Source: IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
MEASUREMENT AND MITIGATION OF ODOR AND AIR EMISSIONS FROM CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0207629
Grant No.
2006-34554-17563
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
2006-06139
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Aug 15, 2006
Project End Date
Aug 14, 2008
Grant Year
2006
Program Code
[XD]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
2229 Lincoln Way
AMES,IA 50011
Performing Department
AGRI & BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Non Technical Summary
Certain animal production facilities contribute to odor and gas concentrations that may be considered a nuisance to surrounding residents. This project will investigate the effectiveness of partial biofiltration of a critical minimum airflow to maximize odor and gas reduction from swine and poultry production housing.
Animal Health Component
70%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
20%
Applied
70%
Developmental
10%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
1330410202020%
1330410309020%
1333299202010%
1333599202010%
3073299202010%
3073599202010%
3075330202010%
4047220309010%
Goals / Objectives
1)Develop a combined Mobile Emissions and Mobile Ambient Laboratory (ME/AL) for the purpose of evaluating emission mitigation strategies via the monitoring of aerial emissions and downwind concentrations of odors, noxious gases (NH3, H2S), greenhouse gases (NOx, CO2) and particulates (PM2.5, PM10, TSP) from CAFOs. 2) Evaluate potential cost effective methods to reduce the emissions and downwind concentrations of odors, gases, and particulates from swine finishing and egg laying facilities, using the developed ME/AL. 3) Conduct outreach activities demonstrating basic scientific principles of air quality and mitigation design and implementation strategies for reducing building and manure storage emissions.
Project Methods
This research project will investigate the gas and odor emission reduction potential from a deep-pit swine finisher and the manure storage building of a manure-belt laying hen operation using a strategy of partial (for swine) or full (poultry) biofiltration of the exhaust air. The partial biofiltration targets a critical minimum amount of exhausted air during stable weather conditions when emissions do not disperse readily near the source. The key idea is that ventilation air exhausted during the heat of summer days is exhausted into an atmosphere that is, for the vast majority of times, very unstable thus providing excellent and natural mixing potential near the building source. In more stable evening atmospheres, biofiltration of a critical minimum of exhaust ventilation air would reduce gas and odor emissions and the potential for large odor plumes to travel long distances. The overall effect could be a more attractive and affordable biofiltration strategy that maximizes odor and gas reduction potential when it is needed most. Objective (1) involves the development of a single mobile laboratory capable of monitoring both source emission rates of gases and particulates and the low-level ambient concentrations downwind from CAFOs. This mobile laboratory will then combine monitoring equipment developed and calibrated specifically for the higher concentrations of gases expected inside livestock and poultry facilities and the lower-level ambient concentrations expected downwind. Accordingly, this mobile laboratory will be referred to as a Mobile Emission/Ambient Laboratory (ME/AL). Objective (2) involves the development of a potential low-cost mitigation strategy to demonstrate, with the use of the developed ME/AL, the effectiveness in terms of building gas and particulate emission reduction and simultaneous downwind concentrations in the community of CAFOs. The proposal is to develop a biofiltration strategy that could be implemented by livestock and poultry producers to filter a 'critical minimum' amount of ventilation air that results in maximum benefit. To achieve 100 percent biofiltration of ventilation exhaust air for high ventilation rates is not economically feasible. However, a strategy to treat only a critical minimum amount of ventilation air by biofiltration could maximize the emissions reduction benefit. Specific tasks involved with this objective are, i) to retrofit an existing deep-pit swine finisher for biofiltration of a critical minimum amount of the hot weather ventilation, ii) to monitor the emissions and simultaneous downwind concentrations of hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, and odor from a biofiltered barn and compare these emissions from an identical on-site barn without biofiltration, and, iii) to provide design recommendations for critical minimum biofiltration strategies. To assess the mitigation effectiveness of a developed biofilter for treating a critical minimum airflow will require on-site implementation for both the biofilter and the ME/AL.

