Source: UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA submitted to NRP
INTEGRATIVE FUNCTIONAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS OF POULTRY
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0216887
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
S-1037
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2007
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2012
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
200 D.W. BROOKS DR
ATHENS,GA 30602-5016
Performing Department
Poultry Science
Non Technical Summary
This project directly addresses a national initiative in the area of Genetic Resources, Development and Manipulation. Several disciplines and co-operative investigations are encompassed within the proposed research. However, the distinguishing feature of this project is its emphasis on a systems approach to the elucidation of molecular, biochemical and physiological changes as impacted by genetic selection. Only collaborative efforts between geneticists, physiologists, nutritionists, immunologists make this possible. No one experiment station possesses the expertise to maintain and select genetic lines while conducting the molecular, physiological and biochemical assays necessary to meet the objectives of this proposal. Impact and benefit Benefits of this research include a) basic information about selected lines for use by poultry breeders and b) elucidation of biochemical, physiological and cellular pathways affected by selection for economically important traits. This creates an opportunity to transfer scientific knowledge from specific studies involving the chicken to other less widely-studied poultry species including turkey, quail and guinea fowl.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
30432201080100%
Knowledge Area
304 - Animal Genome;

Subject Of Investigation
3220 - Meat-type chicken, live animal;

Field Of Science
1080 - Genetics;
Goals / Objectives
1. To determine the functional mechanisms of genetic changes as a result of selection and gene introgression. 2. To determine the effect of genotype by environmental interaction on the biochemical and physiological mechanisms involved in the expression of productive phenotypes. 3. Evaluate individual loci and resultant protein expression on performance phenotypes and genetic background.
Project Methods
Genetic Selection: Genetic lines will continue to be selected for growth rate, antibody response, susceptibility to ascites, TD, phyate phosphorus utilization (PPU), and Rous sarcoma regression. The dwarf line (GA) was developed by introgression. Other single gene traits lines will be developed and studied by gene introgression. The development and maintenance of these lines are part of the primary focus of this aspect of Objective 1, and is primarily accomplished at individual stations as this is where the lines are generated and the scientific expertise in genetics is located.

Progress 01/01/12 to 12/31/12

Outputs
OUTPUTS: We studied the characteristics of human miR-1 and miR-124 to create a miRNA target prediction program based on the common features of the interaction with their targets. The program yielded 78% sensitivity and 98% specificity for miR-1 target prediction and 77% sensitivity and 98% specificity for miR-124 target prediction. To test whether miRNA class grouping is necessary for miRNA target prediction, we used the features of the interaction of miR-1 and miR-124 to their targets to predict miR-16 and miR-15a targets. We also investigated the effect of growth and skeletal problems in meat-type chickens, and conservation genetics of the Houbara. PARTICIPANTS: Samuel E. Aggrey (PD) planned the miRNA work and supervised the work; Bram Sebastian, PhD student executed the programing; Amal Korrida PhD student undertook the conversation genetics work. TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs which regulate gene expressions by targeting the mRNAs especially in the 3'UTR regions. The identification of miRNAs has been done by biological experiment and computational prediction. The computational prediction approach has been done by two major methods, comparative and non-comparative. Comparative method is dependent on the conservation of the miRNA sequences and secondary structure. Non-comparative method in the other hand does not rely on conservation. We hypothesized that each miRNA class has its own unique set of features therefore, grouping miRNA by classes before using them as training data will improve sensitivity and specificity. The average sensitivity was 88.62% for Mir-Explore which rely on within miRNA class alignment, and 70.82% for mir-Abela which relies on global alignment. Compared with global alignment, grouping miRNA by classes yield a better sensitivity with very high specificity for pre-miRNA prediction even when a simple positional based secondary and primary structure alignment are used. We studied the characteristics of human miR-1 and miR-124 to create a miRNA target prediction program based on the common features of the interaction with their targets. The program yielded 78% sensitivity and 98% specificity for miR-1 target prediction and 77% sensitivity and 98% specificity for miR-124 target prediction. To test whether miRNA class grouping is necessary for miRNA target prediction, we used the features of the interaction of miR-1 and miR-124 to their targets to predict miR-16 and miR-15a targets. We obtained 28% sensitivity and 98% specificity for both miR-16 and miR-15a. This indicates that the features of miR-1 and miR-124 target interaction are different than miR-16 and miR-15a and that miR-16 and miR-15a have their own target interaction characteristics. Hence grouping miRNA by classes significantly improves sensitivity and specificity of miRNA target prediction. We also tested the efficacy of two previously developed programs, miRanda and miTarget to predict miR-16 and miR-15a targets. These programs were developed based on generalized features of miRNA and target interactions. Sensitivity of miRanda was 23% for mir-15a and 0% for mir-16, while miTarget had 14% sensitivity for mir-15a and 16% for mir-16. Specificity for miRanda is 99% for miR-15a and 98% for miR-16.

Publications

  • Samuel, D., S. Trabelsi, A. B. Karnuah, N. B. Anthony, and S. E. Aggrey, 2012. The use of dielectric spectroscopy as a tool for predicting meat quality in poultry. Int. J. Poultry. Sci. 11: 551-555.
  • Sebastian, B., and S. E. Aggrey, 2013. miR-Explore: Predicting microRNA precursors by class grouping and secondary structure position alignment. Bioinformatics and Biology Insights 7:133-142;
  • Korrida, A., S. N. Nahashon, A. Amin-Alami, S. Jadallah, and S. E. Aggrey, 2012. Modeling absolute and allometric growth in Houbara Bustard (Clamydotis undulata undulata) in captivity. Atlas J. Biol. 2: 110-115.;
  • Shim, M.Y., A. B. Karnuah, N. B. Anthony, and S.E. Aggrey, 2012. The effect of broiler chicken growth rate on valgus, varus, and tibial dyschondroplasia. Poultry Sci. 91: 62-65.;
  • Korrida,A., S. Jadallah, F. Chbel, A. Amin-Alami, M. Ahra, and S. E. Aggrey, 2012. Patterns of genetic diversity and population structure of the threatened Houbara and Macqueen's bustard as revealed by microsatellite markers. Genetics and Molecular Research 11: 3207-3221.;


Progress 10/01/07 to 09/30/12

Outputs
Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? nothing to report

Publications