Source: CORNELL UNIVERSITY submitted to NRP
NUTRITIONAL EPIGENOMICS
Sponsoring Institution
State Agricultural Experiment Station
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0194630
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2002
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2009
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
CORNELL UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
ITHACA,NY 14853
Performing Department
NUTRITIONAL SCIENCES
Non Technical Summary
When mutations occur, they can turn off a gene which may then produce disease state. The same genes can also be turned off by a process called DNA methylation which can produce the same disease state. DNA methylation is reversible, but little is known about how methylation is placed or removed. The goal of this project is to understand the mechanisms regulating DNA methylation.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
100%
Applied
(N/A)
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
30438401080100%
Knowledge Area
304 - Animal Genome;

Subject Of Investigation
3840 - Laboratory animals;

Field Of Science
1080 - Genetics;
Goals / Objectives
It is widely accepted that mutations in genes or changes in their expression levels can contribute to the development of a variety of plant, human and animal phenotypes including pigmentation and diseases such as cancer and developmental growth disorders. One of the ways that expression is regulated is by DNA methylation - a reversible epigenetic modification to the genome. The methylation status of large regions of the genome, including several growth regulating genes, has been shown to undergo changes during the transition from the normal to aberrant state. In some cancers and cancer models these changes in DNA methylation status have been shown to be critical contributing events to tumor development. Methylation state of DNA is highly responsive to environmental changes including nutritional status and may represent the interface between environmental-genetic interactions. There are many data in the literature describing where and when methylated DNA can be found in the genome of plants and disease affected individuals and animals. But few data exist that describe how a sequence is chosen for (or protected from) methylation or how patterns of methylation are established, maintained and modified during development. For some loci, it is known that DNA methylation can affect the binding of transcription factors or recruitment of histone deacetylases, but the mechanisms by which methylation affects expression are not completely understood. One key objective of this project is to identify cis- and trans- acting factors that can control DNA methylation. A second goal is to characterize some of the mechanisms by which methylation affects transcription. Our model system is the imprinted gene, Rasgrf1, in the laboratory mouse. The reasons for choosing this system are as follows: First, imprinted genes are methylated on just one allele - the maternal or paternal allele, therefore, they provide a tractable system for studying methylation in the normal developmental state. Second, any study of cis-acting regulators of DNA methylation will require preparing mutants, which is technically straight forward in mice. We have found a bifunctional DNA sequence from Rasgrf1 that (a) regulates establishment of local DNA methylation in the male germ line and (b) can silence transcription by blocking enhancer-to-promoter interactions. The experiments that are part of this project will exploit this system in an effort to understand how methylation marks are placed in the genome and how they affect gene expression. The answers provided by these studies will contribute to the understanding of epigenetic regulation of the genome and may prove useful for future development of therapeutics for treating cancer or other diseases based on modifying epigenetic phenomena.
Project Methods
In mice, the imprinted Rasgrf1 locus is methylated on the paternal allele within a differentially methylated domain (DMD) 30-kbp 5' of the promoter. Expression is exclusively from the paternal allele in neonatal brain [Nat Genet (1996) 14 106-9]. We have shown that establishment of methylation is regulated by a repeated sequence, consisting of a 41-mer repeated 40 times, found immediately 3' of the DMD [Nature Genet. (2002) 30 92-96]. This is the only paternally methylated locus for which a cis-acting regulator of methylation establishment has been identified. When DMD methylation was lost, paternal allele-specific expression was lost too. This is because the DMD is a methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking element. The repeats and the DMD together act as a binary switch that regulates imprinting of Rasgrf1. The overall goal of the following Specific Aims is to characterize the mechanism by which the repeats regulate DNA methylation and to extend this analysis to the human gene. Aim 1: Can the binary switch that regulates imprinting of Rasgrf1 be used to impart imprinting to another locus? The repeat element and the methylation-sensitive enhancer blocking activity of the DMD are necessary elements for imprinting of Rasgrf1. In this aim, we will ask if they are sufficient for imprinting control. Aim 2: Is the Rasgrf1 repeat element involved in methylation maintenance? The Rasgrf1 repeat element regulates establishment of DNA methylation. In this aim, we will ask if it also plays a role in methylation maintenance. Results will reveal if establishment and maintenance of methylation have a different set of cis-acting requirements. Aim 3: Does the Rasgrf1 repeat sequence interact with any factors that are relevant to repeat function? In this aim, repeat binding factors that may be involved in control of methylation will be identified. Aim 4: Where is (are) the enhancer(s) predicted to exist 5' of the DMD? A prediction arising from our data is that one or more enhancers lie 5' of the DMD, which, when controlled by the DMD-repeat switch, result in imprinted expression. Complete validation of the model for Rasgrf1 regulation will require that the enhancers are identified. Aim 5: What regions are included on the novel paternal allele-specific transcript spanning the DMD and is it regulated by the repeats? A novel transcript spanning the region that includes part of the repeats and DMD is expressed from the paternal allele. We will characterize this transcript and determine if, like the RASGRF1 coding sequences, it is regulated by the repeats. Aim 6: Is the human RASGRF1 gene imprinted? It is not known if the human RASGRF1 gene is imprinted. In this aim, we will find out if it is.

