Source: UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS submitted to NRP
EFFECTS OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT ON OLDER ADULTS
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0190718
Grant No.
(N/A)
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
(N/A)
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Oct 1, 2001
Project End Date
Sep 30, 2007
Grant Year
(N/A)
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS
(N/A)
FAYETTEVILLE,AR 72703
Performing Department
HUMAN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Non Technical Summary
Home transitions for older adults are difficult. The purpose of this project is to analyze the environmental usage patterns and the contribution of architectural and interior elements to the concept of home. The analysis will provide data to facilitate the design of alternate living environments for older adults.
Animal Health Component
25%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
50%
Applied
25%
Developmental
25%
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
80460203110100%
Goals / Objectives
1. To clarify the definition of home among today's older adults as a function of their age, socio-economic level, and current living environment. 2. To investigate the contribution of interior elements to the concept of home as perceived by older adults of differing ages, socio-economic levels and current living environment. 3. To investigate territoriality and privacy mechanisms used by older adults in home and congregate living environments. 4. To investigate the contribution of the luminous environment to the concept of home and to identify illumination techniques and lighting levels that further compliment the concept of home. 5. To investigate the perception of home in the private and public spaces of congregate living environments.
Project Methods
Objective One Method: For Objectives One and Two, older adults (aged 55 and up) will be interviewed in his/her private residence. Approximately 25 individuals will be sought through churches, practitioners, and organizations. Each participant will be informed of the project goals and will be asked to participate in private interview sessions with the investigator. The interviews will be semi-structured. Information sought will include background information, daily activities and routines, life history, relationships, and events as centered around the home. The interview responses will be tape recorded and transcribed for analysis. The interview responses will be analyzed for categories or patterns within the content. Objective Two Method: Data collection will include semi-structured interviews, photo-documentation, and questionnaires. A quantitative instrument developed from Objective One findings will be administered following the interview. Objective Three Method: Environment-behavior techniques including behavioral mapping (systematic recording of activities/behaviors on floor plans), trace observation (systematic examination of physical surroundings to find reflections of previous unconscious or conscious activity) and person-environment observation (systematically watching people use their environments) will be used to determine methods of claiming and defending territories in private homes as well as in congregate living environments. Participants will respond to the Privacy Scale, the Territorial Behavior Scale, the Adjustment Scale, and the Environmental Perception Scale. Objective Four Method. The luminous environment will be examined using environmental assessment instruments, focused interviews, and photo-documentation. Objective four will consist of two phases. Phase one will examine the lighting in private residences of independent older adults who are participants for objectives one and two. Field instruments will address both quantitative/objective and qualitative/subjective elements of the luminous environment. The instrument will record and assess the features of the luminous environment that accommodate vision requirements of older adults. It will be composed of rating scales and check sheets and supplemented with field notes. Locations of lighting fixtures, switches, and windows will be noted on floor plans. Photo-documentation will be used to record the appearance of both lighting fixtures and lighting conditions within interior spaces. Phase two will use an experimental approach in a field setting to manipulate specific aspects of the luminous environment. Data collection methods may include observation with behavioral mapping and field notes, participant questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews.

Progress 10/01/01 to 09/30/07

Outputs
OUTPUTS: Outcomes for the project titled "Effects of the Built Environment on Older Adults" include conference presentations concerning the research method as well as findings. Data collected as part of the Arkansas Poll (Living Arrangements of Older Adults) was analyzed and disseminated through radio broadcasts on KUAF, at the 24th Annual Arkansas Aging Conference, and through the Department of Political Science website. The Arkansas Health and Housing Survey was completed and data have been presented at three different international meetings of the Interior Design Educators Council and at three different international meetings of the Environmental Design Research Association. The Arkansas Governor's Task Force on Housing received a summary report of the AHHS data that was subsequently published online via studioaid.org. Data from the AHHS study has been and continues to be disseminated through peer reviewed journals and face-to-face presentations with stakeholders in Arkansas (home builders, contractors, policymakers, and service providers). A new Model of Person Environment Fit has been presented at a national conference, forms the theoretical framework for a book on housing and disability in the south, and has been presented in classes in interior design, architecture, and rehabilitation sciences. There are plans to develop the data from the AHHS and the Person-Environment Fit model into educational modules for allied professionals in the building industry and to policy makers at the local, state, and national levels. PARTICIPANTS: Nancy G. Miller, Associate Professor, School of Human Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas; Naz Kaya, Assistant Professor, University of Georgia; Korydon H. Smith, Assistant Professor School of Architecture, University of Arkansas; Brent T. Williams, Assistant Professor, Department of Rehabilitiation Sciences, University of Arkansas. Funding provided for the Arkansas Health and Housing Survey: Arkansas Rehabilitation Services; Arkansas Dept. of Health & Human Services, Division of Aging and Adult Services, Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services; UAMS, Partners for Inclusive Communities. Training provided for the Northwest Arkansas Home Builders Association and for the Governor's Taskforce for Affordable Housing. TARGET AUDIENCES: Arkansas residents, home builders and contractors, home designers including architects, interior designers, furniture designers, kitchen and bath specialists, policy makers, legislators, and service providers.

