Source: CORNELL UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
UNDERSTANDING AND MANAGING IMPACTS OF DAIRY FARM ODORS FOR IMPROVED COMMUNITY
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0215683
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2008
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2011
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
CORNELL UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
ITHACA,NY 14853
Performing Department
Biological & Environmental Engineering
Non Technical Summary
Communities situated in areas with animal operations may be subjected to odors that affect their quality of life. Human health can be affected negatively by exposure to odorous gases. Common symptoms include eye, nose, and throat irritation, headache, nausea, diarrhea, cough, and drowsiness, among others. In a survey conducted in New York, 61% of large dairy farms (>300 animal I units) received odor complaints from neighbors, 42% of the medium (100~300 animal units) and 24% of the small (<100 animal units) dairy farms received complaints (Wright and Inglis, 2001). Modern communication and transportation allow people traditionally living in cities to move to rural areas. Because these non-farm residents may not be accustomed to a rural setting and have different expectations of rural life, increased numbers of odor complaints can be expected in the future. Community planners in New York are in need of a tool that can quantitatively predict the impacts of odors from animal operations on surrounding communities. Two specific examples of existing programs that would find this information useful are: 1) county farmland protection boards: one of their objectives is to preserve farmland in blocks, see: http://www.agmkt.state.ny.us/AP/agservices/farmprotect.html; and 2) NYS has ag-municipal planning grants that help towns develop master plans, see: http://www.agmkt.state.ny.us/rfps/MuniGrant/SDOC0394.pdf or http://www.agmkt.state.ny.us/RFPS.html Likewise, managers of animal operation need a tool to promote "smart" growth around their facilities. The University of Minnesota has been developing a decision-support model (referred to as the Schmidt model) to predict the annoyance factor of odors associated with different farm activities. This decision-support model has not been applied or evaluated in a New York setting, but provides an excellent starting point for creating such a community resource development tool in New York. Benefactors from this project include the dairy industry and their surrounding communities. It is only through methodical community planning that animal operations and their surrounding communities can exist harmoniously. Using a decision-support model to predict the magnitude of odor annoyance will assist in establishing realistic expectations. For example, according to the Schmidt decision support model, a residence 1,100 feet from a typical 700-cow dairy farm will experience annoyance-free conditions 91% of the time. However, this translates to 66 hours per month of annoying odors. To achieve a 98% annoyance-free environment, the same residence will need to be 8,000 feet from the farm but still may experience seven hours per month of annoying odors. Applying and analyzing the Schmidt model to situations in NY will help in determining realistic setback distances between farm units and residences for mutual co-existence.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
30734102020100%
Knowledge Area
307 - Animal Management Systems;

Subject Of Investigation
3410 - Dairy cattle, live animal;

Field Of Science
2020 - Engineering;
Goals / Objectives
GOALS/OBJECTIVES: There are three primary objectives to this research. The first objective is to apply the Schmidt model to a New York dairy community. The criteria for the test community include available GIS data (i.e., location of dwellings) and cooperating dairy farms within the community. Once the farm data are incorporated into the model, theoretical odor annoyance curves will be established. The second objective is to validate the outcome of the Schmidt model using subjective odor reports and quantitative air measurements (more detail below). Odor reporting forms will be provided to residences inside and adjacent to the proposed setback area. When annoying odors are suspected above theoretical threshold levels, air samples will be taken for analysis of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide using gas chromatography. These concentrations will be used to correlate to published objectionable odor standards. The third objective is to evaluate the suitability of the Schmidt model for applications to New York conditions. Technical barriers, such as the lack of GIS data or poor prediction of annoying odors, will be identified and further funding sought. EXPECTED OUTPUTS: There are two significant outcomes from this project. First, an accurate decision-support model can be used by communities to determine a threshold annoyance-free odor standard. It is logical that new dairy farms would need to be designed and situated to meet the annoyance-free standard. Second, the decision-support model can be used to evaluate changes to existing dairy farms to meet the annoyance-free odor threshold. Thirdly, actual data will be collected during perceived odor events so that physical data collected at the time of the event can be compared to current standards for odor offensiveness to determine the current validity of these standards. All these outcomes will help community planners be more effective and fair to both the farmer and the community non-farm residents.
Project Methods
PROCEDURE: Specifically, this project will adopt and expand on the work of David Schmidt (M.S. PE, Extension Engineer with the University of Minnesota Manure Management Systems, also a collaborator on this project) to predict the annoyance factor of odors associated with different farm activities. Schmidt's model determines a Total Odor Emissions Factor (TOEF) which is used to estimate a separation distance to achieve different annoyance-free frequencies. Phase I of this project is to apply the Schmidt model to a NY dairy community and evaluate its effectiveness. The criteria for the test community include available GIS data (i.e., location of dwellings) and availability of cooperating dairy farms within the community, since data from the dairy farms are supplied on a voluntary basis. Once the farm data are incorporated into the model, theoretical odor annoyance curves will be established. Phase II is to validate the outcome (predictions) of the Schmidt model using subjective odor data and quantitative air measurements taken during an event. Odor reporting forms will be provided to residences inside and adjacent (outside) to the proposed setback area. When annoying odors are suspected above theoretical threshold levels, the project team will collect air samples for analysis of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide using gas chromatography. These concentrations will be compared to published objectionable odor standards. Phase III is to evaluate the suitability of the Schmidt model for applications to New York conditions. The sample gas data will be analyzed in four steps in order to correlate odor intensity and concentration of hydrogen sulfide and ammonia for dairy farms: 1) sample collection and preparation; 2) H2S and NH3 concentration measurement; 3) odor intensity measurement; and 4) data processing. IMPACT/EVALUATION Applying and evaluating the Schmidt decision-support model for community planning will require the support of a local community and its dairy farm members. A local community will be selected for study based on its overall cooperation, the availability of specific GIS data, and the willingness of the dairy farm members to subject themselves to oversight. The project is a team effort consisting of the State Conservation Engineer, Natural Resources Conservation Service, the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, community planners, local farmers and community members. This team will evaluate the effectiveness of the project by direct interviews of impacted community members and how the project has affected expansions of current dairy farms or relocation of existing farms to more appropriate sites within the community.

