Source: ELTRON RESEARCH, INC. submitted to
CATALYTIC ETHYLENE REMOVAL
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0217976
Grant No.
2009-33610-19671
Project No.
COLK-2009-00062
Proposal No.
2009-00062
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
8.13
Project Start Date
May 15, 2009
Project End Date
Jan 14, 2010
Grant Year
2009
Project Director
Taylor, J. W.
Recipient Organization
ELTRON RESEARCH, INC.
4600 NAUTILUS COURT SOUTH
BOULDER,CO 80301
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Fresh fruit, vegetables, and flowers are transported and stored in refrigerated containers. As the produce ripens, ethylene gas is produced, which further ripens the product and can lead to premature spoilage. Most fruits and vegetables emit ethylene gas which promotes ripening. Certain species, such as apples and bananas, produce more ethylene than others. Elevated ethylene levels can significantly reduce storage time; concentrations as high as only 1 ppm can destroy an entire container of produce in one day. The current ethylene removal industry uses single-use potassium permanganate adsorbent blankets or sachets, or a removal device that has a limited lifetime (38 months). Other devices that are on the market or currently being developed include biofilters, ozone generators, and photocatalytic and electrocatalytic devices. Disadvantages of these devices include very strict storage requirements, the potential of contamination by the ethylene-destroying bacteria, the need to employ complex systems to produce ozone, and high manufacturing costs of the photocatalytic device and nanoporous gold electrocatalysts. The goal of this Phase I program is to optimize Eltron's proprietary catalytic adsorbents for ethylene removal and design a prototype ethylene removal device. We envision that by the end of the Phase II program a prototype low-cost device for the catalytic removal of low concentrations of ethylene will have been fabricated, evaluated in a lab setting and in a real-world setting by Ethylene Control Inc., who have already expressed interest in this technology.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
5031499200050%
5031199200050%
Goals / Objectives
Eltron has developed proprietary catalytic adsorbents for ethylene removal. Data collected during internally funded, preliminary research shows that Eltron's catalyst (unoptimized, at this point) has shown activity for ethylene removal. The primary goal of the Phase I program is to optimize the catalyst. Overall, the program aims to develop an ethylene removal device with significant improvements over state-of-the-art technologies. Major benefits of the new system include regenerability of the catalyst (long lifetimes, without having to replace the active species), use of an inexpensive catalyst, and a simple device design, making it inexpensive to manufacture and simple to use. The low maintenance design of the device will allow for increased storage time and reduce spoilage, resulting in reduced costs to all parties along the supply chain - grower, transporter, distributor, and consumer.
Project Methods
The approach for this Phase I program will be to optimize Eltron's catalytic adsorbents for ethylene removal and to design a low-power ethylene removal device. The compositions will be derived from Eltron's proprietary materials that have shown high activity for the removal of ethylene and HCN (which has a similar chemical bonding environment compared to ethylene) at low temperatures. Catalytic materials will undergo brief optimization and will be fabricated in an appropriate form. Basic kinetic studies will be performed that will enable the prototype device design. The device will be designed and an economic feasibility study will be conducted. The specific objectives for Phase I are as follows: 1) Synthesize and characterize catalytic adsorbents; 2) Screen materials for ethylene removal, relative to current materials; 3) Determine catalytic removal rates; 4) Optimize catalyst composition; 5) Determine sorbent regenerability and lifetimes; 6) Develop catalytic adsorbents into appropriate forms; 7) Perform kinetic studies; 8) Design prototype device; 9) Conduct economic feasibility study. Catalytic adsorbent candidates will be prepared using standard methods such as co-precipitation and impregnation. Physical characterization will be performed on the catalytic adsorbent candidates using established analytical techniques including but not limited to: SEM/EDX; XRD; surface area and pore size analysis, FTIR, and AAS. The catalytic adsorbents will be evaluated for ethylene removal using fixed bed reactors. Low concentrations of ethylene in air will be dosed to the catalytic adsorbent. Gas chromatography will be used to determine removal rates. Systematic modifications to the catalyst compositions will be made to optimize ethylene removal. Optimized catalytic adsorbents will be prepared into an appropriate form, such as beads or rings and re-evaluated for ethylene removal. Kinetic studies will be performed on down selected catalysts and a prototype device will be designed based on this data. Finally, an economic analysis will be performed.

