Source: MICHIGAN STATE UNIV submitted to
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
TERMINATED
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0193830
Grant No.
(N/A)
Project No.
MICL02028
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Program Code
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Sep 1, 2002
Project End Date
Dec 31, 2004
Grant Year
(N/A)
Project Director
Beckwith, J. A.
Recipient Organization
MICHIGAN STATE UNIV
(N/A)
EAST LANSING,MI 48824
Performing Department
DEPT OF COMMUNITY, AGRICULTURE, RECREATION & RESOURCE STUDIES
Non Technical Summary
Although the public's attitudes toward the environment have strengthened over the past 30 years, these positive attitudes have not been reflected in corresponding gains in positive environmental behavioral change. The studies in this project examine why this is the case and explore how environmental behavior can be enhanced.
Animal Health Component
(N/A)
Research Effort Categories
Basic
20%
Applied
60%
Developmental
20%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
1310860307040%
1316010307030%
1336010307030%
Goals / Objectives
Research Objective - To evaluate the psychological determinants of environmental behavior. Specific Research Questions 1.Are worldviews or paradigms good predictors of environmental behavior? 2.What direct or indirect role does knowledge play in determining environmental behavior? 3.What strategies can be employed to remove or reduce barriers to environmental behavioral change? (Studies 1, 2 & 3) 4.Is there a generalizable model of environmental behavior? What psychological determinants (e.g. empowerment, trust, norms, values, traditional knowledge, experience) would comprise such a model? (Studies 1, 2 & 3) 5.Is traditional knowledge a determinant of environmental behavior? (Study 2 & 3) Study 1 The Endangered Species Act has achieved limited success in getting private landowners to engage in endangered species recovery. The purpose of this study is to identify the various determinants of private landowner behavior with respect to species recovery efforts on their properties. Building on Ajzen's theory of planned behavior (TPB), this research will explore the attitudes, subjective norms, personal norms, perceived behavioral control, social constraints, behavioral intentions, and realized behavior of landowners involved with endangered species recovery on private lands. Study 2 Empowerment theory suggests that individuals may gain control over important life domains such as food choices through a process of learning and skill development. This process leads to a critical awareness of the individual's role within the larger system that allows for positive and educated behavioral changes. These educated behavioral changes result in an empowered individual that understands his or her rights and responsibilities and the repercussions associated with behavioral choices. This study will examine the sources and methods of knowledge and skill development as experienced by participants in an urban community gardening program. Study 3 Fishing is an important cultural, recreational and economic activity for Native Americans in Michigan. As with other Michigan anglers, they are exposed to the presence of toxic substances in the waters of the Great Lakes Basin which pose a significant public health concern. The research project is designed to answer two key questions: 1. Is Michigan's current fish advisory an effective risk communication mechanism for Native American anglers? 2. What form would a more effective risk communication strategy, tailored to Native American anglers as the target audience, take?
Project Methods
Study 1: Landowner Perspectives on Recovery of Endangered Species: A Grounded Theory Approach. Using a grounded theory approach, two target populations, (a) private landowners with a range of experience with endangered species and (b) organizations promoting recovery efforts will be informants in a series of face-to-face semi-structured in-depth interviews. In addition to the qualitative work, a quantitative analysis will be conducted on a brief questionnaire designed to test the applicability of the TPB to the situation being researched. The study population is limited to those private landowners in Michigan whose properties are potentially suitable for a species recovery program (e.g., presence of an endangered species or suitable habitat). The species are Kirtland's warbler, Great Lakes piping plover, and Mitchell's satyr (a butterfly). Interviews will also be conducted with representatives of government agencies and other organizations working in the area of species recovery. Study 2: Personal Empowerment and Behavioral Change Through Community Gardening: The Foster Park Community Garden The study will employ a single case study methodology using the Foster Park Community Garden. Face to face in-depth interviews will be the primary source of data, supplemented by documentation and direct observation. The individuals to be interviewed in this study fall into two categories: a) community gardeners, and b) key informants. The Lansing Garden Project possesses a number of internal documents that will be used as secondary sources of information allowing for an understanding of the gardener and key informant interviews within context of the organization. Study 3: Michigan's Fish Advisory and Native American Anglers: A Risk Perception and Communication Study. Theoretically the study will draw upon the risk perception and risk communication literature. The project will use both quantitative (statistical analysis of survey data) and qualitative (focus groups, workshops) techniques. In Phase 1, a survey instrument will be designed and administered through structured face to face interviews at selected lake and river fishing locations (including the Bay Mills Indian Reservation) in the Michigan Upper Peninsula (UP) during the fishing season. Specific survey locations will be determined in consultation with UP Native American communities. Both Native American anglers and a comparison group of other anglers will be surveyed. The survey data will be used to develop lay risk perception models for Native American and other anglers. In Phase 2, a review will be conducted of the fish advisory materials and processes used in other Great Lake states and provinces. Focus groups and workshops will be conducted in the UP with Native American anglers, representatives of the Sault Tribal Government, and relevant state agencies (e.g., Department of Natural Resources, MDCH, MSU Extension in the UP). These activities will focus on the design of a risk communication strategy tailored to Native American anglers and their households. This will include the identification of preferred presentation formats, content, and methods of message dissemination.

