Source: UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI submitted to NRP
MANAGED DRAINAGE SYSTEM FOR CROP PRODUCTION
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0218433
Grant No.
2009-34632-19763
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
2009-03409
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 15, 2009
Project End Date
Nov 14, 2010
Grant Year
2009
Program Code
[DD-I]- Managed Drainage System for Crop Production, MO
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI
(N/A)
COLUMBIA,MO 65211
Performing Department
Plant Sciences
Non Technical Summary
Currently, Missouri is not a major subsurface drainage state. However, designing managed drainage systems are necessary for improved water quality. The proposed sites would provide stakeholders with the necessary information to design and install systems that minimize environmental impacts and avoid retrofitting drainage systems to reduce nitrate-N delivery. No-till corn production has had limited adoption in this region due to cool, wet soils in the spring. Subsurface drainage systems have been utilized to lower water levels in fields with seasonally high water levels during planting and harvest. While being beneficial for production, agricultural drainage water has been perceived to be a substantial source of non-point source nitrate-N pollution. Numerous studies have quantified the impact of subsurface agricultural drainage water on water quality. Reviews have reported that improved subsurface drainage reduced peak runoff, peak outflow rates, and sediment loss. Surface water runoff has been the major contributor of phosphorus, pesticide, and sediment loss when compared with subsurface drainage. In Missouri, claypan soils are known to have slow infiltration due to the impermeable claypan and a high runoff potential which encourages surface water runoff. Missouri has approximately 2.1 million acres of crop land with potential for managed drainage systems. Managed drainage is a key production component that may help family farms increase productivity while protecting natural resources. Integrated crop and livestock systems have been essential to maintaining profitability and economic development in this region. Research on managed drainage systems on crops and forages for livestock is needed to promote rural development in areas such as this region. In this region, farmers have concentrated on value-added endeavors to promote agriculture profitability and economic development. However, production stability from year to year may impact the ability to attract new value-added opportunities in the long-term. It is essential to provide appropriate applied research on managed drainage systems to strengthen the agriculture industry in this region and the Midwest by using best management practices for agriculture production, water quality, and conservation. Expansion of research on managed drainage systems is needed to promote agriculture economic development and increase rural per capita income. Managed drainage research is needed to enhance the development of science-based, market sensitive, and stakeholder relevant recommendations for implementation by landowners. The goal of a managed drainage system is to drain only the water that is necessary to ensure trafficability and crop production, and not a drop more. No research has evaluated enhanced efficiency fertilizers (polymer-coated urea) for reduced nitrate-N loss through subsurface drain tiles. An integration of enhanced efficiency fertilizer management with managed drainage may further reduce nitrate-N loss through subsurface drainage systems.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
1020199106020%
1021510106060%
1021630106010%
1021631106010%
Goals / Objectives
Managed drainage has been utilized as a best management system to reduce nitrate-N loss through subsurface drain tiles. Regulated water flow through the winter months has reduced nitrate-N loading of streams up to 75%. Field research will be conducted on claypan and silty clay soils to evaluate the impacts of managed drainage systems for crop and livestock production from 2009 to 2012. Enhanced efficiency fertilizers may further reduce nitrate-N loss through subsurface drainage systems that utilize managed drainage for corn production. The hypothesis of this research is that managed drainage and enhanced efficiency fertilizer (polymer-coated urea) will synergistically increase corn yields and reduce nitrate-N loss, and managed drainage will reduce nitrate-N loss from an intensive annual forage production system. This research will 1) determine the effects of managed drainage systems and enhanced efficiency nitrogen fertilizer (polymer-coated urea) on corn production, nitrogen use efficiency, and nitrogen loss through the drainage system; and 2) evaluate the effects of managed drainage on forage production, nitrogen use efficiency, and non-point source nitrogen loss through the drainage system.
Project Methods
This research will be completed at three experimental sites in Missouri. The experiments will be designed as split-plots with two replications and repeated in time. The main plots are drainage water management (non-drained, drainage only, and managed drainage) and sub-plots are urea fertilizer treatments (polymer- and non-coated urea). Data will be subjected to analysis of variance and means separated using Fisher's protected LSD. Subsurface drainage tile will be installed at recommended spacings. A plastic barrier will be installed between the non-drained controls, drainage only, and managed drainage treatments at the Greenley site. In addition, a levee plow will be used to separate plots and prevent surface water movement between treatments at this site. The forage site will include a non-treated control, managed drainage, and drainage only treatments. No enhanced efficiency fertilizer applications will be made to this experimental site since forage yields have not increased using this fertilizer source in Missouri. The experimental sites will determine plant N uptake, silage and grain yields. The Greenley and Bee Ridge sites will be planted to continuous corn to complete two field seasons by 2012. At the Forage site, whole-plant tissue samples will be collected from each treatment prior to grazing. Forage yields and nutrient uptake will be determined in a transect perpendicular to the tile lines. Penetrometer resistance will be used to determine relative compaction differences between drainage systems. Tile flow, water and soil sampling for nitrate-N, and nitrous oxide gas efflux measurements will determine N fate in the managed drainage production systems. Flow proportional samples of subsurface drainage water for nitrate-N will be collected with individual auto samplers at each water level control structure. Auto samplers will be removed during the winter months and grab samples used to determine N concentration during these periods. A minisat will be used to identify water flow events during the winter months and obtain grab samples. Deep soil samples will be collected at the Greenley and Forage sites using a Giddings probe to determine soil N concentration in a transect perpendicular to the tile lines in the same transect as the plant sample harvest to determine residual N in the soil. Deep soil samples will be collected at the Bee Ridge site following harvest to determine residual N in the soil profile. The Greenley site will be utilized to monitor gaseous N fertilizer loss similar to other research and will follow the GRACEnet protocol recommended by the Agricultural Research Service. Results will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication upon the completion of this research.

