Source: UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS submitted to NRP
PHYTOSEIIDS AND SPINOSAD FOR THRIPS: IPM IN GREENHOUSE EFFICACY AND COMPATIBILITY
Sponsoring Institution
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Status
COMPLETE
Funding Source
Reporting Frequency
Annual
Accession No.
0188366
Grant No.
2001-34103-10407
Cumulative Award Amt.
(N/A)
Proposal No.
2001-03532
Multistate No.
(N/A)
Project Start Date
Aug 1, 2001
Project End Date
Jul 31, 2004
Grant Year
2001
Program Code
[(N/A)]- (N/A)
Recipient Organization
UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS
(N/A)
AMHERST,MA 01003
Performing Department
PLANT, SOIL & INSECT SCIENCE
Non Technical Summary
Bedding plants (transplants for garden use) are a major crop. In the NE U.S., they generate $343,000,000 in annual sales. This "hidden" crop is composed of diverse plant material, but is unified by production methods and timing and is a major contributor to the incomes of many small producers. In surveys, growers of bedding plants have identified western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis) as their most important pest, as judged by pesticide application number. Work in MA showed the predatory mite Neoseiulus cucumeris can control WFT in spring bedding plants. However, there is not enough information from realistic field trials to rely on this control method at this time. We need more knowledge on thrips control by predatory mites in bedding plants. We will compare efficacy of two mites and study their potentials to be integrated with spinosad, the insecticide used against WFT in greenhouses. We propose to test N. cucumeris and a new phytoseiid from Australia known as Ozzie 1. We will run laboratory tests to determine the compatibility of spinosad with both species. Finally, we will compare the control provided by the better mite when used alone versus its efficacy when combined with spinosad. These trials will help integrate biological control into western flower thrips control programs in flower production.
Animal Health Component
50%
Research Effort Categories
Basic
50%
Applied
50%
Developmental
(N/A)
Classification

Knowledge Area (KA)Subject of Investigation (SOI)Field of Science (FOS)Percent
21621221130100%
Knowledge Area
216 - Integrated Pest Management Systems;

Subject Of Investigation
2122 - Potted plants;

Field Of Science
1130 - Entomology and acarology;
Goals / Objectives
Obj. 1. Comparison of WFT control by N. cucumeris and Ozzie #1 in bedding plant crops. The goal of this objective is to determine how well the major commercially available predatory mite (N. cucumeris) sold for thrips control works in bedding crops in commercial greenhouses under northeastern U.S. conditions and to compare its efficacy with what may well be the next important predator mite commercialized for thrips control (Ozzie 1, being brought into mass production in 2001 by Novartis). We believe, based on preliminary trials in MA and NY in 2000 that N. cucumeris will provide adequate control, but it may not do so in all cases. We don't know how well Ozzie 1 will work and we need to find out as this product will soon be marketed. Obj. 2. Determination of compatibility of spinosad with N. cucumeris and Ozzie #1. Spinosad (Conserve) is the major insecticide used for WFT control. Some evidence suggests that it may be compatible with phytoseiid mites, but there are no data on this. Growers who use predatory mites for biological thrips control may need to supplement these mites with chemical applications if control is insufficient or begins to fail before harvest. If there is a compatible chemical that could be used without persistent damage to the predatory mites, it would be beneficial. If spinosad, the compound most growers are now using for thrips control were compatible, it would be especially good as growers would be very comfortable with that as their back up product. We don't have this information and need to run some rather straight forward laboratory tests to get it.Obj. 3. Assessment of integration of spinosad and phytoseiids in commercial greenhouses. Given the laboratory measurements of compatibility of these phytoseiids and spinosad, we next want to assess what happens to both thrips control and phytoseiid numbers when a spinosad application is added to a thrips biological control program in mid-crop. We will compare this to the use of mite releases alone to see if laboratory estimates of spinosad's compatibility are borne out in real crops. We will also include comparison to spinosad used alone to determine the contribution of the addition of mites to the IPM package.
Project Methods
Obj. 1. Comparison of WFT control by N. cucumeris and Ozzie #1 in bedding plant crops. This trial will be run at three commercial greenhouse businesses in MA. At each site there will be three test greenhouses. Two will be phytoseiid mite release greenhouses, one for N. cucumeris and one for Ozzie 1. The third greenhouse will be a chemical control greenhouse in which the grower will apply insecticides for thrips suppression as he or she sees fit based on counts of thrips on sticky cards, which we will provide. The grower, however, will make any decisions about whether or not to spray and which products to use. The release rate and frequency for N. cucumeris will be the same as we employed in our spring 2000 trial (10,000 mites per 1000 sq. ft.) repeated in weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 of the 10 week crop) because we have confidence that this rate can work. The application rate for Ozzie 1 will be the same, unless the insectary has a different, specific recommended rate. Obj. 2.Determination of compatibility of spinosad with N. cucumeris and Ozzie #1. To determine the relative compatibility of spinosad with these mites, we will run tests on (1) direct toxicity, (2) effect on egg laying, and (3) repellency. For comparison, the direct toxicity test will also include first instar larvae and adult females of western flower thrips and both thrips and mites will be tested at both the maximum labeled rate and half maximum labeled rate. Obj. 3. Assessment of integration of spinosad and phytoseiids in commercial greenhouses. Based on the results of work for the first two objectives, by the second year of the project (2003), we should have information to suggest if one mite gives better control than the other and whether or not Conserve is compatible with either species of mite in laboratory assays. We will then conduct a second grower trial. As in the first year's trial, it will be run at three locations and at each location there will be two biological control greenhouses and one chemical control greenhouse. In one biological control greenhouse, we will release the better of the two mite species but make no application of Conserve. In the second biological control greenhouse, we will combine releases of the same mite with one mid crop application of Conserve at the high label rate. In the chemical control greenhouse, one high rate application of Conserve will be made on the same date on which Conserve is applied in the mites plus spinosad greenhouse.

