Source: IOWA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION submitted to NRP
INCREASING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT IN HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0219742
Grant No.
2009-41210-05883
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
2009-04076
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2009
Project End Date
Dec 31, 2011
Grant Year
2009
Program Code
[MB]- ESNP Special Needs
Recipient Organization
IOWA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION
(N/A)
AMES,IA 50011-2026
Performing Department
Extension to Communities
Non Technical Summary
Under the Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, municipalities are required to develop hazard mitigation plans to be eligible for pre-and post-disaster grants. While the intent of the plans is to identify risk reduction strategies to reduce losses from future disasters, implementation often falls short because of citizens' resistance to politically controversial strategies. Hazard mitigation planning stands a greater chance of affecting community change if it is coupled with an effective citizen involvement process to generate community awareness of, and support for risk reduction strategies. This project is designed to (1) develop a facilitation process designed to increase the level and quality of citizen involvement in community hazard mitigation planning and implementation, and (2) create programming materials that will allow extension professionals and community planners to replicate the facilitation process with communities nationwide. The Project Directors (PDs) will develop a citizen involvement process that (1) educates citizens on hazard risks (2) involves citizens in the identification and prioritization of mitigation strategies, and (3) builds among the public a committed constituency for hazard mitigation. The PDs will work with the Iowa Northland Regional Council of Governments and an Iowa municipality in a pilot project to implement and improve the citizen involvement process. Using lessons learned from the pilot project, the PDs will develop a facilitator's manual for use by extension professionals and planners working with communities on hazard mitigation plans. Electronic copies of the manual will be made available to other extension professionals via the Extension Disaster Education Network (EDEN) and eXtension. This project addresses three key target areas of the Smith-Lever Special Needs Program. As a demonstration project with a deliverable (facilitators manual) usable nationwide, this project contributes to disaster education and technical assistance. It promotes collaboration with government agencies at the federal (FEMA), state (Homeland Security agencies) and local level by contributing to a federally-mandated, locally-driven planning process. Finally, it directly contributes to a long range community planning process by enhancing citizen involvement.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
6080120306025%
8056099306075%
Goals / Objectives
Goals: (1) to develop a citizen involvement process designed to increase the level and quality of citizen involvement in community hazard mitigation planning and implementation; and (2) to create programming materials that will allow extension professionals and community planners to replicate the facilitation process with other communities nationwide. Objectives: The citizen involvement process will be designed to satisfy several objectives: (a) it will educate citizens on hazard risks found in their communities, including the severity and likelihood of these risks occurring; (b) it will involve citizens in the prioritization of mitigation policies appropriate for the risks faced, and appropriate for the unique circumstances of their communities; (c) it will involve citizens and elected and appointed officials together in the development of a set of "action steps" for implementing those policies; (d) As a general outcome of the process, it will build among the public a committed constituency for hazard mitigation. The facilitator's manual for use by extension professionals and/or planners will be designed to provide a roadmap to effective citizen involvement in hazard mitigation planning and implementation. Outputs: The facilitator's manual for use by extension professionals and/or planners will be designed to provide a roadmap to effective citizen involvement in hazard mitigation planning and implementation. The manual will be designed to work within existing FEMA guidelines for plan development so that the LHMP developed by the community will still be certifiable; however, it will provide a mechanism for incorporating agreed-upon policies into existing plans and regulations, which is currently missing from the LHMP planning process. The facilitator's manual will include a description of the goals of the individual elements of the citizen involvement process, instructions for its use, the relationship of the different elements of the manual to the LHMP planning process, worksheets and exercises for use during citizen meetings, and sample announcements and advertisements for publicizing citizen meetings. In order to expand upon existing web-based educational materials for extension professionals, electronic copies of the facilitator's manual, along with a summary of the project and an explanation of the origins of the manual, will be made available via EDEN and eXtension. In addition, the PDs will also submit proposals to deliver sessions describing the work and outcomes at the annual conferences of the National Association of Community Development Extension Professionals (NACDEP) and the American Planning Association (APA). Forty printed copies of the facilitator's manual will be printed for distribution to each of Iowa's regional councils of government, and to be made available at no cost to the cooperative extension systems in other states.
Project Methods
Methodology: The pilot project for citizen involvement will proceed in four phases. Phase one is to hold meetings with community leaders and the planner from the regional planning commission leading the community local hazard mitigation planning (LHMP) effort in order to identify the key individuals to serve on a hazard mitigation planning advisory committee. The advisory committee will work with the regional planner as the primary steering committee for the LHMP planning process, and will also provide valuable advice and feedback to the PDs on the citizen involvement process. The committee also will act as a liaison between elected decision-makers, professional planners and community citizens. In this capacity, it is anticipated that the committee members will act as a citizen constituency committed to promoting the development and implementation of sound hazard mitigation policies. Phase 1 milestone will be a resolution from the city council of the pilot community formalizing the membership of the hazard mitigation planning advisory committee. Phase 2 will be to facilitate public workshops designed to educate citizens on hazard risks found in their communities, including the severity and likelihood of these risks occurring. These workshops will proceed in conjunction with the data gathering and analysis phase of the LHMP planning process. The workshops will be designed specifically to deliver the complex scientific and technical data on risk probability and magnitude, loss valuation, regulation, property rights and other issues in ways to make it useful to all participants for decision-making. The workshops will also be designed to help citizens understand the limitations of scientific data, and the degree to which controversial public decisions must be made under conditions of uncertainty. For the Phase 2 milestone, a test instrument will be employed at the conclusions of these workshops to assess whether key educational objectives were met. In Phase 3, citizens will be brought together in one or more facilitated public conversations to discuss and prioritize mitigation policies appropriate to the risks faced by the community. The conversation will be structured to facilitate communication about potentially controversial policy choices, anticipating an emotionally-charged climate. Phase 3 milestone: As an outcome of these public conversations key critical hazards will be identified, and a series of general policies for responding to each will be identified and prioritized. In Phase 4, the PDs, the regional planner, elected officials and the advisory committee will work together to develop a series of action steps for integrating the hazard mitigation policies identified in phase three into the community's land use plan, development regulations, and other government policies. Phase 4 milestone: A set of written action steps to be formally presented to the city council of the pilot community.

