Source: UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION submitted to NRP
UTAH EXTENSION INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0218325
Grant No.
2009-41534-05456
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
2009-00661
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 1, 2009
Project End Date
Jun 30, 2010
Grant Year
2009
Program Code
[QQIPM]- Extension Integrated Pest Management - Coordination
Recipient Organization
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION
(N/A)
LOGAN,UT 84322
Performing Department
Cooperative Extension
Non Technical Summary
The major goal of the Utah Extension IPM Program is to increase the use of low toxicity and sustainable pest management practices on agricultural and urban. The Utah IPM COORDINATION proposal will support program infrastructure to enable the Coordinator and Project Leader to develop and extend IPM education to meet critical pest management needs, recognizing Utah?s concentrated urban areas consisting of part-time agricultural producers and homeowners with a strong agrarian heritage, and widespread rural areas where agriculture is limited by high elevation arid environments and alkaline soils. Utah IPM Program collaborations and activities will emphasize high-value crops and consumer/urban situations, and include: joint publication of a tree fruit production guide with Colorado State University, administration of an Extension mini-grant with Western SARE, involvement in School IPM through the Western Region School IPM Work Group, an online decision aid tool with the Utah Climate Center, IPM outreach via Pesticide Recertification Workshops sponsored by the Utah Department of Agriculture and Food (UDAF), IPM training with NRCS, stakeholder research collaborations with Utah Horticultural Association, and participation in pest diagnostic and detection service and training activities with Utah Plant Pest Diagnostic Lab, UDAF, Western Plant Diagnostic Network, and Utah Cooperative Agricultural Survey Program. The Utah IPM program focuses on the following emphasis areas: IPM in agronomic crops (the mini-grant program), IPM in high value crops (a pest advisory program, IPM survey, applied research, etc.), IPM in Schools, and Consumer/Urban IPM (pest advisory program, education/outreach, green industry survey.)
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2161119113010%
2161119116010%
2161129113010%
2161129116010%
2161499113010%
2161499116010%
2162199113010%
2162199116010%
2163099113010%
2164099116010%
Goals / Objectives
The major goal of the Utah Extension IPM Program is to increase the use of low toxicity and sustainable pest management practices on agricultural and urban lands. By emphasizing this goal in Extension IPM Program activities, additional goals will be reached, including enhancing economic sustainability, and reducing negative impacts to human health and safety and the environment. Objectives: 1. Provide a core of IPM-dedicated resources that serves as a focal point and catalyst for effective IPM team-building and communication with all relevant groups in Utah 2. Provide relevant and effective training and education on IPM concepts and technologies to Utah stakeholder groups targeted in this application. The Extension IPM Program will re-evaluate new and changing IPM needs in the state on an on-going basis and adjust targeted program efforts accordingly. 3. Organize and facilitate cooperative and collaborative IPM educational efforts, such as training programs, pest advisory services, weather network, pest activity predictive tools, information databases, development of educational products, applied research and demonstration projects, and others. 4. Address and facilitate collaborations on ecologically- and economically-based applied research needs. 5. Serve as the IPM resource center for Utah. 6. Support and facilitate communication on state, multi-state, and regional IPM activities, including planning and reporting, through participation in meetings and committees relative to the USDA CSREES and Utah IPM Program missions. Outputs 1) a list of targeted stakeholder groups, key group contacts, and group educational opportunities and preferences; 2) on-going data on needs assessment and feedback from stakeholder groups to guide the direction of the IPM Program; 3) Extension IPM publications including a comprehensive Utah-Colorado tree fruit production guide, slideshows, online resources, pest and host injury images, pest diagnostic and management guidelines and tools, and 28 tree fruit, 18 small fruit/vegetable, 15 landscape, and 6 turf IPM pest advisories published to over 2000 subscribers; 4) research reports, new knowledge delivered to stakeholders via educational products described in #3, and established collaborations to continue contributions to the IPM knowledge-base; 5) cost-benefit analysis data will be used to promote IPM adoption; 6) an IPM resource center housed on the Utah IPM Web site and linked to relevant IPM resources in the region and world; 7) reports, feedback, and initiation of new activities and projects based on knowledge gained and new collaborations formed at state, regional, and national meetings; and 8) based on past years, leveraged funds will double to triple Utah IPM funds; increased funding will support collaborative IPM applied research and outreach education activities.
