Source: UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT submitted to NRP
COSTS AND CHALLENGES ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING A COMMUNITY-WIDE BIOSECURITY PLAN
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0220982
Grant No.
2010-85122-20613
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
2009-05382
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Mar 1, 2010
Project End Date
Feb 28, 2014
Grant Year
2010
Program Code
[92620]- Integrated Solutions for Animal Ag
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT
(N/A)
BURLINGTON,VT 05405
Performing Department
Animal Science
Non Technical Summary
Livestock farmers and surrounding communities need cost-effective and reasonable approaches to prevent disease and minimize the indirect costs of disease control in the event of a highly contagious animal disease emergency. To address shortfalls in current preparedness, this project (1) takes a producer-centric approach to benefit-cost analysis of biosecurity interventions in the face of a highly contagious disease event, (2) engages stakeholders in identifying feasible incentives to support the implementation of emergency biosecurity procedures on individual farms or a community-wide basis, (3) helps producers better understand the relationship between their contact networks and their risks of exposure to disease with the goal of promoting protocols to control or monitor access to farm facilities, and (4) develops "model" biosecurity operating guidelines and protocols for use during highly contagious animal disease emergencies. As a result of this project, farmers, allied industry, and local town officers will have tools and strategies they can use to prevent the unchecked spread of disease in advance of and during a highly contagious animal disease emergency. The project will be conducted in a dairy-intensive county in Vermont; however, the methodology and tools developed through this project are expected to apply to other livestock sectors and other states and will be shared through national web-based platforms with the intent of increasing agricultural animal-disease-disaster readiness nationwide.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
3113499117050%
6096099301050%
Goals / Objectives
This project, through a set of inter-related objectives, is designed to enhance the willingness and readiness of dairy producers, allied industry, and community responders to implement strict biosecurity protocols in the event of a highly contagious disease emergency. Objective 1: (Years 1 and 2) Conduct cost-benefit analyses of community-supported biosecurity plans for use during highly contagious animal disease emergencies to protect healthy livestock and economic viability. In order for individual producers, allied industry, and communities to be willing to adopt stringent emergency biosecurity plans, there must be scientifically-valid evidence that doing so is worth the cost and effort involved. This objective involves conducting research to fill this gap in knowledge. Objective 2: (Years 1 and 2) Identify what incentives or other support would facilitate farmer and community-wide compliance with strict biosecurity measures. A participatory process engaging farmers and other stakeholders will investigate risk perception and potential incentives to implementing emergency biosecurity protocols. Having a better understanding of attitudes towards disease threats and perceived benefits of "investing" in biosecurity will facilitate identification of effective incentives to carry out recommendations. Objective 3: (Years 1, 2, and 3) Encourage the adoption of protocols to control or monitor access to farm facilities. A basic principle of disease prevention is to prevent or reduce exposure, yet farms have a regular stream of vehicles, people, and even animals coming on and off the premises on a regular basis. Recounting exactly who and what entered and left the farm over a discrete period of time is a critical component of the epidemiological tracing that would take place in the event of a highly contagious disease event. Having accurate information when needed would facilitate more rapid control of an outbreak. Objective 4: (Years 3 and 4) Promote biosecurity plans for use during highly contagious animal disease emergencies to protect healthy livestock and economic viability. Despite its importance in protecting the health of animals on individual farms, statewide, and nationwide, getting people excited about biosecurity requires effective marketing. To facilitate delivery of information in a manner that will be easily understood and acted upon, this project will endeavor to create highly visual messages for delivery in such a way that they can be accessed and distributed rapidly when needed. Key outputs from the completion of this project include: (1) "Model" biosecurity plans for use in highly contagious animal disease emergency, (2) Cost-benefit and sensitivity analyses of these plans, (3) A report on perception of risk and incentives identified to promote adoption of strict biosecurity, and (4) Several record-keeping systems for dairy farm contacts.
Project Methods
The proposed objectives will be conducted in Vermont by interacting with stakeholders in a dairy-intensive county. However, the methodology and tools developed for this project are expected to apply to other livestock sectors and other states and will be shared through national and web-based platforms with the intent of increasing agricultural animal-disease-disaster readiness nationwide. Obj. 1. (1a) Planning scenarios will be developed and reviewed by experts in animal disease emergency management. Current applicable regulatory authorities and likely official responses will frame these scenarios. Guidelines will focus on the protective actions livestock owners and community responders can take. (1b) Using a capability-focused approach, supplies, equipment, and personnel needed to implement biosecurity protocols in accordance with the guidelines from 1a will be identified for 4 case farms. Cost estimates for deploying these resources will feed into the cost-benefit analysis in 1c. On-farm demonstrations of protocols will validate estimates and provide video documentation that will be incorporated into outreach materials in 4a. Drills to demonstrate the feasibility of resources for meeting key capabilities will be conducted under Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) guidelines to the extent possible and recorded by video. (1c) Quantitative risk analysis strategies will be used to estimate costs and benefits. Stochastic rather than deterministic models will better reflect the uncertainties surrounding inputs and outcomes and support informed decision making. Obj. 2. (2a) A structured interview tool will be developed to gauge (1) farmers' and stakeholders' concern about highly contagious disease threats and (2) likely responses to a series of hypothetical event scenarios. (2b) Based on information gained through interviews in 2a, a Public Policy Forum modeled after the National Issues Forums (Institute) deliberative process will be developed on this issue of concern. (2c) Through a facilitated process, communities will begin to narrow ideas and develop action plans for rapid implementation in the event of a highly contagious disease emergency, focusing on finding and mobilizing the community's assets and resources as well as linking to supports provided through state and federal agencies. Obj. 3. (3a) A contact recall test will stimulate implementation of access control and/or monitoring as routine biosecurity practices on farms. (3b) Contact record forms will be developed and distributed to encourage regular monitoring. (3c) An assessment will compare how farms are monitoring access at end of project versus at start of project. Obj. 4. (4a) "Model" biosecurity guidelines and plans based on risk analysis, surveys, and collaborative processes conducted in objectives 1 and 2 will be packaged for delivery. (4b) These plans will be publicized and distributed locally and nationally. (4c) The effectiveness of marketing of biosecurity plans will be evaluated through a phone survey of a random sampling of Vermont dairy producers and a web-based survey of all (250) emergency management directors in Vermont.

