Source: CORNELL UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
COMMUNITY MOBILIZATION FOR MENTORING YOUTH
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0215865
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2008
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2009
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
CORNELL UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
ITHACA,NY 14853
Performing Department
FAMILY LIFE DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Non Technical Summary
Brain drain and loss of the young adult population threaten rural areas in NYS and elsewhere, as does the decision of youth who remain in their communities to drop out of high school or not to pursue post-secondary education. Youth who have natural mentors (i.e., not in a mentoring program) are more likely to enter higher education; however, youth from disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to have mentors. The development of natural mentoring relationships can be fostered by having youth and adults work together toward common goals. Secondary school youth and adults in three rural communities will engage in participatory action research. The Community Mobilization for Mentoring Youth project will encourage natural mentoring and increase opportunities for more youth to contribute to their communities' vitality and to reflect on and pursue their personal goals, especially via post-secondary education or training. Activities during the three phases of the project enable youth to create Life Stories of adults, develop Community Action Plans to create more opportunities for youth-adult engagement, and work in Community Opportunities with adults in service learning teams, in jobs, and in internships. These opportunities will promote individual youth development (especially connectedness to adults, school and community; school success; civic engagement; planfulness; and agency). This project will simultaneously develop and test a program that can be disseminated through Extension, conduct evaluation research on the program itself, and conduct basic research on how natural mentoring relationships form and foster youth development, and how to mobilize communities. We propose that youth are more likely to make and follow rewarding life plans, succeed in secondary school, and engage in their communities when they have opportunities to work alongside adults to learn about, make plans, and act to improve their communities. Such goal-directed activities are optimal for fostering natural mentoring relationships. The project addresses all five of New York State's Applied Research and Extension priorities. It is most directly related to Youth Development (especially #2, Youth Community Action/Citizenship, and #4, Positive Youth Development and Life Skill Development), and Community and Economic Vitality priorities, notably, Community-based decision making that includes an engaged and educated citizenry representative of the community. By building human resources in rural communities it also addresses Agriculture and Food Systems Sustainability. In addition, the project responds to and builds on priorities for rural communities in the state arising from a comprehensive New York State Rural Vision Project conducted by Cornell's Community and Rural Development Institute, notably the consensus that schools are central institutions in rural communities and have essential contributions to make to all economic and community development initiatives.
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
8066010302020%
8066010307030%
8066010308010%
8066099302010%
8066099307010%
8066099308020%
Goals / Objectives
Objective 1. Approximately 30 youth, teachers, and other adults from three communities will learn how to produce life stories annually in Phase 1 (first year for each Cohort; new cohort starts each of 3 years). Objective 2. In each community, 10-20 students will produce life stories annually in Phase 1. Objective 3. Through the Adult Life Stories and other activities (in next 2 years), youth will learn how adults have made satisfying lives in their communities and who mentored them when they were young. Objective 4. In Phase 2, (year 2 for each Cohort), students and adults will jointly plan community actions to improve supports and opportunities for youth. Objective 5. In Phase 3, (year 3 for Cohort 1) youth and adults will work together to implement the action steps to increase youth opportunities for: supportive relationships (connectedness to adults, school and community), efficacy and mattering (youth voice, youth leadership, civic engagement), and skill building (goal-directed activities, civic competence). Objective 6. Through participation in project activities (during each Phase), adults in the communities will get to know young people outside their families. Some will become natural mentors. Objective 7. Schools' dropout rates will decrease as participants gain connectedness to school and planfulness. Objective 8. The investigators will gain understanding of the formation and functioning of natural mentoring relationships and will publish their findings. Timeline for Production of Deliverables October 2008: Workshop introduction to the Life Stories Curriculum, and continuing testing and development during the three years, placed on website. 2009 and after: Articles submitted for publication 2009 and after: Conference Presentations August 2009 continuing: Life Story Products created by youth (e.g., pod casts, newsletter features, journal, artistic creation, video), placed on websites. August 2010 continuing: Compendium of Community Action Planning Materials, placed on website. August 2011 continuing: Case Studies of Exemplary Community Opportunities (e.g., internships, youth jobs, team service projects), placed on website. September 201: Final Report 2011 - 2013: Website guides, Publications (articles)
Project Methods
Secondary school youth and adults in three rural communities will be trained and engage in participatory action research. A new cohort will begin Phase 1, Life Stories, at the start of each of the three years. Phase 2, Community Action Plans, begins approximately at the start of their second year in the project. In the third year or earlier, Cohort 1 will begin Phase 3, Community Opportunities. The proposed project is integrated to generate new knowledge by creating, monitoring, refining, and assessing an intervention that includes education and community development. As much as possible, participants will both conduct the research and interpret the findings, and re-shape the methods and the activities. Timely reports of findings will inform participants and guide next steps. This formative evaluation will also be a kind of Participatory Action Research, initiated by the investigators and on occasion by the local participants. A one-day workshop at Cornell will introduce community teams to the Life Stories Curriculum. Teachers will train students to conduct, analyze and create products from interviews of adults in their community, with consultation available from the Cornell team. Project funds will provide digital cameras, digital recorders, digital transcribers, and camcorders to each school for data collection and processing. Youth will create story products, e.g., a web page, video, pod cast, newsletter, or an article for their local newspaper. Students will reflect on what they have learned from the stories: about adults, education, mentoring, life planning, and their community. During Phase 2, Community Action Plans, youth will assess the community supports and opportunities they need to achieve their goals. A Town Meeting will explore recommendations for increasing Community Opportunities, Phase 3 for youth to work with adults in team service learning projects, internships, and jobs. At Cornell summer institutes youth and adults will share progress and develop new strategies. Annual focus groups will build on reflections from the activities, and help youth map out their dreams for the future, and identify supports and opportunities they need to reach them. The Cornell team will interview 10 youth participants in each community at the end of each school year. Youth will also be asked about their individual experiences to better understand connectedness, planfulness, and civic engagement. Story-telling methods will be used to elicit thick description and reflection on key incidents identified by youth. School success will be indicated by school records of attendance, course credits and grades, and scores on standardized tests. Annual focus groups and interviews, and continuous ethnographic observations will be coded using frameworks and systems developed by the investigators and entered Atlas-ti. Youth development outcomes of interest are: connectedness to school, adults, and the community; planfulness (career information, future goals, pathway, and aligned ambitions); and civic engagement (volunteerism, commitment, future service). Youth sense of purpose and agency will be analyzed.

