Source: Quasar Energy Group (formerly Schmack BioEnergy) submitted to NRP
DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATED ANAEROBIC DIGESTION SYSTEM FOR METHANE PRODUCTION FROM LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0221859
Grant No.
2010-33610-21013
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
2010-00220
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jun 15, 2010
Project End Date
Feb 14, 2011
Grant Year
2010
Program Code
[8.8]- Biofuels and Biobased Products
Recipient Organization
Quasar Energy Group (formerly Schmack BioEnergy)
7624 Riverview Road
Cleveland,OH 44141
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
The proposed project builds on prior research that has shown the potential for energy recovery from lignocellulosic biomass through an integrated anaerobic digestion (iADs) process. A 2005 USDA report places the current production of corn stover at 75 million dry tons per year and stated that this represents a major untapped source of agricultural biomass. The innovative anaerobic digestion process developed at the Ohio State University has demonstrated energy recovery from corn stover and other lignocellulosic biomass to be feasible, without the need for energy intensive pretreatment processes as required for conversion of woody biomass to alcohols. The process will be scaled-up from bench systems to be tested in a pilot reactor. The project will further develop a cost-effective anaerobic digestion process to recover energy from lignocellulosic biomass. This research will allow the process to be optimized for stability, energy efficiency, and biogas yield, providing the foundation for commercialization of the technology. An economic analysis of the process places the energy production cost at less than $0.10/kWh, making it highly competitive with current renewable technologies. Renewable energy production credits lower this cost to approximately $0.08/kWh. The technology will open up new sources of on-farm revenue and provide distributed energy generation for the benefit of American agriculture and the rural community. The technology can recover significant renewable energy from crop residue without diverting agricultural land from food production to biomass production. The iADs process will help to reduce our nation's dependence on fossil fuels, while sustainably managing natural resources and growing the rural economy.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
5115310202050%
5114010100050%
Goals / Objectives
The project will research the effectiveness of a new solid-state anaerobic digestion system/process (SS-AD) to produce methane gas from organic feedstock such as agricultural crop residue, organic fraction of municipal solid waste, and yard waste. The project specifically seeks to maximize net energy recovery while minimizing operational cost. Technical Goals and Objectives - The overarching goal of this project is to advance the development of the iADs process that has potential to bring revenue into rural economies, create employment opportunities, and propel this nation forward to become a recognized international leader in renewable energy innovation and industry, resource conservation, and workforce development for green jobs. The specific technical objectives of this research are as follows: 1) Build on prior research to optimize the design of SS-AD reactors and test a pilot scale system. 2) Determine acceptable operating ranges for process variables. 3) Characterize and evaluate applications for the digestate. Expected Outputs - iADs is a net energy producing process. iADs can benefit farmers by providing on-site energy generation, nuisance odor reduction, vector attraction reduction, and recycled fiber for bedding material. In addition, the process can convert nitrogen in manure to nitrates which crops are better able to utilize.
Project Methods
Methods: A pilot reactor will be constructed and operated to: optimize design parameters of SS-AD reactors for use with the patent pending iADs process; determine acceptable operating ranges for process variables; and to characterize and evaluate applications for digestate. The method of using pilot scale reactors to predict performance of full-scale plant reactors, especially for anaerobic systems, is well documented and commonly used by industry and research institutions. Measured data from this system will be evaluated and compared with previous findings in smaller reactors. It will also be benchmarked against operating liquid and solid-state anaerobic systems. Dr. Yebo Li of The Ohio State University and Clemens Halene of quasar energy group will collaborate in the analysis and interpretation of the results. Efforts: The proposed research for Phase I will contribute to the advancement of SS-AD technologies by opening the door to the utilization of the previously untapped energy potential of lignocellulosic biomass. The groundwork laid down by the Phase I research effort will ultimately lead to the full commercialization of the technology. The techniques and process used in this research will be relevant to SS-AD of all feedstocks and to commercial application in the form of waste-to-energy facilities, both on and off-farm. The development of this technology to affordably and efficiently recover energy from crop residue will generate a new revenue source for farms, establish distributed energy production, mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, and reduce the risk of nutrient leaching into surface waters by managing liquid byproducts. A graduate student in Dr. Li's lab will have the opportunity to participate in this project for a period of 6 months. Other co-op student undergraduate researchers from the University who work in the quasar lab will also have opportunities for hands-on learning during the course of this project. Evaluation: Phase I research will provide and report evidence of the iADs process capability to meet market requirements in terms of energy recovery, environmental sustainability, and economic feasibility. The six month research project will advance understanding of new applications and opportunities to utilize this technology in the marketplace. Accepetable ranges will be determined for all Key Process Indicators (KPIs) for the system to ensure stable operation. These KPIs include gas quality and quantity, volatile fatty acid to alkalinity ratio, system pH, volatile solids destruction, pathogen destruction, and moisture content. Value ranges for Key Process Control (KPC) parameters will also be determined. KPCs for this system include feeding rate, retention time, volume of inoculation material to fresh feedstock, mixing time, temperature, particle size, and stack height. Other output values to be measured include biogas production volume and composition and biogas production rate. Based on the results of this testing, changes will be made to optimize the system performance and refine the economic and operational models. A full accounting of this data will create a roadmap for the operation of the iADs.

