Source: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY submitted to NRP
GLOBALIZATION AND LABOR MARKET OUTCOMES
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0212344
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2007
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2012
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
(N/A)
BERKELEY,CA 94720
Performing Department
Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley
Non Technical Summary
The project will be divided into four distinct components. The first project will analyze the impact of offshoring activities by US multinationals on employment and wages in California and the United States. The second project will utilize data across countries and over four decades to explore how globalization has affected labor's share in income. The third project will analyze how anti-sweatshop activists have affected labor standards in developing countries. The fourth project will examine how globalization is affecting labor markets in India and China. This project will explore different ways in which globalization has affected labor market outcomes, including wages, employment, and labor's share in income. Globalization is defined to include international trade, foreign investment, outsourcing, offshoring, and global activist networks.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
(N/A)
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
60361993010100%
Knowledge Area
603 - Market Economics;

Subject Of Investigation
6199 - Economy, general/other;

Field Of Science
3010 - Economics;
Goals / Objectives
I have the following objectives for this project: 1. Identify how offshoring activities by US multinational firms are affecting manufacturing wages and employment. The hypothesis to be tested is that offshoring by US firms is putting downward pressure on US wages and employment. I will develop new databases merging information on the offshoring and trade activities of US multinationals with data on worker outcomes from the Current Population Survey. I will also develop theoretical frameworks and econometric solutions to the problems of selection and endogeneity. A related goal is to identify how different modes of globalization (offshoring, international trade, intra-firm trade) affect labor market outcomes. 2. Compare the results for US companies with firm-level data for French companies doing offshoring activity. Examine whether French companies setting up subsidiaries and outsourcing arrangements abroad are contracting employment and putting downward pressure on wages in France. 3. Create a new database for public use on labor shares for more than forty years and over 100 countries. This database will give researchers a new measure of inequality which is more consistent across countries and available over more years than other existing measures. I will use this database to explore how globalization has affected labor's share, and will also dispute Gollin's (2002) claim that labor shares are constant over time and across countries. 4. Identify the impact on developing country wages and employment for low income workers of the anti-sweatshop movement. In particular, I will analyze the outcome of efforts by anti-sweatshop organizations to improve labor standards for workers employed by firms subcontracting with Nike in Indonesia. I will analyze whether the resulting gains to workers from increases in compensation are offset by reduced employment. I will also test for an impact on firm productivity, investment, and profits. Finally, I will analyze whether there are spillovers to other enterprises in the same sector not subcontracting with Nike. 5. I will develop new datasets on the manufacturing sectors in India and China with detailed information on firm behavior and changes in trade laws. The goal is to identify how recent changes in exposure to globalization have affected workers and firms in India and China. A related goal is to test recent theories of heterogeneous firms developed by Melitz (2003) and others to see how applicable they are.
Project Methods
To carry out this project, I plan to construct new datasets and do new statistical work using econometric estimation techniques that address endogeneity and selection problems. For the offshoring project, I will develop an empirical framework which allows firms to simultaneously determine employment and the capital stock at home and abroad. With this framework, we will be able to separately identify the impact on home employment of affiliate hires in low and high income countries, expansion of the capital stock across different locations, changes in intra-firm and arms-length trade, and technological change. We will address endogeneity problems using instrumental variables techniques. We also plan to account for sample selection problems: US firms most affected by global competition may leave the sample. The methodology adopted for the US data, which must be analyzed in Washington D.C. at the Bureau of Economic Analysis, will also be used to analyze French data, which must be used at CEPII in Paris. Finally, to address the possibility that methodological differences might be driving different results, I will adopt a variety of different approaches to estimating labor demand and a range of econometric techniques. For the project on national labor shares, I will gather data from the United Nations National Accounts, and combine this data with data on changes in global conditions which I will collect from the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the ILO. I will model the impact of globalization on national labor shares using simple game theory models such as Nash bargaining. To address endogeneity problems, I will use Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) techniques and instrumental variable approaches to estimating the relationship between national labor shares and measures of globalization. For the project on the anti-sweatshop movement, we plan to use micro census data on Indonesian manufacturing from 1990 through 1996. We will examine the extent to which anti-sweatshop activism affected wages and employment in districts where Nike, Reebok, Adidas, and other brand-name plants were located. We will compare these changes to changes brought about through the national Indonesian minimum wage legislation that affected all regions and all firms. We will use difference-in-difference techniques developed to disentangle trends across treatment and control groups in economics, and will also use alternative statistical techniques such as nearest neighbor matching. The project on Indian and China would combine a series of firm-level surveys to trace the impact of changes in trade protection on the wages and employment opportunities of workers, as well as measure the impact of changes in tariffs on enterprise profits and productivity. Firm census samples are rich in information, which would also allow us to control for differences across enterprises in size, access to credit, etc. Productivity would be measured using the Olley-Pakes approach, and further tests of the adequacy of controls would be done using the latest matching techniques.

