Source: MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
USING SHEEP IN GRAIN FALLOW MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL WEEDS AND INSECT PESTS AND REDUCE USE OF PESTICIDES AND FOSSIL FUELS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0214571
Grant No.
2008-34103-19289
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
2008-03027
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Aug 1, 2008
Project End Date
Jul 31, 2010
Grant Year
2008
Program Code
[QQ.W]- Integrated Pest Management - West Region
Recipient Organization
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
BOZEMAN,MT 59717
Performing Department
ANIMAL & RANGE SCIENCES
Non Technical Summary
15.5 million acres of farmland (USDA-NASS) in the western U.S. are rotated into summer fallow annually with up to 4 applications of herbicides annually for weed control. IR-4 priority settings, crop profiles, and pest management strategic plans are not available for summer fallow. As reduced tillage practices become more common, herbicide use will continue to increase. Currently, mechanical tillage is the only practical alternative to chemical fallow. However, tillage decreases residue cover and may increase soil erosion. Herbicide use in Montana's grain production systems represents the single largest use of pesticides in the state. Montana wheat producers alone use approximately 4.5 million pounds of active ingredient of herbicides annually for weed control on summer fallow ground (Johnson et al., 1997 and Montana Agricultural Statistics, 2000). Strategic grazing of grain stubble and weeds on the western U S's 15.5 million acres of summer fallow by sheep may offer an alternative to traditional stubble and weed management systems with the added benefit of not negatively influencing soil nutrient cycling or increasing erosion potential. In addition, sheep grazing summer fallow may significantly reduce use and thus selection pressure for glyphosate resistant weeds by precluding the need to control weeds with glyphosate (RIPM Part 1 B 2, 3).
Animal Health Component
100%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
100%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2161540113025%
2161541113025%
2161540114025%
2161541114025%
Goals / Objectives
The goal of our project is to reduce pesticide use in grain farming operations while maintaining or improving profitability. Our objectives are to compare strategically managed sheep grazing to chemical and mechanical fallow on: a) weed and volunteer grain biomass reduction, and weed and weed seedbank composition and density b) soil nutrients and soil bulk density c) insect populations (including pest, beneficial, and benign d) grain production and quality. We will publish and communicate results and potential economic and biological advantages of incorporating sheep grazing stubble and weeds into sustainable grain farming systems to clientele. Our preliminary results (Snyder et al. 2007, and attached in field 11) indicate no differences for grain yield among summer fallow systems. Our interdisciplinary team of scientists anticipates a positive long term biological and economical outcome (our companion economic decision support tool pending as a WSARE proposal addresses RIPM Part 1, B 1) from the integrated system of weed management by sheep grazing, and significant reduction in herbicide use in the Northern Great Plains. However, to generate sound scientific results and present a convincing argument to grain growers for the incorporation of sheep into farming systems, we need to build upon our preliminary results. With four years of replicated treatment imposition and production data, our research will serve as a new model for fallow and stubble management in small grain production systems.
Project Methods
The study site consists of 45 0.5-acre plots in a grain production system that are highly visible at Montana State University, Fort Ellis research facility 6 miles from Bozeman, adjacent to Interstate 90. We have three cropping systems: 1) continuous spring wheat (cv. McNeal), 2) spring wheat-summer fallow, and 3) winter wheat (cv. Big Sky) winter wheat)-summer fallow. Within each cropping system, summer fallow and post-harvest weed management are conducted with three methods: 1) herbicides and zero tillage, chemfallow, 2) minimum tillage with a field cultivator, and 3) sheep grazing. Each rotational component is present in each of 3 replicates every year, for a total of 45 0.5 acre plots . Broadleaf weed control within cereals will be done post-emergence with Bronate at 1.5 pt per acre. Weed control in the chemfallow treatment will be done with tank-mixed glyphosate and dicamba or glyphosate alone, depending on weed species present. An appropriate number of sheep at the proper duration and intensity (based on the weed and total biomass) will be used on each grazed plot. Based upon research by Thomas et al. (1990) and Hatfield et al., (1999), we anticipate approximately 5 sheep for each .5 acre summer fallow plot for 7 to 10 days. To achieve the desired weed removal and retain sufficient residual cover for each plot, a put and take stock rate based upon weed and volunteer availability will be employed. In preliminary fieldwork, we have observed that green weeds are the first plant material to be consumed by sheep. Therefore, we are certain that we will be able to maintain the appropriate amount of stubble cover to conform to USDA-NRCS soil cover regulations for erosion prevention.