Progress 10/01/08 to 09/30/09

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Peer reviewed journal publications; presentations at international meetings; patent applications filed. PARTICIPANTS: James R. Putnam, technician Chelsea Brideau, graduate student Nadia Drake, graduate student Patrick Murphy, graduate student Yoon Jung Park, graduate student Ruqian Zhao, visiting scientist TARGET AUDIENCES: Researchers in epigenetics and epigenomics PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Not relevant to this project.

Impacts
Outcomes of these efforts are primarily in the realm of changes in knowledge. Some of these outcomes have been published; others are the subjects of manuscripts currently under review or in preparation. All changes in knowledge relate to mechanisms that control epigenetic phenomena in mammals as modeled using laboratory mice, insights into how these mechanisms control body growth, use of epigenomic signatures to identify novel imprinted genes and the development of new technologies to assess epigenetic state.

Publications

  • Drake, N. M., Park, Y. J., Shirali, A. S., Cleland, T. A., and Soloway, P. D. (2009) "Imprint switch mutations at Rasgrf1 support conflict hypothesis of imprinting and define a growth control mechanism upstream of IGF1" Mamm Genome 20:(9-10), 654-663
  • Fasano, S., D'Antoni, A., Orban, P. C., Valjent, E., Putignano, E., Vara, H., Pizzorusso, T., Giustetto, M., Yoon, B., Soloway, P., Maldonado, R., Caboche, J., and Brambilla, R. (2009) "Ras-guanine nucleotide-releasing factor 1 (Ras-GRF1) controls activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling in the striatum and long-term behavioral responses to cocaine" Biological psychiatry 66:(8), 758-768
  • Cipriany, B. R., Zhao, R., Murphy, P. J., Levy, S. L., Tan, C. P., Craighead, H. G., and Soloway, P. D. (2010) "Single Molecule Epigenetic Analysis in a Nanofluidic Channel" Anal Chem
  • Kandalam, V., Basu, R., Abraham, T., Wang, X., Soloway, P. D., Jaworski, D. M., Oudit, G. Y., and Kassiri, Z. (2010) "TIMP2 Deficiency Accelerates Adverse Post-Myocardial Infarction Remodeling Because of Enhanced MT1-MMP Activity Despite Lack of MMP2 Activation" Circ Res


Progress 10/01/07 to 09/30/08

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Outputs include peer reviewed publications listed elsewhere in this report; grant proposals submitted to federal agencies that were approved and awarded and public lectures. PARTICIPANTS: James R. Putnam, technician Chelsea McLean, graduate student Nadia Drake, graduate student Yoon Jung Park, graduate student Anders Lindroth, post doctoral fellow Paul D. Soloway, principal investigator TARGET AUDIENCES: Not relevant to this project. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS: Nothing significant to report during this reporting period.