Progress 10/01/07 to 09/30/12

Outputs
Target Audience: Nothing Reported Changes/Problems: Nothing Reported What opportunities for training and professional development has the project provided? Nothing Reported How have the results been disseminated to communities of interest? Nothing Reported What do you plan to do during the next reporting period to accomplish the goals? Nothing Reported

Impacts
What was accomplished under these goals? PD hasseparated fromUC Berkeley campus on 12/31/2011. We could not get hold of her to terminate this project.

Publications


    Progress 01/01/10 to 12/31/10

    Outputs
    OUTPUTS: I developed new datasets on the manufacturing sectors in India and China with detailed information on firm behavior and changes in trade laws. The goal was to identify how recent changes in exposure to globalization have affected workers and firms in India and China. A related goal was to test recent theories of heterogeneous firms developed by Melitz (2003) and others to see how applicable they are. I have completed a number of research papers related to the project (see list of publications below). I gave presentations at the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, to the Mexican government, at Yale University, and elsewhere. PARTICIPANTS: Catherine Hausman, PhD student, UC Berkeley Shanthi Nataraj, Rand Corporation Leslie Martin, PhD student, UC Berkeley Luosha Du, PhD student, UC Berkeley Gary Jefferson, Brandeis University Margaret McMillan, Tufts University TARGET AUDIENCES: Universities: Yale and elsewhere Organizations: International Monetary Fund, World Bank PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

    Impacts
    In new research on China and India, I continue to investigate how firms are responding to changes in the trade regime in both countries. My new work on China explores how tariffs on inputs and outputs affect firm performance as well as vertical linkages from foreign investment. Another new paper, co-authored with two Berkeley PhD students Leslie Martin and Shanthi Nataraj, decomposes the increases in aggregate productivity growth across Indian firms over the last twenty years into two components: market share reallocations from less to more efficient enterprises, and learning within the same enterprise. We find that while the major trade reform in 1991 was accompanied by a reallocation of market share towards more efficient firms, most of the productivity increases over the 1985-2004 period were driven by within-firm improvements in productivity. This working paper has generated significant interest, with invitations to feature the research in VOXEU, an invitation to give the paper from the head of the World Bank in India, and other activities. Following the 2008 financial crisis, global trade flows collapsed, but quickly recovered during 2009. My co-authors Mona Haddad, Catherine Hausman, and I identify a new set of stylized facts on the 2008-2009 trade collapse that we hope can be used to shed light on the importance of demand and supply-side factors in explaining the fall in trade. We build on previous work by Peter Schott and others to decompose the fall in international trade into product entry and exit, price changes, and quantity changes for imports by Brazil, the European Union, Indonesia, and the United States. We find significant heterogeneity across product groups. While both prices and quantities fell within commodities, in manufacturing quantity changes were also negative but prices moved in the opposite direction. Consequently, within manufacturing, there is some evidence consistent with the hypothesis that supply side frictions played a role. For the United States, price increases were most significant in sectors which are typically credit constrained.

    Publications

    • An Anatomy of the Great Trade Collapse, with Mona Haddad and Catherine Hausman, in Managing Openness, edited by Mona Haddad, forthcoming, 2011.
    • Learning from Developing Country Experience: Growth and Economic Thought Before and After the 2008-2009 Crisis, with Claudia Sepulveda, forthcoming, Comparative Economic Studies, 2011.
    • Trade and Inequality, with John McLaren and Margaret McMillan, forthcoming, Annual Review of Economics, 2011.
    • Offshoring Jobs Multinationals and US Employment, with Margaret McMillan, forthcoming, Review of Economics and Statistics, 2011.
    • Testing for Horizontal and Vertical Foreign Investment Spillovers in China, 1998-2007, with Luosha Du and Gary Jefferson, forthcoming, Journal of Asian Economics, 2011.
    • From hard to soft industrial policies in developing countries, with Andres-Rodriguez-Clare, June 27, 2010, VOXEU.
    • Price versus quantities in the great trade collapse, with Mona Haddad and Catherine Hausman, August 27, 2010, VOXEU.


