Source: WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
WINE GRAPE FOUNDATION BLOCK, WA
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0207720
Grant No.
2006-34559-17500
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
2006-06221
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Aug 15, 2006
Project End Date
Aug 14, 2008
Grant Year
2006
Program Code
[XT]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY
240 FRENCH ADMINISTRATION BLDG
PULLMAN,WA 99164-0001
Performing Department
ARC
Non Technical Summary
As the industry matures, aging vineyards and periodic winter freezes create the need for certified plants, grown and tested regionally, to renew vineyards in the Pacific Northwest, the leading producer of juice grapes in the US and a growing area of premium wine grapes. As a source for disease-free material, the Foundation Block with certified disease-free plants is a valuable resource for ongoing research by the regional land-grant universities and USDA-ARS.
Animal Health Component
60%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
40%
Applied
60%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
2021131116050%
2021139116050%
Knowledge Area
202 - Plant Genetic Resources;

Subject Of Investigation
1131 - Wine grapes; 1139 - Grapes, general/other;

Field Of Science
1160 - Pathology;
Goals / Objectives
1. Maintain and expand a planting (termed Foundation Block) of virus-free commercial grape cultivars from sources worldwide at Washington State University's Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center at Prosser, WA, to serve the needs of Pacific Northwest (PNW) grape researchers and growers in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. This planting (short-term) will support objectives 2 and 3 (long-term). 2. Begin evaluating the performance of grape cultivars and rootstocks in the unique PNW growing region to: (a) determine both genetic (cultivar, rootstock) and environmental (including manageable) effects on grapevine yield components and fruit composition; and (b) investigate post-veraison grape berry shrivel (arrested development syndrome) and its effect on fruit composition. 3. Evaluate interactions of plant diseases with seasonal environmental effects on grapevine performance to: (a) document the occurrence of different grapevine leafroll-associated viruses in Washington state vineyards; and (b) study the field spread of grapevine leafroll disease. 4. Develop educational and extension programs and materials for growers about the value of (a) cultivar and rootstock diversification and use and (b) virus-free plant materials.
Project Methods
All objectives have already been started and will be worked on simultaneously throughout the year. Germplasm for all objectives has been obtained from Foundation Plant Services at UC Davis in February of 2004, 2005, and 2006; and additional selections will be acquired during the winter of 2006-07. Objective 1 contains greenhouse and laboratory components that are performed year-round. Planting of clean selections in the Foundation Block will occur in May/June of both 2006 and 2007. Objective 2 has field and laboratory components with field samples being collected in September of 2006 and March of 2007. Objective 3 also has field and laboratory components and will involve seasonal sampling and observations. Educational material will be developed throughout the year and workshops will be conducted in June of 2006 and February of 2007.