Project Methods
Methods for COORDINATION COMPONENT 1) identify stakeholder groups for communication, 2) assess priorities and needs for pest management education and support, 3) provide IPM education, 4) coordinate and direct applied research, 5) collaborate with Economist to document changes in IPM, 6) gather and tailor external IPM resources to Utah situations and needs, 7) maintain and promote IPM resources, 9) represent Utah stakeholder interests, and 10) leverage IPM funding from organizational, state, and federal sources. Methods for COLLABORATION COMPONENT 1) A Utah-Colorado tree fruit production guide will be designed, written, and distributed. 2) Participate in School IPM Program by joining the Western Region School IPM Implementation and Assessment Work Group. 3) Partner with the Utah Climate Center to continue service of online plant and pest management tools. 4) Administer mini-grant program with Western SARE to provide funding for county Extension agents. 5) Continue partnership with Utah Department of Agriculture and Food to provide IPM training to pesticide applicators. 6) Coordinate pest management educational activities with the Western Plant Diagnostic Network and Utah Plant Pest Diagnostic Lab. Methods for EMPHASIS AREAS Administer IPM Pest Advisory Program, TRAPs online decision aid tool, and weather station network. The IPM pest advisory program consists of free, weekly, subscription-based emails (tree fruits, small fruits/vegetables, landscape, and turf) that provide pest alerts, and more. Weekly monitoring occurs in 26 locations. Conduct research in high value crops: Five projects are planned for the 2009-10 season: 1) determine whether Utah's high elevation affects degradation of codling moth mating disruption dispensers; 2) validate codling moth pheromone lure trap thresholds in mating disrupted orchards; 3) continue investigation into biology, incidence, and severity of stone fruit-boring insects; 4) begin trial survey of stone fruit trees for canker-causing fungi and bacteria; 5) determine the effectiveness of mating disruption in suppressing currant borer. IPM support for pest diagnostic facilities: The IPM Program assists the the plant clinic through site visits and field diagnostics, field scouting and notification of unusual pest sightings, contribution to and facilitation of workshop programs, coordination/preparation of the UTAH PESTS quarterly newsletter. Surveys: In order to determine critical IPM needs in IPM, we will conduct surveys of stakeholders in tree fruits and the green industry. Evaluation results and outcomes will be evaluated by on-going discussions with partners at appropriate program meetings and through surveys and forums on stakeholder feedback. The success of partnerships in meeting IPM Program goals will be measured by progress achieved toward specific project goals, the degree of expansion and enhancement of IPM Program educational offerings, identification of new and on-going IPM needs, and development of new and renewed partnerships.

