Progress 06/01/07 to 01/31/08
Outputs OUTPUTS: Activities included: 1. Creating, conducting and analyzing surveys of master gardeners, nursery retailers, and nursery wholesale growers. 2. developing a greater understanding of the horticultural industry including sales processes, inventory management, product development. 3. evaluating the needs of the consumer against the products and services provided by the horticulture industry. 4. developing a greater understanding of the text and image data requirements needed to create a consumer plant selection and identification tool. 5. Soliciting a review of the technical prototype selection tool from a select group of master gardeners, nursery retailers, and nursery wholesale growers. Products included: Developing a technical prototype selection tool which included: 1. new fundamental or applied knowledge 2. construction of two databases (derived from horticultural texts and the collection and data extraction of several thousand plant images) 3. developing systems and software
for individuals to selection and identify plant species and acquire information about plant species. Dissemination: Reaching out to master gardeners, nursery retailers, and nursery wholesale growers to make them aware of our plant selection software advances, to encourage their participation, and help us change the current conditions. No events or services were completed during the reporting period.
PARTICIPANTS: Susan Dunlap (Co-PI) collected images and extracted image data, compiled text data from all know horticultural resources, managed and filed administrative reports, and compiled and compressed the software menu. In addition, Ms. Dunlap co-developed the industry surveys, made arrangements to distribute them, contacted industry suppliers to conduct live surveys, conducted live surveys, and contributed to the analysis of the surveys. Dr. Dreyfuss (Co-PI) refined the database structure, developed technical tools, engineered the software, developed advanced strategies to speed up the software performance, assisted in the development of the user interface, and assisted in the compilation and compression of the software menu. In addition, Dr. Dreyfuss co-developed the industry surveys, made arrangements to distribute them, conducted live surveys, and contributed to the analysis of the surveys. David Cockerill assisted in the development of the user interface, assisted in the
compilation and compression of the software menu, developed techniques and strategies to manage the image data, and developed processes to compress and tag the image data. Members and staff of the San Francisco and San Mateo County Master Gardener program (UC Cooperative Extension) helped coordinate the distribution of our on-line consumer survey. Many members took the survey. Professional botanists Ernesto Sandoval and Brian Kemble provided a professional review of our software menu.
TARGET AUDIENCES: Plant consumers and the horticulture sector will be served by this project. Our efforts will deliver science-based knowledge to people through informal educational programs and web resources.
PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: There were no major changes in approach.
Impacts Our knowledge of the horticulture industry changed as we developed an understanding of the vast data gaps in the horticulture literature that fundamentally hamper the development of consumer friendly selection tools, and changed again as we juxtaposed this knowledge against our analysis of the industry surveys we conducted. The data knowledge developed from our compilation and study of novel images and image data, text data compiled from existing literature, and grower product lists. Because of our change in knowledge, we changed our actions, and adopted new techniques and methods to achieve primary project goals: develop a prototype consumer plant selection tool and acquire input from a cross-section of potential users. Faced with vast text data gaps, we developed strategies to fill in data from images, and to develop a database of tagged images of a large variety of plant traits. Additionally, this knowledge contributed to the construction of the software menu. We
vastly expanded the selection criterion to 10 times that is typically available. Response to the image database made this expansion possible. Changes in actions: The image data gave us a new base of knowledge to insert into the consumer selection tool. Extracting this data improved the results and helped achieve the project goals. Survey activities and analysis also prompted us to change our business strategies and policies. We adjusted our plans to create software tools to serve the suppliers, choosing to focus instead on consumer facing plant selection tools. Change in conditions: As a consequence of conducting surveys, we developed additional human resources - expanding our contacts in important ways. As a consequence of developing software and databases, we developed improved information resources.
Publications
- No publications reported this period
|