Impacts
Outcomes of these efforts are primarily in the realm of changes in knowledge. Some of these outcomes have been published; others are the subjects of manuscripts in preparation. All changes in knowledge relate to mechanisms that control epigenetic phenomena in mammals as modeled using laboratory mice. Highlights of the changes in knowledge include the following: two essential epigenetic modifications in the mammalian genome (DNA methylation and histone H3 lysine 27 methylation) were shown to operate in antagonism to one another; epigenomic data from ES cells, mouse embryo fibroblasts and neuronal progenitor cells were used successfully in a machine learning paradigm to identify previously unknown imprinted genes; transcriptome wide sequences was used successfully to identify additional previously unknown imprinted genes; imprinting of Rasgrf1 in mice during the perinatal period controls life long growth by early effects on the Ifg1 growth regulatory system; novel approaches to epigenomic analysis have been initiated by single molecule analysis on a nano-scale device.

Publications

  • Lindroth AM, Park YJ, McLean CM, Dokshin GA, Persson JM et al. (2008) Antagonism between DNA and H3K27 Methylation at the Imprinted Rasgrf1 Locus. PLoS Genetics 4(8): e1000145.
  • Lluri G, Langlois GD, Soloway PD, Jaworski DM (2008) Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) regulates myogenesis and beta1 integrin expression in vitro. Exp Cell Res 314(1): 11-24.
  • Wang X, Sun Q, McGrath SD, Mardis ER, Soloway PD et al. (2008) Transcriptome-wide identification of novel imprinted genes in neonatal mouse brain. PLoS ONE 3(12): e3839.


Progress 10/01/06 to 09/30/07

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Outputs completed during this reporting period include publications listed in the Publications section, presentations at international meetings including the biannual Gordon Conference on Epigenetics, media interviews and sharing of reagents with other scientists. PARTICIPANTS: National Cancer Institute, Univ of Vermont, Ontario Cancer Institute, Scripps Research Institute, Universite de Provence

Impacts
Ongoing research efforts seek to understand how epigenetic modifications are established, maintained and exchanged between chromosomal locations in the mammalian genome. The system studied in my lab is the Rasgrf1 locus, where we have identified the only known mammalian DNA methylation promoter, which functions to control local DNA methylation. This year, we have made several discoveries: (1) the DNA methylation promoter element controls not only DNA methylation, but histone methylation as well; (2) histone H3 methylation on lysine 27 antagonizes placement of DNA methylation and vise versa; (3) histone H3 methylation on lysine 9 supports placement of DNA methylation; (3) the DNA and histone methylation promoter is homologous to small 31 nt piRNA sized transcripts, which may be essential to the control of the methylation events; (4) epigenetically controlled gene expression on one allele of Rasgrf1 is affected by mutations on the homologous allele, providing an example of trans chromosomal interactions; (5) disruptions in epigenetically controlled Rasgrf1 expression states leads to aberrant growth phenotypes in mice.

