Progress 09/01/02 to 08/31/04
Outputs This project analyzes media coverage and effects on public opinion in the area of biotechnology. Current aspects of the project include content analysis of science and biotechnology, and opinion surveys.
Impacts Increased public understanding of agricultural biotechnology has consistently been the goal of this project.
Publications
- Besley, J., & Shanahan, J. 2005. Exploring the relationship between media attention and exposure and support for agricultural biotechnology. Science Communication.
- Besley, J. C., & Shanahan, J. 2004. Skepticism about media effects concerning the environment: Examining Lomborg's hypotheses. Society and Natural Resources, 17, 861-880.
|
Progress 01/01/03 to 12/31/03
Outputs A variety of papers and reports were published relative to public understanding of biotechnology. These efforts continue to focus on basic issues of understanding of biotechnology, especially within New York State but also nationally and internationally.
Impacts Increased public understanding of agricultural biotechnology has consistently been the goal of this project.
Publications
- D. Brossard & J. Shanahan. 2003. Do they want to have their say? Media, agricultural biotechnology, and authoritarian views of democratic processes in science. Mass Communication and Society, 2003, 6(3): 291-312.
- Shanahan, J.E., M. Nisbet, D. Scheufele, B. Lewenstein, P. Moy, & D. Brossard. 2002. Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology. Communication Research, 2002, 29(5): 584-608.
|
Progress 01/01/02 to 12/31/02
Outputs This project analyzes media coverage and effects on public opinion in teh area of biotechnology. Cuirrent aspects of the project include content analysis of science and biotechnology, and opinion surveys. Data gathering is under way for these studies.
Impacts (N/A)
Publications
- Nisbet, M., Scheufele, D., Shanahan, J., Moy, P. & Brossard, D. 2002. Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology. Communication Research, 584-608.
|
|