Progress 08/01/01 to 07/31/04

Outputs
Objectives for this project were to run greenhouse trials to determine if releases of the phytoseiid mite Neoseiulus cucumeris could effectively suppress population growth of western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis), either alone or in combination with the insecticide spinosad. We ran three trials. Trial one was done in six commercial greenhouses filled with spring bedding plants. There were two replicates of each of three treatments (mites at the commercial rate, spinosad at label rate, or both). As the measure of outcome, we trapped adult thrips with yellow sticky cards. Under commercial greenhouse conditions there was too much variability in plant species in the greenhouse and too much between-greenhouse movement of plants by growers to see clear treatment effects. In one block, spinosad alone was highly effective, but in the other it was not. Mites were not highly effective in either block. Trial two was run in University greenhouses in pure impatiens monocultures, with two replications (over time) of the same three treatments as in Trial 1. Using thrips per flower as the measure of outcome, mite releases caused ca 50% reduction in both larvae and adults of western flower thrips. To see if a higher mite release rate might increase the level of control, Trial 3 was run in the same university greenhouses, with three replications (over time) of two rates of mite release (the commercially recommended rate and 3.8X that rate) plus an untreated control. In two replicates, the higher mite release rate was better than the commercially recommended rate, providing ca 80% control of larvae in flowers, but having no obvious effect on adults per flower. A manuscript has been prepared covering these trials and has been submitted to the journal Biological Control and is in review. The other objective of this grant was to assess the compatibility of spinosad with N. cucumeris. This was done by measuring mortality and oviposition of mites exposed to spinosad residues. This compound was found to have only minimal effects on this mite. The results of this study are being prepared for publication.

Impacts
This study provides evidence that releases of N. cucumeris are only partially effective in suppressing WFT within a ten week impatiens crop, even at 3.8X the commercially recommended rate. Spinosad was found to be highly effective and to have no impact on N. cucumeris, so the two approaches can be used together without conflict, and the combination should be useful in slowing the development of resistance by thrips to spinosad. One impact of this work is to advise growers that this particular biological control method is not highly effective.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 10/01/02 to 09/30/03

