Source: CEA SYSTEMS submitted to NRP
TOBACCO TRANSFORMANT & CELLULASE TO DEFINE HOW ROOT AND AERIAL TEMPS AND DAILY LIGHT INTEGRALS INFLUENCE BIOMASS AND PROTEIN PRODUCTION
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0211131
Grant No.
2007-33610-18621
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
2007-03698
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2007
Project End Date
Aug 31, 2009
Grant Year
2007
Program Code
[8.2]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
CEA SYSTEMS
(N/A)
ALBANY,NY 12208
Performing Department
(N/A)
Non Technical Summary
Genomic research has identified many proteins encoded by DNA sequences, ranging from industrial enzymes to pharmaceuticals to nanostructures valuable to industry and medicine. Plants produce proteins at lower cost and with flexibility of scale, options often lacking in mammalian cell cultures and microbial fermentation. Plant cells have more chloroplasts than nuclei, making chloroplast (plastid) transformants more productive. Additionally, plastids are also present in roots, possibly increasing yield (and they are harvestable only in hydroponic systems). Plant environments influence biomass and protein production, and specific protein production can be guided using refined, accurate environment controls. Hydroponics permits separate and independent root and shoot environment control. Our purpose in this two year effort is to use a tobacco transformant and a representative protein (cellulase) to define how root and aerial temperatures and daily light integrals influence biomass and protein production, and the potential for changing the relative expression of the protein of interest. Concomitantly, transformants containing a pharmaceutical gene will be developed so a combination of more valuable protein and optimized plant production system will be ready for commercialization in tandem.
Animal Health Component
50%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
50%
Applied
50%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
20124991040100%
Goals / Objectives
The primary goal of the experimental efforts of Phase 2 is to develop tobacco as a vehicle for future production of target proteins (TPs) of various kinds in controlled environments. This work will move us closer to prototype-scale commercial production of a pharmaceutical TP and beyond in Phase 3. In light of our Phase 1 market research, we no longer anticipate large-scale production of industrial-quality cellulase taking place in the greenhouse, because it can be more economically produced in other ways, but the cellulase transformants we have prepared will continue to serve well as example TPs. Laboratory-quality production in a greenhouse remains a potentially viable opportunity. We are investing our efforts in tobacco as a vehicle crop because, for the time being, it is the species in which chloroplast transformants are most easily created. We are primarily interested in chloroplast-transformants because target protein expression in this type of transformant is typically several times greater than in nuclear transformants. As part of Phase 1, we leveraged the Phase 1 USDA funding to obtain additional funding to prepare chloroplast transforms expressing cellulase for use in Phase 2. For these transformants we used Samsun, an excellent cultivar used in Phase 1, and a new nicotine-free line designated 22X. During Phase 2 we intend to produce transformants containing a pharmaceutical product (to be selected as part of the Phase 2 effort) for use in Phase 3. In the long-run, the best commercial prospects for CEA production of transgenic products will be those products that require containment and cannot be grown in the field where production costs typically would be less. Pharmaceuticals fall into this category. To find optimal environmental set points and cultural methods to produce target proteins (TPs) in a greenhouse at minimum production cost, we will need to repeat the same process needed to perfect production of any commercial greenhouse crop. However, in this case and because of the high value of the TP, we should include consideration of more expensive inputs than usual, and more elaborate cultural techniques if they result in enhanced expression or accumulation of the transgene products. Finding optimal environmental set points in controlled environments is a challenge because, in contrast to field production, many environmental parameters can be controlled and there is a myriad of options. Not every variable that can be manipulated should, to be practical, be systematically varied with every other variable; the number of combinations is too great. Our focus in the planned experiments will be long-term environmental set-points. A final objective for Phase 2 is to demonstrate optimized continuous production of transgenic biomass in a realistic small-scale production system, using the results of our research.