    Progress 01/01/09 to 12/31/09

    Outputs
    OUTPUTS: Outputs: I have completed a number of research papers related to the project (see list of publications below). I have also put together a dataset that merges detailed information on trade and offshoring of US multinational firms with individual level data from the Current Population Surveys. Dissemination has included a number of presentations on the topic of globalization and labor market outcomes. I gave presentations at the World Bank, at Brandeis University (on offshoring, trade, and wages), and elsewhere. PARTICIPANTS: Jason Scorse, PhD student at Berkeley and now at Monterrey Institute. This collaboration gave him an opportunity for training and professional development Margaret McMillan, Tufts University Avraham Ebenstein, Hebrew University Shannon Phillips, PhD student at Boston College Andres Rodriguez-Clare, Pennsylvania State University TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

    Impacts
    My new research on offshoring links industry-level data on offshoring activities of U.S. multinational firms, import penetration, and export shares with individual level worker data from the Current Population Surveys. I examine whether increasing globalization through offshoring or trade has led to reallocation of labor, both within and out of manufacturing, and measure its impact on the wages of domestic workers. We also control for the "routineness" of individual occupations. The results suggest that (1) offshoring to high wage countries is positively correlated with U.S. manufacturing employment (2) offshoring to low wage countries is associated with U.S. employment declines (3) wages for workers who remain in manufacturing are generally positively affected by offshoring; in particular, I find that wages are positively associated with an increase in U.S. multinational employment in high income locations (4) much of the negative effects of globalization operate through downward pressure on wages of workers who leave manufacturing to take jobs in agriculture or services and (5) the downward pressure on aggregate U.S. wages operating through import competition has been quite important for some occupations. This effect has been overlooked because it operates across, not within, industries. I prepared a non-technical version of the research on offshoring and US wages for the internet site VOXEU. More than 10,000 individuals read the work, which also provides links to other publications on the impact of globalization on labor market outcomes. New research co-authored with Jason Scorse explored the role of multinational corporations in raising wages in developing countries. The resaerch, which focues on Indonesia, showed that foreign firms pay a wage premium compared to other types of enterprises, even after controlling for worker and firm characteristics.

    Publications

    • Avraham Ebenstein, Ann Harrison, Margaret McMillan and Shannon Phillips, Estimating the Impact of Trade and Offshoring on American Workers Using the Current Population Surveys, NBER Working Paper 15107, 2009.
    • Ann Harrison and Jason Scorse, Do Foreign-Owned Firms Pay More Evidence from the Indonesian Manufacturing Sector, in Labour Markets and Development, edited by Ravi Kanbur and Jan Svejnar, Routledge, 2009.
    • Avraham Ebenstein, Ann Harrison, Margaret McMillan, and Shannon Phillips, International trade, Offshoring, and US wages, August 31, 2009, VOXEU.
    • Ann Harrison and Andres Rodriguez-Clare, NBER Working Paper, Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy for Developing Countries, 2009.


    Progress 01/01/08 to 12/31/08

    Outputs
    OUTPUTS: This project has five distinct parts. I discuss the outputs of each of these five parts in turn. 1. Impact of offshoring on US wages and employment 2. Comparison of offshoring effects in the US and France 3. Create a new database for public use on labor shares 4. Identify the effects of the anti-sweatshop movement. 5. Develop databases on India and China and examine how globalization has affected workers in those countries. Progress was achieved in completing papers for parts 1,4, and 5. Databases were created for parts 3 and 5. For part 5, much of the activity included cleaning and preparing datasets to do work on India and China. These projects were disseminated in the following locations: "Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy" (parts 4 and 5) Harvard University "Multinationals and Anti-Sweatshop Activism" (part 4) Paris School of Economics University of California, San Diego UC Berkeley Labor Lunch UC Davis NCAER (India) Georgetown University INSEAD Public Policy Institute of California World Bank "Outsourcing Jobs Multinationals and US Employment" (part 1) Columbia University New School for Social Research Yale University Brandeis Business School University of Michigan Stanford University "Foreign Investment in China" (part 5) Fudan University, China PARTICIPANTS: PhD students: Clair Null (UC Berkeley) Shanthi Nataraj (UC Berkeley) Luosha Du (UC Berkeley) Former PhD students: Jason Scorse (Monterrey Institute) Other collaborators: Margaret McMillan (Tufts University) Avi Ebenstein (Hebrew University) Gary Jefferson (Brandeis University) TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