Progress 08/15/06 to 08/14/08

Outputs
OUTPUTS: 1. Mathematical procedures developed to predict ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, and particulate concentrations inside swine deep-pit finishing facilities. 2. Mathematical procedures developed to predict ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, and particulate emissions from swine deep-pit finishing facilities. Information can be used in air quality gas and particulate dispersion within a community. 3. Practical partial biofiltration research presented at the Mitigating Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations held in Des Moines, IA May 19-21, 2008. This research resulted in tangible cost estimates for future biofilter installation retrofit considerations. PARTICIPANTS: Participants include Dr. Robert Burns, Dr. Lingshuang Cai, Dr. Jay Harmon, Dr. Steve Hoff, Dr. Ramesh Kanwar, Dr. Jacek Koziel, Dr. Hong Li, and Dr. Hongwei Xin. TARGET AUDIENCES: The intended audience for this research are rural community residents, livestock and poultry producers, commodity groups, NRCS personnel, and legislative members. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: None.

Impacts
The need to investigate cost-effective management practices or technologies to mitigate such emissions, both at and downwind from the source, is more pressing than ever. The specific objectives of this research project were to; 1) Develop Mobile Emission and Ambient Laboratories (ME/AL) for the purpose of evaluating emission mitigation strategies via the monitoring of aerial emissions and downwind concentrations of odors, noxious gases, greenhouse gases and particulates from CAFOs, 2) Using the developed ME/AL from objective one, evaluate potential cost effective methods to reduce the emissions and downwind concentrations of odors, gases, and particulates from swine finishing and egg laying facilities, and, 3) Conduct outreach activities demonstrating basic scientific principles of air quality and mitigation design and implementation strategies for reducing building and manure storage emissions. Significant progress has been made towards the objectives outlined. Objective one has been completed with the development of six Mobile Laboratories which are now fully operational. Objective two is currently being satisfied where we have active research being conducted at one swine finishing site, one egg-layer facility, and one turkey finishing facility. These sites are being used to investigate novel techniques for biofiltering swine exhaust air, diet and litter effects on ammonia emission from high-rise egg laying facilities, and for quantifying ammonia and particulate emission from turkey finishing facilities. This research will impact and benefit both CAFO producers and rural residents by a) systematically collecting science-based emission inventory data, with and without a mitigation strategy; b) providing unbiased and socially relevant analysis of health-related risks associated with CAFO air emissions; and c) identifying and developing emission mitigation techniques or practices. For example, building exhaust air contains odorous gases, moisture, animal dander, and feed dust particles, and can represent a concentrated odor source. Biofiltering ventilation exhaust air is a strategy that has been proven to be effective. However, for biofilters to be successful, designs must be developed that allow producers to use existing ventilation fan systems, operate at marginal increased costs, and that can be used effectively on a portion of the total exhaust air volume. An important recent impact as a result, in part, of the research conducted with this project was the approval in the state of Iowa for EQIP funding for producers who install biofilters. An on-site demonstration was given to Iowa NRCS personnel in June 2008, following the Mitigating Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations held in Des Moines, IA May 19-21, 2008. Shortly after this demonstration and discussion the plan for providing EQIP funding was approved. This demonstration and discussion was conducted at the swine biofilter research site established with funding from this project.