Publications

  • Slape C, Chung YJ, Soloway PD, Tessarollo L, Aplan PD. 2007. Mouse embryonic stem cells that express a NUP98-HOXD13 fusion protein are impaired in their ability to differentiate and can be complemented by BCR-ABL. Leukemia 21(6):1239-1248.
  • Lluri G, Langlois GD, Soloway PD, Jaworski DM. 2007. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) regulates myogenesis and beta1 integrin expression in vitro. Exp Cell Res.
  • Soloway PD. 2006. Gene nutrient interactions and evolution. Nutr Rev 64(5 Pt 2):S52-54; discussion S72-91.
  • Soloway PD. 2006. Paramutable Possibilities. Nature 441:413-414.
  • Lluri G, Langlois GD, McClellan B, Soloway PD, Jaworski DM. 2006. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) regulates neuromuscular junction development via a beta1 integrin-mediated mechanism. J Neurobiol 66(12):1365-1377.
  • Jaworski DM, Soloway P, Caterina J, Falls WA. 2006. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2(TIMP-2)-deficient mice display motor deficits. J Neurobiol 66(1):82-94.
  • Holmes R, Soloway PD. 2006. Regulation of imprinted DNA methylation. Cytogenet Genome Res 113(1-4)122-129.
  • Holmes R, Chang Y, Soloway PD. 2006. Timing and Sequence Requirements Defined for Embryonic Maintenance of Imprinted DNA Methylation at Rasgrf1. Mol Cell Biol 26(24):9564-9570.
  • English JL, Kassiri Z, Koskivirta I, Atkinson SJ, Di Grappa M et al. 2006. Individual Timp deficiencies differentially impact pro-MMP-2 activation. J Biol Chem 281(15):10337-10346.
  • Crocker SJ, Whitmire JK, Frausto RF, Chertboonmuang P, Soloway PD et al. 2006. Persistent macrophage/microglial activation and myelin disruption after experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1-deficient mice. Am J Pathol 169(6):2104-2116.
  • Chaillan FA, Rivera S, Marchetti E, Jourquin J, Werb Z et al. 2006. Involvement of tissue inhibition of metalloproteinases-1 in learning and memory in mice. Behav Brain Res 173:191-198.


Progress 01/01/05 to 12/31/05

Outputs
Efforts have focused on two issues: Understanding mechanisms of epigenetic regulation and mapping genes that control the effects of diet on colon cancer. In mammals, DNA is methylated at at CpGs and associated histones are methylated at lysines. Proper methylation is crucial for normal development and inappropriate methylation contributes to cancer. Little is known about how methylation is controlled. We previously identified a repeated DNA sequence that regulates establishment of DNA methylation in the male germ line at Rasgrf1. This year, we showed that the same sequence regulates maintenance of paternal allele DNA methylation in somatic tissue of fertilized embryos, but only during the first 5 days of embryogenesis in mice prior to the epiblast stage. Beyond this very early period of development, the methyl-regulating sequence is dispensable. In related studies, we have shown that in addition to regulating DNA methylation, the repeat sequence also regulates histone H3 tri-methlation on lysine 27 of the maternal allele. Furthermore, DNA methylation is able to exclude histone H3 lysine 27 methylation. This work demonstrates that patterns of histone and DNA methylation at this locus are coordinately regulated and involve a common mechanism. In a second project, we are studying nutrient-genome interactions relevant to cancer. Many studies have shown that diet influences cancer rates. As with many environmental variables, the in vivo responses are affected by genetic factors. So which genes influence how diet affects cancer? Very little is known. We are using recombinant inbred (RI) strains of mice to map genomic locations of such genes. We previously showed that two strains, C57BL/6 and A/J, harbor sufficient variability in responses to diet that they can be used to map genetic loci controlling the effects of diet on cancer. Fourteen RI strains derived from C57BL/6 and A/J were obtained from Jackson Labs, the colony was expanded and mice from each RI strain were divided into two groups. One was fed a high fat, low mineral and low vitamin western style diet. The other was fed a control diet. Both groups were given the carcinogen azoxymethyane (AOM) to induce colon cancer. After tumors had developed, we analyzed all mice for tumor number and identified three strains with diet-dependent tumor responses. The logistic regression analysis is ongoing to identify genetic loci controlling the diet-responsive phenotype.

Impacts
The first project will reveal mechanisms by which chromatin methylation patterns are controlled in the genome. It may identify therapeutic targets for manipulating these epigenetic events to control gene expression. The second project may reveal the genetic basis of how diet affects cancer outcome differently in different individuals.