Progress 07/15/09 to 11/14/10

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Enhanced efficiency fertilizers such as polymer-coated urea (PCU) have been shown to reduce nitrate concentrations in lysimeters in claypan soils (Nelson et al., 2009). These fertilizers may further reduce NO3-N loss through subsurface drainage systems that utilize managed drainage for corn production, but no research has been conducted to evaluate both best management practices. Agricultural drainage is not a new concept; however, utilizing managed drainage as part of an integrated water management system is a relatively new concept that has been shown to improve water quality by reducing NO3-N load up to 75% (Drury et al., 1996; Frankenberger et al., 2006; Drury et al., 2009) and sustain agricultural viability (Belcher and D'Itri 1995). Groundwater quality is affected by nitrate (NO3-) pollution that may result from excessive N fertilizer applications and other practices (Knox and Moody, 1991). Since NO3-N is soluble in water and is not retained by soil particles, it is susceptible to be leached to groundwater prior to crop growth or following harvest. In the United States, N losses in crop production are a concern due to relatively high N fertilizer application rates and considerable amounts of NO3-N released in drainage waters from agricultural soils (Cambardella et al., 1999). As a result, NO3-N concentration is regulated to prevent negative health impacts and eutrophication (Shaviv and Mikkelsen, 1993; USEPA, 1995; Hunter, 2001). Soil and water conservation systems for productivity and environmental protection are key components of this enhanced efficiency N fertilizer and managed drainage project. In order for rural communities to remain competitive in a rapidly changing agricultural environment, technology that integrates current best management practices must also maintain a highly productive, safe, and efficient food supply. Water conservation, reduced fertilizer loss, increased nutrient use efficiency, and reduced sediment loss while improving crop production combined with managed drainage that is based on solid research is a win-win situation for farmers, consumers, and the environment. It is expected that there will be a reduction in NO3-N loading of up to 75% (Zucker and Brown, 1998; Frankenberger et al., 2006; Drury et al., 2009) and an additive effect of the enhanced efficiency fertilizer on reducing N loss in the crop production system and increasing corn grain yield. The hypothesis of this research is that managed drainage and enhanced efficiency fertilizer (polymer-coated urea) will synergistically increase corn yields and reduce NO3-N loss. The objective of this research is to determine the effects of managed drainage systems (MSD) and enhanced efficiency nitrogen fertilizer (PCU) on corn production, nitrogen use efficiency, and nitrogen loss through the subsurface drainage system. PARTICIPANTS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
Research was initiated in July 2010 in a Putnam silt loam (Greenley site) and Wabash silty-clay (Bee Ridge site). Water samples and flow were collected and monitored from the drainage systems at both sites year around using automated collection systems and flow monitoring equipment. Water samples were analyzed for nitrate-N, ortho-phosphate, and sediment concentration. Water flowing out of subsurface drainage systems was typically restricted over the period of Oct. through Apr. with MSD, while conventional subsurface drainage systems (CSD) had unrestricted water flow over the same period of time. Supplemental data including ammonia volatilization, nitrous oxide gas loss, and soil nitrogen concentration were also collected at the Greenley site which allows us to better understand how subsurface drainage systems and enhanced efficiency nitrogen fertilizer impacted corn production, nitrogen loss, and fertilizer use efficiency.

