Progress 10/01/09 to 09/30/14
Outputs Target Audience: One of the most intriguing ideas in evolutionary biology is the suggestions that sexually reproducing animals choose mates who carry "good genes" for survival. Choosing mates with such good genes would enhance the genetic quality of offspring. Further it is proposed that ornamental traits such as the antlers of deer or the bright coloration of feathers might serve as indicators of genetic quality. This good genes hypothesis is very intuitive and appealing but it has proven difficult to test. New genetic tools, however, provide an opportunity to test the theory. We propose to use new genetic tools for studying gene expression to identify genes that appear to function in the immune response of the House Finch when it is infected by the bacterium Mycoplasma gallicepticum (MG). Once these candidate genes are identified we will use another set of genetic tools to search for genetic variation that could be inherited and could be the "good genes" sought by choosing females. Finally we will test the good genes hypothesis by correlating the brightness of red plumage in male house finches to their genetic makeup, looking for associations between good genes and color display. This research is aimed at improving our basic understanding of immunogentics and the evolution of disease resistance in animals. There are potential direct benefits for agriculture. The focal pathogen in this study, MG, is among the most damaging diseases to U.S. poultry, costing millions of dollars in treatment and lost sales. A better understanding of the co-evolution of MG and a novel bird host and how evolution shapes immunity to MG will allow for the development of better treatments for this important poultry disease. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? This project has involved 3 doctoral students and 4 undergraduate students at Auburn University. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Talks were presented at the 2013, 2014, and 2015 meetings for the Society for Comparative and Integrative Biology. Graduate student Molly Staley was the lead and presenting author and Dr. Geoffrey Hill was the second author for three talks, and undergraduate student Hillary Rizk was the lead and presenting author on a fourth presentation. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals?
Nothing Reported
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
In September through Nov 2014 we conducted infection experiments with leghorn chickens. 75 five-week-old leghorns were received from a dealer and allowed to acclimate to cages in a quarantine facility at the school of veterinary medicine at Auburn University. After 10 days of acclimation, chickens were divided into 5 treatment groups with 15 birds per treatment. These treatments were: 1) infection with House Finch Strain of MG and incubate for 4 days; 2) nfection with House Finch Strain of MG and incubate for 14 days; 3) infection with chicken Strain of MG and incubate for 4 days; 4) nfection with chicken Strain of MG and incubate for 14 days; 5) sham manipulated control. At the designated number of days, all chickens were euthanized and spleen and trachea tissue was collected. There spleen and trachea samples are currently being analyzed to study the effects that an adapted versus a non-adapted pathogen have on immune responsiveness of host tissues.
Publications
|
Progress 10/01/13 to 09/30/14
Outputs Target Audience: One of the most intriguing ideas in evolutionary biology is the suggestions that sexually reproducing animals choose mates who carry "good genes" for survival. Choosing mates with such good genes would enhance the genetic quality of offspring. Further it is proposed that ornamental traits such as the antlers of deer or the bright coloration of feathers might serve as indicators of genetic quality. This good genes hypothesis is very intuitive and appealing but it has proven difficult to test. New genetic tools, however, provide an opportunity to test the theory. We propose to use new genetic tools for studying gene expression to identify genes that appear to function in the immune response of the House Finch when it is infected by the bacterium Mycoplasma gallicepticum (MG). Once these candidate genes are identified we will use another set of genetic tools to search for genetic variation that could be inherited and could be the "good genes" sought by choosing females. Finally we will test the good genes hypothesis by correlating the brightness of red plumage in male house finches to their genetic makeup, looking for associations between good genes and color display. This research is aimed at improving our basic understanding of immunogentics and the evolution of disease resistance in animals. There are potential direct benefits for agriculture. The focal pathogen in this study, MG, is among the most damaging diseases to U.S. poultry, costing millions of dollars in treatment and lost sales. A better understanding of the co-evolution of MG and a novel bird host and how evolution shapes immunity to MG will allow for the development of better treatments for this important poultry disease. Changes/Problems: no major changes What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? This project has involved 3 doctoral students and 4 undergraduate students at Auburn university. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Talks were presented at the 2013, 2014, and 2015 meetings for the Society for Comparative and Integrative Biology. Graduate student Molly Staley was the lead and presenting author and Dr. Geoffrey Hill was the second author for three talks, and undergraduate student Hillary Rizk wasthe lead and presenting author on a fourth presentation. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? We are currently analyzing the tissue samples from infection experiments.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
In September through Nov 2014 we conducted infection experiments with leghorn chickens. 75 five-week-old leghorns were received from a dealer and allowed to acclimate to cages in a quarantine facility at the school of veterinary medicine at Auburn University. After 10 days of acclimation, chickens were divided into 5 treatment groups with 15 birds per treatment. These treatments were: 1) infection with House Finch Strain of MG and incubate for 4 days; 2) nfection with House Finch Strain of MG and incubate for 14 days; 3) infection with chicken Strain of MG and incubate for 4 days; 4) nfection with chicken Strain of MG and incubate for 14 days; 5) sham manipulated control. At the designated number of days, all chickens were euthanized and spleen and trachea tissue was collected. There spleen and trachea samples are currently being analyzed to study the effects that an adapted versus a non-adapted pathogen have on immune responsiveness of host tissues.