Publications

  • Hoff, S.J., D.S. Bundy, and J.D. Harmon. 2008. Modeling Receptor Odor Exposure from Swine Production Sources Using CAM. Applied Engineering in Agriculture (in print).
  • Hoff, S.J., J.D. Harmon, D.S. Bundy, and B.C. Zelle. 2008. Hydrogen Sulfide Source and Receptor Ammonia and Hydrogen Sulfide in Communities With and Without Swine Emission Sources: Follow-Up Study. Applied Engineering in Agriculture (in review).
  • Hoff, S.J., J.D. Harmon, D.S. Bundy, and B.C. Zelle. 2008. Hydrogen Sulfide and Ammonia Receptor Concentrations in a Community of Multiple Swine Emission Sources: Preliminary Study. Applied Engineering in Agriculture (in print).
  • Lo, Y.M., J.A. Koziel, L. Cai, S.J. Hoff, W.S. Jenks, and H. Xin. 2008. Simultaneous Chemical and Sensory Characterization of Volatile Organic Compounds and Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds Emitted from Swine Manure using Solid Phase Microextraction and Multidimensional Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Olfactometry.. Journal of Environ. Qual. 37:521-534.
  • Sun, G., S.J. Hoff, B.C. Zelle, and M.A. Nelson. 2008 Development and Comparison of Backpropagation and Generalized Regression Neural Network Models to Predict Diurnal and Seasonal Gas and PM10 Concentrations and Emissions from Swine Buildings. Transactions of the ASABE 51(2): 685-694.
  • Sun, G., S.J. Hoff, B.C. Zelle, and M.A. Nelson. 2008. Forecasting Daily Source Air Quality Using Multivariate Statistical Analysis and Radial Basis Function Networks. Journal of the A&WMA (accepted for publication).
  • Yang, X., J.A. Koziel, T. Cutler, S. Zhang, J. Zimmerman, S.J. Hoff, W. Jenks, J (Hans) van Leeuwen, J. Harmon, C. Faulhaber, Y. Laor, U. Ravid, R. Armon. 2008. Treatment of livestock odor and pathogens with ultraviolet light. ASABE Paper # 085198. ASABE Annual International Meeting. Providence, RI, June, 2008.
  • Zhang, S., L. Cai, E. A. Caraway, J.A. Koziel, D. B. Parker, I. Celen, B. Hetchler, L. Jacobson, D.R. Smith, C.J. Clanton, K.Y. Heathcote, S. J. Hoff, S. Anderson-Bereznicki, A. Heber. 2008. Livestock odorants characterization and quantification with a combination of sorbent tube sampling and thermal desorption - multidimensional gas chromatography mass spectrometry olfactometry. ASABE Paper # 085164. ASABE Annual International Meeting. Providence, RI, June, 2008.
  • Koziel, J.A., J. Zimmerman, S. Hoff, H. van Leeuwen, W. Jenks. Research Brief: Simultaneous treatment of odor, VOCs, H2S, NH3, and pathogens with UV light. 2008 Annual Report of the S-1032: Improving the Sustainability of Livestock and Poultry Production in the United States.
  • Sun, G., S. Hoff, B. Zelle, and M. Nelson. 2008. Development and Comparison of Backpropagation and Generalized Regression Neural Network Models to Predict Diurnal and Seasonal Gas and PM10 Concentrations and Emissions from Swine Buildings. ASABE Paper No 085100. ASABE Annual International Meeting. Providence. RI. USA.
  • Chen, L., S. Hoff, L. Cai, and J. Koziel. 2008. Assessment of a Two-Stage Wood Chip-Based Biofilter Using Solid-Phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Olfactometry. ASABE Paper No 083861. ASABE Annual International Meeting. Providence. RI. USA.
  • Chen, L., S. Hoff, L. Cai, and J. Koziel. 2008. Odor Reduction During Biofiltration as Affected by Air Flow Rate and Media Moisture Content. ASABE Paper No 083859. ASABE Annual International Meeting. Providence. RI. USA.


Progress 08/15/06 to 08/14/07

Outputs
OUTPUTS: 1. Lab-scale studies on feed additives and manure-pile topical treatments for egg-laying facilities transferred to an on-farm test research site. 2. Progress results on feed additives and manure-pile topical treatments for egg-laying facilities were reported through conference or workshop papers/proceedings (ASABE, AWMA, Iowa Egg Industry Symposium). 3. An overview of mitigation strategies, many of which were either developed or refined with this research project, were presented to Iowa legislative members. The information presented will be used to help develop Iowa policy on odor research and mitigation during the 2008 legislative session. 4. An international conference highlighting mitigation strategies for odor and gas emissions from livestock systems has been planned and abstracts are currently being accepted for a conference planned for mid-2008. PARTICIPANTS: Key project leader participants include Dr. Robert Burns, Dr. Hongwei Xin, Dr. Jay Harmon, Dr. Jacek Koziel, Dr. Hong Li, Dr. Lingshuang Cai, Mr. Brian Zelle, and Dr. Steve Hoff. Several graduate research assistants and research associates participated in this project as well. TARGET AUDIENCES: The intended audience for this research are rural community residents, livestock and poultry producers, commodity groups, and legislative members.