Publications

  • Jaworski, D.M., J. Boone, J. Caterina, P. Soloway and W.A. Falls. 2005. Prepulse inhibition and fear-potentiated startle are altered in tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) knockout mice. Brain Res 1051(1-2): 81-9.
  • Jourquin, J., E. Tremblay, A. Bernard, G. Charton, F.A. Chaillan, E. Marchetti, F.S. Roman, P.D. Soloway, V. Dive, A. Yiotakis, M. Khrestchatisky and S. Rivera. 2005. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) modulates neuronal death, axonal plasticity, and learning and memory. Eur J Neurosci 22(10): 2569-2578.
  • Ogier, C., R. Creidy, J. Boucraut, P.D. Soloway, M. Khrestchatisky and S. Rivera. 2005. Astrocyte reactivity to Fas activation is attenuated in TIMP-1 deficient mice: an in vitro study. BMC Neurosci 6(1): 68.
  • Lee, M.M., B.J. Yoon, K. Osiewicz, M. Preston, B. Bundy, A.M. van Heeckeren, Z. Werb and P.D. Soloway. 2005. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 regulates resistance to infection. Infect Immun 73(1):661-5.
  • Mohammed, F.F., C.J. Pennington, Z. Kassiri, J.S. Rubin, P.D. Soloway, U. Ruther, D.R. Edwards and R. Khokha. 2005. Metalloproteinase inhibitor TIMP-1 affects hepatocyte cell cycle via HGF activation in murine liver regeneration. Hepatology 41(4): 857-67.
  • Kim, K.H., K. Burkhart, P. Chen, C.W. Frevert, J. Randolph-Habecker, R. C. Hackman, P.D. Soloway and D. K. Madtes. 2005. Tissue Inhibitor of MP-1 Deficiency Amplifies Acute Lung Injury in Bleomycin Exposed Mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol.
  • Yoon, B.-J., H. Herman, B. Hu, Y.J. Park, A.M. Lindroth, A. Bell, A.G. West, Y. Chang, A. Stablewski, J.C. Piel, D.I. Loukinov, V. Lobanenkov and P.D. Soloway. 2005. Rasgrf1 Imprinting is Regulated by a CTCF-dependent Methylation-Sensitive Enhancer Blocker. Mol Cell Biol 25(24): 11184-11190.


Progress 01/01/04 to 12/31/04

Outputs
Efforts have focused on two issues: Understanding mechanisms of epigenetic regulation and validating methods for mapping genes that control the effects of diet on colon cancer. In mammals, DNA is methylated at at CpGs and associated histones are methylated at lysines. Proper methylation is crucial for normal development and inappropriate methylation contributes to cancer. Little is known about how methylation is controlled. We previously identified a repeated DNA sequence that regulates establishment of DNA methylation in the male germ line at Rasgrf1. This year, we showed that the same sequence regulates maintenance of DNA methylation in somatic tissue of fertilized embryos, but only during the first 5 days of embryogenesis in mice prior to the epiblast stage. Beyond this very early period of development, the methyl-regulating sequence is dispensable. In related studies, we have shown that in addition to regulating DNA methylation, the repeat sequence also regulates histone H3 tri-methlation on lysine 9. This work demonstrates that patterns of histone and DNA methylation at this locus are coordinately regulated and involve a common mechanism. In a second project, we are studying nutrient-genome interactions relevant to cancer. Many studies have shown that diet influences cancer rates. As with many environmental variables, the in vivo responses are affected by genetic factors. So which genes influence how diet affects cancer? Very little is known. We are using recombinant inbred (RI) strains of mice to map genomic locations of such genes. To identify which RI strains would be useful for this, we used 30 mice from each of two strains, C57BL/6 and A/J as well as 30 of their F1 progeny. Each group of 30 was divided into two groups. One was fed a high fat, low mineral and low vitamin western style diet. The other was fed a control diet. Both groups were given the carcinogen azoxymethyane (AOM) to induce colon cancer. After tumors had developed, we analyzed all mice for tumor number and showed that the C57BL/6 mice were highly resistant to AOM: Only two tumors were observed, regardless of the diet used. A/J mice were susceptible to AOM with the majority of mice developing multiple tumors, but diet did not affect tumor number. The F1 mice were similar to the A/J parent, however, they developed a significantly larger tumor burden when fed the western diet. These data immediately revealed that there was no simple pattern of dominant, recessive or intermediate phenotypes typical of simple Mendelian inheritance. This also showed that there was an interaction between alleles of the two parental inbred genomes that influenced tumor outcome. The lack of simple Mendelian inheritance and the presence of allelic interactions that influenced a quantifiable phenotype are hallmarks of a complex, quantitative trait and indicates C57BL/6 and A/J are excellent tools to begin identifying the genetic loci controlling the influence of diet upon tumor development. Work with RI strains has been initiated.