Progress 03/01/10 to 02/28/14

Outputs
Target Audience: The advisory group gathered for the final time during the funding period for this project. Farmers, local emergency management, service providers, and higher education were represented. Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Project results and lessons learned have been reported to other AFRI PIs, attendees of the American Association of Extension Veterinarians Applied Animal and Public Health Symposium, Vermont town officers, Extension Disaster Education Network delegates, state veterinarians, dairy cooperative members, and the general public. Smith, J., R. L. Parsons, and S. E. Rowe. AFRI Biosecurity Project Update. Agri-Mark Region 8 Meeting. December 6, 2012, Middlebury, VT. Smith, J., R. L. Parsons, and S.E. Rowe. Costs and Challenges Associated with Developing and Implementing a Community-Wide Biosecurity Project. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Project Director Meeting. December 1, 2012, Chicago, IL. Smith, J. Vermont's Dairy Farm Contact Recall Challenge. American Association of Extension Veterinarians Applied Animal and Public Health Symposium, October 20, 2012, Greensboro, NC. Smith, J. Vermont Dairy Sustainability: Challenges and Opportunities. Vermont Dairy Industry Association Conference, September 19, 2012, Burlington, VT. Smith, J. Milk Truck Cleaning and Disinfection Drill. New England States Animal Agricultural Security Alliance. May 7, 2012, White River Junction, VT. Smith, J. Incorporating agricultural disasters into all hazards planning. Town Officers’ Education Conferences. April 4, 2012, Burlington, VT. Smith, J. and S. E. Rowe. Engaging Stakeholders in Animal Disease Disaster Preparedness. Extension Disaster Education Network Annual Meeting, October 13, 2011, Portland, OR. Smith, J. Agricultural Emergency Preparedness. Vermont Emergency Preparedness Conference. November 5, 2011, Stowe, VT. Smith, J. An Overview of Modern Livestock Production: Trends and Vulnerabilities. August 30, 2011, Agricultural lecture series, Ilsley Public Library. Middlebury, VT. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? Farmers involved with the project have a good idea of steps to take in the event of a highly contagious disease emergency. Open-ended interviews have been successful in identifying perceptions and possible solutions to monitoring access of farms. Interview data compiled through this project will inform the development of risk communication messages and an interactive web site for farmers. A model of producer financial survivability has been piloted in collaboration with the USDA Economic Research Service. Economic impacts are currently being estimated for several scenarios. A work group established in Vermont through this grant will continue to promote agricultural emergency preparedness beyond the end of the funding period.