Progress 06/15/10 to 02/14/11

Outputs
OUTPUTS: 1) Build on prior research to optimize the design of SS-AD reactors and test a pilot scale system. The SS-AD reactor will be a single tank, batch/continuous flow design. The start-up and production phases of the reactor will be based on the recommended operating ranges from the OSU lab test results. Biogas and methane production will be measured and input parameters will be changed to optimize production throughout the start-up and production phases. Additional feedstocks will be lab tested as they become available to determine their suitability for dry digestion. 2) Determine acceptable operating ranges for process variables. We have compared the performance of solid state anaerobic digestion of corn stover with effluent from three different sources (Buckeye seed from a food waste digester, Akron seed from a municipal biosolids digester, and Bridgewater seed from a dairy waste digester). The biogas yields of three feedstocks (corn stover, wheat straw, yard waste, and leaves) in solid state anaerobic digestion were also studied. The effects of substrate/inoculum (S/I) ratios (2, 4 and 6) and NaOH addition on the performance of the digestion were also studied. 3) Characterize and evaluate applications for the digestate. The digestate for each of the above tests were characterized with total solids, volatile solids, total nitrogen, total carbon, cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin contents. Applications for the digestate are twofold: land apply as a farm fertilizer or mix with additional dry feedstock to create compost. PARTICIPANTS: Clemens Halene - Vice President of Engineering, quasar energy group. Management, operations, and product development with executive leadership role and direct influence on performance and growth of project. Dr. Yebo Li - Assistant Professor, Department of Food, Agriculture, and Biological Engineering. The Ohio State University OARDC John McClellan - Project Manager on demonstration scale digester, quasar energy group TARGET AUDIENCES: Not relevant to this project. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.

Impacts
The highest methane yield about 105 L/kg VSfeed was obtained with corn stover at S/I ratio of 3. At S/I ratio of 4, the highest methane yield about 82 L/kg VSfeed was obtained with wheat straw. Yard waste has the lowest methane yield. Due to the difference in bulk density of each feedstocks, more VS could be loaded per unit working volume with feedstocks having higher bulk density. Methane productivity from SS-AD of corn stover(10.8 L/L) remained as the highest among four feedstocks tested. This was followed by SS-AD of leaves with an average methane productivity of 9.1 L/L, which was only 16% less than that of corn stover. Methane productivities of both wheat straw and yard waste were considerably lower. Methane productivity attained in SS-AD of wheat straw was 7.8 L/L, an average of 29% less than that of corn stover. The lowest methane productivity was observed with SS-AD of yard waste (S/I ratio = 2 and 3) which was approximately 36% less compared to that of corn stover. Compositional analysis was performed on content in reactors at the beginning and after 30 days digestion of SS-AD. Changes in the composition were expressed as the weight of each compound measured based on initial loading level of 100 g TS. The highest cellulose degradation was observed with SS-AD of corn stover, about 41% of cellulose was degraded. This was followed by wheat straw with 36% cellulose degradation. Significant lower cellulose degradation was noted with SS-AD of yard waste and leaves (6 and 16% respectively). Similar degradation trend was noted in hemicellulose, the highest degradation (36%) was obtained with SS-AD of wheat straw followed by corn stover (34%), respectively. Substantial lower hemicellulose degradation was noted with SS-AD of yard waste and leaves (7% and 21%); respectively. The degradation of holocellulose was closely related to the lignin content of each lignocellulosic biomass feedstock. Higher degradation in holocellulose was associated with lower lignin content. At S/I ratio of 2, reactors inoculated with effluent from food processing waste digester had the highest methane yield in the first 10 days. However, the methane production of reactors using this seed was lower than that of a digester fed with dairy manure seed in the last 20 days. A probable reason could be that the first seed was the effluent from a food waste digester and thus may have less cellulose-hydrolyzing bacteria. After the readily digestible organic matter was consumed, hydrolysis rate became a limiting factor. This also might explain why a S/I ratio of 4 has higher gas production than a S/I ratio of 2 for first seed, since there are more readily digestible carbohydrates. Dairy manure effluent had the highest methane yield at S/I ratio of 2. Food waste effluent had the shortest start-up time. The daily methane yield peaks of NaOH treated leaves were much higher than that of the control (no NaOH addition). Due to the inhibition of Na+, the methane peaks were delayed with the addition of NaOH. When the NaOH concentration increased from 2.0% to 5.0%, the appearance of methane production peak was delayed from the third day to the 16th day.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period