Impacts
The effect of air emissions from concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) continues to be a major issue in the surrounding rural community. The issue arises primarily from odors as a nuisance and secondly a potential health concern from exposure to ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and/or particulate matter. The need to investigate cost-effective management practices or technologies to mitigate such emissions, both at and downwind from the source, is more pressing than ever. The specific objectives of this research project representing a continuation of IOW05038, were to; 1) Develop Mobile Emission and Ambient Laboratories (ME/AL) for the purpose of evaluating emission mitigation strategies via the monitoring of aerial emissions and downwind concentrations of odors, noxious gases, greenhouse gases and particulates from CAFOs, 2) Using the developed ME/AL from objective one, evaluate potential cost effective methods to reduce the emissions and downwind concentrations of odors, gases, and particulates from swine finishing and egg laying facilities, and, 3) Conduct outreach activities demonstrating basic scientific principles of air quality and mitigation design and implementation strategies for reducing building and manure storage emissions. The specific outcomes of this research were as follows: Methods continue to be developed that quantify the specific compounds contributing to offensive odors. Volatile organic compound quantification using sorbent tubes has been developed that will be used to both identify and quantify compounds associated with livestock odor. A strategy of partial biofiltration, developed during project IOW05038, has been further refined to provide a by-pass control system where odor mitigation is used only if a downwind receptor is estimated to receive an odor. This method significantly reduces the operational time of a mitigation strategy thereby reducing operational costs. This strategy was developed for biofiltration but the concept is applicable to most any mitigation strategy involving barn ventilation air. On-farm field trials of dietary changes to laying hens and topical applications of Zeolite, alum, Ferix 3, and PLT to the litter manure pack have shown a 40 percent reduction in ammonia emission. On-farm field trials of belt-house laying hen facilities versus standard high-rise facilities shows a reduction in ammonia emission nearing 80 percent. The cost of belt-house laying hen facilities however is 50 percent higher than traditional high-rise laying hen facilities. Lab-scale experiments continue on the use of ultraviolet light to treat both odorous compounds and pathogens from barn ventilation air. Research results show significant reductions in many of the principal odorous compounds, in many cases exceeding 97 percent reduction with a one second exposure time. Experimental methods are being developed to test the specific dosage level required to achieve acceptable reductions and the applicability of this dosage level to on-farm treatment of barn ventilation air.

Publications

  • Chen, L., SJ Hoff, JA Koziel, L Cai, B Zelle, G Sun. 2007. Performance Evaluation of a Wood-Chip Based Biofilter Using Solid-Phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Olfactometry. ASABE Paper No. 074137. St Joseph, MI.: ASABE.
  • Burns, R.T., H. Xin, R. Gates, H. Li, D.G. Overhults and J. Earnest. 2007 Ammonia Emissions from Broiler Houses in the Southeastern United States. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Air Quality and Waste Management for Agriculture. September 16-19, 2007. Broomfield, Colorado. ASABE Publication Number 701P0907cd.
  • Moody, Lara, Hong Li, Robert Burns, Hongwei Xin and Richard Gates. 2007. Southeastern Broiler Gaseous and Particulate Matter Emission Monitoring Quality Assurance Project Plan, Version 1.3. Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
  • Zhu, Z., H. Xin, H. Li, R.T. Burns and H. Dong. 2007. Assessment of in-line filter type and condition on ammonia measurement, Transactions of the ASAE 50 (5):(in press).
  • Burns, R.T., H. Xin, R. Gates, H. Li, S. Hoff, L. Moody, D. Overhults and J. Earnest. 2007. Southeastern Broiler Gaseous and Particulate Matter Air Emissions Monitoring System Design and Performance. Proceedings of the International ASABE Meeting, Minneapolis, MN. Paper # 074127.
  • Cai, L., J.A. Koziel, A.T. Nguyen, Y. Liang, and H. Xin. 2007. Evaluation of zeolite for control of odorants emissions from simulated poultry manure storage. Journal of Environmental Quality, 36(1):184-193.