Publications

  • Belcher, H.W. and F.M. D'itri (Eds.). 1995. Subirrigation and controlled drainage. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. pp. 482. Beyrouty, C.A., L.E. Sommers., and D.W. Nelson. 1988. Ammonia volatilization from surface-applied urea as affected by several phosphoroamide compounds. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52:1173-1178 Cambardella, C.C., T.B. Moorman, D.B. Jaynes, J.L. Hatfield, T.B. Parkin, W.W. Simpkins, and D.L. Karlen. 1999. Water quality in Walnut Creek watershed: Nitrate-nitrogen in soils, subsurface drainage water, and shallow groundwater. J. Environ. Qual. 28:25-34. Drury, C.F., C.S. Tan, J.D. Gaynor, T.O. Oloyo, I.J. Van Vesenbeeck, and D.J. McKenney. 1997. Optimizing corn production and reducing nitrate losses with water table control-subirrigation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61:889-895. Drury, C.F., C.S. Tan, J.D. Gaynor, T.O. Oloya, and T.W. Welacky. 1996. Influence of controlled drainage-subirrigation on surface and tile drainage nitrate loss. J. Environ. Qual. 25:317-324. Drury, C.F., C.S. Tan, W.D. Rynolds, T.W. Welacky, T.O. Oloya, and J.D. Gaynor. 2009. Managing tile drainage, subirrigation, and nitrogen fertilization to enhance crop yields and reduce nitrate losss. J. Environ. Qual. 38:1193-1204. Fausey, N.R., L.C. Brown, H.W. Belcher, and R.S. Kanwar. 1995. Drainage and water quality in Great Lakes and cornbelt states. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 121:283-288. Frankenberger, J., E. Kladivko, G. Sands, D. Jaynes, N. Fausey, M. Helmers, R. Cooke, J. Strock, K. Nelson, and L. Brown. 2006. Drainage water management for the Midwest: Questions and answers about drainage water management for the Midwest. Purdue Ext., p. 8. Griggs, B.R., R.J. Norman, C.E. Wilson, Jr., and N.A. Slaton. 2007. Ammonia volatilization and nitrogen uptake for conventional and conservation tilled dry-seeded, delayed-flood rice. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 71:745-751. Hunter, W.J. 2001. Remediation of drinking water for rural populations. p. 433-460 in R.F. Follett and J.L. Hatfield (ed.) Nitrogen in the environment: Sources, problems, and management. Elsevier Science B.V, The Netherlands. Knox, E., and D.W. Moody. 1991. Influence of hydrology, soil properties, and agricultural land use on nitrogen in ground water. pp. 1-7 in R.F. Follett et al. (ed.) Managing nitrogen for ground water quality and farm profitability. SSSA, Madison, WI. Nelson, K.A., C.G. Meinhardt, and R.L. Smoot. 2010. MU drainage and subirrigation (MUDS) research update. Greenley Memorial Research Center Field Day Report. pp. 12-23. Nelson, K.A., S.M. Paniagua, and P.P. Motavalli. 2009. Effect of polymer coated urea, irrigation, and drainage on nitrogen utilization and yield of corn in a claypan soil. Agron. J. 101:681-687. Shaviv, A., and R.L. Mikkelsen. 1993. Controlled-release fertilizers to increase efficiency of nutrient use and minimize environmental degradation-A review. Fert. Res. 35:1-12. Skaggs, R. W. 1999. Water table management: subirrigation and controlled drainage. Pages 695-718 in R. W. Skaggs and J. van Schilfgaarde (ed.) Agricultural drainage. Agron. Monogr. 38. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1995. Drinking Water Relations and Health Advisories. Office of Water, Washington, D.C. Zucker, L.A. and L.C. Brown (Eds.). 1998. Agriculture drainage: water quality impacts and subsurface drainage studies in the Midwest. Ohio State University Extension Bulletin 871. The Ohio State University. pp. 40.


Progress 07/15/09 to 07/14/10

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Managed drainage has been utilized as a best management system to reduce NO3-N loss through subsurface drain tiles. Regulated water flow through the winter months has reduced NO3-N loading of streams up to 75%. Enhanced efficiency fertilizers may further reduce NO3-N loss through subsurface drainage systems that utilize managed drainage for corn production. The hypothesis of this research is that managed drainage and enhanced efficiency fertilizer (polymer-coated urea) will synergistically increase corn yields and reduce NO3-N loss, and managed drainage will reduce NO3-N loss from an intensive annual forage production system. This research will 1) determine the effects of managed drainage systems and enhanced efficiency nitrogen fertilizer (polymer-coated urea) on corn production, nitrogen use efficiency, and nitrogen loss through the drainage system; and 2) evaluate the effects of managed drainage on forage production, nitrogen use efficiency, and non-point source nitrogen loss through the drainage system. PARTICIPANTS: Not relevant to this project. TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.

Impacts
Field Research was initiated on claypan and silty clay soils to evaluate the impacts of managed drainage systems for crop and livestock prodution from 2009 to 2012. Two sites were selected to conduct experiments evaluating managed drainage for corn production referred to as the Greenley and Bee Ridge sites, and one for forage production for cattle (Bos taurus) referred to as the Forage site. Design and layout of component practices were comnpleted with local contractors. All sites were installed in the fall, 2009 to spring 2010. Currently, water sampling, flow rates, and field evaluations have been underway at all three of the installed sites.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period