Progress 10/01/08 to 09/30/11

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Communities situated in areas with animal operations may be subjected to odors that affect their quality of life. Residents living within farming communities have low tolerance for normal farm odors and often create strong negative community relations as a result of being subjected to such odors. Right-to-farm laws do not help appease the offended homeowner. We developed a mathematical model, based upon the Schmidt Model (Univ. Minnesota) that predicts the zone of influence from a concentrated animal feeding unit, e.g., commercial dairy farm. The model is responsive to seasonal variations in air temperature and wind speed and direction. The model was constructed with a fairly simple user interface that is appropriate for environmental engineers and county planners. PARTICIPANTS: David Schmidt (M.S. PE, Extension Engineer with the University of Minnesota Manure Management Systems). David was our key cooperator on this project. We worked closely with him to adapt his existing model to NY conditions and to be more sensitive to aerial environmental conditions. TARGET AUDIENCES: Intend the model to be used by county planning agencies, zoning boards, county agents to assist dairyman with expansion planning efforts, and engineering consultants working in the area of land use planning. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: No changes were made to the project's original objectives.

Impacts
The model can be used as an unbiased approach to determine appropriate setback distances for proposed residential housing that is near a commercial dairy farm. Preventing construction of a residence in an agricultural zoned area can help to prevent poor farm-community relations.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 10/01/09 to 09/30/10

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Regulatory criteria for nuisance odor needs firm scientific basis in both frequency and intensity of odors received from a source. OFFSET (Odor From Feedlots - Setback Estimation Tool), a commonly used decision support tool for determining distances between odor-producing agricultural sites and odor sensitive locations, was compared to setbacks calculated by non-steady state Gaussian puff dispersion model CALPUFF. Results show medians of 1h averaged CALPUFF setback distances are less by up to a factor of 2 than that of OFFSET. When CALPUFF intensity criteria are modified to reflect a shorter concentration averaging period, CALPUFF setback distances are much less than that of OFFSET, even when concentrations are converted to a shorter averaging period by common air modeling methods. These results suggest that full scale simulation to obtain frequency results for setback distances is underestimated by 1h concentration averages, and simple modification of criteria may not be adequate for solving the discrepancy . Both CALPUFF and OFFSET need to be correlated with long rage (>1 km) field data in order to determine which method is best and if actual modeling of nuisance odor frequency. PARTICIPANTS: PARTICIPANTS: M.B. Timmons, Erik Kopache, C. A. Gooch (Department Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University; Schmidt D.R. (Extension Engineer, Manure Management Systems, University of Minnesota, Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, 1390 Eckles Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108-6005). TARGET AUDIENCES: Intend the model to be used by county planning agencies, zoning boards, county agents to assist dairyman with expansion planning efforts, and engineering consultants working in the area of land use planning. TARGET AUDIENCES: Intend the model to be used by county planning agencies, zoning boards, county agents to assist dairyman with expansion planning efforts, and engineering consultants working in the area of land use planning. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: No major changes have been made since last year's report. Have completed the modeling effort and nearing completion of a paper for submission to a refereed journal.

Impacts
This project is resulting in an improved model to estimate the impact of dairy farm odors on the surrounding community. The refined model is based upon a currently accepted model used by the EPA to model aerial environments. The final model will allow planners and regulators to better assess the aerial environmental impact (smell) of a point source emitter (the dairy farm) on surrounding residences.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 10/01/08 to 09/30/09

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Our goal is to effectively model nuisance odor emissions from New York State Dairy Farms to determine appropriate setback distances of residential areas from emission sources. Our model will be based on the OFFSET model (Schmidt et al. 2004) with intended end users being county planners, consultants, or famers wishing to evaluate their impacts on the surrounding community. Approach: Using the EPA-approved CALPUFF model for calculation of Gaussian puff dispersion, attempt to recreate the setback curves found in Part II of Schmidt et al. using the same weather data and site conditions. CALPUFF was found to be an acceptable model for odor dispersion research, especially with regards to short setback distances less than 2 km (Yu et al. 2009;Wang et al 2006). If the same setback curves can be generated as those in the Schmidt paper, we will then attempt to create setback curves specifically for dairy-related odors in New York State. Good progress has been made in that the CALPUFF model has been successfully executed and we are currently comparing its outputs to the earlier output conclusions developed by Schmidt. PARTICIPANTS: M.B. Timmons, Erik Kopache, C. A. Gooch (Department Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University; Schmidt D.R. (Extension Engineer, Manure Management Systems, University of Minnesota, Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, 1390 Eckles Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108-6005). TARGET AUDIENCES: Intend the model to be used by county planning agencies, zoning boards, county agents to assist dairyman with expansion planning efforts, and engineering consultants working in the area of land use planning. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Original project intended to take air samples once an odor event was identified by local community. Have de-emphasized this due to the subjective nature of the process and the long standing efforts already conducted on physical measurements. Emphasizing the modelling approach and further refining the Schmidt model that is already available.

Impacts
We are still in the initial stages of this project (approval was not granted till spring of 09), but are optimistic that our results will assist in helping to guide land development in dairy community areas. We intend that the model will be used to prevent misuse of land when balancing the rights, needs, and priveleges of both the dairy landowner and the surrounding community. The model and its use could replace or improve the decision making process of determing how much dairy production can be safely accommodated in a political district, e.g., township or county.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period