Project Methods
In the growth chamber research, we intend to perform three main experiments, each of which will be replicated three times. Repeats in time will provide replication and also allow counterbalancing for chamber effects. The first set of experiments will have three levels of air temperature (provided by chambers) and three levels of root temperature (provided by production systems within chambers). Locations of production systems within chambers will be randomized. When all three repeats are complete we will conduct a 3-way ANOVA, with chamber as a blocking factor, and air temperature and root temperature as the independent variables, each with three levels. The second set of experiments will have three levels of daily light integral in a fixed photosynthetic period of 18 hours, with three levels of root temperature and the analysis will be similar. The final set of experiments will have three levels of photosynthetic period with a fixed daily light integral. Depending on the outcome of the earlier sets of experiments, instead of root temperature being examined, additional cultivars may be included. The greenhouse research program is intended to follow the chamber research and confirm the findings in the somewhat different conditions of the greenhouse. The experiments will focus on the two levels of the main independent variables shown to be of greatest interest (air temperature, daily light integral and photosynthetic period), and each experiment will be repeated twice. Three root temperatures will be available. To simultaneously fix photosynthetic period and daily light integral, done in the second set of chamber experiments, will be more difficult, but can be approximated reasonably well with the use of supplemental lighting, shade cloth and occasional manual intervention. To achieve these objectives we will establish experimental hydroponic plant production systems in three walk-in growth chambers, and two greenhouse sections. Each location will have three hydroponic production systems, and all production systems will be completely independent of one another in the root zone so root temperature can be varied as required. In the root zone there will be a positive circulation system and continuous aeration; root zone temperature will be computer controlled and continuously logged. Temperature will be adjusted up through use of submersed heaters, and lowered through use of a cold finger with circulated water chilled external to the units. Aerial temperatures and light intensities will be continuously logged in both greenhouse and growth chambers. Throughout all experiments, elemental analysis of the nutrient solution will be performed every two weeks, and appropriate corrections made to restore original concentrations of all ions. A fourth growth chamber will be equipped with an ebb-and-flood bench on which seedlings will be produced for all experiments until they reach transplant size. The temperature of the reservoir of nutrient solution in the ebb-and-flood bench will be controlled and continuously logged, as will aerial temperature and light level.

Progress 09/01/07 to 08/31/09

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Our research partner was Cornell University, as sub grantee. During Phase I and early Phase II, we worked in collaboration with the laboratories of Drs. Maureen Hanson and Beth Ahner, also of Cornell University, whose work was focused on developing more productive transformants, and who supplied us the transformed plant materials. Shortly after the start of Phase II, they succeeded in creating a chloroplast transformant of Samsun tobacco designated Cel6A, expressing and accumulating high levels of a cellulase enzyme. It was this transformant and its untransformed parent that we used as example crops in Phase II. We believe that this sharing of research products was mutually beneficial, both as to research techniques and to specific plant products. Our outputs include data and knowledge gained by working with the research materials. The data has been shared with the Cornell CEA researchers, staff and students and is expected to impact ongoing and future plant research, particularly in controlled system environments such as growth chambers and greenhouses. The researchers attended conferences and shared the general research subject matter with other conference attendees. PARTICIPANTS: Dr. Louis Albright, as principal investigator led the team of researchers and worked closely with the sub grantee, Cornell University. Additional researchers include Melissa Brechner, post doc associate; David de Villiers, PhD, Research Associate, Phase II PI for Cornell, and lead researcher for the sub grantee; Timothy J. Shelford, PhD, Growth chamber set up, and control program programmer; Colin Meeks, BSc, Chief Research Grower; Beth A. Ahner, Professor, Genetic Transformation Specialist, Cornell University; Ben Gray, PhD Grad Student, Developer of Cel6A; Huijun Yang, PhD, Post-doc, Developer of Interleukin transformant, tissue analysis; Maureen Hanson, Liberty Hyde Bailey Professor, Molecular Geneticist, Cornell University and Long Xi, PhD, Post-Doc. TARGET AUDIENCES: Not relevant to this project. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.