Impacts
The healthcare and housing industries are the two largest economic forces and have the most extensive social and financial impacts on individuals and families in the United States. Current support systems for housing and healthcare for older adults and people with disabilities relies heavily on nursing home care and assisted living, both of which are costly and result in a lower quality of life. The research efforts revealed that while the overwhelming majority of Arkansans wish to live at home, they understand that they will experience significant decline in health over their lifespan. At the same time, Arkansans did not believe the design of their homes would impact their ability to live independently. The lack of understanding concerning independent living and environmental design indicates that extensive educational efforts are needed for policy makers, housing designers, and consumers. Equally important is the indication that design and construction must be re-visioned to respond to not only the physical and emotional needs of an individual but to provide housing that is accessible financially to all Arkansans. Privacy in congregate living environments has been defined and the use of behavioral and physical mechanisms to create desired levels of privacy are better understood. There are clear indications that current design solutions do not support residents' perceived need for privacy. Recommendations for design standards can be made and improve satisfaction with congregate living environments. Data collected from a statewide sample on the Living Arrangements for Older Arkansans revealed that Arkansans believe that they wish to remain in their homes throughout the lifespan. This indicates that housing and service providers must be better prepared for the aging Baby Boom generation. Additionally, respondents indicate a lack of knowledge concerning the funding of later life medical care. Efforts must be made to educate consumers and service providers alike.

Publications

  • Smith, K. H., Williams, B. T., Webb, J. D. (2008). "Introduction" in Just Below the Line: A Primer on Housing, Disability, and Equity in the South, Korydon Smith, Jennifer Webb, Brent Williams, eds., University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, AR. (In press).
  • Webb, J. D. and Miller, N. G. (2008). "Chapter 2: Defining Home," in Just Below the Line: A Primer on Housing, Disability, and Equity in the South, Korydon Smith, Jennifer Webb, Brent Williams, eds., University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, AR. (In press).
  • Webb, J. D. and Smith, K. H. (2008). "Chapter 4: Defining Policy and Practice," in Just Below the Line: A Primer on Housing, Disability, and Equity in the South, Korydon Smith, Jennifer Webb, Brent Williams, eds., University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, AR. (In press).
  • Webb, J. D., Smith, K.H., Williams, B.T., and Miller, N. G. (2008). "Chapter 5: Redefining Disability," in Just Below the Line: A Primer on Housing, Disability, and Equity in the South, Korydon Smith, Jennifer Webb, Brent Williams, eds., University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, AR. (In press).
  • Williams, B.T., Smith, K.H., and Webb, J. D. (2008). "Chapter 8: Redefining Policy and Practice," in Just Below the Line: A Primer on Housing, Disability, and Equity in the South, Korydon Smith, Jennifer Webb, Brent Williams, eds., University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, AR. (In press).
  • Smith, K.H., Williams, B.T. and Webb, J. D. (2008). "Conclusion" in Just Below the Line: A Primer on Housing, Disability, and Equity in the South, Korydon Smith, Jennifer Webb, Brent Williams, eds., University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, AR. (In press).
  • Smith, K.H., Webb, J.D., Miller, N.G., and Williams, B.T. (2006) "Arkansas Health and Housing Survey 2006: Summary Report," http://studioaid.org/.
  • Webb, J. D., Kaya, N. and Miller, N. G. (2005). Do Past Living Environments Influence Older Adults' Environmental Perception in Congregate Living Environments. Proceedings of the Interior Design Educators' Council International Conference. Savannah, Georgia.
  • Webb, J.D., Miller, N.G., and Turner, J. (2004). Senior Living Arrangements: Findings from the 2003 Arkansas Poll. The Proceedings of the 24th Annual Arkansas Aging Conference, Hot Springs, Arkansas.
  • Smith, K. H., Webb, J. D., and Williams, B. T. (2008). Just Below the Line: A Primer on Housing, Disability, and Equity in the South, University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, AR. (In press).