    Impacts
    To address part 4, I explore the linkages between multinationals and wage-setting behavior in developing countries. I show that the typical wage premium of 10 to 20 percentage points paid by multinationals to their workers shrinks to 3 to 7 percent when worker characteristics are taken into account. Consequently, part of the higher wages paid by multinationals in developing countries stems from the fact that foreign firms tend to hire better educated and more skilled workers. This research shows, however,that foreign enterprises do not unfairly "exploit" workers, paying them below what their domestic counterparts would pay. My forthcoming American Economic Review article finds that foreign firms in Indonesia during the 1990s were much more likely than domestic enterprises to raise wages and adhere to minimum wages as a consequence of the anti-sweatshop campaigns there. This research suggests that anti-sweatshop activists play an important policing role in ensuring that multinational and local enterprises comply with labor legislation. Their role is particularly critical in developing countries, where few resources are available for ensuring compliance with labor standards. We also find that the employment costs of the anti-sweatshop campaigns were minimal, as garment and footwear subcontractors cut profits to pay higher wages without reducing the number of workers. In Indonesia, the anti-sweatshop movement resulted in a type of forced profit sharing, where higher wages for TFA workers were financed largely through lower returns to capital. A more accessible version of this research, with additional tables and graphs, appears in the California Management Review and is now available as a Harvard Business School case. A second broad research area (part 1 above) examines the implications of offshoring by US multinationals for labor market outcomes in the United States. This research was motivated by the fact that between 1982 and 1999, foreign employment of US multinationals rose from 26 percent to nearly 40 percent of their labor force. Two articles, including one co-authored with current PhD student Clair Null, show that the impact of expanding foreign activity by US multinationals has different effects on US manufacturing employment depending on where the foreign activities are located. When US multinationals increase employment in high income affiliate locations, we find that foreign expansion abroad is complementary with employment at home. However, expanding activities in low income countries are associated with falling labor demand in the United States. This research directly addresses both research and policy concerns about the hollowing out of the US labor force as a consequence of globalization. This new research also show that offshoring is not the primary driver of declining domestic employment of US manufacturing multinationals between 1977 and 1999. We show that declining domestic employment of US multinationals was primarily due to falling prices of investment goods (such as computers, which substitute for labor), falling prices of consumption goods, and increasing import competition.

    Publications

    • US Multinational Activity Abroad and US Jobs: Substitutes or Complements, with Margaret McMillan and Clair Null, Industrial Relations, Volume 46, Number 2, 2007, pages 347-365.
    • Harrison, Ann E., editor, Globalization and Poverty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
    • Harrison, Ann E., Globalization and Poverty: An Introduction, in Harrison, Ann E., editor, Globalization and Poverty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
    • On the links between globalization and poverty, with Margaret McMillan, Journal of Economic Inequality, Volume 5, Number 1, April 2007, pages 123-134. Reprinted in Macromarketing, (eds) S. J. Shapiro, M. Tadajewski, and C.J. Shultz, Sage Publishing, July 2009.
    • Multinationals and Anti-sweatshop Activism, with Jason Scorse, forthcoming, 2009, American Economic Review.
    • Do Foreign-Owned Firms Pay More Evidence from the Indonesian Manufacturing Sector, with Jason Scorse, in Labour Markets and Development, edited by Ravi Kanbur and Jan Svejnar, Routledge, 2008.
    • Trade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy, with Andres Rodriguez-Clare, in Handbook of Development Economics, edited by Dani Rodrik and Mark Rosenzweig, North Holland, forthcoming, 2009.