Impacts
Tobacco is a major field crop, but a new greenhouse crop. The opportunities for enhancing productivity in controlled environments such as greenhouses, growth chambers and plant factories, are far greater than exist in the field. Plants can be re-spaced, irrigation and fertilization can be precisely managed, temperature can be continuously controlled, and supplementary light and CO2 can be supplied as needed. However, until the advent of bio-molecular farming, no one had reason to optimize greenhouse production of tobacco. In Phase I of this SBIR project, we explored the effect of temperature and daily light integral on expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) in two different genetic lines of tobacco that had been transformed to include the GFP gene either in the nuclear or the chloroplast genome. We found evidence that these environmental factors affected biomass production and target enzyme as a proportion of total soluble protein (TSP) in different ways in the nuclear transformants, so that optimization of production of the target chemical might not be simply a matter of maximizing biomass productivity. We found the chloroplast transformant to be far superior to the nuclear transformants in terms of enzyme tissue content as percent of TSP; in the case of the chloroplast transformant, different light integral levels did not affect percent TSP.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 09/01/07 to 08/31/08

Outputs
OUTPUTS: The stated intent in the proposal for funding of the Phase II was to use chloroplast-transformed tobacco cultivars expressing cellulase as model crops with which to determine how to produce pharmaceuticals in controlled environments (CEs) most cost effectively. It was thought unlikely that cellulase enzymes would be a major target chemical for commercial CE production, but it was expected knowledge of the factors affecting the performance of chloroplast transformants expressing cellulase would generalize to transformants expressing other chemicals requiring/ benefiting from greenhouse containment/production, that would be commercially viable. A second objective of our Phase II proposal was to identify a commercially promising target protein (TP) and transform a suitable vehicle plant (not necessarily tobacco) for its commercial production in Phase III and beyond. (Note: a small profitable industry may be possible for production of specialty types of cellulase in tobacco in CEs, in small quantities for experimental purposes.) Our Phase I research showed that a target protein, green fluorescent protein (GFP), was recoverable in much higher amounts in chloroplast than in nuclear transformants, as expected, and also that a number of environmental and cultural factors strongly influence both overall biomass production, and percentage of target protein (in this case GFP) found in total soluble protein and thus in the tissue in general. But levels of environmental parameters optimal for biomass production did not necessarily result in highest content of TP in the tissue, suggesting some subtlety of approach is called for in optimizing productivity of TP. Our research showed that GFP increased in leaves as they got older, up to a point, and suggested that the balance between production, accumulation, and degradation of TP in the leaf was important. Plant age at time of harvest was also shown to be a dominant factor in TP productivity on a whole-plant basis, corroborating the individual leaf analysis. In our Phase II application we proposed a systematic evaluation of the effects of temperature and various light parameters in the aerial environment, and temperature in the root environment, on absolute productivity of target protein (i.e. g m-2 d-1 of cellulase). In practice, we will determine fresh and dry mass productivity, total soluble protein productivity, and target protein as a percentage of total soluble protein, separately, and compute target protein productivity from these data. We will develop these data longitudinally in order to determine optimal timing of harvest. In the above work the whole plant will be sampled. We also proposed a subset of experiments in which each leaf of the plant will be systematically analyzed, and this done longitudinally, to better understand overall plant TP productivity. PARTICIPANTS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. TARGET AUDIENCES: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
With the pilot studies completed satisfactorily, and decisions made on how concretely to proceed, the formal experiments are about to begin, and will commence during the latter part of September 2008 with seeding of the first rep of the photosynthetic period experiment. Student help has been enlisted for day-to-day management of the experiments. Thereafter experiments will proceed continuously until the work is done. Tissue analysis will commence at the beginning of 2009, working off a backlog of stored tissue. At present no obstacles to successful completion of the work are foreseen, although there may be a small time overrun. We will consider and timely request an extension, if appropriate.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period