neiderer, Yuanghong Zhu, Leah Wasser, Valerie Mebane (research support). Wilkes University / Pa GIS Consortium - Dale Bruns (PI), Tom Sweet (research support), University of Wisconsin - Steve Ventura (PI), University of North Dakota Leon Osborne, (PI), Scott Kroeber, Damon Grabow (research support), University of Central Washington - Anthony Gabriel, David Cordner, (PIs), J. Murray, John Bowen, Michael Pease (research support), South Georgia Development Commission - Vance Roberts (PI), Chris Strom (research support), University of Arkansas - Fred Limp, Jack Cothren (PIs), Brian Culpepper (research support), Tribal Technical Center - Joan Goodman, Maggie Porter (PIs), Dario Rodriguez-Bejarano, Christel White (project support). Partner organizations: Penn State Cooperative Extension, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Pennsylvania State Conservation Commission, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Farm Bureau, Pennsylvania Association of Conservation Districts, Office of Surface Mining, Wisconsin Departments of Natural Resources and Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection, International Water Institute River Watch Program, North Dakota Department of Transportation, JDOSAS Center of Excellence for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Research, Education, and Training, University of North Dakota Surface Transportation Weather Research Center, WA; WSU Island County Beach Watcher's and Island County; WA Department of Natural Resources Aquatic Reserves Program.Training: All RGIS sites engage in training sessions throughout their regions through short-courses to a variety of audiences. Partner Collaborators from RGIS: Wilkes-University, Pa GIS Consortium, University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Arkansas-Fayetteville, Central Washington University, Southwest Indian Polytechnic Institute, University of North Dakota, South Georgia Commission. TARGET AUDIENCES: Training and outreach efforts are targeted to rural geospatial technology users throughout the U.S., including tribes and tribal members, in all disciplines including agriculture, environment, climate, economics, rural development, and emergency response. In Pennsylvania, web applications for agriculture are aimed at the 60,000 farms that need conservation and nutrient management plans and the entire agricultural industry that can be assisted by online marketing support. Native Americans from across the county are served by the TTC. RGIS-TTC provided outreach to tribes by hosting the first annual Tribal GIS Conference held on October 17-22, 2010. The conference was well attended by 23 nations from 10 different states. There were 110 conference attendees. The conference will be held again in October 2011 and will be hosted by RGIS-TTC. Each of the other six RGIS sites has similar local and state-level constituencies. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

    Impacts
    Detailed documentation of individual impacts for each of the 8 RGIS sites is not possible here, so much of this discussion will be focused on collective impact. Firstly, RGIS sites collectively leveraged significant funding from other sources to support objectives funded by USDA-NIFA as part of this special project. RGIS sites engaged in educational outreach, training, and technical support that benefited geospatial technology users and local governments throughout the country, including tribal communities. Sites engaged in modeling, website development, online geospatial application development or analyses that provided valuable information and analytical tools for a variety of applications spanning multiple disciplines including land use planning, agriculture, environment, ecology, climatology, emergency management, and economics. Additionally, the scale of applications ranges from single agricultural fields, to counties, states and the nation. In Pennsylvania, a drought vulnerability model assesses land at the field scale whereas the PaGIS Consortium employs data sharing among regional user groups. In Pennsylvania, the PaOneStop project (http://paonestop.org) serves 40,000 farmers without current E&S Plans and over 50,000 manure transfers each year. PaOneStop is a web application that will serve all of those users. A Great Lakes report "Wisconsin Sustainable Planting and Harvest Guidelines for Nonforest Biomass" was adopted as state policy by the Wisconsin Bioenergy Council. Their interactive web-mapping resource has been provided with a permanent institutional home at Energy Center of Wisconsin - http://biomap.wisc.edu/biofuels/ . Tribal Technical Center hosted the First Annual Tribal GIS Conference, collaboration with tribes is expanding, and the number of students is increasing. During the past year, 11 SIPI interns were hired by Federal Agencies and Universities and more students are continuing their education beyond 2 years. At Chesapeake Wilkes the "Pollmap" project spatially evaluates public opinion and provides decisionmakers with an understanding of public perception. RGIS-GP's participation helped the Larimore River Watch Team earned the People's Choice Award for their presentation on soil types and sedimentation loading. In South Georgia, the digital pen-based technique for disaster assessment resulted in implementation in Lowndes County, GA. Pacific Northwest's shoreline resource mapping project provides an innovative forum and access to spatial data sets for informed public input on a wide variety of shoreline management issues in the Puget Sound. In Arkansas, over the past eleven years, outreach and technical support has benefited well over 3,450 private citizens and many federal, state and local governments located roughly within a day's drive of Fayetteville, Arkansas. RGIS-GP has formed a relationship with a local hydrologic and environmental monitoring program called River Watch, a basin-wide citizen water quality monitoring program organized and delivered by the International Water Institute and its partners through high schools and communities (www.internationalwaterinstitue.org).