Progress 09/01/09 to 12/31/11

Outputs
OUTPUTS: ACTIVITIES Over the life of the grant, the PDs facilitated a total of nine public meetings with hazard mitigation planning committees from Bremer County and municipalities within Bremer County. Meetings were designed to help citizens identify and prioritize feasible mitigation measures. A final meeting brought together representatives from each participating community as a wrap-up of the planning effort and to summarize the action steps to be taken by those communities. DISSEMINATION As of this date, three presentations have been given related to the process and findings of this project - one at a national extension conference and two in Iowa. "Improving Implementation of Hazard Mitigation Planning" was presented at the 2011 National Association of Community Development Extension Professionals (NACDEP) Conference in Charleston, South Carolina on March 9, 2011. "Facilitating the Integration of Hazard Mitigation Planning into Comprehensive Planning" was presented at a meeting organized to discuss the implementation of the Greater Des Moines Partnership's (GDMP) Regional Sustainability Plan. This meeting was sponsored by the GDMP in Des Moines, Iowa on December 8, 2011. "Facilitating the Integration of Hazard Mitigation Planning into Comprehensive Planning" was presented at a workshop for communities receiving smart planning comprehensive planning grants. The workshop was sponsored by the Iowa Department of Economic Development in Des Moines, Iowa on November 2, 2011 and had 70 participants. In addition, the Facilitators Manual (identified under 'Publications') has just been printed and will be disseminated to Iowa planning professionals, and to the Extension Disaster Education Network (EDEN). ONGOING EFFORTS The Federal Emergency Management Agency has yet to certify the Bremer County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. While plans of action for each community have been drafted, final plans depend on any feedback provided by FEMA. INRCOG intends to prepare posters for each community that identify action steps, timelines and responsible departments. PARTICIPANTS: Gary Taylor,PD - Primary developer of facilitation processes and related materials. Conducted meetings at all locations. Presented a session about the project at the February 2011 National Association of Community Development Extension Professionals (NACDEP) conference (reported in 'Outputs' above). Don Broshar, Co-PD - Assisted in outlining facilitation processes and modifications thereto after early public meetings. Brad Grefe, Technical Assistant - Assisted with the preparation (desktop publishing using InDesign) of the meeting materials and flyers publicizing the public meetings. Julie Whitson, Technical Assistant - Assisted with the preparation of the facilitators manual. Brian Schoon, Planner with the Iowa Northland Regional Council of Governments (collaborator) - prepared the actual hazard mitigation plan and helped with the public meetings. TARGET AUDIENCES: Target audiences were citizen committees representing Bremer County and each of the cities involved in the hazard mitigation planning process. Approximately 10-20 citizens participated from each jurisdiction. The ultimate target audience for the project is extension community development professionals interested in working with communities to increase the level of implementation of hazard mitigation measures. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: The initial proposal was to work with one community developing a single-jurisdiction hazard mitigation process; however, the Iowa Department of Homeland Security is "strongly encouraging" all new or amended plans be developed as county-wide multi-jurisdictional plans involving a single county and all municipalities with that county. Considering this is a new approach for almost all Iowa communities, we saw this as an opportunity to put the goals and objectives of this project to work in the state's new paradigm. Another minor change in approach was the lessened emphasis on the discussion in our (extension-led) public meetings of the scientific information on risk. We learned from early experiences that these discussions were detracting from the main objective of plan implementation.