Impacts
The first project will reveal mechanisms by which chromatin methylation patterns are controlled in the genome. It may identify therapeutic targets for manipulating these epigenetic events to control gene expression. The second project may reveal the genetic basis of how diet affects cancer outcome differently in different individuals.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 01/01/03 to 12/31/03

Outputs
Many of our genomics efforts over the past year have focused on understanding mechanisms of epigenetic regulation. We have been specifically interested in discovering how patterns of DNA methylation are established and propagated in the genome and how these regulate transcription and have studied this in two related projects. In mammals, DNA is methylated at cytosines within CpG dinucleotides. Properly regulated methylation is crucial for normal development. Inappropriate methylation may contribute to tumorigenesis by silencing tumor-suppressor genes or by activating growth-stimulating genes. Although many genes have been identified that acquire methylation and whose expression is methylation-sensitive, little is known about how DNA methylation is controlled. We have identified a DNA sequence that regulates establishment of DNA methylation in the male germ line at Rasgrf1. In mice, the imprinted Rasgrf1 locus is methylated on the paternal allele within a differentially methylated domain (DMD) 30 kbp 5 prime of the promoter. Expression is exclusively from the paternal allele in neonatal brain. Methylation is regulated by a repeated sequence, consisting of a 41-mer repeated 40 times, found immediately 3 prime of the DMD. The repeats are needed for both establishment of methylation in the male germ line and maintenance of methylation after fertilization. In addition, DMD methylation is required for imprinted Rasgrf1 expression. Together the DMD and repeat element constitute a binary switch that regulates the locus. We are now positioned to identify repeat interacting factors to elucidate the trans acting components that regulate DNA methylation. At Igf2r, an intronic sequence called region 2, has been shown by others to control methylation of the active maternal allele at that locus. We have shown that replacing the Rasgrf1 repeats on the paternal allele with Igf2r region 2 allows both methylation and expression of the paternal copy of Rasgrf1 demonstrating that methylation controlling sequences can function ectopically. Surprisingly, paternal transmission of the mutant allele also induced methylation and expression in trans of the normally unmethylated and silent wildtype maternal allele. Once activated, the wildtype maternal Rasgrf1 allele maintained its activated state in the next generation, independently of the paternal allele. Furthermore, the influence of the region 2 insertion at Rasgrf1 is not limited to the Rasgrf1locus on chromosome 9, instead, the mutation can exert its effects on the Igf2r locus on chromosome 17 demonstrating that trans effects are not restricted to homologous chromosomes. These results recapitulate in mice the epigenetic phenomena of paramutation described in plants and trans allele methylation and quelling described in fungi. Furthermore, this may serve as a model system for characterizing the mechanisms underlying related phenomena in humans and sheep in which susceptibility to diabetes and muscle development respectively are controlled by trans allele interactions. We have begun to ask if dietary perturbations applied to this system can produce multigenerational epigenetic alterations.

Impacts
This work will reveal mechanisms by which normal and aberrant DNA methylation patterns are established and maintained in the genome. It may identify therapeutic targets for manipulating these epigenetic events to control gene expression.

Publications

  • Herman, H., Lu, M., Anggraini, M., Sikora, A., Chang, Y., Yoon, B.-J. and Soloway, P.D. 2003. Trans-Allele Methylation and Paramutation-like Effects In Mice. Nature Genetics 34: 199-202.