Source: AUBURN UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
ASSESSING THE EPIDEMIOLOGIC IMPACT OF VACCINATION FOR BOVINE VIRAL DIARRHEA VIRUS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0210457
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Mar 15, 2007
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2009
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
AUBURN UNIVERSITY
108 M. WHITE SMITH HALL
AUBURN,AL 36849
Performing Department
PATHOBIOLOGY
Non Technical Summary
To be effective, vaccines must protect pregnant animals and gestating fetuses from infection with bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) despite exposure to persistently infected cattle. To date, research trials involving vaccines for BVDV have used a single intranasal inoculation with limited quantities of virus to challenge the protection afforded by the vaccine. This research will assess the true efficacy of 3 top-selling vaccines for prevention of fetal infection with BVDV after pregnant heifers are challenged by exposure to 3 persistently infected heifers.
Animal Health Component
85%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
15%
Applied
85%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
3113310110115%
3113310117085%
Knowledge Area
311 - Animal Diseases;

Subject Of Investigation
3310 - Beef cattle, live animal;

Field Of Science
1101 - Virology; 1170 - Epidemiology;
Goals / Objectives
The objective of this research is to assess the true efficacy of vaccination for control of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV).
Project Methods
To assess the true efficacy of vaccination for control of BVDV, 84 heifer calves born from September to November 2006 will be randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups. The source herd is currently free of BVDV as determined by virus isolation testing of all calves weaned in May 2006 and verification of seronegative status in a random subset of those weaned calves. One treatment group will serve as non-vaccinated controls, while the other three groups will be vaccinated with BVDV at weaning (May 2007), 3 weeks post-weaning, one year of age (October 2007), and 3 weeks later (Table 1, page 8). Each treatment group will receive a different BVDV vaccine; however, within treatment groups, heifers will receive the same vaccine at each immunization. To select the vaccines used in this research, a large distributor of animal health products in the Southeastern United States was consulted. Based on volume of sales in July 2006, Bovishield Gold FP5 (Pfizer Animal Health, US, Inc. Kalamazoo, MI), Pyramid 5 (Fort Dodge Animal Health, Overland Park, KS) and Virashield 6 (Novartis Animal Health, Larchwood, IO) will be administered to the treatment groups. These top selling vaccines represent two modified-live virus products containing both cytopathic type 1a and type 2 strains of BVDV with label claims for fetal protection (Bovishield Bold FP5 and Pyramid 5) and an inactivated virus product containing a cytopathic type 1a strain of BVDV, a noncytopathic type 1 strain of BVDV and a noncytopathic type 2 strain of BVDV (ViraShield 6). Estrus will be synchronized in all heifers using melengestrol acetate (MGA) and dinaprost tromethamine (Lutalyse) to facilitate artificial insemination in late December of 2007 (Table 1, page 8). After artificial insemination of all heifers exhibiting estrus over a 3-day period, bulls will be introduced to the heifers to ensure maximum potential for pregnancy. Sixty-four days after initial breeding, pregnancy status and gestational age will be assessed using transrectal palpation and ultrasound. Seventy-one days after initial breeding, 3 PI heifers will be transported from Auburn to Winfield and commingled with the pregnant heifers in an isolated pasture of the experiment station. These 3 heifers are persistently infected with a type 1a, 1b and 2 field strain of BVDV, respectively. The exposed, pregnant heifers will be monitored closely for clinical disease, loss of pregnancy and viremia after this realistic viral challenge. Calves born in September, October and November of 2008 will be assessed using virus isolation from nasal secretions, immunohistochemistry of ear notch skin biopsies, and duplex real-time, quantitative PCR from serum to determine if persistent infection resulted from in utero exposure to BVDV. If offspring are determined to be persistently infected with BVDV, persistent infection with multiple strains will be assessed using uniquely labeled fluorescent probes to differentiate each of the field strains using real-time, quantitative PCR.

Progress 03/15/07 to 09/30/09

Outputs
OUTPUTS: The described project has been completed as designed. Results of the completed study have been presented at various producer continuing education programs including the Mississippi Cattlemen's Association Annual Conference, Missouri Cattlemen's Association Annual Conference, Georgia Cattlemen's Association Annual Conference, and the National Cattleman's Beef Association 2009 Annual Conference. PARTICIPANTS: M. Daniel Givens, project director; Soren P. Rodning, co-project director; This project provided a research training opportunity to Callie L. Nunley who was involved as a graduate student in the conduct of this research. Other collaborators included M. Shonda D. Marley, Yijing Zhand, Andrew B. Eason, Paul H. Walz, Kay P. Riddell, Patricia K. Galik, and Bruce W. Brodersen. TARGET AUDIENCES: Veterinarians, cattle producers, vaccine manufacturers PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
Eighty crossbred beef heifers were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups to evaluate the efficacy of vaccination in preventing the development of calves persistently infected with BVDV. Group 1 (n=11) served as non-vaccinated controls, while 3 groups were vaccinated with commercially available multivalent vaccines containing modified-live or inactivated BVDV at weaning, 28 d post-weaning, approximately one year of age, and 28 d later. Groups 2 (n=23) and 3 (n=23) were administered a modified-live BVDV vaccine, while Group 4 was administered an inactivated BVDV vaccine. Heifers were artificially inseminated (AI), after which two bulls were introduced. Pregnancy status and gestational age were assessed 61 d post-AI via transrectal ultrasound. Seventy heifers became pregnant (n=10 for Group 1; n=20 for Groups 2, 3, and 4). Three animals persistently infected with BVDV were commingled with the pregnant heifers in an isolated pasture for approximately 60 d (68 to 126 d post-AI). After BVDV exposure, viremias were detected in pregnant heifers from Group 1 (10/10), Group 3 (1/20), and Group 4 (10/20). No viremias were detected in Group 2 (0/20). Resulting calves were assessed for persistent infection using serum PCR, serum virus isolation, ear notch antigen capture-ELISA and immunohistochemistry. Persistently infected calves were only produced in Group 1 (10/10) and Group 4 (2/18). Results demonstrate that commercially available vaccines can provide effective fetal protection despite prolonged natural exposure to BVDV. However, viremias were detected in 11 vaccinated heifers after BVDV exposure and two vaccinated heifers gave birth to persistently infected calves, indicating the continued need for biosecurity and diagnostic surveillance in addition to vaccination to ensure effective BVDV control.