Outputs
Obj. 1. Because the trial run in 2002 under commercial condition was too variable in crop composition and starting pest levels among greenhouses available to assign to treatments, in 2003, we repeated the trial with N. cucumeris (mite alone, mite+spinosad, or spinosad alone) in UMASS greenhouses with impatiens as the only crop, replicated twice over time. Treatments were imposed and results scored as either WFT adults caught on yellow sticky cards (weekly) or as numbers of WFT (adults and larvae) counted in randomly chosen flowers. Based on sticky card counts, both spinosad alone and spinosad plus N. cucumeris suppressed thrips to 1 or fewer thips per card per week, in both of the trials. In contrast numbers in the untreated control exceeded 20 per card in the April-March trial and 80 in the May-June trial. For plants treated only with N. cucumeris, thrips catches peaked at 7-10 per trap per week. In counts on flowers, we saw the same order of treatment effectiveness. From both the catch per trap and thrips per flower data sets (still being analyzed), we conclude that spinosad was highly effective and that N. cucumeris alone, at the rate applied, was partially effective. We found no difference between spinosad alone compared to the combination of spinosad and N. cucumeris. Obj 2. In laboratory trials we found freshly dried (2h) residues of spinosad at the full labeled rate were not repellant to either N. cucumeris or I. degenerans and did not increase mortality for either mite species, compared to that of untreated controls. In contrast, the same batch of spinosad was highly toxic to WFT adults. From this we conclude that spinosad is highly effective against WFT and highly compatible with the two species of phytoseiid mites tested. Remaining work is to assess the impact of spinosad on mite oviposition and to complete data analysis and publication.

Impacts
This study provides evidence that releases of A. cucumeris are at least partially effective in suppressing WFT within a ten week impatiens crop. Spinosad was found to be highly effective and to have no impact on A. cucumeris, so the two approaches can be used together without conflict. These findings imply that growers can combine the use of spinosad and A. cucumeris release.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 10/01/01 to 09/30/02

Outputs
In 2002, we performed the first of the greenhouse tests, with A. cucumeris alone, spinosad alone, and the combination, as the three treatments. We enrolled nine greenhouses filled with spring bedding plants in the trial (three replicates each of the three treatments). We experienced considerable difficulty maintaining cleanly defined treatments due to variation in the plant composition of "bedding plants" grown in each greenhouse. At the best site (Mahoney), where all three greenhouses were filled with impatiens, order of suppression of treatments was as expected from best to worst: mites plus spinosad, spinosad alone, and mites alone. For the last three weeks of the crop, mites alone were significantly different (more thrips) than the other two treatments, but those two (spinosad alone, spinosad with mites) did not differ. For the second group of greenhouses (Valley), the order from best to worst was spinosad alone, spinosad plus mites, and mites alone. Each treatment was significantly different from the others. However, in these greenhouses the spinosad treated greenhouse had distinctly lower thrips at the start of the trial, a condition that did not change. Thus, the low thrips counts for this treatment reflect starting conditions, not treatment effects. The third set of greenhouses could not be analyzed because growers did not apply the treatments correctly. Work on the laboratory tests will begin in January of 2003. Also, in spring of 2003, the greenhouse tests will be repeated in UMASS research greenhouses, all filled with impatiens and inoculated evenly with thrips to create better conditions for a comparative trial.

Impacts
The expected impact of this work will be to make biological control of western flower thrips in bedding plant crops more highly and reliably suppressive. Trials we have run for this and other related projects have led us to believe that the currently recommended rate of five applications of 106 mites per sq meter does not strongly and consistently suppress western flower thrips. This trial is an attempt to determine if this rate might be adequately effective if combined with a mid crop application of spinosad. (Other efforts involve looking at higher mite release rates, use of pollen to stimulate mite population increase in the crop, and use of another species of mite). Tests of each of these factors will eventually lead to a recipe that is reliable. Lack of reliability impedes the adoption of biological control by growers. Results of this trial should make adoption more likely. Use of biological control by growers will slow down development of resistance to pesticides by western flower thrips and give growers better protection from INSV virus outbreaks in their crops.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period


Progress 10/01/00 to 09/30/01

Outputs
As the start date for this project (August 1, 2001) indicates, there was only one active month for the project in this reporting year. No work has been accomplished yet. The USDA APHIS has not yet issued an importation permit for one of the two mite species to be examined (A. montdorensis). We will begin with A. cucumeris and reevaluate in one year to see if APHIS has issued a permit for importation of the second species.

Impacts
The project has not yet had any impact, as the work has not yet been done. We expect that the project will help define how to successfully use one or more predators with spinosad for western flower thrips control in greenhouse bedding plant crops.

Publications

  • No publications reported this period