Publications


    Progress 03/01/12 to 02/27/13

    Outputs
    OUTPUTS: To help livestock farmers and surrounding communities prevent disease transmission and minimize the indirect costs of disease control in the event of a highly contagious animal disease emergency, this project has continued to engage with dairy farmers and community members to investigate and develop preparedness and response strategies in their best interests. In year 3, the results of the farm traffic (contact) recall intervention were analyzed by an undergraduate and presented as an abstract at the UVM Undergraduate Student Research Day. Results were also presented at the US Animal Health Association. A manuscript is under preparation. Additional interviews with farmers who participated in the contact recall intervention were conducted to assess perceptions and motivators regarding controlling access or recording visits to their farms. To demonstrate on-farm biosecurity protocols, a milk truck cleaning and mock disinfection drill was conducted and featured in an Across the Fence episode. Lessons learned were shared with the New England States Agricultural Animal Security Alliance. A website is under construction in which audio and video will be used to engage visitors in an interactive, informal learning experience. In collaboration with USDA ERS, we will be testing a decision-support tool that farmers can use when considering recovery alternatives in the event of a highly contagious animal disease emergency. Meetings with project advisors every six months have presented relevant information and project progress. The blog site, http://blog.uvm.edu/jmsmith/, features project activities and related information. PARTICIPANTS: One undergraduate who had helped conduct the farm traffic (contact) recall intervention used the data for an independent research project. As summer interns, two Animal Science undergraduates and one recent graduate assisted with farmer interviews and an investigation of contact networks of dairy farms. TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

    Impacts
    Through this project, farmers and community members are becoming more aware of animal disease disaster issues and where to find resources to better respond in an emergency. This project will make a difference in the lives of farmers, agricultural stakeholders, and emergency management personnel across Vermont by investigating the feasibility and acceptability of on-farm biosecurity practices, especially in the face of a highly contagious disease emergency.