Progress 01/01/06 to 12/31/06

Outputs
The healthcare and housing industries are the two largest economic forces and have the most extensive social and financial impacts on individuals and families in the US. The current support system, in terms of housing and healthcare for older adults and people with disabilities, relies heavily on nursing home care and various forms of assisted living. This type of living environment is problematic for two reasons: cost and perceived quality of life. Nursing home care is more than double that of in home care; nursing home care costs the federal government more than 150 billion dollars annually. The purpose of this research is to better understand the fit between the person and the built environment and, more specifically, the individual and his or her home. Investigators conducted the Arkansas Housing and Health Survey to examine housing preference and perceived health status across the state. The results indicate that while the overwhelming majority of Arkansans wish to live at home, they understand that they will experience significant decline in health over their lifespan. At the same time, Arkansans do not believe the design of their homes will impact their ability to live independently. This disconnect suggests that most Arkansans will be poorly prepared as they approach later life and the demand for appropriate housing will create hardships on many indivduals and families. Investigators are preparing information to be disseminated across the state with several objectives. First, Arkansas' policy makers, housing designers, and consumers must be educated on the impact housing design has on individual's abilities to live independently. Second, housing designers and builders must be educated to a new standard that encompasses inclusive design for people of all ages and functionality. Finally, both design and construction must be re-visioned to respond to not only the physical and emotional needs of an individual but to provide housing that is accessible financially to all Arkansans.

Impacts
Policy makers, housing designers, home builders, and consumers will be better informed as to the issues associated with creating equitable housing. Through the construction of housing that fulfills Arkansans' needs, state, federal and private funds can be shifted from costly nursing home care to provide basic, preventative healthcare for the state's residents.

Publications

  • Webb, J.D., Smith, K.D.H., and Williams, B.T. (December, 2006). Perceptions of independent living: influences on the relationship between disability and design. Interdisciplinary Design Research Journal, Vol 1, no. 1. Retrievable from http://www.idrp.wsu.edu/googlefd44a7f0b1456374.html.
  • Webb, J.D., Smith, K.H., and Miller, N.G. (May, 2006). Using Q-Sort to evaluate environmental components of home. Proceedings of the Environmental Design Research Association, 37th Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia.


Progress 01/01/05 to 12/31/05

Outputs
This study has investigated the need for privacy of the older adults and the ways in which they regulate their privacy via behavioral mechanisms in congregate living environments. Structured interviews were conducted with 71 adults residing in independent and assisted living settings. Results revealed that independent living and assisted living residents differed in the use of behavioral mechanisms to either gain social contact or avoid social interaction with others. Independent living residents achieved more privacy than assisted living residents. However, no significant difference was found in the desired privacy level between the two living arrangements. Assisted living residents displayed better personal adjustment than independent living residents. Older adults who felt crowded in their living spaces, reported lower personal adjustment and overall adjustment scores than older adults whose level of achieved privacy was greater than desired (isolated) or those whose privacy was optimized (i.e., desired privacy equals achieved privacy). These findings suggest that both facility policies and design can have a positive impact on privacy control and adjustment. Design recommendations include smaller congregate sitting areas near resident's rooms for informal meetings, views into activity areas, variety of travel distances to activity areas, flexible room sizes and shapes to facilitate the arrangement of furniture thereby impacting visiting and interaction between residences. Additional efforts include a comprehensive pilot study utlizing computer generated models relative to housing preference and architectural elements. Data collection on this phase of the research should begin Spring, 2006.

Impacts
By applying the findings of this project, interior designers and architects can improve the design of living environments for older adults in long term care settings. Privacy and control over one's environment has been linked to emotional well-being, and the findings of this study can be applied in the design of these environments. These environments can lead to more successful adjustment in new living environments and enhance the quality of life for older adults. The information may be further used by facility administrators and caregivers in determining policy within these living environments.

Publications

  • Kaya, N., Webb, J., and Miller, N.G. (2005). Adjustment to congregate living environments: older adults and privacy regulation. Journal of Interior Design, 31(1), 14-24.