    Publications

    • Arrington, K. E. and S. J. Ventura. 2010. Modeling and Mapping Soil Infiltration Rates in Dane County, WI. ESRI Southeast Regional User. Group Conference Proceedings, 2010. Charlotte NC. April 26-28, 2010. Online Publication accessed at http://gisandscience.com/2010/page/31/.
    • Cordner, D., A. Gabriel, and J. Murray. 2011. Rapid assessment, monitoring and aesthetic evaluation of lake shorelines using geospatial techniques. 2011 Symposium Program. North American Lake Management Society. Spokane, Washington. October, 2011.(Abstract) (Pending).
    • Gabriel, A. and D. Cordner. 2010. Assessment of scenic preferences and aesthetic resources in Washington State coastal parks using internet-based geospatial techniques. Coastal Zone Canada 2010 Program. Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada. July, 2010. p. 88. (Abstract).
    • Gabriel, A. and D. Cordner. 2011. SoundMap: Puget Sound public resource mapping project. 2011 Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference Program. Vancouver, BC. October, 2011. (Abstract) (Pending).
    • Gabriel, A., D. Cordner, and J. Murray. 2011. An interactive web-based geospatial database for mapping and analyzing volunteer beach monitoring data, Coastal Zone 2011 Program. Chicago, Illinois. July, 2011. http://www.csc.noaa.gov/cz/. (Abstract).
    • Gabriel, A., D. Cordner, and J. Murray. 2011. Use of geospatial techniques for rapid assessment, monitoring and aesthetic evaluation of lake shorelines. Annual Conference Program Association of American Geographers. Seattle, WA. April, 2011. http://meridian.aag.org/callforpapers/program/AbstractDetail.cfmAbst ractID=37794.(Abstract).
    • Gabriel, A., J. Murray, and B. Sainsbury. 2011. Assessment of potential climate change impacts on Washington State Park shorelines. 2011 Salish Sea Ecosystem Conference Program. Vancouver, BC. October, 2011. (Abstract) (Pending).
    • Gocmen, Z. A. and S. J. Ventura. 2010. Challenges to GIS Use in Planning: The Case of Public Planning Agencies in Wisconsin. Journal of the American Planning Association 76(2): 172-183.
    • Bowen, J. 2011. US rural economic competitiveness by the numbers: data mining, analysis, and web mapping, Applied Geography (Pending).
    • Chi, G. and S. J. Ventura. 2011. Population Change and Its Driving Factors in Rural, Suburban, and Urban Areas of Wisconsin, USA, 1970-2000. International Journal of Population Research vol. 2011, 14 pages, 2011. http: dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/856534.
    • Moltz, H. L., V. L. Lopes, W. Rast, and S. J. Ventura. 2010. A Hydrologic-Economic Analysis of Best Management Practices for Sediment Control in the Santa Fe Watershed, New Mexico. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 15(4): 308-317.
    • Niemann, B. J., S. J. Ventura, D. D. Moyer, and R. E. Chenoweth. 2010. Planning Analyst. ESRI Press, Redlands CA. 400 pages.
    • Pease, M. 2011. Development of a geospatial database for mapping water rights attributes in the Yakima Basin, Aquanomics: The Economics of Water. http://www.aquanomics.com. (In Press).
    • Pease, M. and J. Murray. 2011. Making water resource decisions more "informationally" efficient: development of a geospatial water rights Decision Support System for Kittitas County, Washington. Annual Conference Program. Association of American Geographers. Seattle, WA. April, 2011. http://meridian.aag.org/callforpapers/program/AbstractDetail.cfmAbst ractID=39201. (Abstract).
    • Pease, M. and J. Murray. 2011. Developing geospatial water rights Decision Support Systems: does publically-available water rights data lead to enhanced water resource decisions Conference Proceedings, Water in the Columbia Basin: Sharing a Limited Resource. Stevenson, WA. November, 2011. (Abstract) (Pending).
    • Wasser, L., L. Chasmer, A. Taylor, and R. Day. 2010. Validating LiDAR derived estimates of canopy height, structure and fractional cover in forested riparian buffers. 2010 American Geophysical Union Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA (Abstract). Poster B33A-0385.
    • Gocman, Z. A., S. J. Ventura, and A. Seeboth. 2010. Geospatial Data Issues in Wisconsin Public Planning Agencies. University of Wisconsin-Extension. Publication G3872-03.
    • Hull, S., J. Arntzen, K. Bleser, A. Crossley, R. Jackson, E. Lobner, L. Paine, G. Radloff, C. Ribic, D. Sample, J. Vandenbrook, S. Ventura, S. Walling, J. Widholm, and C. Williams. 2011. Wisconsin Sustainable Planting and Harvest Guidelines for Nonforest Biomass. Wisconsin Bioenergy Council, adopted July 2011. 88 pages.
    • Lillquist, K., A. Gabriel, B. Sainsbury, and T. Winter. 2011. Spatial and temporal fluctuations of closed-basin, wetland ponds, Waterville Plateau, Washington. Annual Conference Program. Association of American Geographers. Seattle, WA. April, 2011. http://meridian.aag.org/callforpapers/program/AbstractDetail.cfmAbst ractID=40742. (Abstract).
    • Mebane, V. 2011. Modeling the drought vulnerability of Pennsylvania Soils. M.S. Thesis. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 216 pp.