Impacts
CHANGE IN KNOWLEDGE Extension has a role to play in improving the degree to which hazard mitigation measures are recognized, publicized, and ultimately implemented by communities. Extension professionals are generally seen as impartial neutrals, and, as such, are well-suited to engage citizens and elected officials in a public dialogue designed to achieve more informed decisions, especially around sometimes-controversial public policy choices. CHANGE IN ACTIONS Questioning of participants at the conclusion of the final public meeting indicates that participants had a better understanding of the risks facing the community, and felt that the process was beneficial in setting priorities for hazard mitigation steps. As a result, it is projected that communities will have a greater degree of implementation of mitigation measures because of participation in this project. Other long-term impacts cannot be assessed at this time. It is also hoped that the dissemination of the results of this project will lead extension professionals across the country to seek participation in the hazard mitigation planning and implementation process in their local communities. CHANGE IN CONDITIONS Ultimately, because of the participation of extension professionals in the hazard mitigation plan implementation process, mitigation measures will be adopted at a higher rate than without their participation. This will ultimately lead to a reduction in losses of lives and property

Publications

  • MANUAL Taylor, G. 2011. Improving Implementation in Hazard Mitigation Planning: A Facilitators Manual. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Extension and Outreach.


Progress 09/01/10 to 08/31/11

Outputs
OUTPUTS: One of the project goals is to develop a facilitation process designed to increase the value of citizen involvement in community hazard mitigation planning and implementation. The Principal Investigators continued to work with Bremer County Iowa officials and citizens, and officials from municipalities within Bremer County on their multi-jurisdictional hazard mitigation plan. ACTIVITIES- We facilitated four public meetings designed to help citizens identify and prioritize feasible mitigation measures, based on fiscal and administrative capacity of the community, the perceived risk to the community presented by hazards, and the perceived benefits of the mitigation measures in reducing those risks. The final meeting brought together representatives from each participating community as a wrap up of the planning effort and an enunciation of action steps to be taken by those communities. DISSEMINATION - summarized results of each meeting were shared with local officials and participating citizens. PLANNED EFFORTS - INRCOG intends to prepare 'action posters' for each community that identify action steps, responsible parties and deadlines. The facilitator's guide to be disseminated via EDEN is in process. PARTICIPANTS: Gary Taylor, PI - Primary developer of facilitation process and related materials. Conducted public meetings. Presented a session at the February 2010 National Association of Community Development Extension Professionals (NACDEP) annual conference explaining the project and the progress to-date. Brad Grefe, Technical Assistant - Assisted with development of meeting materials, posters, and flyers publicizing the public meetings. Julie Whitson, Technical Assistant - Currently assisting with preparation of facilitator's manual. Brian Schoon, INRCOG Planner - Prepared the actual hazard mitigation plan and assisted in facilitating the public meetings. TARGET AUDIENCES: Target audiences were citizen committees and public officials representing Bremer County, Iowa and each of the cities participating in the planning process. Approximately 5 - 20 citizens participated from each jurisdiction. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: No major changes to the approach were made since the last annual reporting period.

Impacts
A short survey at the conclusion of the final meeting indicates that participants had a better understanding of the hazard risks facing the community and felt that the process was beneficial in setting priorities for hazard mitigation steps. Longer term impacts cannot be assessed at this time, but it is projected that communities will have a greater degree of implementation of mitigation measures because of participation in this project.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 09/01/09 to 08/31/10

Outputs
OUTPUTS: One of the project goals is to develop a facilitation process designed to increase the level and quality of citizen involvement in community hazard mitigation planning and implementation. Working with the Iowa Northland Regional Council of Governments (INRCOG), the Principal Investigators began working with Bremer County, Iowa and the municipalities within Bremer County on their multi-jurisdictional hazard mitigation plan. We developed facilitation materials and facilitated public meetings in the cities of Frederika, Tripola, Sumner and Denver. At each meeting, we educated citizens on hazard risks found in their communities and conducted a process to enable citizens to identify and prioritize mitigation policies and action steps. With each successive public meeting, we revised the approach based on lessons learned from previous meetings. The summarized results of each meeting were shared with the meeting participants and with the local officials of that city. Two joint public meetings of all cities and the county participating in the multi-jurisdictional planning process will be held. Regional flooding in July and August 2010 set us back on our timeline, as our collaborators at INRCOG were drawn away to various disaster recovery projects. PARTICIPANTS: Gary Taylor,PI - Primary developer of facilitation processes and related materials. Conducted meetings at all locations. Don Broshar, Co-PI - Assisted in outlining facilitation processes and modifications thereto after each successive public meeting. Brad Grefe, Technical Assistant - Assisted with the physical development (desktop publishing using InDesign) of the meeting materials and flyers publicizing the public meetings. TARGET AUDIENCES: Target audiences were citizen committees representing Bremer County and each of the cities involved in the hazard mitigation planning process. Approximately 10-20 citizens participated from each jurisdiction. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: The initial proposal was to work with one community developing a single-jurisdiction hazard mitigation process; however, the Iowa Department of Homeland Security is "strongly encouraging" all new or amended plans be developed as county-wide multijurisdictional plans involving a single county and all municipalities with that county. Considering this is a new approach for almost all Iowa communities, we saw this as an opportunity to put the goals and objectives of this project to work in the state's new paradigm. This, along with summer 2010 flooding in north central Iowa, has resulted in slight delays to the project. We still anticipate completion in Spring 2011.

Impacts
As stated above, with each successive public meeting we revised our facilitation process based on lessons learned from previous meetings. We will need to conduct the final two joint public meetings and conduct the final evaluation before we can determine how our approach has resulted in changed action by the local governments involved.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period