Publications

  • Rodning SP, Marley MSD, Zhang Y, Eason AB, Nunley CL, Walz PH, Riddell KP, Galik PK, Brodersen BW, Givens MD. 2010. Comparison of three commercial vaccines for preventing persistent infection with bovine viral diarrhea virus. Theriogenology, doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.01.017


Progress 01/01/08 to 12/31/08

Outputs
OUTPUTS: This project has resulted in a controlled research study involving 70 cows, 3 different commercially available vaccines for bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), and challenge of vaccinated heifers by exposure to persistently infected cattle for 56 days duration. The results of this study have been shared at the 7th European Society for Veterinary Virology Pestivirus Symposium in Uppsala, Sweden (September 2008) as a platform presentation, at the Annual Conference of the American Association of Bovine Practitioner's in Charlotte, NC (September 2008) as a poster presentation, at the 4th BVDV Symposium in Phoenix, AZ (January 2009) as a poster presentation, and at the Alabama Food Animal Vaterinarian Conference in Columbiana, AL (February 2009) as a platform presentation. The project has facilitated consulting with commercial producers of cattle vaccines to ensure the efficacy of available products. PARTICIPANTS: M. Daniel Givens, project director Soren P. Rodning, co-project director TARGET AUDIENCES: Veterinarians, cattle producers, vaccine manufacturers PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
This project resulted in the knowledge that (a) 4 doses of modified-live BVDV vaccine provided 100% protection against fetal infection of calves, (b) 4 doses of killed BVDV vaccine provided 89% protection against fetal infection of calves, and (c) lack of vaccination resulted in 100% fetal infection of calves. Viremia was prevented in only 50% of vaccinates receiving a killed viral vaccine compared to 95% and 100% of vaccinates receiving modified-live BVDV vaccine. Virus was detectable in nasal swabs of calves only when calves had not yet absorbed colostral antibodies. The study also demonstrated that some modified-live vaccines exhibit a greater negative impact on average daily gain immediately after vaccination. This may be economically important if ownership changes within a few weeks of vaccination. However, compensatory gain eventually neutralizes differences in average daily gain indicating that this effect is less critical if ownership is retained.

Publications

  • Rodning SP, Zhang Y, Eason AB, Marley MSD, Nunley CL, Walz PH, Riddell KP, Galik PK, Brodersen BW, Givens MD. Efficacy of various vaccination protocols in preventing persistent infection of calves with bovine viral diarrhea virus. Proceedings and poster presentation (#4) at the Fourth U.S. BVDV Symposium, Phoenix, Arizona, January, 2009.
  • Rodning SP, Givens MD, Zhang Y, Marley MSD, Nunley CL, Walz PH, Riddell KP, Galik PK. Assessing the epidemiologic impact of vaccination for bovine viral diarrhea virus. Proceedings and poster presentation at the American Association of Bovine Practitioners 2008 Annual Conference in Charlotte, NC, September 2008.
  • Rodning SP, Givens MD, Zhang Y, Marley MSD, Nunley CL, Walz PH, Riddell KP, Galik PK, Eason AB. Evaluating the efficacy of vaccination for bovine viral diarrhea virus. Platform presentation and proceedings p. 102 of the 7th ESVV Pestivirus Symposium in Uppsala, Sweden, September 2008.


Progress 01/01/07 to 12/31/07

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Preliminary results of this project have been shared in presentations at the Fort Dodge Animal Health Food Animal Symposium at Auburn, AL in January 2008, the Pfizer Veterinary Symposium at Opelika, AL in December 2007 and the 21st Annual South Carolina Large Animal Medicine Short Course at Columbia, SC in November 2007. PARTICIPANTS: Participants of this project have included Givens MD, Rodning SP, Walz PH, and Marley MSD. This project has facilitated the research training of 2 undergraduate students and 2 graduate student. TARGET AUDIENCES: The target audience for dissemination of research results includes cattle producers, veterinarians, biologics manufacturers and regulatory officials.

Impacts
Preliminary results of this project indicate that the stimulation of humoral immunity can be associated with a decrease in growth rate. While commercially available vaccines to immunize cattle for bovine viral diarrhea virus vary in ability to stimulate humoral immunity and impact growth rate, future results will characterize the resulting protection afforded by immunization with these various products when animals are challenged under field condtions. Obviously, preference should be given to using vaccines that minimize temporary impairment of growth rates while maximizing protection afforded under field conditions.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period