Progress 08/15/06 to 08/14/08

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Grape cuttings were obtained from Foundation Plant Services (FPS) at UC Davis and Oregon State University based on recommendations from an advisory group (industry representatives, state regulatory agency representatives, university researchers and extension specialists). Cuttings were grown in a greenhouse and propagated by meristem culture to eliminate crown-gall. Plants were then virus-indexed by ELISA and/or RT-PCR optimized for detection of grapevine leafroll-associated viruses, grapevine viruses A and B, grapevine fanleaf virus, tomato ringspot virus, grapevine fleck virus, and rupestris stem pitting-associated virus. Of 170 selections acquired to date, 90 tested selections have been planted in the Foundation Vineyard on a quarantine site at WSU's Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center in Prosser, WA. Virus-retesting so far has not revealed any viruses, but regular testing will continue to ensure the planting remains clean. Remaining selections are currently at various stages of development (meristem culture, virus indexing, or propagation). A graduate research assistant is studying interactions of viruses with environmental effects on grapevine performance. We also developed a website (http://nwgfs.wsu.edu) with educational information about grapevine certification, virus indexing, plant selection and introduction, and current listings of available selections and certified nurseries. Throughout each winter, we evaluated grapevine cold hardiness by differential thermal analysis and posted critical temps on the internet (http://winegrapes.wsu.edu/frigid.html) to assist growers with decisions on matching cvs. to sites and on frost protection measures. We established a field trial that includes Chardonnay (CH), Merlot (ME), and Syrah (SY) grafted to 6 rootstocks in addition to own-rooted plants. Another field trial was planted with Concord juice grapes on 3 rootstocks and on their own roots. We also established a link with the national NE-1020 project to plant ~20 wine grape selections at a testing site in ID for performance evaluation. In 2006, own-rooted CH in the wine-grape rootstock trial had higher yields than grafted vines, while no differences were found for ME. Own-rooted SY had the lowest yields and SY grafted to 3309 the highest. Rootstocks did not affect sugar and color accumulation and acid degradation in CH and ME, but sugar accumulation was fastest on own-rooted SY, and less color accumulated in SY on 140-2. CH and ME, but not SY juice had the highest pH on their own roots (ME also on 101-14) and the lowest on 140-2. Although rootstocks did not affect juice potassium (K), variations in K rather than titratable acidity explained most of the difference in pH between and within cvs.: ME contained the most and CH the least K. ME juice was high in proline but low in arginine, SY was low in proline but high in arginine, while CH was low in both amino acids. Grafting did not affect juice proline, while juice from own-rooted CH and SY, but not ME, contained more arginine than that from grafted vines. In practical terms, high juice pH can lead to poor wine stability, and low arginine may result in stuck fermentations. PARTICIPANTS: Markus Keller, Ken Eastwell, Naidu Rayapati, Washington Association of Wine Grape Growers, Washington State Wine Commission TARGET AUDIENCES: Target audiences include wine and juice grape growers in the Pacific Northwest and the nurseries which sell plants to them. Efforts to deliver science-based knowledge include a website (http://nwgfs.wsu.edu) with educational information about grapevine certification, virus indexing, plant selection and introduction, and current listings of available selections and certified nurseries. Throughout each winter, we evaluated grapevine cold hardiness by differential thermal analysis and posted critical temps on the internet (http://winegrapes.wsu.edu/frigid.html) to assist growers with decisions on matching cvs. to sites and on frost protection measures. More detailed progress reports were included in a compiled booklet of wine-grape-funded progress reports that was available at the Wine Research Review held in Prosser, Washington on February 22, 2008. Copies of the progress-report booklet were also mailed to members of the Washington Wine Commission and the Wine Advisory Committee, and copies are available in the WSU Agricultural Research Center. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.

Impacts
The WSU Grape Foundation Block and associated research programs have had an immediate impact on nurseries and vineyards throughout Washington, as documented by the strong increase in sales of propagation material over the last three years. The block has expanded rapidly to become a regional service center serving the grape and wine industries of Washington, Oregon and Idaho. As a result, approximately half of all grower requests for inclusion of grape selections in the block now come from the wine and table grape industries outside of Washington. Nurseries throughout the region are buying virus-tested plant material, so that future plantings will be free of debilitating virus and bacterial diseases. The information on the performance and cold hardiness of varieties and rootstocks under the arid summer and cold winter conditions of the inland Pacific Northwest is highly valued by growers, because it enables them to make informed decisions on the selection of planting material and sites, and on frost protection measures during the winter season.

Publications

  • Keller M. and L.J. Mills. 2005. Recovery of Merlot vines from winter injury: a matter of bud number Proc. XIV Internat. Symp. `Groupe d'Etude des Systemes de Conduite de la Vigne'. Geisenheim, Germany, pp. 74-79.
  • Mills L.J., J.C. Ferguson and M. Keller. 2006. Cold hardiness evaluation of grapevine buds and cane tissues. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 57:194-200.
  • Keller M. and L.J. Mills. 2007. Effect of pruning on recovery and productivity of cold-injured Merlot grapevines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 58: 351-357.
  • Keller M., L.J. Mills and D.S. Hackett. 2007. Field grafting and cold injury: grafting height but not rootstock affects scion survival. Proc. XV International Symposium `Groupe d'Etude des Systemes de Conduite de la Vigne'. Porec, Croatia, pp. 294-300.
  • Olmstead M.A. and M. Keller. 2007. Chip bud grafting in Washington state vineyards. Washington State University Extension Bulletin EB2023E: 4 pp.