Source: NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
WINTERING BALD EAGLE ROOSTING HABITAT
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0210849
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Jul 1, 2007
Project End Date
Jun 30, 2008
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
FLAGSTAFF,AZ 86011
Performing Department
SCHOOL OF FORESTRY
Non Technical Summary
Understanding the winter ecology of bald eagles has been important in the protection and recovery of this species. Successful managment of a wintering population of bald eagles requires an understanding of the reasons for variability in foraging behavior and habitat use. Results form this study will help forest managers in developing forest management treatments that will retain or enhance habitat for bald eagles.
Animal Health Component
65%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
35%
Applied
65%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
12106991070100%
Goals / Objectives
The objective of the study is to describe winter roosting habitat for bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) on the Coconino and Kaibab National Forests and to assess the impacts of forest management on roosts. Specific objectives are: (1) To describe bald eagle night roosts and day perch sites. This shall include characterization of night roosts (frequency of use, tree species used, size, and other features) and areas around roosts and perches using on-the-ground measurements and those obtained using Geographic Information System (GIS; distance to water, roads; vegetation characteristics, vegetation type, patch size, etc.), and (2) To develop a predictive model that will enable resource managers to protect bald eagle roost and perch sites.
Project Methods
Research efforts will be concentrated in areas where bald eagles indicate night roosts in the Kaibab and Coconino National Forests on the Colorado Plateau (Figures 1 and 2). Dominant vegetation includes ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) associations, with mixed conifer associations of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and white fir (Abies concolor) at higher elevations, and pinyon-juniper woodland associations (Pinus edulis-Juniperus spp.) at lower elevations. We will locate roost sites using GPS locations provided to us by AGFD. We will categorize night roosts versus day perches by time the location was collected and identify any roosts that used multiple times (e.g., locations used on different days that were < 15 m apart and where only single roost structures were available). We will randomly sample a subset of the potential roosts, prioritizing those roosts that were used >1 time. Searches will be conducted by walking around potential roost trees clockwise, then counter-clockwise, 2- and 5-m away from the base of the tree or farther if necessary for tree lean. Sign will be removed from the roost tree prior to the next field season. For each identifiable roost, we will measure characteristics of roost trees and roost sites (the patch surrounding each roost). For roost trees, we will record: tree species, dbh, tree height, slope position, aspect, dominance class, tree position (e.g., isolation, interior), and tree vigor classification. We will also collect roost site information. For roost sites, we will sample tree density, height and dbh for trees >40 cm dbh, slope, aspect, canopy closure, number of stumps and shrub density at each site in 15 m radius plots (Buehler et al., 1991). If we cannot identify a specific roost tree (e.g., Figure 3A - there were 3 potential roost trees at this site, all with white wash), we will collect roost site information. In addition, elevation, area, distance to nearest water, distance to potential disturbance by humans (e.g., roads, buildings, power lines) and distance to forest edge will be sampled using GIS. Random trees and sites will be used for comparison. We visited 4 roost sites to determine how difficult it would be to identify a specific roost and to test our methods for measuring roost sites. At 3 of the 4 roosts, we were able to identify potential roost structures (Figure 3A). We also flushed a mature bald eagle from one of these sites (Figure 3B), which confirmed use in this area. By conducting the work during winter, we are more likely to determine which trees are being used as roosts since bald eagles might be present. The study seems very feasible and there is potential for us to describe a large number of previously unknown wintering bald eagle roosts. Data will be analyzed by Multivariate Analysis Of Variance (MANOVA) using JMP (Statistical Analysis Software). Based on habitat characteristics that are determined to be important, a first approximation CART (Classification and Regression Trees) model will be developed. By modeling we will estimate the probability that a given area will provide suitable bald eagle roosting habitat.

Progress 07/01/07 to 06/30/08

Outputs
OUTPUTS: 1. March 2007: Report to NAU community (poster presentation) 2. November 2007: Report and presentation to cooperators - Coconino National Forest, Kaibab National Forest, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Emergency Military Affairs, Ecological Restoration Institute 3. February 2008: Presentation at regional conference - P.K. Joshi and C.L. Chambers, Night roosts of bald eagles wintering in northern Arizona, Arizona/New Mexico Chapters of The Wildlife Society 41st Joint Annual Meeting 4. Thesis defense November 2008 PARTICIPANTS: Prabin Joshi, MS student Carol Chambers Partner Organizations: Coconino National Forest Kaibab National Forest Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Game and Fish Department Department of Emergency Military Affairs TARGET AUDIENCES: Presented information to biologists involved in management of bald eagles in Arizona through presentations at meetings PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.

Impacts
Data were collected for 54 night roosts for 10 bald eagles that wintered in northern Arizona. We measured microhabitat characteristics for the 54 roosts in ponderosa pine forest and for paired randomly-selected plots. We also mapped 200 night roosts using GIS and gathered data for roosts and 200 randomly-selected points for macrohabitat comparison. We used and Information Theoretic approach to analyze data. Trees used as night roosts were larger diameter, on steeper slopes and surrounded by greater basal area, higher densities of large trees and lower densities of small trees than random trees. Mean dbh for trees in the plot was larger than for random plots. Roost plots were more likely to face east than west. Most of the large trees in roost plots were co-dominant or dominant and had >50% live crown ratio. We used a post-hoc analysis to find a more parsimonious model to describe night roost characteristics. The top 3 models that best predicted use of a roost by eagles included diameter of largest tree, density of large trees, density of small trees, slope, eastness, variability in tree size, and number of trees with live crown ratios >75%. The 3 models that best described night roosts for bald eagles at the macrohabitat scale included distance to lakes, highways, interstates, and measures of aspect. Eagles used roosts that were closer to highways and interstates but farther from lakes. Roosts were more likely to face northeast and northwest than southeast or southwest. Model-averaged estimates suggested that distances to highways and lakes and a north-facing aspect were important predictors of roosting. Bald eagles selected night roosts with characteristics that provided physical safety and thermal cover. Night roosts for bald eagles in northern Arizona can be maintained by protecting clumps (3 to 4 trees) of large (>75 cm dbh) ponderosa pine trees on northeast-facing slopes.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period