Progress 09/01/02 to 12/31/04

Outputs
Two research projects were undertaken under this umbrella project. Project 1: Recreational Anglers and Michigan's Fish Consumption Advisory The study examines whether Michigan's current fish consumption guide is an effective risk communication tool for recreational anglers of inland waters. Recreational anglers are a vulnerable group because of their higher than average consumption of sport caught fish. Interviews were conducted with 98 individuals fishing on either Michigan's Bear River or St. Mary's River during the fall 2003 fishing season. Project 2: A Study of the Efficacy of Public Issues Forums as a Mechanism for Empowering Communities to Participate in Environmental Cleanups. The purpose of the research study is to evaluate the effectiveness of public issues forums as a means of enhancing the level of involvement of these citizens in decision making processes. The Tittabawassee/Saginaw River Dioxin contamination remediation project has been selected as the location for this study. The research project has two major stages. First is development of treatment materials in the form of an issue guide providing background information on the selected case including scientific information on the contamination and several scenarios for a clean-up. In the second stage, facilitated small group discussions are conducted with local unaligned citizens on the selected case and topics covered in the issue guide. Changes in participant knowledge and attitudes are measured through pre and post testing surveys. The quality of deliberative discourse is evaluated through an analysis of group video tapes. This study is being conducted under an USEPA-MSU research cooperative agreement. The data collection phase has been completed. The analysis phase is ongoing.

Impacts
Will aid in closing the gap between theory and practice in the environmental planning field through more effective translation of attitudes to desired environmental behaviors.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 01/01/03 to 12/31/03

Outputs
Study 1 - Landowners and Endangeredd Species Recovery. Data has been collected and is now being analyzed. Expected completion of project by fall 2004. Two articles already published. Study 2 - Community Gardening. Data analysis completed and journal articles are in preparation. One draft article is titled Civic Agriculture: Does Public Space Require Public Ownership? authors: Kimberly Chung, Robert J. Kirkby, Lamar Chet Kendell, and Jo Ann Beckwith. Others in preparation. Study 2 - Michigan's Fish Advisory: A Risk Perception and Communication Study. Survey data has been collected and is being analyzed.

Impacts
Will aid in closing the gap between theory and practice in the environmental planning field through more effective translation of attitudes to desired environmental behaviors.

Publications

  • Hadlock, T. & J. Beckwith. 2002. Providing Incentives for Endangered Species Recovery. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7 (3): 197-213.
  • Hadlock, T. & J. Beckwith. 2002. Problems with Recovery Under the Endangered Species Act. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7 (1): 37-54.