    Publications

    • No publications reported this period


    Progress 03/01/11 to 02/28/12

    Outputs
    OUTPUTS: This project is predicated on the assumption that proactive planning and response can enhance the resilience and sustainability of agricultural businesses and communities if an animal disease disaster strikes. In year 2, farmers, allied industry members, and emergency managers have been engaged in a number of project activities to investigate their perceptions of and possible responses to a hypothetical foot-and-mouth disease outbreak scenario. To meet objective 1, (Increase adoption of farm visitor record-keeping tools by increasing awareness of risk in agricultural contact networks), two undergraduate Animal Science majors were recruited to conduct the contact recall challenge with dairy farmers. They interviewed 26 participating farms and are in the process of analyzing the data. According to the plan for meeting objective 2 (Identify possible incentives to support protective emergency biosecurity protocols), interviews with individuals representing each of these stakeholder groups were conducted in late Fall 2010. Responses suggested that some local town officers are not sure of their roles in such a scenario and others focused on their roles in public information. Responses from farmers and allied industry personnel suggested they were prepared to implement significant biosecurity restrictions on their activities and would contact their veterinarian or Extension for advice. A public issues forum was held in September 2011 and a second session is planned for November to foster discussion of communications, biosecurity, and community planning strategies with the viewpoints of the three stakeholder groups represented. According to the plan for meeting objective 4 (Complete a farm-level cost-benefit analysis of implementing strict biosecurity in the face of a highly contagious disease outbreak), more in-depth interviews with case farm participants subsequently focused on getting their perspectives on a number of biosecurity practices that could be implemented in the event of a highly contagious animal disease emergency. Activities underway to meet objective 3 (Develop a catalog of educational resources) include capturing relevant video and still footage of farm activities and developing a website framework to host the content. Meetings with project advisors every six months have presented relevant information and project progress. The blog site, http://blog.uvm.edu/jmsmith/, features project activities and related information. In the next year, activities related to all objectives will continue. PARTICIPANTS: Dr. Julie Smith has provided overall project leadership, supervised the students conducting the contact recall challenge, participated in the in-depth case farm interviews with Dr. Steve Van Wie, and presented at the public issues forum and advisory meetings. Emergency biosecurity consultant Dr. Van Wie has presented in person to the advisors and to the first public issues forum in addition to contributing to the development of project biosecurity materials. Dr. Ellen Rowe has led the development and conduct of the stakeholder interviews on perceptions of and readiness for an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. Dr. Rowe was also responsible for designing the public issues forum and recruiting facilitators. She has also presented to the advisors. Dr. Bob Parsons has been responsible for directing the activities of the project related to analyzing costs and benefits of biosecurity strategies in the face of foot-and-mouth disease. Louis Bedor III, outreach professional hired for the project, has coordinated all meetings and communications with advisors and media. His expertise and connections in video production have been critical to project progress. He has also learned how to create maps with Arc GIS and is gaining web page design skills. TARGET AUDIENCES: The primary target audience for this project is dairy farmers. All sizes and types of dairy operations in the northeast milk shed fit within the scope of this project. We are working directly with farms in Addison County, Vt, one of the top 50 counties for dairy production in the U.S. Secondary audiences for this project include allied agricultural industry personnel and town officers/emergency managers/community leaders who can use information from our project to plan and prepare for an animal disease emergency. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: A graduate student was not recruited to work on the project, so hourly temporary employees and student interns have been collecting the data that would have been the responsibility of the graduate student. The objectives can be met with this change in personnel.

    Impacts
    This project will make a difference in the lives of farmers, agricultural stakeholders, and emergency management personnel across Vermont by investigating the feasibility and acceptability of on-farm biosecurity practices, especially in the face of a highly contagious disease emergency.

    Publications

    • Suozzo, Andrea. 2011. Dairy forum deals with infectious disease. Addison County Independent. September 22, 2011.
    • Suozzo, Andrea. 2011 Local farms prepped for emergencies. Addison County Independent. July 4, 2011.


    Progress 03/01/10 to 02/28/11

    Outputs
    OUTPUTS: In the United Kingdom in 2001, foot-and-mouth disease devastated the industries with susceptible livestock--cattle, swine, sheep, and goats--at a cost of over $15 billion dollars in a country only slightly larger than New England. Preparedness and proactive response plans are the best ways to reduce the economic, environmental, and social devastation that could be caused by a disaster like that in the US. Through this integrated research and extension project, over the next three-and-half years, we expect to (1) Increase adoption of farm visitor record-keeping tools by increasing awareness of risk in agricultural contact networks, (2) Identify possible incentives to support protective emergency biosecurity protocols, (3) Develop a catalog of educational resources to distribute to farms and agricultural communities in the event of a highly contagious disease outbreak, and (4) Complete a farm-level cost-benefit analysis of implementing strict biosecurity in the face of a highly contagious disease outbreak. In Year 1 we have (1) recruited four case farms to participate in the project, (2) developed a PARTICIPANTS: The case farms participating in the project represent a range of farm types in Vermont: a small organic dairy, a mid-sized conventional dairy, a dairy with its own processing plant, and a large-sized conventional dairy. The Addison County Regional Planning Commission and Addison County Local Emergency Planning Committee have been supportive of the project. Outreach professional, Louis Bedor III, has been taking relevant certified courses about the incident command system. A graduate student will be working on this project with Dr. Smith. TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

    Impacts
    This project is predicated on the assumption that proactive planning and response can enhance the resilience and sustainability of agricultural businesses if disaster strikes. This project will make a difference in the lives of farmers, agricultural stakeholders, and emergency management personnel across Vermont by investigating the feasibility and acceptability of on-farm biosecurity practices, especially in the face of a highly contagious disease emergency.

    Publications

    • No publications reported this period