Progress 05/15/09 to 01/14/10

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Task 1: Syntheses of adsorbents for ethylene removal were performed using various literature preparation methods. Surface areas and pore sizes were obtained for all adsorbents. Task 2: A reactor system was designed and constructed which enabled testing of a fixed bed of adsorbent contained in a quartz tube within a Pyrex sleeve that was capable of being filled with coolant. The temperature of the coolant could be controlled between -10 and 100C. Feed gas flows were controlled via mass flow controllers and humidity was added to the line via a bubbler placed prior to the reactor which could be cooled with an ice bath. Sample ports were place both prior to and immediately after the adsorbent bed and samples were taken and run through a G.C. equipped with a 3' Porapak Q column. The total concentration of ethylene was 20 ppm in air but could be reduced to as low as 2 ppm via mixing with another independent air line. In all a multitude of experimental runs were performed on 20 different adsorbents under both dry and humidified ethylene/air streams containing between 2 and 20 pm ethylene. Task 3: The most promising adsorbents were run through a series of adsorption/regeneration cycles under both dry and humidified ethylene/air streams and also tested under ethylene/air streams within which the ethylene concentration was cycling between 5 and 10 ppm over time. Both of our primary adsorbents were also re-synthesized with various binders in hopes of adding additional strength and support. Several significant kinetic studies were also performed to discern the effects of both changes in concentration of ethylene and changes in flow rates. Task 4: Design of a small prototype was designed based on the initial results obtained in Phase I and a general economic feasibility study was also completed. Eltron Research & Development also had discussions with Ethylene Control Inc. (Selma, CA) prior to the Phase I project, during the project, and upon its completion in January 2010. Ethylene Control deals in potassium permanganate packets which are disposable and help remove ethylene in confined spaces. The ability to offer an ethylene removal system which can be regenerated is of real interest to Ethylene Control and they have agreed to field test a prototype unit to be produced in the proposed Phase II and also aid Eltron in advancing the system to market should we produce an "economically compelling technical solution". Ethylene Control has also offered advice on various performance targets which would be crucial to the commercial appeal of any new ethylene removal system. These suggestions helped guide the development of the workplan in the Phase II proposal which is expected to help speed the development of the prototype and ultimately the commercial product. PARTICIPANTS: Jesse W. Taylor - Primary Investigator Dr. Taylor=s role in this program was as the primary investigator and as such he provided the research direction, performed the majority of the data evaluation, and wrote the majority of all reports. Erick J. Schutte - Secondary Investigator Dr. Schutte provided assistance in all areas of the project including synthesis, characterization and testing of materials, data logging and evaluation, and report writing. Porntip Dubuisson - Technician Mrs. Dubuisson was the primary laboratory researcher on the project whose focus was synthesizing, characterizing, and testing all materials, logging all pertinent data, and recording findings in official notebooks. Dave Biswell - President of Ethylene Control, Inc. (Selma, CA.) Mr. Biswell currently oversees a company that specializes in ethylene removal within the fruit, flower, and vegetable industry. The investigators on the project were in contact with Mr. Biswell before, during, and after the Phase I project and were provided with crucial information about the industry including various needs and issues. Mr. Biswell also provided a list of key research targets that needed to be met in order for a new ethylene removal technology to be viable in the commercial market. This information was used extensively during the development of the Phase II proposal Work Plan. TARGET AUDIENCES: Companies and individuals within the horticulture commodities and adsorbents markets, including produce and floral shippers and distributors. Companies and/or individuals who specialize in providing ethylene removal solutions will also be prime targets for technology licensing. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: The original project plan was to develop regenerable "catalytic" ethylene removal materials. However, the catalysts developed early in the project did not produce the desired results (i.e., they did not remove 100% of a 20 ppm stream of ethylene and were not very regenerable). We then turned our focus to sorbents and found several which met the necessary criteria, both from an adsorption and regeneration standpoint, that we had put in place to determine if a material was deserving of optimization. This minor change in material development was reflected in the Phase II being titled "Regenerable Ethylene Removal" after an e-mail exchange with the USDA project officer was completed addressing the issue.

Impacts
In order for a new ethylene removal system to be considered viable in the current marketplace it needs to be able to function in humid conditions and under variable ethylene concentrations while being capable of removing 100% of low ppm levels of ethylene for an extended period of time. Any sorbent that can be regenerated also needs to exhibit high, steady, continuous activity over numerous regeneration cycles. During Phase I, Eltron developed regenerable adsorbents for ethylene removal under humid conditions and finished preliminary designs of a prototype ethylene removal device. Data collected during the Phase I showed that Eltron's primary adsorbent was capable of removing 100% of the ethylene in a 5 ppm ethylene/air stream for over 24 hours in dry conditions and for 2.5 hours in humid (60% relative humidity) conditions. Changes in ethylene concentration during experiments did not have any negative effect on the ethylene removal ability of the adsorbent. The adsorbent was also shown to be regenerable in both dry and humid conditions through multiple cycles with no substantial loss in activity. Financial assistance through the United States Department of Agriculture, and more specifically, the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service was crucial in the success of the Phase I. The assistance allowed us to purchase raw materials for test reactors and sorbent synthesis, fund a technician who could run the experiments and log data on the project, and fund a primary investigator to interpret the data, evaluate results, and make decisions moving forward.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period