Publications
|
Progress 01/01/13 to 09/30/13
Outputs Target Audience: This report is aimed primarily at professional agricultural research scientists, and secondarily at poultry farmers and veterinarians who address poultry diseases. Changes/Problems:
Nothing Reported
What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? This project has invovled 3 doctoral students and 3 undergraduate students at Auburn university. How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? A talk was presented at the 2013 meeting for the Society for Comparative and Integrative Biology. Graduate student Molly Staley was the lead and presenting author and Dr. Geoffrey Hill was the second authoer. What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? During the next reporting period we will complete the second and final portion of the chicken infection experiments. Once we have all tissues collected, we will assess whether damage is due to host immune responses by comparing tracheal and conjunctiva tissue damage in chickens infected with their natural live MG strain versus natural heat-inactivated MG strain. Following euthanization of birds, we will formalin-fix tissues and then submit tissues to the Auburn University Histopathology Laboratory to be paraffin embedded, sectioned, and stained for microscopy work. we will then quantify tissue lesions and measure tracheal mucosal thickness following the methods of Nunoya et al (1987). Alternatively, MG products could cause direct damage to host tissues. We will compare tracheal primary cell cultures from chickens inoculated with house finch MG or chicken MG, respectively. We will then compare cultures inoculated with MG relative to controls for changes in cellular morphology and tracheal cell death. We predict that if virulence is primarily due to the host immune responses, then chickens treated with heat-inactivated MG will show similar levels of disease and tissue damage to those treated with live MG. We also predict there will be no difference between cell culture treatments.
Impacts What was accomplished under these goals?
In September 2013 we initiated infection experiments with leghorn chickens. 30 five-week-old leghorns were received from a dealer and allowed to acclimate to cages in a quarantine facility at the school of veterinary medicine at Auburn University. After 10 days of acclimation, fifteen leghorns were infected with a house finch strain of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and fifteen were sham inoculated. All birds were sacrificed on day 10 following inoculation and spleen and trachea tissue was collected. There spleen and trachea samples will be analyzed to study the effects that an adapted versus a non-adapted pathogen have on immune responsiveness of host tissues.
Publications
|
Progress 01/01/12 to 12/31/12
Outputs OUTPUTS: This is a new project and I am in the process of preparing for spring infection experiments that will comprise the core activity of this grant. I am currently obtaining a chicken strain of MG and I am verifying the viability of our House Finch MG culture. This project has been refocused to be more in line with the objectives of the Hatch program. I am now focusing on understanding the pathogenicity of a major poultry pathogen. The title of the project is now: The genetic basis for attuation of virulence of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in chickens following host shift PARTICIPANTS: Molly Staley--Doctoral student Roy Ge -- Doctoral student Hilary Rizk -- undergrad student Rosana Garcia -- Undergraduate student TARGET AUDIENCES: Our target audience is research specialists in agriculature as well as scientists studying host-parasite co-evolution. Our goal is to discover basic properties of mycoplasma that affect pathogenicity so products can be developed that tangibly improve US agriculture. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: This project has been refocused to be more in line with the objectives of the Hatch program. I am now focusing on understanding the pathogenicity of a major poultry pathogen. The title of the project is now: The genetic basis for attuation of virulence of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in chickens following host shift
Impacts This is a new research endeavor so no specific results have emerged yet.
Publications
- No publications reported this period
|
Progress 01/01/11 to 12/31/11
Outputs OUTPUTS: not funded. no outputs PARTICIPANTS: Not relevant to this project. TARGET AUDIENCES: Not relevant to this project. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.
Impacts not funded. no outcomes
Publications
- No publications reported this period
|
Progress 01/01/10 to 12/31/10
Outputs OUTPUTS: project not funded; no output PARTICIPANTS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.
Impacts project not funded; no output
Publications
- No publications reported this period
|
Progress 01/01/09 to 12/31/09
Outputs OUTPUTS: Not funded so still in planning phase PARTICIPANTS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.
Impacts Not funded so still in planning phase
Publications
- No publications reported this period
|
|