Progress 07/01/09 to 06/30/10

Outputs
OUTPUTS: IPM in Agronomic Crops: In collaboration with Western SARE, two mini-grants in agronomic crops were awarded, and resulted in a workshop, bulletin, and grower survey on using IPM to manage Townsend's squirrel in alfalfa, and demonstration sites on using goats to manage Russian olive. IPM in High Value Crops: Two mini-grants in high value crops were awarded, resulting in a television program, demonstration site, and booklet on using chickens for vegetable pest control and a demonstration peach orchard showing IPM methods to manage boring insects. In our IPM Pest Advisory program, we delivered newsletters covering small fruits & vegetables (5) and tree fruit (17) to over 3500 e-mail subscribers. We enhanced content on the IPM website by: uploading all advisories from 2003-current to a searchable format on the IPM website (over 300); added social media (Twitter); and converted the home orchard guide to html. We developed IPM spray tables for commercial tree fruit growers and will be expanding the content to a multi-state publication. We expanded the online pest decision aid tool, TRAPs (Timing Resource Alert for Pests) with new models (fire blight) and weather data access. We conducted a tree fruit IPM survey to evaluate the program's successes and future needs and achieved a 75% response rate (results are currently being analyzed). We produced a codling moth mating disruption fact sheet based on several years of research and presented findings at meetings and distributed to all commercial growers. We produced a raspberry horntail fact sheet based on biology and management research, and presented findings in newsletters and 9 professional meetings. The IPM staff delivered approximately 19 talks to commodity groups, Master Gardeners, and pesticide license applicators; 21 tree fruit and vegetable grower field meetings; 2 in-service pest training workshops (Extension and NRCS); 8 gardening radio programs; and 1 fire blight workshop. IPM Support for Pest Diagnostic Facilities: The IPM group met monthly with the diagnostic lab to coordinate workshops, budgets, etc. We scanned and uploaded over 400 images with captions to the pest diagnostic website, representing 13 insect and disease categories. We delivered 4 quarterly Utah Pests newsletters to approximately 5000 e-mail subscribers, and uploaded each to the website. IPM in Schools: We met with school IPM committees in Utah and the western U.S. region, and an IPM staff member attended two professional development conferences, and presented two school IPM talks. Consumer/Urban IPM: In collaboration with Western SARE, one mini-grant in consumer/urban IPM was awarded, and resulted in the production of four pest identification posters distributed across the state, and three pest ID workshops. The IPM staff delivered approximately 10 talks to green industry professionals, Master Gardeners, and pesticide license applicators. We conducted the first IPM survey of green industry professionals as a baseline for future programs targeting this group. We delivered newsletters covering landscape (5) and turf (3) to over 3000 e-mail subscribers. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals: Diane Alston, Entomologist and State IPM Coordinator, Utah State University, Principle Investigator. Facilitates coordination of IPM programs, supervisory role, research, training, diagostics, etc.; Marion Murray, IPM Project Leader, Utah State University, Co-PI. Carries out daily operations, training, research, etc.; Ruby Ward, Economist, Utah State University, Co-PI. Survey design and analysis; Ryan Davis, Arthropod Diagnostician, Utah State University. Runs school IPM program; Kelly Kopp, Turf Specialist, Utah State University, turf IPM. Partner Organizations: Utah State Horticultural Association (tree fruits); Utah Department of Agriculture and Food; Utah Plant Pest Diagnostic Lab. Collaborators: Colorado State University tree fruit plant pathologist and agronomist; Western Region School IPM Implementation and Assessment Work Group; Utah Climate Center; Western Sustainable Agriculture and Research Education; Utah Cooperative Agriculture Pest Survey Committee. Training Opportunities: tree fruit, vegetable field days; undergraduate student training in IPM; faculty professional development at professional organization meetings. TARGET AUDIENCES: Producers in fruits and vegetables throughout Utah, Master Gardeners, pesticide applicators, green industry professionals, school administrators and staff, USU Extension agriculture and horticulture agents, and citizens of Utah learned about IPM through field days, grower meetings, workshops, fact sheets, conference calls, website, social media, newsletters, and face-to-face, phone, and email contacts. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.