Progress 08/01/08 to 07/31/10

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Over the course of this funded project along with our long term commitment, our goal has been to develop integrated crop/livestock production systems that are economical and environmentally sustainable, provides benefits to both grazing livestock and crop farming systems, and offers opportunities for rural development through new enterprises focused on targeted grazing. We evaluated several interconnected issues including soil health and nutrient cycling, production of greenhouse gases, residue management, pest management, crop yields and profitability. Our research has shown that targeted sheep grazing provides several ecosystem services (Goosey et al., 2004, 2005, 2011-in review, Hatfield et al., 2007a, b, c; Sainju, et al., 2010, 2011). First, it can help reduce tillage intensity and soil erosion, promote nutrient cycling, and enhance soil tilth. Second, sheep grazing stubble results in the greatest levels of wheat stem sawfly (one of the most damaging insect pests to wheat production in the U.S.) mortality when compared to burned, tilled, and no no-till systems. Third, sheep grazing of alfalfa aftermath and early spring growth reduces alfalfa weevil numbers without reducing subsequent hay production. Finally, in a four-year comparison of winter and spring wheat rotations with summer fallow, targeted sheep grazing did not reduce yields when compared to tilled- or chemical-fallow (Hatfield et al., in review). Carbon Sequestration, Nitrogen Cycling, and Greenhouse Gas Emission. We showed that soil organic C and total N levels were not significantly different among tillage, herbicide application, and sheep grazing methods of weed control (Sainju et al., 2011). Although soil NO3-N level was lower in the continuous wheat than in spring wheat-fallow and winter-wheat fallow systems, cropping sequence had no effect on soil NH4-N, organic and inorganic C and total N levels. The results indicate that reduced tillage with less intensive sheep grazing could be used to maintain soil C and N levels and sustain wheat yields. Although sheep grazing reduced soil P and K levels compared with tillage and herbicide application because of no application of these nutrients through fertilizers, other soil nutrients and chemical properties were largely not influenced. Weed reduction ¿ comparing herbicides to grazing Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) and wild oat (Avena fatua) are problematic weeds in Montana agricultural systems spanning from rangeland to cropland. The primary focus of this project was to investigate how the incorporation of sheep grazing into agricultural systems impacts grassy weeds. Specifically, we evaluated the impact of incorporating sheep grazing into cropping systems on cheatgrass and wild oat populations at a large-scale replicated field experiment located at the Fort Ellis Research Farm near Bozeman, Montana. Demographic parameters including seedbank decay, seedling recruitment, seedling survival, and plant fecundity were obtained in three agricultural systems commonly used in Montana: continuous spring wheat, continuous alfalfa, and a 3-year (wheat, pea-hay barley, summer fallow) rotation. Two sets of paired quadrats were located within each plot and 5,150 seeds/m2 cheatgrass and 2,120 seeds/m2 wild oat were planted in each quadrat in fall 2009. Rotation plots were subjected to grazing or chemical treatment. Stocking rates on grazed plots ranged from 134 sheep days/ha to 537 sheep days/ha and were based on weed densities. Dicamba and/or glyphosate was applied at label rates in chemical treatment plots prior to planting. Subsequent herbicide treatments were done as needed. Weed seedling emergence, survivorship and seed production was monitored throughout the 2010 season. Preliminary data indicated grazed fallow plots resulted in a reduction in weed biomass by up to 95% compared to chemical fallow plots. Information gained from this study will be used to build a population growth model allowing producers to incorporate grazing into their agricultural management practices. PARTICIPANTS: Patrick G. Hatfield, PhD. Animal Scientist Hayes Goosey, PhD. Research Scientist Andrew Lenssen, PhD. Agro-ecologist Sue Blodgett, PhD. Entomologist Fabian Menalled, PhD. Weed ecologist TARGET AUDIENCES: Our primary target audience is sheep and grain producers in the northern great plains. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
The potential impact is high. With 15.5 million acres of farmland rotated into summer fallow annually with up to 4 applications of herbicides annually for weed control bio-based alternative have both an economic and ecological attraction. As reduced tillage practices become more common, herbicide use will continue to increase. Currently, mechanical tillage is the only practical alternative to chemical fallow. However, tillage decreases residue cover and may increase soil erosion. Herbicide use in Montana¿s grain production systems represents the single largest use of pesticides in the state. Montana wheat producers alone use approximately 4.5 million pounds of active ingredient of herbicides annually for weed control on summer fallow ground. Our goal is to reduce pesticide use in grain farming operations while maintaining or improving grain production profitability. We have begun begun data analysis. Four years of field research indicate no difference in grain yield among summer fallow treatments.

