Source: CORNELL UNIVERSITY submitted to
IMPACTS OF AGRICULTURAL INSECTICIDE USE ON AMPHIBIAN POPULATIONS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0190769
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2001
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2004
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
CORNELL UNIVERSITY
(N/A)
ITHACA,NY 14853
Performing Department
ECOLOGY & EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Non Technical Summary
Previous studies have shown reduced amphibian species diversity associated with agricultural areas, where high levels of organochlorine pesticides are applied. This project will compare genetic diversity in populations of amphibians living in conventional, IPM, and organic farms to assess the effects of agricultural practices on amphibian population genetic structure.
Animal Health Component
80%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
20%
Applied
80%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
1350330104030%
1350330106015%
1350330115040%
2160330106015%
Goals / Objectives
1. Assess and predict impacts of current and changing insecticide use practices on vegetable farms in central NY on water quality and local amphibian populations. 2. Determine whether historically organic farms or uncultivated areas have "safer" water, and compare these to gradients in insecticide contamination, including pesticide intensive farms and integrated pest management (IPM) farms. 3. Quantify the effect of pesticide contamination on the genetic diversity of local amphibian populations, and the predicted influence on regional "metapopulations". This will determine whether contaminated ponds (populations) act as genetic "sinks" within the ranges of these metapopulations. 4. Establish a baseline for future quantification of environmental risks/benefits of changes in pesticide input.
Project Methods
This project considers the effects of reduced pesticide use (by comparing conventional, IPM and organic farms) on amphibian populations dependant on water bodies in close proximity to farms. As amphibians are recognized as excellent indicators of water quality, they can provide a functional indicator group to monitor the impacts of changes in the use of potential pollutants of water bodies. We will use high resolution molecular techniques, such as microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) to assess population status and viability in increasingly altered wetland ecosystems. We will compare selected farms with different pesticide-use histories (e.g. pesticide intensive, integrated, organic), and 1) determine whether significant residues of pesticides are present in water bodies on the farms, 2) evaluate genetic diversity and heterozygosity within each population to determine the extent of pesticide contamination that may influence genetic structure of naturally breeding populations.

Progress 10/01/01 to 09/30/04

Outputs
We have completed our exploration of molecular assays as a measure of agricultural impact to amphibian populations breeding in farm ponds. Our efforts to develop the AFLP analyses met with some unexpected difficulties, forcing us to focus on two of the four species we had originally proposed. We found that for those two species of common frogs, the patterns of genetic distribution vary in traditional and organic farms, but that the impact of farming alone is sufficient to alter the geographic distribution of genetic diversity. Our findings are corroborated by a recently published paper (Gustafson et al., 2001, J. Environmental Management) demonstrating that amphibian populations are highly sensitive to land use changes, and therefore the primary disturbance (modification of land for agriculture) has more impact than the choice of agricultural procedures, as measured by the populations breeding in farm ponds. Our results have led us to explore other changes in frogs, such as increased susceptibility to disease and changes in reproductive function, that might serve as better indicators of the relative impact of different farming practices on natural populations. Using our pilot data, my lab has submitted a proposal to the New York State Biodiversity Research Institute to continue work on this system.

Impacts
An objective assay for the genetic consequences of farming practices on amphibian populations will help define the thresholds for impact on these species. Our expectation is that populations breeding in ponds that receive runoff from pesticide application in traditional farms will have the genetic signature of bottlenecked populations. If these expectations are met, our assay will enable an independent test for the environmental benefits of practices that reduce application of pesticides to crops.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 01/01/03 to 12/31/03

Outputs
The goal of our Hatch grant is to develop a molecular assay that can be used to determine the impact of traditional and organic farming on amphibian populations breeding in farm ponds. During the past year we have developed and optimized the molecular protocols for applying AFLP analyses in tadpoles of 4 different species, and began collections of tadpoles from ponds that are found on organic and traditional farms. We encountered some difficulties when comparing genetic diversity from various species; primarily because in our AFLP analyses our primer combination that yielded reliable amplification of 30-50 bands (the target number for comparisons among populations) did not work equally well for all species. We are working further on this fine-tune the laboratory protocols and should have them worked out in the next few months. During the next breeding season (Feb/March) we will perform the bulk of the collections and test the generality of this molecular assay of amphibian population health.

Impacts
An objective assay for the genetic consequences of farming practices on amphibian populations will help define the thresholds for impact on these species. Our expectation is that populations breeding in ponds that receive runoff from pesticide application in traditional farms will have the genetic signature of bottlenecked populations. If these expectations are met, our assay will enable an independent test for the environmental benefits of practices that reduce application of pesticides to crops.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 01/01/02 to 12/31/02

Outputs
The goal of our Hatch grant is to develop a molecular assay that can be used to determine the impact of traditional and organic farming on amphibian populations breeding in farm ponds. During the past year we have developed and optimized the molecular protocols for applying AFLP analyses in tadpoles of 4 different species, and began collections of tadpoles from ponds that are found on organic and traditional farms. In a preliminary sampling, we collected tadpole samples from 6 ponds and used the 4 species collected at these sites to develop the molecular assay for genetic heterogeneity, using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). AFLP analyses works well for all 4 species tested and after extensive optimization we found a primer combination that yielded reliable amplification of 30-50 bands (the target number for comparisons among populations). The laboratory protocols are now in place. During the next breeding season we will focus on collecting larger samples, to test the generality of this molecular assay of amphibian population health.

Impacts
An objective assay for the genetic consequences of farming practices on amphibian populations will help define the thresholds for impact on these species. Our expectation is that populations breeding in ponds that receive runoff from pesticide application in traditional farms will have the genetic signature of bottlenecked populations. If these expectations are met, our assay will enable an independent test for the environmental benefits of practices that reduce application of pesticides to crops.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period