Impacts
IPM in Agronomic Crops: County agents that completed mini-grant projects are better able to serve their clientele due to their greater experiential knowledge of local and regional IPM issues. Their counties now offer more IPM services and products than counties that have not participated. Agents reported that the mini-grant program allows them to deal with local IPM issues based on stakeholder input. IPM in High Value Crops: Participant surveys, one-on-one conversations, and feedback at grower meetings showed that farmers subscribing to the IPM advisory program have reduced their pesticide use and/or have changed to reduced risk products. Several applied research projects contributed to pesticide reduction and increase in IPM implementation: 1) Utah onion growers now use IPM to manage onion thrips, resulting in an annual savings of about $180,000 and improved yields. 2) Growers have adopted a codling moth treatment threshold for mating disruption orchards developed by the IPM program, resulting in improved detection and decreased errors in supplemental insecticide applications. 3) A new program targeting an underserved tree fruit grower group used field meetings and demonstrations, and has energized this group to switch from organophosphates to alternative options. 4) Analysis of four brands of codling moth mating disruption dispensers showed clear differences, allowing us to advise growers on the most efficacious products. 5) Our recommendations of raspberry horntail control timing based on observations of biology and varietal susceptibility saved the raspberry industry $80,000 in crop loss. Individuals who have learned monitoring, identification, and correct pest suppression skills through IPM training are adopting IPM, as seen in the pest advisory user survey and at grower meetings. Growers' knowledge in the correct use and choice of pesticides has increased, resulting in a greater awareness of pesticide safety to humans and the environment. The Utah IPM Program and IPM training has helped growers produce healthier plants (26% increase). IPM advisory recipients also reported decreased costs (27%) due to reduced sprays, better spray timing, and knowledge of appropriate products. IPM Support for Diagnostic Facilities: Improvements made to the Utah Pests and IPM websites have driven more traffic to the sites, where the number of unique visitors for the month of May has increased by 38% since 2008 and the number of visits directed to the site from non-USU extension sites has also increased by 38%. IPM in Schools: Interaction with the Salt Lake School District has enabled the IPM program to be the primary source for pest identification and management in schools. Over 40 professionals in the district were trained at a school IPM workshop. Consumer/Urban IPM: The survey results of green industry professionals will be used to guide future programs. We found that most landscapers (40%) use IPM; however many (41%) offer season-long spray programs that are not tied in to a scouting service, 22% still spray on calendar dates, and 79% do not keep permanent scouting records.

Publications

  • Alston, D. 2010 (February). Pesticide product use and safety for consumers. Deseret News (newspaper): Consumer Section, Provo, UT.
  • Murray, M. 2009-10. Utah Small Fruits and Vegetables IPM Pest Advisory. Semi-weekly. Provides current pest activity, biology, timing, and technical information for residential and commercial growers. Via email and on utahpests.usu.edu/ipm.
  • Murray, M. 2009-10. Utah Tree Fruit IPM Pest Advisory. Semi-weekly. Provides current pest activity, biology, timing, and technical information for residential and commercial growers. Via email and on utahpests.usu.edu/ipm.
  • Murray, M. and Alston, D. 2010. Codling Moth Mating Disruption. Utah Pests Fact Sheet, ENT-137-10. 5 pp.
  • Pereault, R. J., M. E. Whalon, and D. G. Alston. 2009. Field efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi and nematodes targeting caged last-instar plum curculio (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in apple and cherry orchards. Environmental Entomology 38 (4): 1126-1134.
  • Teixeira, L. A. F., L.. J. Gut, R. Issacs, and D. G. Alston. 2009. Reproductive maturity of cherry fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in managed and natural habitats. Environmental Entomology 38 (4): 955-961.
  • Alston, D. 2010. New fruit fly pest rapidly expands its distribution in the West during 2009. Utah Berry Growers Association Newsletter Vol. 3, Issue 2: 3-4.
  • Alston, D., Murray, M. and Black, B. 2009. Raspberry Horntail. Utah Pests Fact Sheet, ENT-132-09. 4 pp.
  • Alston, D., Davis, R., Murray, M., and Vorel, C. 2009-10. Utah Pests News. Quarterly. Articles on current pest news and research at Utah State University. Via email and on utahpests.usu.edu.
  • Knight, A., D. Light, R. Hilton, and D. Alston. 2010. Pear ester for codling moth monitoring and management. Good Fruit Grower 61 (5): 40-41.
  • Kopp, K. 2009-10. Utah Turf IPM Pest Advisory. Quarterly. Provides current pest activity, biology, timing, and technical information for residential and commercial growers. Via email and on utahpests.usu.edu/ipm.
  • Murray, M. 2009. Community-Wide Grasshopper Control. Utah Pests Fact Sheet, ENT-131-09. 2 pp.
  • Murray, M. 2009-10. Utah Landscape IPM Pest Advisory. Semi-weekly. Provides current pest activity, biology, timing, and technical information for residential and commercial growers. Via email and on utahpests.usu.edu/ipm.