Progress 01/01/04 to 12/30/04

Outputs
Researchers from two universities collected data in residents of two assisted-living facilities and one independent living facility with similar philosophies of care, size, and services in the southern United States. Participants were asked background questions concerning their previous living environment, territorial behaviors, and perceived crowding in their present living environment. Findings indicate that assisted-living residents have firmer boundaries than independent-living residents. Assisted living residents, for this reason, share personal belongings and room features with other residents/roommates less than independent-living residents. Assisted-living residents reported more personalization and claiming behavior compared to independent-living residents. Assisted-living residents experienced their rooms as more personal and expressive of self than independent-living residents. Furthermore, independent-living residents evaluated their living spaces as more comfortable, more personal, more open, and more quiet than assisted-living residents The size of the preceding environment was also related to evaluation of having things of value/importance in the present living space, reflection of self and reflection of the facility in the private living areas. A significant determinant in all relationships was length of time in the present living environment.

Impacts
This knowledge will aid developers, architects, and long term care administrators in the planning and design of congregate living environments for older adults. Territoriality and crowding are significant to adjustment in any novel environment and the provision of architectural mechanisms contributes to quality of life. Older adults will benefit from the increased sensitivity of designers and caregivers. Further, administrators and family members can better aid residents in the transition from home to congregate care.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 01/01/03 to 12/31/03

Outputs
This phase of the project investigated differences in achieved privacy levels and behaviors for older adults residing in independent living environments and assisted living environments. Assisted and independent living environments were contacted in three southern states and selected for similar philosophies of care, size, and services provided. Interviews with adults residing in independent and assisted living settings were completed. Structured interviews included scaled questions measuring achieved and desired privacy levels and privacy mechanisms including contact-seeking and contact-avoiding behaviors. Independent samples t-tests indicated no significant difference in desired privacy levels of older adults in either setting. Achieved privacy levels were significantly different between the environments. Independent living residents achieved more privacy than assisted living residents. Results also showed significant differences in privacy mechanisms that elderly used in their living settings. Contact-seeking behaviors were significantly different between individuals in assisted and independent settings. Assisted living residents opened the door to their room more often than independent living residents. Conversely, inviting other people to the room was used significantly more often by those in independent living compared to those in assisted living. No differences were found in going to other places or planning activities at times where people were around, calling someone on the phone, or visiting others' rooms. Among the contact-avoiding behaviors, average use of finding a quiet place in the building was higher for independent living residents than for assisted living residents. No differences were found in closing door to one's room, playing music to reduce distractions, going for a walk alone, and getting up early or staying up late. Conflicting results were found with loneliness and crowding scores with those in assisted living facilities. Those in independent living settings experienced higher levels of solitude than those in assisted living settings.

Impacts
Transition from home to congregate living offers challenges for older adults. These challenges include privacy regulation which optimizes desired levels of social interaction and solitude. Although previous research has established the need for privacy in congregate living environments, specific behavioral mechanisms in privacy regulation have not been investigated for this population and setting. The findings of the current study will contribute to the research base and can be applied to the design of living environments for older adults.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 01/01/02 to 12/31/02

Outputs
Principal activities during 2002 included visiting funding agencies in Washington, DC and preparing a project proposal, with the research to be completed by summer 2003. Researchers have developed a research proposal for one phase of the project during fall semester 2002 in collaboration with other researchers at the University of Arkansas and the University of Georgia. In addition, an interview instrument was created using scales developed by the University of Georgia investigators. To increase generalizability, data will be collected in Arkansas, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Georgia. The primary purpose of this phase of the study is to determine what privacy regulation mechanisms (contact-seeking and contact-avoiding behaviors) are used by older adults residing in supportive, congregate environments. The individual factors that are considered as important include previous living arrangements, present living arrangements, and discrepancy scores between achieved and desired privacy levels (crowded, optimum, and isolated). Furthermore, the relationships between the desired and achieved levels of privacy and the perception of crowding in residential settings will be investigated as a function of privacy control mechanisms afforded by the built environment. Also, the differences in the crowding perception scores of participants (crowded, optimum, and isolated) will be examined on the basis of culture and gender.

Impacts
By applying the findings of this project, interior designers and architects can improve the design of living environments for older adults in long term care settings. Privacy and control over one's environment has been linked to emotional well-being, and the findings of this study can be applied in the design of these environments. These environments can lead to more successful adjustment in new living environments and enhance the quality of life for older adults. The information may be further used by facility administrators and caregivers in determining policy within these living environments.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period