Progress 10/01/08 to 09/30/09

Outputs
OUTPUTS: The pilot phase of the project was completed. 26 students, a teacher, and a teacher's aide in a rural high school conducted 7 life story interviews with local adults, which were then transcribed. Two focus groups were held with 16 of the participating students to elicit their perceptions of the strengths and limitations of the life stories activity and of its impact on them. Meetings and follow-up communications (via e-mail and telephone) with school administrators and cooperative extension educators in four communities led to plans for implementing the project in three communities. One school subsequently withdrew when the principal took a new position. Leaders of a fourth school declined to participate citing limited time and other resources. Neither of the remaining two schools followed through with implementation. Although they gave no explicit reason, we assume other activities were seen as higher priority. The PI for this project, M.A. Hamilton, retired from Cornell as of July 1, 2009. Without her leadership and in view of the absence of ready partners, the remaining co-PIs (S.F. Hamilton, D.J. Greenwood, T.A. Hirschl) decided to terminate the project. PARTICIPANTS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Project terminated

Impacts
A teacher's guide and student's workbook were developed, printed, and distributed in small numbers. They are accessible at: http://www.youthinsociety.human.cornell.edu/che/fldc/yis/research/pub lications.cfm At the conclusion of the focus groups, students were asked to write brief responses to he question: What was most valuable for you? Their responses are summarized here. Adult's life story (4 persons) Learning about someone else's life and realizing that everyone is different, and one skill is not more valuable than another. I met someone new that lived in this area. Getting to know someone that lived around here. Going out and getting to know someone you didn't and hearing what they have to say. Interview skills (4 persons) I got to learn how to interview. I learned how to do a successful interview. The most valuable thing I learned during this experience is the certain ways to keep a conversation going, and also interviewing tips. This could help us in the future. I learned how to communicate better with others. Teamwork (3 persons) Being able to work in a group. (I learned) how to work together to build a successful interview. Learning how to work in a group with some people who may not want to be there. Becoming better friends with the team. And becoming more of a people person. Extra credit (1 person) Being able to get extra credit In addition to the barrier of school participation, the teacher found it a challenge to change from the usual didactic role to a facilitating role appropriate to youth development. As a result, it was sometimes difficult for participating youth to make themselves heard and to make choices about how to engage in the program. As a result of the failure to implement the program as planned, we are in the process of redirecting the life story interviewing methodology that we have developed for use by low-income high school students as a means to learn about supports and barriers to college completion by older youth in their communities. All 16 students hoped to continue with the project.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period