Publications

  • Hanson, M., P. G. Hatfield, H. Goosey, and F. Menalled. 2010. Impact of strategic sheep grazing on weed communities. Abst. Joint annual meeting, Soc. Range Manage. And Weed Sci. Soc. Of Am. Denver CO., Febuary, 2010
  • Goosey, H. B. J. P. Hatfield, M. G. Rolston, K. M. O�Neill, G. D. Johnson, and P. G. Hatfield. Submitted. Hymenopteran parasitoid response to sheep grazing, tillage, and herbicides in wheat-fallow rotations. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. In review.
  • Hatfield, P. G., H. B. Goosey, A. W. Lenssen, and S. Blodgett. Accepted. Sheep grazing to manage crop residues and control insects and weeds in northern plains Grain and alfalfa production. SARE learning center
  • Sainju, U. M., A. W. Lenssen, H. B. Goosey, E. Snyder, and P. G. Hatfield. 2011 Sheep grazing in the wheat-fallow system affects dryland soil properties and grain yield. 2011. Soil Sci. Soc. Of Amer. J. (accepted on June 2, 2011)
  • Sainju, U. M., A. W. Lenssen, H. B. Goosey, E. Snyder, and P. G. Hatfield. 2010. Dryland soil carbon and nitrogen influenced by sheep grazing in the wheat-fallow system. Agronomy J. 102: 1153-1561.
  • Sainju, U. M., A. W. Lenssen, H.B. Goosey, E. Snyder, and P. G. Hatfield. Sheep grazing effect on dryland soil carbon and nitrogen in the wheat-fallow system. 2011. Western Nutr. Management Conf. 9: 146-151
  • Sainju, U. M., A. W. Lenssen, H. B. Goosey, E. Snyder and P. G. Hatfield. 2011. Sheep grazing effect on dryland soil carbon and nitrogen in the wheat-fallow system. Proc. Western Nutrient Management Conference
  • Graves,M., J. Mangold, H. Goosey, P. Hatfield, and F. Menalled. 2011. Impact of sheep grazing on demographic parameters of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) and wild oat (Avena fatua) in three common Montana agricultural systems. SRM


Progress 08/01/08 to 07/31/09

Outputs
OUTPUTS: 15.5 million acres of farmland (USDA-NASS) in the western U.S. are rotated into summer fallow annually with up to 4 applications of herbicides annually for weed control. IR-4 priority settings, crop profiles, and pest management strategic plans are not available for summer fallow. As reduced tillage practices become more common, herbicide use will continue to increase. Currently, mechanical tillage is the only practical alternative to chemical fallow. However, tillage decreases residue cover and may increase soil erosion. Herbicide use in Montana's grain production systems represents the single largest use of pesticides in the state. Montana wheat producers alone use approximately 4.5 million pounds of active ingredient of herbicides annually for weed control on summer fallow ground (Johnson et al., 1997 and Montana Agricultural Statistics, 2000). Strategic grazing of grain stubble and weeds on the western U S's 15.5 million acres of summer fallow by sheep may offer an alternative to traditional stubble and weed management systems with the added benefit of not negatively influencing soil nutrient cycling or increasing erosion potential. In addition, sheep grazing summer fallow may significantly reduce use and thus selection pressure for glyphosate resistant weeds by precluding the need to control weeds with glyphosat PARTICIPANTS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
We are in the process of completing field work, publishing results and developing outreach programs centered around our concept of incorporation of sheep into farming systems

Publications

  • No publications reported this period